-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.06
0.056159243 = product of:
0.112318486 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.04941852 = product of:
0.07412778 = sum of:
0.0266323 = weight(_text_:science in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0266323 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047495477 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.05
0.046886668 = product of:
0.093773335 = sum of:
0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717497 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.046598367 = product of:
0.06989755 = sum of:
0.034596376 = weight(_text_:science in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034596376 = score(doc=994,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035301168 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.04
0.039365895 = product of:
0.07873179 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.015831826 = product of:
0.047495477 = sum of:
0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047495477 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 27.12.2007 17:16:29
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1395-1402
-
Meng, L.: ¬The creation of [the] Chinese Science Citation Database : status quo and future development (1997)
0.04
0.039138064 = product of:
0.07827613 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
0.015376167 = product of:
0.0461285 = sum of:
0.0461285 = weight(_text_:science in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0461285 = score(doc=954,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.40326554 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) is a significant document database on mainland China, which has been built up by the Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Briefly introduces the background to CSCD, and discusses in detail its development and application, source journals and citation data, data processing methods, subject scope, compilation regulations, stylistic rules and layout, and usage directions for both the printed and CD-ROM editions of CSCD which have been published from the data
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.4, S.39-54
-
Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987)
0.03
0.03144998 = product of:
0.12579992 = sum of:
0.12579992 = weight(_text_:processing in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12579992 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.03
0.03140261 = product of:
0.06280522 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.0077677546 = product of:
0.023303263 = sum of:
0.023303263 = weight(_text_:science in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023303263 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1403-1418
-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) : life course, nature, and importance of a special kind of science referencing (1999)
0.03
0.030245561 = product of:
0.060491122 = sum of:
0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 4298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717497 = score(doc=4298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 4298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4298)
0.01331615 = product of:
0.03994845 = sum of:
0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 4298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03994845 = score(doc=4298,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4298, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4298)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Indirect collective referencing (ICR) is a special kind of indirect referencing, in an act making reference to all references cited in a directly cited paper. In this research the literature phenomenon of ICR is defined in the narrowest sense, taking into account only its indisputable minimum. To reveal the life course of this phenomenon, a longitudinal section was taken in the representative elite general physics journal, The Physical Review, processing more than 4.200 journal papers from 1897 to 1997 and their close to 84.00 formal references. This investigation showed that the ICR phenomenon has existed in the journal for a century now; that the frequency and intensity of the phenomenon have been constantly increasing in both absolute and relative terms since the last, mature period of the Little Science age; and that this growth has accelerated in the publication explosion of the Big Science age. It was shown that the Citation Indexes show only a fraction of the really cited references in the journal
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.14, S.1284-1294
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.03
0.029471014 = product of:
0.058942027 = sum of:
0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717497 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.011767056 = product of:
0.035301168 = sum of:
0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035301168 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005)
0.03
0.029353548 = product of:
0.058707096 = sum of:
0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717497 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.011532126 = product of:
0.034596376 = sum of:
0.034596376 = weight(_text_:science in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034596376 = score(doc=1069,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The present paper is devoted to two directions in algorithmic classificatory procedures: the journal co-citation analysis as an example of citation networks and lexical analysis of keywords in the titles and texts. What is common to those approaches is the general idea of normalization of deviations of the observed data from the mathematical expectation. The application of the same formula leads to discovery of statistically significant links between objects (journals in one case, keywords - in the other). The results of the journal co-citation analysis are reflected in tables and map for field "Women's Studies" and for field "Information Science and Library Science". An experimental attempt at establishing textual links between words was carried out on two samples from SSCI Data base: (1) EDUCATION and (2) ETHICS. The EDUCATION file included 2180 documents (of which 751 had abstracts); the ETHICS file included 807 documents (289 abstracts). Some examples of the results of this pilot study are given in tabular form . The binary links between words discovered in this way may form triplets or other groups with more than two member words.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1534-1547
-
Kwok, K.L.: ¬The use of titles and cited titles as document representations for automatic classification (1975)
0.03
0.027518734 = product of:
0.11007494 = sum of:
0.11007494 = weight(_text_:processing in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11007494 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 11(1975), S.201-206
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002)
0.03
0.027518734 = product of:
0.11007494 = sum of:
0.11007494 = weight(_text_:processing in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11007494 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
-
Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005)
0.03
0.026916523 = product of:
0.053833045 = sum of:
0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717497 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.006658075 = product of:
0.019974224 = sum of:
0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019974224 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Citation analysis is performed in order to evaluate authors and scientific collections, such as journals and conference proceedings. Currently, two major systems exist that perform citation analysis: Science Citation Index (SCI) by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and CiteSeer by the NEC Research Institute. The SCI, mostly a manual system up until recently, is based on the notion of the ISI Impact Factor, which has been used extensively for citation analysis purposes. On the other hand the CiteSeer system is an automatically built digital library using agents technology, also based on the notion of ISI Impact Factor. In this paper, we investigate new alternative notions besides the ISI impact factor, in order to provide a novel approach aiming at ranking scientific collections. Furthermore, we present a web-based system that has been built by extracting data from the Databases and Logic Programming (DBLP) website of the University of Trier. Our system, by using the new citation metrics, emerges as a useful tool for ranking scientific collections. In this respect, some first remarks are presented, e.g. on ranking conferences related to databases.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.289-312
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.024566842 = product of:
0.09826737 = sum of:
0.09826737 = product of:
0.14740105 = sum of:
0.0532646 = weight(_text_:science in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0532646 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.094136454 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094136454 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004)
0.02
0.019569032 = product of:
0.039138064 = sum of:
0.03144998 = weight(_text_:processing in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03144998 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17890452 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.0076880837 = product of:
0.02306425 = sum of:
0.02306425 = weight(_text_:science in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02306425 = score(doc=3093,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.20163277 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- How do authors refer to Web-based information sources in their formal scientific publications? It is not yet weIl known how scientists and scholars actually include new types of information sources, available through the new media, in their published work. This article reports an a comparative study of the lists of references in 38 scientific journals in five different scientific and social scientific fields. The fields are sociology, library and information science, biochemistry and biotechnology, neuroscience, and the mathematics of computing. As is weIl known, references, citations, and hyperlinks play different roles in academic publishing and communication. Our study focuses an hyperlinks as attributes of references in formal scholarly publications. The study developed and applied a method to analyze the differential roles of publishing media in the analysis of scientific and scholarly literature references. The present secondary databases that include reference and citation data (the Web of Science) cannot be used for this type of research. By the automated processing and analysis of the full text of scientific and scholarly articles, we were able to extract the references and hyperlinks contained in these references in relation to other features of the scientific and scholarly literature. Our findings show that hyperlinking references are indeed, as expected, abundantly present in the formal literature. They also tend to cite more recent literature than the average reference. The large majority of the references are to Web instances of traditional scientific journals. Other types of Web-based information sources are less weIl represented in the lists of references, except in the case of pure e-journals. We conclude that this can be explained by taking the role of the publisher into account. Indeed, it seems that the shift from print-based to electronic publishing has created new roles for the publisher. By shaping the way scientific references are hyperlinking to other information sources, the publisher may have a large impact an the availability of scientific and scholarly information.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1250-1260
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017652497 = product of:
0.07060999 = sum of:
0.07060999 = product of:
0.10591498 = sum of:
0.047079697 = weight(_text_:science in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047079697 = score(doc=613,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.058835283 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058835283 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Abschnitte zu: The origins of citation indexing in science - Citation analysis in sociology, history and philosophy of science - From ASIS to ASIST
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006)
0.01
0.014091378 = product of:
0.056365512 = sum of:
0.056365512 = product of:
0.084548265 = sum of:
0.04892666 = weight(_text_:science in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04892666 = score(doc=5021,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562161 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Bei den nachfolgenden Ausführungen handelt es sich um eine Zusammenstellung von Kommentaren, Vorträgen und Rückmeldungen von Kollegen bzw. Benutzern der Bibliothek sowie meine eigenen Erfahrungen als Vortragender im Universitätslehrgang "Master of Science", in dessen Rahmen ich das Fach "Bibliometrie" unterrichte. Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrages ist eine Zusammenfassung der Diskussion "Web of Science versus Scopus", die den aktuellen Stand der Kontroverse (vor allem an der Universität Wien im naturwissenschaftlichen Sektor) widerspiegelt. Hier ist zu bemerken, dass diese Problematik auch fachspezifisch ist und deswegen an jeder Universität bzw. in jedem Fachgebiet anders zu betrachten ist. Startpunkt meiner Betrachtung ist die allgemein akzeptierte Notwendigkeit des "Journal of Citation Reports (JCR)". Nur in diesem bibliometrischen Verzeichnis sind derzeit die "Impact Factors" zu finden, die als Grundlage jeder akademischen Evaluation dienen. Deswegen ist JCR heutzutage an jeder Universität mit naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern unentbehrlich und das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliothekare lautet nicht wirklich "Web of Science versus Scopus", sondern genaugesagt "Fallbeispiel A: Web of Science &JCR" oder "Fallbeispiel B: Scopus &JCR".
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:36:29
- Object
- Web of Science
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.013591189 = product of:
0.054364756 = sum of:
0.054364756 = product of:
0.08154713 = sum of:
0.040362436 = weight(_text_:science in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040362436 = score(doc=6920,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
- Object
- Science Citation Index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.013028536 = product of:
0.052114144 = sum of:
0.052114144 = product of:
0.078171216 = sum of:
0.02824782 = weight(_text_:science in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02824782 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.049923394 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049923394 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.012356749 = product of:
0.049426995 = sum of:
0.049426995 = product of:
0.07414049 = sum of:
0.03295579 = weight(_text_:science in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03295579 = score(doc=40,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
- Object
- Web of Science
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.01
0.01235463 = product of:
0.04941852 = sum of:
0.04941852 = product of:
0.07412778 = sum of:
0.0266323 = weight(_text_:science in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0266323 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047495477 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 8.2006 14:29:40
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1404-1405
