Search (109 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.03 
    0.031158837 = product of:
  0.062317673 = sum of:
    0.054472968 = weight(_text_:processing in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054472968 = score(doc=1447,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.30987173 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.007844705 = product of:
      0.023534114 = sum of:
        0.023534114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023534114 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  2. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02 
    0.023640927 = product of:
  0.09456371 = sum of:
    0.09456371 = product of:
      0.14184555 = sum of:
        0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07124322 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
        0.070602335 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070602335 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
  3. Silva, A.J.C.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Laender, A.H.F.; Modesto, M.A.B.; Cristo, M.; Ziviani, N.: Finding what is missing from a digital library : a case study in the computer science field (2009) 0.02 
    0.023579547 = product of:
  0.047159094 = sum of:
    0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03931248 = score(doc=4219,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
    0.007846616 = product of:
      0.023539849 = sum of:
        0.023539849 = weight(_text_:science in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023539849 = score(doc=4219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a process to retrieve the URL of a document for which metadata records exist in a digital library catalog but a pointer to the full text of the document is not available. The process uses results from queries submitted to Web search engines for finding the URL of the corresponding full text or any related material. We present a comprehensive study of this process in different situations by investigating different query strategies applied to three general purpose search engines (Google, Yahoo!, MSN) and two specialized ones (Scholar and CiteSeer), considering five user scenarios. Specifically, we have conducted experiments with metadata records taken from the Brazilian Digital Library of Computing (BDBComp) and The DBLP Computer Science Bibliography (DBLP). We found that Scholar was the most effective search engine for this task in all considered scenarios and that simple strategies for combining and re-ranking results from Scholar and Google significantly improve the retrieval quality. Moreover, we study the influence of the number of query results on the effectiveness of finding missing information as well as the coverage of the proposed scenarios.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.3, S.380-391
  4. Sasaki, H.; Kiyoki, Y.: ¬A formulation for patenting content-based retrieval processes in digital libraries (2005) 0.02 
    0.020427363 = product of:
  0.08170945 = sum of:
    0.08170945 = weight(_text_:processing in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08170945 = score(doc=998,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.4648076 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present a formulation and case studies of the conditions for patenting content-based retrieval processes in digital libraries, especially in image libraries. Inventors and practitioners demand a formulation of the conditions for patenting data-processing processes as computer-related inventions in the form of computer programs. A process for content-based retrieval often consists of a combination of prior disclosed means and also comprises means for parameter setting that is adjusted to retrieve specific kinds of images in certain narrow domains. We focus on requirements for technical advancement (nonobviousness) in the combination of data-processing means, i.e., processes and specification (enablement) on the means for parameter setting in computer programs. Our formulation follows the standards of patent examination and litigation on computer-related inventions in the US. We confirm the feasibility and accountability of our formulation by applying it to several inventions patented in the US.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.1, S.57-74
  5. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.02 
    0.015354276 = product of:
  0.061417103 = sum of:
    0.061417103 = product of:
      0.092125654 = sum of:
        0.033290375 = weight(_text_:science in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033290375 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
        0.058835283 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058835283 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Subject gateways zu den Bereichen: Business economics - The virtual music library - clinical information - food science and food technology - energy technology
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  6. Bainbridge, D.; Dewsnip, M.; Witten, l.H.: Searching digital music libraries (2005) 0.01 
    0.013759367 = product of:
  0.05503747 = sum of:
    0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05503747 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.1, S.41-56
  7. Renda, M.E.; Straccia, U.: ¬A personalized collaborative Digital Library environment : a model and an application (2005) 0.01 
    0.013759367 = product of:
  0.05503747 = sum of:
    0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05503747 = score(doc=999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=999)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.1, S.5-21
  8. Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.; Lim, E.-P.; Liu, Z.; Yin, M.; Pang, N.L.-S.; Wong, P.B.-B.: Applying scenario-based design and claims analysis to the design of a digital library of geography examination resources (2005) 0.01 
    0.011793743 = product of:
  0.04717497 = sum of:
    0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04717497 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.1, S.23-40
  9. Blandford, A.; Adams, A.; Attfield, S.; Buchanan, G.; Gow, J.; Makri, S.; Rimmer, J.; Warwick, C.: ¬The PRET A Rapporter framework : evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work (2008) 0.01 
    0.011793743 = product of:
  0.04717497 = sum of:
    0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04717497 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.4-21
  10. Xie, H.I.: Users' evaluation of digital libraries (DLs) : their uses, their criteria, and their assessment (2008) 0.01 
    0.011793743 = product of:
  0.04717497 = sum of:
    0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 2083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04717497 = score(doc=2083,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2083, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2083)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1346-1373
  11. Neuroth, H.; Pianos, T.: VASCODA: a German scientific portal for cross-searching distributed digital resource collections (2003) 0.01 
    0.011649592 = product of:
  0.046598367 = sum of:
    0.046598367 = product of:
      0.06989755 = sum of:
        0.034596376 = weight(_text_:science in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034596376 = score(doc=2420,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
        0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035301168 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The German information science community - with the support of the two main funding agencies in Germany - will develop a scientific portal, vascoda, for cross-searching distributed metadata collections. In platitudinous words, one of the services of vascoda is going to be a ldquoGooglerdquo-like search for the academic community, an easy to use, yet sophisticated search-engine to supply information on high-quality resources from different media and technical environments. Reaching this objective requires considerable standardisation activity amongst the main players to harmonise the already existing services (e.g. regarding metadata, protocols, etc.). The co-operation amongst the participants including both of the funding agencies is creating a unique team-work situation in Germany thus strengthening the information science community.
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.2769
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  12. Goodchild, M.F.: ¬The Alexandria Digital Library Project : review, assessment, and prospects (2004) 0.01 
    0.010810301 = product of:
  0.043241203 = sum of:
    0.043241203 = product of:
      0.064861804 = sum of:
        0.023303263 = weight(_text_:science in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023303263 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
        0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04155854 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) was established in the late 1990s as a response to several perceived problems of traditional map libraries, notably access and organization. By 1999 it had evolved into an operational digital library, offering a well-defined set of services to a broad user community, based on an extensive collection of georeferenced information objects. The vision of ADL continues to evolve, as technology makes new services possible, as its users become more sophisticated and demanding, and as the broader field of geographic information science (GIScience) identifies new avenues for research and application.
    Date
    26.12.2011 16:29:21
  13. Schaer, P.: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale (2010) 0.01 
    0.010747994 = product of:
  0.042991977 = sum of:
    0.042991977 = product of:
      0.064487964 = sum of:
        0.023303263 = weight(_text_:science in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023303263 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
        0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041184697 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Open Access Repositorien sind Online-Archive für frei im Internet zugängliche Publikationen im Volltext. Open Access Materialien oder die Open Access Repositorien selbst sind allerdings nur unzureichend in zentrale Fachportale (z.B. virtuelle Fachbibliotheken) eingebunden. Der Beitrag stellt SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, einen disziplinären Open Access Volltextserver für die Sozialwissenschaften vor und zeigt wie dieser in das sozialwissenschaftliche Fachportal Sowiport integriert wird.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  14. Gonçalves, M.A.; Moreira, B.L.; Fox, E.A.; Watson, L.T.: "What is a good digital library?" : a quality model for digital libraries (2007) 0.01 
    0.00982812 = product of:
  0.03931248 = sum of:
    0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03931248 = score(doc=937,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 937, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=937)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.5, S.1416-1437
  15. Feng, L.; Jeusfeld, M.A.; Hoppenbrouwers, J.: Beyond information searching and browsing : acquiring knowledge from digital libraries (2005) 0.01 
    0.00982812 = product of:
  0.03931248 = sum of:
    0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03931248 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.1, S.97-120
  16. Oard, D.W.: Serving users in many languages : cross-language information retrieval for digital libraries (1997) 0.01 
    0.00982812 = product of:
  0.03931248 = sum of:
    0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 1261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03931248 = score(doc=1261,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043425296 = queryNorm
        0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 1261, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1261)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    We are rapidly constructing an extensive network infrastructure for moving information across national boundaries, but much remains to be done before linguistic barriers can be surmounted as effectively as geographic ones. Users seeking information from a digital library could benefit from the ability to query large collections once using a single language, even when more than one language is present in the collection. If the information they locate is not available in a language that they can read, some form of translation will be needed. At present, multilingual thesauri such as EUROVOC help to address this challenge by facilitating controlled vocabulary search using terms from several languages, and services such as INSPEC produce English abstracts for documents in other languages. On the other hand, support for free text searching across languages is not yet widely deployed, and fully automatic machine translation is presently neither sufficiently fast nor sufficiently accurate to adequately support interactive cross-language information seeking. An active and rapidly growing research community has coalesced around these and other related issues, applying techniques drawn from several fields - notably information retrieval and natural language processing - to provide access to large multilingual collections.
  17. Ohly, H.P.: ¬The organization of Internet links in a social science clearing house (2004) 0.01 
    0.009265972 = product of:
  0.03706389 = sum of:
    0.03706389 = product of:
      0.055595834 = sum of:
        0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 2641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019974224 = score(doc=2641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2641)
        0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 2641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03562161 = score(doc=2641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2641)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 10:51:14
  18. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01 
    0.009212566 = product of:
  0.036850262 = sum of:
    0.036850262 = product of:
      0.05527539 = sum of:
        0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019974224 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035301168 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  19. Chung, W.; Chen, H.: Browsing the underdeveloped Web : an experiment on the Arabic Medical Web Directory (2009) 0.01 
    0.009212566 = product of:
  0.036850262 = sum of:
    0.036850262 = product of:
      0.05527539 = sum of:
        0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019974224 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
        0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035301168 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:57:50
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.595-607
  20. Facet analytical theory for managing knowledge structure in the humanities : FATKS (2003) 0.01 
    0.007915913 = product of:
  0.031663653 = sum of:
    0.031663653 = product of:
      0.094990954 = sum of:
        0.094990954 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094990954 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:17:18

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 76
  • d 33

Types

  • a 101
  • el 17
  • s 2
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications