-
Pollard, A.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993)
0.07
0.06889032 = product of:
0.13778064 = sum of:
0.11007494 = weight(_text_:processing in 4713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11007494 = score(doc=4713,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 4713, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4713)
0.027705695 = product of:
0.08311708 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 4713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=4713,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4713, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4713)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.3, S.345-358
-
Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998)
0.05
0.052232232 = product of:
0.104464464 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.049426995 = product of:
0.07414049 = sum of:
0.03295579 = weight(_text_:science in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03295579 = score(doc=2346,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Park, Y.C.; Choi, K.-S.: Automatic thesaurus construction using Bayesian networks (1996)
0.04
0.039365895 = product of:
0.07873179 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 6581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=6581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 6581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6581)
0.015831826 = product of:
0.047495477 = sum of:
0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 6581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047495477 = score(doc=6581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6581)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 12. 1.1997 9:52:29
- Source
- Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.5, S.543-553
-
Conlon, S.P.N.; Evens, M.; Ahlswede, T.: Developing a large lexical database for information retrieval, parsing, and text generation systems (1993)
0.04
0.03929468 = product of:
0.07858936 = sum of:
0.06671549 = weight(_text_:processing in 5813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06671549 = score(doc=5813,freq=4.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 5813, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5813)
0.01187387 = product of:
0.03562161 = sum of:
0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 5813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562161 = score(doc=5813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5813)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Shows that it is possible to construct a lexical database by combining material from a number of machine-readable sources. Discusses the kind of lexical information required for applications in information retrieval and in other natural language processing areas, such as database interfaces and automatic filing systems. Describes the organization of the lexical database which is stored in an Oracle relational database management system and the design of the tables that comprise the database. In addition to the traditional alphabetic listing, access is privided from roots to derived forms and from derived forms to roots, and also through lexical and semantic relations between words, so that the database functions as a thesaurus as well as a dictionary. The database is designed to be open-ended and self-defined. Every attribute of every table is defined in the database itself. The lexical database can easily be extended through an SQL forms interface that facilitates additions to the tables
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.415-431
-
Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998)
0.04
0.037308738 = product of:
0.074617475 = sum of:
0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03931248 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.035304993 = product of:
0.05295749 = sum of:
0.023539849 = weight(_text_:science in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023539849 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.029417641 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029417641 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Miller, U.: Thesaurus construction : problems and their roots (1997)
0.04
0.035888698 = product of:
0.071777396 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=1170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
0.008877434 = product of:
0.0266323 = sum of:
0.0266323 = weight(_text_:science in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0266323 = score(doc=1170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Analyzes and discusses general problems of thesaurus construction theory and practice, based on research and experience accumulate in librarianship and information science as well as some other sciences and general scientific methods (e.g. linguistics, and systems analysis). Recommends methodological and methodical ways of solving problems existing in thesaurus construction
- Source
- Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.4, S.481-493
-
Pollard, R.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as a subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993)
0.03
0.03444516 = product of:
0.06889032 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=5096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
0.013852848 = product of:
0.04155854 = sum of:
0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04155854 = score(doc=5096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.3, S.345-357
-
Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990)
0.03
0.03438285 = product of:
0.0687657 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
0.013728233 = product of:
0.041184697 = sum of:
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 4.1996 3:39:53
- Source
- Information processing and management. 26(1990), no.5, S.629-640
-
Mu, X.; Lu, K.; Ryu, H.: Explicitly integrating MeSH thesaurus help into health information retrieval systems : an empirical user study (2014)
0.02
0.024603685 = product of:
0.04920737 = sum of:
0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03931248 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.009894893 = product of:
0.029684676 = sum of:
0.029684676 = weight(_text_:29 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029684676 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 25. 1.2016 18:43:29
- Source
- Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.1, S.24-40
-
Zainab, A.N.; Silva, S.M. de: Expert systems in library and information services : publication trends, authorship patterns and expressiveness of published titles (1998)
0.02
0.023579547 = product of:
0.047159094 = sum of:
0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03931248 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.007846616 = product of:
0.023539849 = sum of:
0.023539849 = weight(_text_:science in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023539849 = score(doc=2927,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a state of the art review of the literature of expert systems in library and information science, involving exhaustive searches of all major LIS CD-ROM databases (LISA, ERIC, LiLi, INSPEC etc.) and bibliographies appended in review articles. The search retrieved 679 references, comprising 362 periodical articles, 180 conference proceedings, 63 books articles, 28 theses and 46 monographs. The growth of the literature peaked between 1989 and 1990 and subsequently declined after 1992. Over 1/3 (287) covered intelligent front ends and interfaces for online searching and retrieval, followed by applications in reference service (113), classification, indexing and abstracting (86) and cataloguing (7). The most productive periodicals comprised 6 titles, of which 'Information processing and management' topped the lsit: 43 authors were found to contribute between 5 and 35 articles each, hence contributing 32,19% of the total contributors. 382 of the publications were single author works, 172 were by 2 authors, 72 were by 3 authors and 49 were by 4 or more authors. Only 161 titles were expressive enough to reveal both the name and function of systems being developed
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.313-336
-
Schulz, T.: Konzeption und prototypische Entwicklung eines Thesaurus für IT-Konzepte an Hochschulen (2021)
0.02
0.022430437 = product of:
0.044860873 = sum of:
0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03931248 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
0.005548396 = product of:
0.016645188 = sum of:
0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016645188 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In Hochschulen besteht derzeit ein großes Anliegen, die Digitalisierung effektiv und effizient für Prozesse in Steuerungsbereichen zu nutzen. Dabei steht die IT-Governance im Mittelpunkt der hochschulpolitischen Überlegungen und beinhaltet "die interne Steuerung und Koordination von Entscheidungsprozessen in Bezug auf IT-Steuerung beziehungsweise Digitalisierungsmaßnahmen."(Christmann-Budian et al. 2018) Strategisch kann die Bündelung von Kompetenzen in der deutschen Hochschullandschaft dabei helfen, die steigenden Anforderungen an die IT-Governance zu erfüllen. Passend zu diesem Ansatz realisieren aktuell im ZDT zusammengeschlossene Hochschulen das Projekt "IT-Konzepte - Portfolio gemeinsamer Vorlagen und Muster". Das Projekt schließt an die Problemstellung an, indem Kompetenzen gebündelt und alle Hochschulen befähigt werden, IT-Konzepte erarbeiten und verabschieden zu können. Dazu wird ein Portfolio an Muster und Vorlagen als Ressourcenpool zusammengetragen und referenziert, um eine Nachvollziehbarkeit der Vielfalt an Herausgebern gewährleisten zu können (Meister 2020). Um den Ressourcenpool, welcher einen Body of Knowledge (BoK) darstellt, effizient durchsuchen zu können, ist eine sinnvolle Struktur unabdinglich. Daher setzt sich das Ziel der Bachelorarbeit aus der Analyse von hochschulinternen Dokumenten mithilfe von Natural Language Processing (NLP) und die daraus resultierende Entwicklung eines Thesaurus-Prototyps für IT-Konzepte zusammen. Dieser soll im Anschluss serialisiert und automatisiert werden, um diesen fortlaufend auf einem aktuellen Stand zu halten. Es wird sich mit der Frage beschäftigt, wie ein Thesaurus nachhaltig technologisch, systematisch und konsistent erstellt werden kann, um diesen Prozess im späteren Verlauf als Grundlage für weitere Themenbereiche einzuführen.
- Content
- Bachelorarbeit zur Erlangung des Grades Bachelor of Science Wirtschaftsinformatik des Fachbereichs Wirtschaft der Technischen Hochschule Brandenburg. Vgl. unter: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-fhbrb/files/2732/20210826_BT_SchulzTheresa.pdf.
-
Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri (2004)
0.02
0.020427363 = product of:
0.08170945 = sum of:
0.08170945 = weight(_text_:processing in 5008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08170945 = score(doc=5008,freq=6.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.4648076 = fieldWeight in 5008, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5008)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- While information retrieval thesauri may improve search results, there is little research documenting whether general information system users employ these vocabulary tools. This article explores user comprehension and searching with thesauri. Data was gathered as part of a larger empirical query-expansion study involving the ProQuest Controlled Vocabulary. The results suggest that users' knowledge of thesauri is extremely limited. After receiving a basic thesaurus introduction, however, users indicate a desire to employ these tools. The most significant result was that users expressed a preference for thesauri employment through interactive processing or a combination of automatic and interactive processing, compared to exclusively automatic processing. This article defines information retrieval thesauri, summarizes research results, considers circumstances underlying users' knowledge and searching with thesauri, and highlights future research needs.
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.02
0.018531945 = product of:
0.07412778 = sum of:
0.07412778 = product of:
0.11119167 = sum of:
0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03994845 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07124322 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 5.2002 17:29:00
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.2, S.111-122
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.02
0.018425131 = product of:
0.073700525 = sum of:
0.073700525 = product of:
0.11055078 = sum of:
0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03994845 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.070602335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070602335 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
- Source
- Journal of information science. 25(1999) no.2, S.113-131
-
Lacasta, J.; Falquet, G.; Nogueras Iso, J.N.; Zarazaga-Soria, J.: ¬A software processing chain for evaluating thesaurus quality (2017)
0.02
0.016678872 = product of:
0.06671549 = sum of:
0.06671549 = weight(_text_:processing in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06671549 = score(doc=3485,freq=4.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Thesauri are knowledge models commonly used for information classication and retrieval whose structure is dened by standards that describe the main features the concepts and relations must have. However, following these standards requires a deep knowledge of the field the thesaurus is going to cover and experience in their creation. To help in this task, this paper describes a software processing chain that provides dierent validation components that evaluates the quality of the main thesaurus features.
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.01379054 = product of:
0.05516216 = sum of:
0.05516216 = product of:
0.08274324 = sum of:
0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04155854 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 2. 3.2013 12:29:05
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesauri facing new challenges (1990)
0.01
0.013759367 = product of:
0.05503747 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The chairman of the thesaurus software seminar held on 14.8.1990 in Darmstadt, introduces into the topics by asking the following 10 questions and by providing his answers to them: (1) what is new in the view? (2) what is the real point of attraction? (3) cannot information retrieval profit from machine processing of language? (4) can we do better now? (5) how van we do better? (6) when does fully automatic IR arrive? (7) thesauri for machine-aided IR - how do we get there? (8) which is the right way, which is the model, what to standardize? (9) can IR people do it alone? (10) are there advanced information services with a truly human interface
-
Petersen, T.: Information on images : the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (1989)
0.01
0.013759367 = product of:
0.05503747 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) was designed as a comprehensive vocabulary in its domain. Its faceted, hierarchically arranged structure allows for powerful indexing and retrieval capabilities, while its planned network of related term relationships makes it especially amenable to natural language processing. To gauge the AAT's effectiveness as a search tool against natural language queries, an experiment was carried out on DIALOG. There are 3 art data bases on DIALOG and there are also a number of other data bases that contain art related material. The experiment used queries culled from reference librarians at art and architecture libraries.
-
Gladun, A.; Rogushina, J.: Development of domain thesaurus as a set of ontology concepts with use of semantic similarity and elements of combinatorial optimization (2021)
0.01
0.013759367 = product of:
0.05503747 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- We consider use of ontological background knowledge in intelligent information systems and analyze directions of their reduction in compliance with specifics of particular user task. Such reduction is aimed at simplification of knowledge processing without loss of significant information. We propose methods of generation of task thesauri based on domain ontology that contain such subset of ontological concepts and relations that can be used in task solving. Combinatorial optimization is used for minimization of task thesaurus. In this approach, semantic similarity estimates are used for determination of concept significance for user task. Some practical examples of optimized thesauri application for semantic retrieval and competence analysis demonstrate efficiency of proposed approach.
-
Milstead, J.L.: Specifications for thesaurus software (1991)
0.01
0.011793743 = product of:
0.04717497 = sum of:
0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717497 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 27(1991) no.2/3, S.165-175
