-
Summarizing text : [Themenheft] (1995)
0.03
0.03144998 = product of:
0.12579992 = sum of:
0.12579992 = weight(_text_:processing in 3872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12579992 = score(doc=3872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 3872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3872)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-784
-
Wang, F.L.; Yang, C.C.: ¬The impact analysis of language differences on an automatic multilingual text summarization system (2006)
0.02
0.022430437 = product of:
0.044860873 = sum of:
0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03931248 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.005548396 = product of:
0.016645188 = sum of:
0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016645188 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Based on the salient features of the documents, automatic text summarization systems extract the key sentences from source documents. This process supports the users in evaluating the relevance of the extracted documents returned by information retrieval systems. Because of this tool, efficient filtering can be achieved. Indirectly, these systems help to resolve the problem of information overloading. Many automatic text summarization systems have been implemented for use with different languages. It has been established that the grammatical and lexical differences between languages have a significant effect on text processing. However, the impact of the language differences on the automatic text summarization systems has not yet been investigated. The authors provide an impact analysis of language difference on automatic text summarization. It includes the effect on the extraction processes, the scoring mechanisms, the performance, and the matching of the extracted sentences, using the parallel corpus in English and Chinese as the tested object. The analysis results provide a greater understanding of language differences and promote the future development of more advanced text summarization techniques.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.5, S.684-696
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995)
0.02
0.019458683 = product of:
0.07783473 = sum of:
0.07783473 = weight(_text_:processing in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07783473 = score(doc=2930,freq=4.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.4427661 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- 4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997)
0.02
0.017841186 = product of:
0.071364745 = sum of:
0.071364745 = product of:
0.10704711 = sum of:
0.059551634 = weight(_text_:science in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059551634 = score(doc=2749,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047495477 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Structured abstracts have now become widespread in medical research journals. Considers whether or not such structured abstracts can be used effectively in social science journals. Reviews a a selection of studies to see if structured abstracts written for social science journals are more informative, easier to read and easier to search than their traditional equivalents. Results suggest that structured abstracts are appropriate for social science journals. Editors of social science journals should consider adopting structured abstracts
- Date
- 25. 2.1997 10:29:16
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.02
0.017652497 = product of:
0.07060999 = sum of:
0.07060999 = product of:
0.10591498 = sum of:
0.047079697 = weight(_text_:science in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047079697 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.058835283 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058835283 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.170-173
-
Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995)
0.02
0.01572499 = product of:
0.06289996 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
-
Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996)
0.02
0.01572499 = product of:
0.06289996 = sum of:
0.06289996 = weight(_text_:processing in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06289996 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 36(1996) no.5, S.1050 (V.K. Raman); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573 (H.R. Tibbo)
-
Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995)
0.01
0.013759367 = product of:
0.05503747 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.769-776
-
Rothkegel, A.: Abstracting from the perspective of text production (1995)
0.01
0.013759367 = product of:
0.05503747 = sum of:
0.05503747 = weight(_text_:processing in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05503747 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.777-784
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarising text for intelligent communication : results of the Dagstuhl seminar (1994)
0.01
0.011793743 = product of:
0.04717497 = sum of:
0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 8867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717497 = score(doc=8867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 8867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8867)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- As a result of the transition to full-text storage, multimedia and networking, information systems are becoming more efficient but at the same time more difficult to use, in particular because users are confronted with information volumes that increasingly exceed individual processing capacities. Consequently, there is an increase in the demand for user aids such as summarising techniques. Against this background, the interdisciplinary Dagstuhl Seminar 'Summarising Text for Intelligent Communication' (Dec. 1993) outlined the academic state of the art with regard to summarising (abstracting) and proposed future directions for research and system development. Research is currently shifting its attention from text summarising to summarising states of affairs. Recycling solutions are put forward in order to satisfy short-term needs for summarisation products. In the medium and long term, it is necessary to devise concepts and methods of intelligent summarising which have a better formal and empirical grounding and a more modular organisation
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.009212566 = product of:
0.036850262 = sum of:
0.036850262 = product of:
0.05527539 = sum of:
0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019974224 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035301168 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.01
0.009212566 = product of:
0.036850262 = sum of:
0.036850262 = product of:
0.05527539 = sum of:
0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019974224 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035301168 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.4, S.217-225
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.01
0.009212566 = product of:
0.036850262 = sum of:
0.036850262 = product of:
0.05527539 = sum of:
0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019974224 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035301168 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010)
0.01
0.007721644 = product of:
0.030886576 = sum of:
0.030886576 = product of:
0.046329863 = sum of:
0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016645188 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
0.029684676 = weight(_text_:29 in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029684676 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of this paper is to systemize and improve the scientific status of studies on document abstracting. This is a diachronic, systematic study of document abstracting studies carried out from different perspectives and models (textual, psycholinguistic, social and communicative). Design/methodology/approach - A review of the perspectives and analysis proposals which are of interest to the various theoreticians of abstracting is carried out using a variety of techniques and approaches (cognitive, linguistic, communicative-social, didactic, etc.), each with different levels of theoretical and methodological abstraction and degrees of application. The most significant contributions of each are reviewed and highlighted, along with their limitations. Findings - It is found that the great challenge in abstracting is the systemization of models and conceptual apparatus, which open up this type of research to semiotic and socio-interactional perspectives. It is necessary to carry out suitable empirical research with operative designs and ad hoc measuring instruments which can measure the efficiency of the abstracting and the efficiency of a good abstract, while at the same time feeding back into the theoretical baggage of this type of study. Such research will have to explain and provide answers to all the elements and variables, which affect the realization and the reception of a quality abstract. Originality/value - The paper provides a small map of the studies on document abstracting. This shows how the conceptual and methodological framework has extended at the same time as the Science of Documentation has been evolving. All the models analysed - the communicative and interactional approach - are integrated in a new systematic framework.
- Date
- 29. 8.2010 13:11:19
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.01
0.007677138 = product of:
0.030708551 = sum of:
0.030708551 = product of:
0.046062827 = sum of:
0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016645188 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.029417641 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029417641 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983)
0.01
0.006926424 = product of:
0.027705695 = sum of:
0.027705695 = product of:
0.08311708 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983)
0.01
0.006926424 = product of:
0.027705695 = sum of:
0.027705695 = product of:
0.08311708 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983)
0.01
0.006926424 = product of:
0.027705695 = sum of:
0.027705695 = product of:
0.08311708 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983)
0.01
0.006926424 = product of:
0.027705695 = sum of:
0.027705695 = product of:
0.08311708 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.00
0.004438717 = product of:
0.017754868 = sum of:
0.017754868 = product of:
0.0532646 = sum of:
0.0532646 = weight(_text_:science in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0532646 = score(doc=2999,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to consider whether or not structured abstracts can be used efectively in non medical science periodicals. Reviews a selection of studies on structured abstracts from the medical and psychological literature, presents examples of structured abstracts published in non medical science periodicals and considers how original abstracts might be written in a structured form for these periodicals. Concludes that, in light of these example studies, editors of these periodicals should consider the value of adopting structured abstracts
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.359-364
