Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Leydesdorff, L."
  1. Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018) 0.03
    0.033720788 = product of:
      0.10116236 = sum of:
        0.10116236 = sum of:
          0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041720904 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
          0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029855011 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
          0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029586446 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article considers the relationships among meaning generation, selection, and the dynamics of discourse from a variety of perspectives ranging from information theory and biology to sociology. Following Husserl's idea of a horizon of meanings in intersubjective communication, we propose a way in which, using Shannon's equations, the generation and selection of meanings from a horizon of possibilities can be considered probabilistically. The information-theoretical dynamics we articulate considers a process of meaning generation within cultural evolution: information is imbued with meaning, and through this process, the number of options for the selection of meaning in discourse proliferates. The redundancy of possible meanings contributes to a codification of expectations within the discourse. Unlike hardwired DNA, the codes of nonbiological systems can coevolve with the variations. Spanning horizons of meaning, the codes structure the communications as selection environments that shape discourses. Discursive knowledge can be considered as meta-coded communication that enables us to translate among differently coded communications. The dynamics of discursive knowledge production can thus infuse the historical dynamics with a cultural evolution by adding options, that is, by increasing redundancy. A calculus of redundancy is presented as an indicator whereby these dynamics of discourse and meaning may be explored empirically.
    Date
    29. 9.2018 11:22:09
  2. Leydesdorff, L.; Ivanova, I.A.: Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems : steps toward a calculus of processing meaning (2014) 0.03
    0.025177073 = product of:
      0.075531214 = sum of:
        0.075531214 = product of:
          0.11329682 = sum of:
            0.08344181 = weight(_text_:theory in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08344181 = score(doc=1211,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.4594418 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
            0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029855011 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The study of interhuman communication requires a more complex framework than Claude E. Shannon's (1948) mathematical theory of communication because "information" is defined in the latter case as meaningless uncertainty. Assuming that meaning cannot be communicated, we extend Shannon's theory by defining mutual redundancy as a positional counterpart of the relational communication of information. Mutual redundancy indicates the surplus of meanings that can be provided to the exchanges in reflexive communications. The information is redundant because it is based on "pure sets" (i.e., without subtraction of mutual information in the overlaps). We show that in the three-dimensional case (e.g., of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations), mutual redundancy is equal to mutual information (Rxyz = Txyz); but when the dimensionality is even, the sign is different. We generalize to the measurement in N dimensions and proceed to the interpretation. Using Niklas Luhmann's (1984-1995) social systems theory and/or Anthony Giddens's (1979, 1984) structuration theory, mutual redundancy can be provided with an interpretation in the sociological case: Different meaning-processing structures code and decode with other algorithms. A surplus of ("absent") options can then be generated that add to the redundancy. Luhmann's "functional (sub)systems" of expectations or Giddens's "rule-resource sets" are positioned mutually, but coupled operationally in events or "instantiated" in actions. Shannon-type information is generated by the mediation, but the "structures" are (re-)positioned toward one another as sets of (potentially counterfactual) expectations. The structural differences among the coding and decoding algorithms provide a source of additional options in reflexive and anticipatory communications.
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:44:54
  3. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003) 0.02
    0.019015294 = product of:
      0.057045877 = sum of:
        0.057045877 = product of:
          0.085568815 = sum of:
            0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050065085 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The relationship between the "knowledge base" and the "globalization" of communication systems is discussed from the perspective of communication theory. I argue that inter-human communication takes place at two levels. At the first level information is exchanged and provided with meaning and at the second level meaning can reflexively be communicated. Human language can be considered as the evolutionary achievement which enables us to use these two channels of communication simultaneously. Providing meaning with hindsight is a recursive operation: a meaning that makes a difference can be considered as knowledge. If the production of knowledge is socially organized, the perspective of hindsight can further be codified. This adds globalization to the historically stabilized patterns of communications. Globalization can be expected to transform the communications in an evolutionary mode. However, the self-organization of a knowledge-based society remains an expectation with the status of a hypothesis.
    Date
    22. 5.2003 19:48:04
  4. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations : Giddens' "structuration theory" and Luhmann's "self-organization" (2010) 0.01
    0.011125575 = product of:
      0.033376724 = sum of:
        0.033376724 = product of:
          0.10013017 = sum of:
            0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 4004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10013017 = score(doc=4004,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 4004, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4004)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The communication of meaning as distinct from (Shannon-type) information is central to Luhmann's social systems theory and Giddens' structuration theory of action. These theories share an emphasis on reflexivity, but focus on meaning along a divide between interhuman communication and intentful action as two different systems of reference. Recombining these two theories into a theory about the structuration of expectations, interactions, organization, and self-organization of intentional communications can be simulated based on algorithms from the computation of anticipatory systems. The self-organizing and organizing layers remain rooted in the double contingency of the human encounter, which provides the variation. Organization and self-organization of communication are reflexive upon and therefore reconstructive of each other. Using mutual information in three dimensions, the imprint of meaning processing in the modeling system on the historical organization of uncertainty in the modeled system can be measured. This is shown empirically in the case of intellectual organization as "structurating" structure in the textual domain of scientific articles.
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Ahrweiler, P.: In search of a network theory of innovations : relations, positions, and perspectives (2014) 0.01
    0.008029193 = product of:
      0.024087576 = sum of:
        0.024087576 = product of:
          0.07226273 = sum of:
            0.07226273 = weight(_text_:theory in 1531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07226273 = score(doc=1531,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.39788827 = fieldWeight in 1531, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1531)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    As a complement to Nelson and Winter's (1977) article titled "In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation," a sociological perspective on innovation networks can be elaborated using Luhmann's social systems theory, on the one hand, and Latour's "sociology of translations," on the other. Because of a common focus on communication, these perspectives can be combined as a set of methodologies. Latour's sociology of translations specifies a mechanism for generating variation in relations ("associations"), whereas Luhmann's systems perspective enables the specification of (functionally different) selection environments such as markets, professional organizations, and political control. Selection environments can be considered as mechanisms of social coordination that can self-organize-beyond the control of human agency-into regimes in terms of interacting codes of communication. Unlike relatively globalized regimes, technological trajectories are organized locally in "landscapes." A resulting "duality of structure" (Giddens, 1979) between the historical organization of trajectories and evolutionary self-organization at the regime level can be expected to drive innovation cycles. Reflexive translations add a third layer of perspectives to (a) the relational analysis of observable links that shape trajectories and (b) the positional analysis of networks in terms of latent dimensions. These three operations can be studied in a single framework, but using different methodologies. Latour's first-order associations can then be analytically distinguished from second-order translations in terms of requiring other communicative competencies. The resulting operations remain infrareflexively nested, and can therefore be used for innovative reconstructions of previously constructed boundaries.
  6. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬A sociological theory of communication : the self-organization of the knowledge-based society (2001) 0.01
    0.00786697 = product of:
      0.02360091 = sum of:
        0.02360091 = product of:
          0.070802726 = sum of:
            0.070802726 = weight(_text_:theory in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070802726 = score(doc=184,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.1, S.61-62 (E.G. Ackermann): "This brief summary cannot do justice to the intellectual depth, philosophical richness of the theoretical models, and their implications presented by Leydesdorff in his book. Next to this, the caveats presented earlier in this review are relatively minor. For all that, this book is not an "easy" read, nor is it for the theoretically or philosophically faint of heart. The content is certainly accessible to those with the interest and the stamina to see it through to the end, and would repay those who reread it with further insight and understanding. This book is recommended especially for the reader who is looking for a well-developed, general sociological theory of communication with a strong philosophical basis upon which to build a postmodern, deconstructionist research methodology"
  7. Leydesdorff, L.: Similarity measures, author cocitation Analysis, and information theory (2005) 0.01
    0.006489919 = product of:
      0.019469757 = sum of:
        0.019469757 = product of:
          0.058409266 = sum of:
            0.058409266 = weight(_text_:theory in 3471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058409266 = score(doc=3471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 3471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3471)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬An indicator of research front activity : measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets (2009) 0.00
    0.0046912627 = product of:
      0.014073787 = sum of:
        0.014073787 = product of:
          0.04222136 = sum of:
            0.04222136 = weight(_text_:29 in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04222136 = score(doc=3297,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 2.2010 19:29:29
  9. Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.: Co-word analysis using the Chinese character set (2008) 0.00
    0.0046441127 = product of:
      0.013932338 = sum of:
        0.013932338 = product of:
          0.041797012 = sum of:
            0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041797012 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2008 18:46:29
  10. Leydesdorff, L.; Vaughan, L.: Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science : extending ACA to the Web environment (2006) 0.00
    0.0046356563 = product of:
      0.013906969 = sum of:
        0.013906969 = product of:
          0.041720904 = sum of:
            0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041720904 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Co-occurrence matrices, such as cocitation, coword, and colink matrices, have been used widely in the information sciences. However, confusion and controversy have hindered the proper statistical analysis of these data. The underlying problem, in our opinion, involved understanding the nature of various types of matrices. This article discusses the difference between a symmetrical cocitation matrix and an asymmetrical citation matrix as well as the appropriate statistical techniques that can be applied to each of these matrices, respectively. Similarity measures (such as the Pearson correlation coefficient or the cosine) should not be applied to the symmetrical cocitation matrix but can be applied to the asymmetrical citation matrix to derive the proximity matrix. The argument is illustrated with examples. The study then extends the application of co-occurrence matrices to the Web environment, in which the nature of the available data and thus data collection methods are different from those of traditional databases such as the Science Citation Index. A set of data collected with the Google Scholar search engine is analyzed by using both the traditional methods of multivariate analysis and the new visualization software Pajek, which is based on social network analysis and graph theory.
  11. Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite(TM)-based historiograms (2008) 0.00
    0.0046356563 = product of:
      0.013906969 = sum of:
        0.013906969 = product of:
          0.041720904 = sum of:
            0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 2373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041720904 = score(doc=2373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 2373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2373)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With the program HistCite(TM) it is possible to generate and visualize the most relevant papers in a set of documents retrieved from the Science Citation Index. Historical reconstructions of scientific developments can be represented chronologically as developments in networks of citation relations extracted from scientific literature. This study aims to go beyond the historical reconstruction of scientific knowledge, enriching the output of HistCiteTM with algorithms from social-network analysis and information theory. Using main-path analysis, it is possible to highlight the structural backbone in the development of a scientific field. The expected information value of the message can be used to indicate whether change in the distribution (of citations) has occurred to such an extent that a path-dependency is generated. This provides us with a measure of evolutionary change between subsequent documents. The forgetting and rewriting of historically prior events at the research front can thus be indicated. These three methods - HistCite, main path and path dependent transitions - are applied to a set of documents related to fullerenes and the fullerene-like structures known as nanotubes.
  12. Leydesdorff, L.; Wagner, C.S.; Porto-Gomez, I.; Comins, J.A.; Phillips, F.: Synergy in the knowledge base of U.S. innovation systems at national, state, and regional levels : the contributions of high-tech manufacturing and knowledge-intensive services (2019) 0.00
    0.0046356563 = product of:
      0.013906969 = sum of:
        0.013906969 = product of:
          0.041720904 = sum of:
            0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041720904 = score(doc=5390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Using information theory, we measure innovation systemness as synergy among size-classes, ZIP Codes, and technological classes (NACE-codes) for 8.5 million American companies. The synergy at the national level is decomposed at the level of states, Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSA), and Combined Statistical Areas (CSA). We zoom in to the state of California and in more detail to Silicon Valley. Our results do not support the assumption of a national system of innovations in the U.S.A. Innovation systems appear to operate at the level of the states; the CBSA are too small, so that systemness spills across their borders. Decomposition of the sample in terms of high-tech manufacturing (HTM), medium-high-tech manufacturing (MHTM), knowledge-intensive services (KIS), and high-tech services (HTKIS) does not change this pattern, but refines it. The East Coast-New Jersey, Boston, and New York-and California are the major players, with Texas a third one in the case of HTKIS. Chicago and industrial centers in the Midwest also contribute synergy. Within California, Los Angeles contributes synergy in the sectors of manufacturing, the San Francisco area in KIS. KIS in Silicon Valley and the Bay Area-a CSA composed of seven CBSA-spill over to other regions and even globally.
  13. Leydesdorff, L.; Ivanova, I.: ¬The measurement of "interdisciplinarity" and "synergy" in scientific and extra-scientific collaborations (2021) 0.00
    0.0046356563 = product of:
      0.013906969 = sum of:
        0.013906969 = product of:
          0.041720904 = sum of:
            0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041720904 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Problem solving often requires crossing boundaries, such as those between disciplines. When policy-makers call for "interdisciplinarity," however, they often mean "synergy." Synergy is generated when the whole offers more possibilities than the sum of its parts. An increase in the number of options above the sum of the options in subsets can be measured as redundancy; that is, the number of not-yet-realized options. The number of options available to an innovation system for realization can be as decisive for the system's survival as the historically already-realized innovations. Unlike "interdisciplinarity," "synergy" can also be generated in sectorial or geographical collaborations. The measurement of "synergy," however, requires a methodology different from the measurement of "interdisciplinarity." In this study, we discuss recent advances in the operationalization and measurement of "interdisciplinarity," and propose a methodology for measuring "synergy" based on information theory. The sharing of meanings attributed to information from different perspectives can increase redundancy. Increasing redundancy reduces the relative uncertainty, for example, in niches. The operationalization of the two concepts-"interdisciplinarity" and "synergy"-as different and partly overlapping indicators allows for distinguishing between the effects and the effectiveness of science-policy interventions in research priorities.
  14. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.00
    0.00394486 = product of:
      0.011834579 = sum of:
        0.011834579 = product of:
          0.035503734 = sum of:
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  15. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.00
    0.00394486 = product of:
      0.011834579 = sum of:
        0.011834579 = product of:
          0.035503734 = sum of:
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  16. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.00
    0.00394486 = product of:
      0.011834579 = sum of:
        0.011834579 = product of:
          0.035503734 = sum of:
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  17. Chen, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays : a new method of publication portfolio analysis (2014) 0.00
    0.0033172236 = product of:
      0.009951671 = sum of:
        0.009951671 = product of:
          0.029855011 = sum of:
            0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 1200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029855011 = score(doc=1200,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1200, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1200)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:38:28
  18. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.00
    0.0032873831 = product of:
      0.009862149 = sum of:
        0.009862149 = product of:
          0.029586446 = sum of:
            0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029586446 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07
  19. Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016) 0.00
    0.0032873831 = product of:
      0.009862149 = sum of:
        0.009862149 = product of:
          0.029586446 = sum of:
            0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029586446 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 17:53:22