Search (72 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.03
    0.03191458 = product of:
      0.09574374 = sum of:
        0.09574374 = product of:
          0.1436156 = sum of:
            0.08444272 = weight(_text_:29 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08444272 = score(doc=2268,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
            0.05917289 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05917289 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    12.12.1998 12:00:29
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  2. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.03
    0.026418425 = product of:
      0.079255275 = sum of:
        0.079255275 = product of:
          0.11888291 = sum of:
            0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059710022 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
            0.05917289 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05917289 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  3. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.02
    0.02362366 = product of:
      0.07087098 = sum of:
        0.07087098 = product of:
          0.10630646 = sum of:
            0.070802726 = weight(_text_:theory in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070802726 = score(doc=54,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
  4. Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999) 0.02
    0.02263315 = product of:
      0.06789945 = sum of:
        0.06789945 = product of:
          0.10184917 = sum of:
            0.07226273 = weight(_text_:theory in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07226273 = score(doc=107,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.39788827 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
            0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029586446 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Forty-five years have passed since Lubetzky outlined the primary objectives of the catalog, which should facilitate the identification of specific bibliographic entities, and the explicit recoguition of works and relationships amongthem. Still, our catalogs are better designed to identify specific bibliographic entities than they are to guide users among the network of potential related editions and translations of works. In this paper, we seck to examine qualitatively some interesting examples of families of related works, defined as bibliographic families. Although the cases described here were derived from a random sample, this is a qualitative analysis. We selected these bibliographic families for their ability to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of Leazer's model, which incorporates relationship taxonomies by Tillett and Smiraglia Qualitatice analysis is intended to produce on explanation of a phenomenou, particularly an identification of any palterns observed. Patterns observed in qualitative analysis can be used to affirm external observations of the same phenomena; conclusions can contribute to what is knoton as grounded theory-a unique explanation grounded in the phenomenon under study. We arrive at two statements of grounded theory concerning bibliographic families: cataloger-generated implicit maps among works are inadequate, and qualitative analysis suggests the complexity of even the smallest bibliographic families. We conclude that user behavior study is needed to suggest which alternative maps are preferable.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011) 0.02
    0.022340208 = product of:
      0.067020625 = sum of:
        0.067020625 = product of:
          0.10053093 = sum of:
            0.059109908 = weight(_text_:29 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059109908 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
            0.041421022 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041421022 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:10:37
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  6. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.02
    0.02113474 = product of:
      0.06340422 = sum of:
        0.06340422 = product of:
          0.095106326 = sum of:
            0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047768015 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
            0.04733831 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733831 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  7. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.02
    0.018492898 = product of:
      0.055478692 = sum of:
        0.055478692 = product of:
          0.08321804 = sum of:
            0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041797012 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
            0.041421022 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041421022 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
  8. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.02
    0.018492898 = product of:
      0.055478692 = sum of:
        0.055478692 = product of:
          0.08321804 = sum of:
            0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041797012 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
            0.041421022 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041421022 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  9. Hedman, T.: Utkast till en deskriptiv teori for katalogsokning / informationsatervinning (1997) 0.01
    0.014511898 = product of:
      0.043535694 = sum of:
        0.043535694 = product of:
          0.13060708 = sum of:
            0.13060708 = weight(_text_:theory in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13060708 = score(doc=1428,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.7191402 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Library information searching lacks a descriptive theory which explains how a user decides to borrow one book and not another. Such theory should act as a reference framework against which cataloguing rules and the classification system can be measured, and should be based on 2 complementary perspectives, described in detail: modern classification theory, which explains what cataloguing and classification involve, and philosophy of science, which explains what happens when the user meets the catalogue record. Catalogue information must answer which work is described, and why this work on the subject is chosen. A descriptive theory is especially necessary for knowing what new information to add to the catalogue. Discusses this in a subsequent article
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Draft of a descriptive theory of catalogue searching / information retrieval
  10. Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997) 0.01
    0.013209213 = product of:
      0.039627638 = sum of:
        0.039627638 = product of:
          0.059441455 = sum of:
            0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029855011 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
            0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029586446 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.175-177
  11. Holley, R.P.: Constraints of the 3 x 5 card (1984) 0.01
    0.010615116 = product of:
      0.031845346 = sum of:
        0.031845346 = product of:
          0.09553603 = sum of:
            0.09553603 = weight(_text_:29 in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09553603 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.1, S.29-35
  12. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01
    0.010519626 = product of:
      0.031558875 = sum of:
        0.031558875 = product of:
          0.09467662 = sum of:
            0.09467662 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09467662 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  13. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.01
    0.010519626 = product of:
      0.031558875 = sum of:
        0.031558875 = product of:
          0.09467662 = sum of:
            0.09467662 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09467662 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  14. Guerrini, M.: ¬The functions of the catalogue from ICCP to FRBR (2000) 0.01
    0.009382525 = product of:
      0.028147575 = sum of:
        0.028147575 = product of:
          0.08444272 = sum of:
            0.08444272 = weight(_text_:29 in 3947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08444272 = score(doc=3947,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 3947, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3947)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2005 11:30:41
    29. 8.2005 13:23:12
  15. Layne, S.S.: Brian E. Schottlaender : politics and philosophy of bibliographic control, a conversation (1999) 0.01
    0.009288225 = product of:
      0.027864676 = sum of:
        0.027864676 = product of:
          0.083594024 = sum of:
            0.083594024 = weight(_text_:29 in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083594024 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 11:29:35
  16. Buschey, D.; Halle, A.; Harms, R.: Zwanzig Jahre Retrokonversion and der SUB Göttingen : Ein Zwischenbericht (2001) 0.01
    0.009288225 = product of:
      0.027864676 = sum of:
        0.027864676 = product of:
          0.083594024 = sum of:
            0.083594024 = weight(_text_:29 in 6510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083594024 = score(doc=6510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6510)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 11:33:24
  17. Bolin, M.K.: Catalog design, catalog maintenance, catalog governance (2000) 0.01
    0.009288225 = product of:
      0.027864676 = sum of:
        0.027864676 = product of:
          0.083594024 = sum of:
            0.083594024 = weight(_text_:29 in 493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083594024 = score(doc=493,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 493, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=493)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 18:46:29
  18. Kemp, R.: Catalog/cataloging changes and Web 2.0 functionality : new directions for serials (2008) 0.01
    0.009178132 = product of:
      0.027534394 = sum of:
        0.027534394 = product of:
          0.08260318 = sum of:
            0.08260318 = weight(_text_:theory in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08260318 = score(doc=2254,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an overview of some of the important recent developments in cataloging theory and practice and online catalog design. Changes in cataloging theory and practice include the incorporation of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records principles into catalogs, the new Resource Description and Access cataloging manual, and the new CONSER Standard Record. Web 2.0 functionalities and advances in search technology and results displays are influencing online catalog design. The paper ends with hypothetical scenarios in which a catalog, enhanced by the developments described, fulfills the tasks of finding serials articles and titles.
  19. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.01
    0.009178132 = product of:
      0.027534394 = sum of:
        0.027534394 = product of:
          0.08260318 = sum of:
            0.08260318 = weight(_text_:theory in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08260318 = score(doc=4536,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  20. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01
    0.00788972 = product of:
      0.023669157 = sum of:
        0.023669157 = product of:
          0.07100747 = sum of:
            0.07100747 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07100747 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27

Years

Languages

  • e 50
  • d 18
  • f 2
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 68
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • s 1
  • More… Less…