-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.03
0.03170211 = product of:
0.095106326 = sum of:
0.095106326 = product of:
0.14265949 = sum of:
0.071652025 = weight(_text_:29 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071652025 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.07100747 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07100747 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.03
0.027560934 = product of:
0.0826828 = sum of:
0.0826828 = product of:
0.1240242 = sum of:
0.08260318 = weight(_text_:theory in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08260318 = score(doc=2509,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.041421022 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041421022 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
LaBarre, K.: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? (2004)
0.02
0.022268062 = product of:
0.066804186 = sum of:
0.066804186 = product of:
0.10020628 = sum of:
0.058409266 = weight(_text_:theory in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058409266 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041797012 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A preliminary, purposive survey of definitions and current applications of facet analytical theory (FA) is used to develop a framework for the analysis of Websites. This set of guidelines may well serve to highlight commonalities and differences among FA applications an the Web. Rather than identifying FA as the terrain of a particular interest group, the goal is to explore current practices, uncover common misconceptions, extend understanding, and highlight developments that augment the traditional practice of FA and faceted classification (FC).
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:42:50
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.02
0.019119084 = product of:
0.05735725 = sum of:
0.05735725 = product of:
0.08603588 = sum of:
0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035826012 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.050209865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050209865 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.019015294 = product of:
0.057045877 = sum of:
0.057045877 = product of:
0.085568815 = sum of:
0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050065085 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035503734 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001)
0.01
0.014929692 = product of:
0.044789076 = sum of:
0.044789076 = product of:
0.067183614 = sum of:
0.055349033 = weight(_text_:theory in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055349033 = score(doc=2047,freq=22.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.3047592 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.011834578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011834578 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 2. 1.2004 10:35:22
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
-
Miksa, F.: Shifting directions in LIS classification (1989)
0.01
0.012979838 = product of:
0.038939513 = sum of:
0.038939513 = product of:
0.11681853 = sum of:
0.11681853 = weight(_text_:theory in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11681853 = score(doc=968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Sandner, M.; Jahns, Y.: Kurzbericht zum DDC-Übersetzer- und Anwendertreffen bei der IFLA-Konferenz 2005 in Oslo, Norwegen (2005)
0.01
0.012615593 = product of:
0.037846778 = sum of:
0.037846778 = product of:
0.056770165 = sum of:
0.020898506 = weight(_text_:29 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020898506 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
0.03587166 = weight(_text_:22 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03587166 = score(doc=4406,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.23454636 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Am 16. August 2005 fand in Oslo im Rahmen der heurigen IFLA-Konferenz das alljährliche Treffen der DDC-Übersetzer und der weltweiten DeweyAnwender-Institutionen (Nationalbibliotheken, Ersteller von Nationalbibliografien) statt. Die im Sommer 2005 bereits abgeschlossene deutsche Übersetzung wird in der Druckfassung Ende des Jahres in 4 Bänden vorliegen, beim K. G. Saur Verlag in München erscheinen (ISBN 3-598-11651-9) und 2006 vom ebenfalls erstmals ins Deutsche übersetzten DDC-Lehrbuch (ISBN 3-598-11748-5) begleitet. Pläne für neu startende Übersetzungen der DDC 22 gibt es für folgende Sprachen: Arabisch (mit der wachsenden Notwendigkeit, Klasse 200 Religion zu revidieren), Französisch (es erschien zuletzt eine neue Kurzausgabe 14, nun werden eine vierbändige Druckausgabe und eine frz. Webversion anvisiert), Schwedisch, Vietnamesisch (hierfür wird eine an die Sprache und Schrift angepasste Version des deutschen Übersetzungstools zum Einsatz kommen).
Allgemein DDC 22 ist im Gegensatz zu den früheren Neuauflagen der Standard Edition eine Ausgabe ohne generelle Überarbeitung einer gesamten Klasse. Sie enthält jedoch zahlreiche Änderungen und Expansionen in fast allen Disziplinen und in vielen Hilfstafeln. Es erschien auch eine Sonderausgabe der Klasse 200, Religion. In der aktuellen Kurzausgabe der DDC 22 (14, aus 2004) sind all diese Neuerungen berücksichtigt. Auch die elektronische Version exisitiert in einer vollständigen (WebDewey) und in einer KurzVariante (Abridged WebDewey) und ist immer auf dem jüngsten Stand der Klassifikation. Ein Tutorial für die Nutzung von WebDewey steht unter www.oclc.org /dewey/ resourcesitutorial zur Verfügung. Der Index enthält in dieser elektronischen Fassung weit mehr zusammengesetzte Notationen und verbale Sucheinstiege (resultierend aus den Titeldaten des "WorldCat") als die Druckausgabe, sowie Mappings zu den aktuellsten Normdatensätzen aus LCSH und McSH. Aktuell Die personelle Zusammensetzung des EPC (Editorial Policy Committee) hat sich im letzten Jahr verändert. Dieses oberste Gremium der DDC hat Prioritäten für den aktuellen Arbeitsplan festgelegt. Es wurde vereinbart, größere Änderungsvorhaben via Dewey-Website künftig wie in einem Stellungnahmeverfahren zur fachlichen Diskussion zu stellen. www.oclc.org/dewey/discussion/."
- Date
- 6.11.2005 12:27:29
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬An ideal classification for an on-line catalog (1989)
0.01
0.011125575 = product of:
0.033376724 = sum of:
0.033376724 = product of:
0.10013017 = sum of:
0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10013017 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: ¬The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching (1989)
0.01
0.011125575 = product of:
0.033376724 = sum of:
0.033376724 = product of:
0.10013017 = sum of:
0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10013017 = score(doc=965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Mandel, C.: ¬A computer age classification : implications for library practice (1989)
0.01
0.011125575 = product of:
0.033376724 = sum of:
0.033376724 = product of:
0.10013017 = sum of:
0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10013017 = score(doc=969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=969)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Classification theory in the computer age : Conversations across the disciplines. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18.-19, 1988, Albany, New York (1989)
0.01
0.011125575 = product of:
0.033376724 = sum of:
0.033376724 = product of:
0.10013017 = sum of:
0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10013017 = score(doc=2071,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of a conference addressing issues in classification theory and practice especially oriented towards online environments.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: D. BATTY: The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research; I. DAHLBERG: Concept and definiton theory; I.L. TRAVIS: Application of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification; E. SVENONIUS: An ideal classification for an on-line catalog; K. MARKEY u. A.N. DEMEYER: The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching; N. WILLIAMSON: The Library of Congress Classification in the Computer age; D.S. SCOTT: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases; F. MIKSA: Shifting directions in LIS classification; C. MANDEL: A computer age classification: implications for library practice; R.S. HALSEY: Implications of classification theory in the computer age for educators of librarians and information science professionals; J. HOLIDAY: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives
-
Loth, K.; Grunewald, F.: Ideen zu einer gemeinsamen Sacherschliessung (1996)
0.01
0.010615116 = product of:
0.031845346 = sum of:
0.031845346 = product of:
0.09553603 = sum of:
0.09553603 = weight(_text_:29 in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09553603 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 15:20:01
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.01
0.010519626 = product of:
0.031558875 = sum of:
0.031558875 = product of:
0.09467662 = sum of:
0.09467662 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09467662 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Williamson, N.J.: Classification in online systems : research and the North American perspective (1985)
0.01
0.009288225 = product of:
0.027864676 = sum of:
0.027864676 = product of:
0.083594024 = sum of:
0.083594024 = weight(_text_:29 in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083594024 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International cataloguing. 14(1985), S.29-31
-
MacLennan, A.: Classification and the Internet (2000)
0.01
0.009288225 = product of:
0.027864676 = sum of:
0.027864676 = product of:
0.083594024 = sum of:
0.083594024 = weight(_text_:29 in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083594024 = score(doc=3150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 1.2002 19:29:20
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998)
0.01
0.0092713125 = product of:
0.027813938 = sum of:
0.027813938 = product of:
0.08344181 = sum of:
0.08344181 = weight(_text_:theory in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08344181 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.4594418 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Theory of information languages. Decomposition of UDC-notations
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Revisiting classification for retrieval (2005)
0.01
0.009178132 = product of:
0.027534394 = sum of:
0.027534394 = product of:
0.08260318 = sum of:
0.08260318 = weight(_text_:theory in 4328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08260318 = score(doc=4328,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 4328, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4328)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This short note seeks to respond to Hjørland and Pederson's paper "A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval" which starts from Sparck Jones's, "Some thoughts on classification for retrieval", originally published in 1970. Design/methodology/approach - The note comments on the context in which the 1970 paper was written, and on Hjørland and Pedersen's views, emphasising the need for well-grounded classification theory and application. Findings - The note maintains that text-based, a posteriori, classification, as increasingly found in applications, is likely to be more useful, in general, than a priori classification. Originality/value - The note elaborates on points made in a well-received earlier paper.
-
Lin, Z.Y.: Classification practice and implications for subject directories of the Chinese language Web-based digital library (2000)
0.01
0.0079613365 = product of:
0.02388401 = sum of:
0.02388401 = product of:
0.071652025 = sum of:
0.071652025 = weight(_text_:29 in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071652025 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 3(2000) no.4, S.29-50
-
Neelameghan, A.: S.R. Ranganathan's general theory of knowledge classification in designing, indexing and retrieving from specialised databases (1997)
0.01
0.00786697 = product of:
0.02360091 = sum of:
0.02360091 = product of:
0.070802726 = sum of:
0.070802726 = weight(_text_:theory in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070802726 = score(doc=3,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.04367448 = queryNorm
0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Summarizes some experiences of the application of the priciples and postulates of S.R. Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification, incorporating the freely faceted approach and analytico synthetic methods, to the design and development of specialized databases, including indexing, user interfaces and retrieval. Enumerates some of the earlier instances of the facet method in machine based systems, beginning with Hollerith's punched card system for the data processing of the US Census. Elaborates on Ranganathan's holistic approach to information systems and services provided by his normative principles. Notes similarities between the design of databases and faceted classification systems. Examples from working systems are given to demonstrate the usefulness of selected canons and principles of classification and the analytico synthetic methodology to database design. The examples are mostly operational database systems developed using Unesco's Micro CDS-ISIS software
