Search (120 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.05
    0.0472091 = product of:
      0.1416273 = sum of:
        0.1416273 = sum of:
          0.058409266 = weight(_text_:theory in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058409266 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041797012 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.041421022 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041421022 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04367448 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  2. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.04
    0.038030587 = product of:
      0.114091754 = sum of:
        0.114091754 = product of:
          0.17113763 = sum of:
            0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10013017 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
            0.07100747 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07100747 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  3. Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016) 0.03
    0.0315937 = product of:
      0.09478109 = sum of:
        0.09478109 = product of:
          0.14217164 = sum of:
            0.094403625 = weight(_text_:theory in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094403625 = score(doc=4889,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
            0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047768015 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  4. Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996) 0.03
    0.025449215 = product of:
      0.07634764 = sum of:
        0.07634764 = product of:
          0.11452146 = sum of:
            0.06675345 = weight(_text_:theory in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06675345 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
            0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047768015 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
    Date
    14. 7.1996 13:29:45
  5. Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004) 0.02
    0.022268062 = product of:
      0.066804186 = sum of:
        0.066804186 = product of:
          0.10020628 = sum of:
            0.058409266 = weight(_text_:theory in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058409266 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
            0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041797012 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The classification of documents about topics relating to people of mixed race is problematic, partly because of the obscurity of racial categorization in general, and partly because of the limitations and inherent biases of bibliographic classification schemes designed primarily for usage in non-digital environments. Critical race theory is an approach that may prove useful in deterrnining how classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification should most appropriately be stuctured.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 10:38:42
  6. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.02
    0.02113474 = product of:
      0.06340422 = sum of:
        0.06340422 = product of:
          0.095106326 = sum of:
            0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047768015 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
            0.04733831 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733831 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  7. Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004) 0.02
    0.019086912 = product of:
      0.057260733 = sum of:
        0.057260733 = product of:
          0.0858911 = sum of:
            0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050065085 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
            0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035826012 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 17:33:13
  8. Frické, M.: Faceted classification, analysis and search : some questions on their interrelations (2017) 0.02
    0.019086912 = product of:
      0.057260733 = sum of:
        0.057260733 = product of:
          0.0858911 = sum of:
            0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050065085 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
            0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035826012 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:53:46
  9. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.019015294 = product of:
      0.057045877 = sum of:
        0.057045877 = product of:
          0.085568815 = sum of:
            0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050065085 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
            0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035503734 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  10. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.02
    0.01590576 = product of:
      0.04771728 = sum of:
        0.04771728 = product of:
          0.07157592 = sum of:
            0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041720904 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
            0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029855011 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:58:02
  11. Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017) 0.02
    0.01590576 = product of:
      0.04771728 = sum of:
        0.04771728 = product of:
          0.07157592 = sum of:
            0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041720904 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
            0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029855011 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Richard P. Smiraglia: A Brief Introduction to Facets in Knowledge Organization / Kathryn La Barre: Interrogating Facet Theory: Decolonizing Knowledge Organization / Joseph T. Tennis: Never Facets Alone: The Evolving Thought and Persistent Problems in Ranganathan's Theories of Classification / M. P. Satija and Dong-Guen Oh: The DDC and the Knowledge Categories: Dewey did Faceting without Knowing It / Claudio Gnoli: Classifying Phenomena Part 3: Facets / Rick Szostak: Facet Analysis Without Facet Indicators / Elizabeth Milonas: An Examination of Facets within Search Engine Result Pages / Richard P. Smiraglia: Facets for Clustering and Disambiguation: The Domain Discourse of Facets in Knowledge Organization
    Date
    17. 2.2018 19:11:29
  12. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.02
    0.015846077 = product of:
      0.047538232 = sum of:
        0.047538232 = product of:
          0.071307346 = sum of:
            0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041720904 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
            0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029586446 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.
    Pages
    S.19-22
  13. Tennis, J.T.: Foundational, first-order, and second-order classification theory (2015) 0.02
    0.01573394 = product of:
      0.04720182 = sum of:
        0.04720182 = product of:
          0.14160545 = sum of:
            0.14160545 = weight(_text_:theory in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14160545 = score(doc=2204,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.7796986 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Both basic and applied research on the construction, implementation, maintenance, and evaluation of classification schemes is called classification theory. If we employ Ritzer's metatheoretical method of analysis on the over one-hundred year-old body of literature, we can se categories of theory emerge. This paper looks at one particular part of knowledge organization work, namely classification theory, and asks 1) what are the contours of this intellectual space, and, 2) what have we produced in the theoretical reflection on constructing, implementing, and evaluating classification schemes? The preliminary findings from this work are that classification theory can be separated into three kinds: foundational classification theory, first-order classification theory, and second-order classification theory, each with its own concerns and objects of study.
  14. Neelameghan, A.: Classification, theory of (1971) 0.01
    0.0148341 = product of:
      0.0445023 = sum of:
        0.0445023 = product of:
          0.1335069 = sum of:
            0.1335069 = weight(_text_:theory in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1335069 = score(doc=1988,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Gopinath, M.A.: Ranganathan's theory of facet analysis and knowledge representation (1992) 0.01
    0.0148341 = product of:
      0.0445023 = sum of:
        0.0445023 = product of:
          0.1335069 = sum of:
            0.1335069 = weight(_text_:theory in 6133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1335069 = score(doc=6133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 6133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6133)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.01
    0.013209213 = product of:
      0.039627638 = sum of:
        0.039627638 = product of:
          0.059441455 = sum of:
            0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029855011 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
            0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029586446 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  17. Farradane, J.E.L.: ¬A scientific theory of classification and indexing : further considerations (1952) 0.01
    0.012979838 = product of:
      0.038939513 = sum of:
        0.038939513 = product of:
          0.11681853 = sum of:
            0.11681853 = weight(_text_:theory in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11681853 = score(doc=1655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. McLachlan, H.V.: Buchanan, Locke and Wittgenstein on classification (1981) 0.01
    0.012979838 = product of:
      0.038939513 = sum of:
        0.038939513 = product of:
          0.11681853 = sum of:
            0.11681853 = weight(_text_:theory in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11681853 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rezensionsbeitrag zu Buchanan, B.: Theory of library classification
  19. Srivastava, A.P.: Theory of knowledge classification in libraries (1964) 0.01
    0.012979838 = product of:
      0.038939513 = sum of:
        0.038939513 = product of:
          0.11681853 = sum of:
            0.11681853 = weight(_text_:theory in 6250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11681853 = score(doc=6250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 6250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6250)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993) 0.01
    0.01243877 = product of:
      0.03731631 = sum of:
        0.03731631 = product of:
          0.11194893 = sum of:
            0.11194893 = weight(_text_:theory in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11194893 = score(doc=5876,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04367448 = queryNorm
                0.61640584 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'

Authors

Languages

  • e 111
  • f 3
  • i 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 103
  • m 14
  • s 4
  • el 3
  • b 1
  • More… Less…