Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.02 
    0.02113474 = product of:
  0.06340422 = sum of:
    0.06340422 = product of:
      0.095106326 = sum of:
        0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047768015 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
        0.04733831 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04733831 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  2. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.02 
    0.01914875 = product of:
  0.05744625 = sum of:
    0.05744625 = product of:
      0.08616937 = sum of:
        0.050665636 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050665636 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
        0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035503734 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:15:36
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  3. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.02 
    0.015846077 = product of:
  0.047538232 = sum of:
    0.047538232 = product of:
      0.071307346 = sum of:
        0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041720904 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
        0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029586446 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose Online knowledge communities make great contributions to global knowledge sharing and innovation. Resource tagging approaches have been widely adopted in such communities to describe, annotate and organize knowledge resources mainly through users' participation. However, it is unclear what causes the adoption of a particular resource tagging approach. The purpose of this paper is to identify factors that drive users to use a hybrid social tagging approach. Design/methodology/approach Technology acceptance model and social cognitive theory are adopted to support an integrated model proposed in this paper. Zhihu, one of the most popular online knowledge communities in China, is taken as the survey context. A survey was conducted with a questionnaire and collected data were analyzed through structural equation model. Findings A new hybrid social resource tagging approach was refined and described. The empirical results revealed that self-efficacy, perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use exert positive effect on users' attitude. Moreover, social influence, PU and attitude impact significantly on users' intention to use a hybrid social resource tagging approach. Originality/value Theoretically, this study enriches the type of resource tagging approaches and recognizes factors influencing user adoption to use it. Regarding the practical parts, the results provide online information system providers and designers with referential strategies to improve the performance of the current tagging approaches and promote them.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  4. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01 
    0.013209213 = product of:
  0.039627638 = sum of:
    0.039627638 = product of:
      0.059441455 = sum of:
        0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029855011 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
        0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029586446 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:07
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Tennis, J.T.; Jacob, E.K.: Toward a theory of structure in information organization frameworks (2008) 0.01 
    0.009178132 = product of:
  0.027534394 = sum of:
    0.027534394 = product of:
      0.08260318 = sum of:
        0.08260318 = weight(_text_:theory in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08260318 = score(doc=2251,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    This paper outlines a formal and systematic approach to explication of the role of structure in information organization. It presents a preliminary set of constructs that are useful for understanding the similarities and differences that obtain across information organization systems. This work seeks to provide necessary groundwork for development of a theory of structure that can serve as a lens through which to observe patterns across systems of information organization.
  6. Qin, J.: Controlled semantics versus social semantics : an epistemological analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.0055627874 = product of:
  0.016688362 = sum of:
    0.016688362 = product of:
      0.050065085 = sum of:
        0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 2269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050065085 = score(doc=2269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2269)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Social semantics is more than just tags or vocabularies. It involves the users who contribute the tags, the perceptions of the world, and intentions that the tags are created for. Whilst social semantics is a valuable, massive data source for developing new knowledge systems or validating existing ones, there are also pitfalls and uncertainties. The epistemological analysis presented in this paper is an attempt to explain the differences and connections between social and controlled semantics from the perspective of knowledge theory. The epistemological connection between social and controlled semantics is particularly important: empirical knowledge can provide data source for testing the rational knowledge and rational knowledge can provide reliability and predictability. Such connection will have significant implications for future research on social and controlled semantics.
  7. Raban, D.R.; Ronen, I.; Guy, I.: Acting or reacting? : Preferential attachment in a people-tagging system (2011) 0.01 
    0.0055627874 = product of:
  0.016688362 = sum of:
    0.016688362 = product of:
      0.050065085 = sum of:
        0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 4371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050065085 = score(doc=4371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 4371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4371)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Social technologies tend to attract research on social structure or interaction. In this paper we analyze the individual use of a social technology, specifically an enterprise people-tagging application. We focus on active participants of the system and distinguish between users who initiate activity and those who respond to activity. This distinction is situated within the preferential attachment theory in order to examine which type of participant contributes more to the process of tagging. We analyze the usage of the people-tagging application in a snapshot representing 3 years of activity, focusing on self-tagging compared to tagging by and of others. The main findings are: (1) People who tag themselves are the most productive contributors to the system. (2) Preferential attachment saturation is reached at 12-14 tags per user. (3) The nature of participation is more significant than the number of participants for system growth. The paper concludes with theoretical and practical implications.
  8. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.01 
    0.005307558 = product of:
  0.015922673 = sum of:
    0.015922673 = product of:
      0.047768015 = sum of:
        0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047768015 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.29-53
  9. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.01 
    0.005307558 = product of:
  0.015922673 = sum of:
    0.015922673 = product of:
      0.047768015 = sum of:
        0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047768015 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  10. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00 
    0.0046490617 = product of:
  0.013947184 = sum of:
    0.013947184 = product of:
      0.04184155 = sum of:
        0.04184155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04184155 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.00 
    0.0046441127 = product of:
  0.013932338 = sum of:
    0.013932338 = product of:
      0.041797012 = sum of:
        0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041797012 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  12. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.00 
    0.0046441127 = product of:
  0.013932338 = sum of:
    0.013932338 = product of:
      0.041797012 = sum of:
        0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041797012 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22.11.2023 18:29:56
  13. Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation : using wikis in science (2006) 0.00 
    0.0046356563 = product of:
  0.013906969 = sum of:
    0.013906969 = product of:
      0.041720904 = sum of:
        0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041720904 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article focuses on two aspects of knowledge generation. First, I want to explore how new knowledge is created in interdisciplinary discourses and, second, how this process might be mediated and promoted by the use of wikis. I suggest that it is the noise coming to life in (ex)changes of perspectives that enables the creation of new knowledge. In section 1-4, I am going to examine how the concepts of noise from the mathematical theory of communication (Shannon 1948) on the one hand and theories of organizational knowledge creation (cf. Nonaka 1994) on the other might help to understand the process of interdisciplinary knowledge creation. In section 5 I am going to explore the role wiki technologies can play in supporting interdisciplinary collaborations. This section is influenced by own experiences in a wiki-based interdisciplinary collaboration. It seems that even though certain features of wiki technology make it an excellent tool to externalize and combine individual knowledge leaving room for noise and at the same time documenting this process, the full benefit of wikis can only be obtained if they are embedded into a broader communication context.
  14. Nov, O.; Naaman, M.; Ye, C.: Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community : a multidimensional perspective (2010) 0.00 
    0.0046356563 = product of:
  0.013906969 = sum of:
    0.013906969 = product of:
      0.041720904 = sum of:
        0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 3424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041720904 = score(doc=3424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3424)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In recent years we have witnessed a significant growth of social-computing communities - online services in which users share information in various forms. As content contributions from participants are critical to the viability of these communities, it is important to understand what drives users to participate and share information with others in such settings. We extend previous literature on user contribution by studying the factors that are associated with various forms of participation in a large online photo-sharing community. Using survey and system data, we examine four different forms of participation and consider the differences between these forms. We build on theories of motivation to examine the relationship between users' participation and their motivations with respect to their tenure in the community. Amongst our findings, we identify individual motivations (both extrinsic and intrinsic) that underpin user participation, and their effects on different forms of information sharing; we show that tenure in the community does affect participation, but that this effect depends on the type of participation activity. Finally, we demonstrate that tenure in the community has a weak moderating effect on a number of motivations with regard to their effect on participation. Directions for future research, as well as implications for theory and practice, are discussed.
  15. Yoon, K.: Conceptual syntagmatic associations in user tagging (2012) 0.00 
    0.0046356563 = product of:
  0.013906969 = sum of:
    0.013906969 = product of:
      0.041720904 = sum of:
        0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041720904 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This study aimed to integrate the linguistic theory of syntagmatic relations and the concept of topic and comment into an empirical analysis of user tagging. User tags on documents in a social bookmarking site reflect a user's views of an information object, which can augment the content description and provide more effective representation of information. The study presents a study of tag analysis to uncover semantic relations among tag terms implicit in user tagging. The objective was to identify the syntagmatic semantic cores of topic and comment in user tags evidenced by the meaning attached to the information object by users. The study focused on syntagmatic relations, which were based on the way in which terms were used within the information content among users. Analysis of descriptive tag terms found three primary categories of concepts: content-topic, content-comment, and context of use. The relations among terms within a group and between the content-topic and content-comment groups were determined by inferring user meaning from the user notes and from the context of the source text. Intergroup relations showed syntagmatic associations between the topic and comment, whereas intragroup relations were more general but were limited in the document context. The findings are discussed with regard to the semantics of concepts and relations in user tagging. An implication of syntagmatic relations to information search suggests that concepts can be combined by a specific association in the context of the actual use of terms.
  16. Rafferty, P.; Murphy, H.: Is there nothing outside the tags? : towards a poststructuralist analysis of social tagging (2015) 0.00 
    0.0046356563 = product of:
  0.013906969 = sum of:
    0.013906969 = product of:
      0.041720904 = sum of:
        0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 1792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041720904 = score(doc=1792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 1792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1792)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of the research is to explore relationships between social tagging and key poststructuralist principles; to devise and construct an analytical framework through which key poststructuralist principles are converted into workable research questions and applied to analyse Librarything tags, and to assess the validity of performing such an analysis. The research hypothesis is that tagging represents an imperfect analogy for the poststructuralist project Design/methodology/approach Tags from LibraryThing and from a library OPAC were compared and constrasted with Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and publishers' descriptions. Research questions derived from poststructuralism, asked whether tags destabilise meaning, whether and how far the death of the author is expressed in tags, and whether tags deconstruct LCSH. Findings Tags can temporarily destabilise meaning by obfuscating the structure of a word. Meaning is destabilised, perhaps only momentarily, and then it is recreated; it might resemble the original meaning, or it may not, however any attempt to make tags useful or functional necessarily imposes some form of structure. The analysis indicates that in tagging, the author, if not dead, is ignored. Authoritative interpretations are not pervasively mimicked in the tags. In relation to LCSH, tagging decentres the dominant view, but neither exposes nor judges it. Nor does tagging achieve the final stage of the deconstructive process, showing the dominant view to be a constructed reality. Originality/value This is one of very few studies to have attempted a critical theoretical approach to social tagging. It offers a novel methodological approach to undertaking analysis based on poststructuralist theory.
  17. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00 
    0.0046023363 = product of:
  0.013807008 = sum of:
    0.013807008 = product of:
      0.041421022 = sum of:
        0.041421022 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421022 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  18. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.00 
    0.0039806683 = product of:
  0.011942005 = sum of:
    0.011942005 = product of:
      0.035826012 = sum of:
        0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035826012 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:31
  19. Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008) 0.00 
    0.0039806683 = product of:
  0.011942005 = sum of:
    0.011942005 = product of:
      0.035826012 = sum of:
        0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035826012 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:20:29
  20. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00 
    0.00394486 = product of:
  0.011834579 = sum of:
    0.011834579 = product of:
      0.035503734 = sum of:
        0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035503734 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 4
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 32
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • More… Less…

Themes