Search (1621 results, page 1 of 82)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.05 
    0.0472091 = product of:
  0.1416273 = sum of:
    0.1416273 = sum of:
      0.058409266 = weight(_text_:theory in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058409266 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.041797012 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041797012 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.041421022 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041421022 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05 
    0.046244435 = product of:
  0.1387333 = sum of:
    0.1387333 = product of:
      0.4161999 = sum of:
        0.4161999 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4161999 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37027273 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04 
    0.038537033 = product of:
  0.11561109 = sum of:
    0.11561109 = product of:
      0.34683326 = sum of:
        0.34683326 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34683326 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37027273 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.04 
    0.038030587 = product of:
  0.114091754 = sum of:
    0.114091754 = product of:
      0.17113763 = sum of:
        0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10013017 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
        0.07100747 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07100747 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  5. Genuis, S.K.; Bronstein, J.: Looking for "normal" : sense making in the context of health disruption (2017) 0.03 
    0.033720788 = product of:
  0.10116236 = sum of:
    0.10116236 = sum of:
      0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041720904 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
      0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029855011 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
      0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029586446 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This investigation examines perceptions of normality emerging from two distinct studies of information behavior associated with life disrupting health symptoms and theorizes the search for normality in the context of sense making theory. Study I explored the experiences of women striving to make sense of symptoms associated with menopause; Study II examined posts from two online discussion groups for people with symptoms of obsessive compulsive disorder. Joint data analysis demonstrates that normality was initially perceived as the absence of illness. A breakdown in perceived normality because of disruptive symptoms created gaps and discontinuities in understanding. As participants interacted with information about the experiences of health-challenged peers, socially constructed notions of normality emerged. This was internalized as a "new normal." Findings demonstrate normality as an element of sense making that changes and develops over time, and experiential information and social contexts as central to health-related sense making. Re-establishing perceptions of normality, as experienced by health-challenged peers, was an important element of sense making. This investigation provides nuanced insight into notions of normality, extends understanding of social processes involved in sense making, and represents the first theorizing of and model development for normality within the information science and sense making literature.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:22
  6. Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018) 0.03 
    0.033720788 = product of:
  0.10116236 = sum of:
    0.10116236 = sum of:
      0.041720904 = weight(_text_:theory in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041720904 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
      0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029855011 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
      0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029586446 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04367448 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article considers the relationships among meaning generation, selection, and the dynamics of discourse from a variety of perspectives ranging from information theory and biology to sociology. Following Husserl's idea of a horizon of meanings in intersubjective communication, we propose a way in which, using Shannon's equations, the generation and selection of meanings from a horizon of possibilities can be considered probabilistically. The information-theoretical dynamics we articulate considers a process of meaning generation within cultural evolution: information is imbued with meaning, and through this process, the number of options for the selection of meaning in discourse proliferates. The redundancy of possible meanings contributes to a codification of expectations within the discourse. Unlike hardwired DNA, the codes of nonbiological systems can coevolve with the variations. Spanning horizons of meaning, the codes structure the communications as selection environments that shape discourses. Discursive knowledge can be considered as meta-coded communication that enables us to translate among differently coded communications. The dynamics of discursive knowledge production can thus infuse the historical dynamics with a cultural evolution by adding options, that is, by increasing redundancy. A calculus of redundancy is presented as an indicator whereby these dynamics of discourse and meaning may be explored empirically.
    Date
    29. 9.2018 11:22:09
  7. Deisseroth, K.: Lichtschalter im Gehirn (2011) 0.03 
    0.03170211 = product of:
  0.095106326 = sum of:
    0.095106326 = product of:
      0.14265949 = sum of:
        0.071652025 = weight(_text_:29 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071652025 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
        0.07100747 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07100747 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29
  8. Sauperl, S.A.: UDC as a standardisation method for providing titles of documents (2015) 0.03 
    0.03170211 = product of:
  0.095106326 = sum of:
    0.095106326 = product of:
      0.14265949 = sum of:
        0.071652025 = weight(_text_:29 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071652025 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
        0.07100747 = weight(_text_:22 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07100747 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10.11.2015 10:22:31
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  9. Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016) 0.03 
    0.0315937 = product of:
  0.09478109 = sum of:
    0.09478109 = product of:
      0.14217164 = sum of:
        0.094403625 = weight(_text_:theory in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094403625 = score(doc=4889,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
        0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047768015 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  10. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.03 
    0.03149821 = product of:
  0.094494626 = sum of:
    0.094494626 = product of:
      0.14174193 = sum of:
        0.094403625 = weight(_text_:theory in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094403625 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.04733831 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04733831 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  11. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.03 
    0.031104354 = product of:
  0.09331306 = sum of:
    0.09331306 = product of:
      0.13996959 = sum of:
        0.11038314 = weight(_text_:theory in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11038314 = score(doc=1440,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.6077844 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
        0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029586446 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Parrochia, D.; Neuville, D.: Towards a general theory of classifications (2013) 0.03 
    0.031104354 = product of:
  0.09331306 = sum of:
    0.09331306 = product of:
      0.13996959 = sum of:
        0.11038314 = weight(_text_:theory in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11038314 = score(doc=3100,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.6077844 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
        0.029586446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029586446 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This book is an essay on the epistemology of classifications. Its main purpose is not to provide an exposition of an actual mathematical theory of classifications, that is, a general theory which would be available to any kind of them: hierarchical or non-hierarchical, ordinary or fuzzy, overlapping or not overlapping, finite or infinite, and so on, establishing a basis for all possible divisions of the real world. For the moment, such a theory remains nothing but a dream. Instead, the authors are essentially put forward a number of key questions. Their aim is rather to reveal the "state of art" of this dynamic field and the philosophy one may eventually adopt to go further. To this end they present some advances made in the course of the last century, discuss a few tricky problems that remain to be solved, and show the avenues open to those who no longer wish to stay on the wrong track. Researchers and professionals interested in the epistemology and philosophy of science, library science, logic and set theory, order theory or cluster analysis will find this book a comprehensive, original and progressive introduction to the main questions in this field.
    Content
    Philosophical problemsInformation / data structures / Empirical clustering and classic hierarchies / Algebra of trees / Generalized classifications / Topology of generalized classifications / Metaclassification / For an axiomatic theory of classifications / Alternative theories and higher infinite / Postscript.
    Date
    8. 9.2016 22:04:09
  13. Hackett, P.M.W.: Facet theory and the mapping sentence : evolving philosophy, use and application (2014) 0.03 
    0.030953227 = product of:
  0.09285968 = sum of:
    0.09285968 = product of:
      0.13928951 = sum of:
        0.11562036 = weight(_text_:theory in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11562036 = score(doc=2258,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.63662124 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
        0.023669155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023669155 = score(doc=2258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This book brings together contemporary facet theory research to propose mapping sentences as a new way of understanding complex behavior, and suggests future directions the approach may take. How do we think about the worlds we live in? The formation of categories of events and objects seems to be a fundamental orientation procedure. Facet theory and its main tool, the mapping sentence, deal with categories of behavior and experience, their interrelationship, and their unification as our worldviews. In this book Hackett reviews philosophical writing along with neuroscientific research and information form other disciplines to provide a context for facet theory and the qualitative developments in this approach. With a variety of examples, the author proposes mapping sentences as a new way of understanding and defining complex behavior.
    Content
    1 Introduction; 2 Ontological Categorisation and Mereology; Human assessment; Categories and the properties of experiential events; Mathematical, computing, artificial intelligence and library classification approaches; Sociological approaches; Psychological approaches; Personal Construct Theory; Philosophical approaches to categories; Mereology: facet theory and relationships between categories; Neuroscience and categories; Conclusions; 3 Facet Theory and Thinking about Human Behaviour Generating knowledge in facet theory: a brief overviewWhat is facet theory?; Facets and facet elements; The mapping sentence; Designing a mapping sentence; Narrative; Roles that facets play; Single-facet structures: axial role and modular role; Polar role; Circumplex; Two-facet structures; Radex; Three-facet structures; Cylindrex; Analysing facet theory research; Conclusions; 4 Evolving Facet Theory Applications; The evolution of facet theory; Mapping a domain: the mapping sentence as a stand-alone approach and integrative tool; Making and understanding fine art; Defining the grid: a mapping sentence for grid imagesFacet sort-technique; Facet mapping therapy: using the mapping sentence and the facet structures to explore client issues; Research program coordination; Conclusions and Future Directions; Glossary of Terms; Bibliography; Index
    Date
    17.10.2015 17:22:01
  14. Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013) 0.03 
    0.030140867 = product of:
  0.0904226 = sum of:
    0.0904226 = product of:
      0.1356339 = sum of:
        0.10013017 = weight(_text_:theory in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10013017 = score(doc=666,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
        0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035503734 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:39:00
  15. Cognitive load theory (2010) 0.03 
    0.027365735 = product of:
  0.0820972 = sum of:
    0.0820972 = product of:
      0.1231458 = sum of:
        0.09329078 = weight(_text_:theory in 3785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09329078 = score(doc=3785,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 3785, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3785)
        0.029855011 = weight(_text_:29 in 3785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029855011 = score(doc=3785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3785)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Cognitive load theory (CLT) is one of the most important theories in educational psychology, a highly effective guide for the design of multimedia and other learning materials. This edited volume brings together the most prolific researchers from around the world who study various aspects of cognitive load to discuss its current theoretical as well as practical issues. The book is divided into three parts. The first part describes the theoretical foundations and assumptions of CLT, the second discusses the empirical findings about the application of CLT to the design of learning environments, and the third part concludes the book with discussions and suggestions for new directions for future research. It aims to become the standard handbook in CLT for researchers and graduate students in psychology, education, and educational technology.
    Content
    Cognitive load theory : historical development and relation to other theories -- Cognitive load theory : recent theoretical advances -- Schema acquisition and courses of cognitive load -- Individual differences and cognitive load theory -- Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving -- Instructional control of cognitive load in the design of complex learning environments -- Techniques that reduce extraneous cognitive load and manage intrinsic cognitive load during multimedia learning -- Techniques that increase generative processing in multimedia learning : open questions for cognitive load research -- Measuring cognitive load -- From neo-behaviorism to neuroscience : perspectives on the origins and future contributions of cognitive load research -- Cognitive load in learning with multiple representations -- Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research
    Date
    26. 8.2017 11:03:29
  16. Tuttle, J.: ¬The aphasia of modern subject access (2012) 0.03 
    0.027231399 = product of:
  0.08169419 = sum of:
    0.08169419 = product of:
      0.122541286 = sum of:
        0.08671527 = weight(_text_:theory in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08671527 = score(doc=1948,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.47746593 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
        0.035826012 = weight(_text_:29 in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035826012 = score(doc=1948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Why do catalogers use two systems, one notational like Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the other terminological like Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), to reach the same goal: subject description and access? This article, divided into two parts, first surveys the library science literature to address the unsatisfying answers given to that question and, secondly, provides a new answer based on the linguistic theory of Roman Jakobson. Jakobson's theory that language is always twofold, the act of selecting words paired with the act of combining words, is proposed as a theory of subject access, with LCSH doing the work of selection and LCC thework of combination.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 15:57:03
  17. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03 
    0.026975922 = product of:
  0.08092777 = sum of:
    0.08092777 = product of:
      0.2427833 = sum of:
        0.2427833 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2427833 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37027273 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  18. Raichle, M.E.: Im Kopf herrscht niemals Ruhe (2010) 0.03 
    0.026418425 = product of:
  0.079255275 = sum of:
    0.079255275 = product of:
      0.11888291 = sum of:
        0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059710022 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
        0.05917289 = weight(_text_:22 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05917289 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    20. 6.2010 9:22:04
  19. Ermert, A.: Terminologie - Bedeutung, Erarbeitung, professionelle Strukturierung und Management : Der 13. Deutsche Terminologietag vom 19. bis 21. April 2012 in Heidelberg (2012) 0.03 
    0.026418425 = product of:
  0.079255275 = sum of:
    0.079255275 = product of:
      0.11888291 = sum of:
        0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059710022 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
        0.05917289 = weight(_text_:22 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05917289 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:37:29
  20. Hjoerland, B.: Domain analysis (2017) 0.03 
    0.025449215 = product of:
  0.07634764 = sum of:
    0.07634764 = product of:
      0.11452146 = sum of:
        0.06675345 = weight(_text_:theory in 3852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06675345 = score(doc=3852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 3852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3852)
        0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 3852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047768015 = score(doc=3852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3852)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
    Date
    29. 9.2017 19:09:20

Authors

Languages

  • e 1296
  • d 311
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1421
  • el 135
  • m 123
  • s 51
  • x 20
  • r 11
  • b 5
  • i 3
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications