-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van; Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schreiber, G.: Two variations on ontology alignment evaluation : methodological issues (2008)
0.01
0.012309102 = product of:
0.036927305 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 4645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=4645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4645)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020915478 = product of:
0.041830957 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 4645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=4645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 4645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4645)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Evaluation of ontology alignments is in practice done in two ways: (1) assessing individual correspondences and (2) comparing the alignment to a reference alignment. However, this type of evaluation does not guarantee that an application which uses the alignment will perform well. In this paper, we contribute to the current ontology alignment evaluation practices by proposing two alternative evaluation methods that take into account some characteristics of a usage scenario without doing a full-fledged end-to-end evaluation. We compare different evaluation approaches in three case studies, focussing on methodological issues. Each case study considers an alignment between a different pair of ontologies, ranging from rich and well-structured to small and poorly structured. This enables us to conclude on the use of different evaluation approaches in different settings.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Isaac, A.: After EDLproject : controlled Vocabularies in TELPlus (2007)
0.01
0.0052892636 = product of:
0.03173558 = sum of:
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Meij, L. van der; Schopman, B.: Instance-based semantic interoperability in the cultural heritage (2012)
0.01
0.0050314823 = product of:
0.030188894 = sum of:
0.030188894 = product of:
0.060377788 = sum of:
0.060377788 = weight(_text_:methods in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060377788 = score(doc=125,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.384686 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper gives a comprehensive overview over the problem of Semantic Interoperability in the Cultural Heritage domain, with a particular focus on solutions centered around extensional, i.e., instance-based, ontology matching methods. It presents three typical scenarios requiring interoperability, one with homogenous collections, one with heterogeneous collections, and one with multi-lingual collection. It discusses two different ways to evaluate potential alignments, one based on the application of re-indexing, one using a reference alignment. To these scenarios we apply extensional matching with different similarity measures which gives interesting insights. Finally, we firmly position our work in the Cultural Heritage context through an extensive discussion of the relevance for, and issues related to this specific field. The findings are as unspectacular as expected but nevertheless important: the provided methods can really improve interoperability in a number of important cases, but they are not universal solutions to all related problems. This paper will provide a solid foundation for any future work on Semantic Interoperability in the Cultural Heritage domain, in particular for anybody intending to apply extensional methods.
-
Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schopman, B.; Schlobach, S.; Meij, L. van der: Matching multilingual subject vocabularies (2009)
0.00
0.004929826 = product of:
0.029578956 = sum of:
0.029578956 = product of:
0.05915791 = sum of:
0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05915791 = score(doc=3035,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Most libraries and other cultural heritage institutions use controlled knowledge organisation systems, such as thesauri, to describe their collections. Unfortunately, as most of these institutions use different such systems, united access to heterogeneous collections is difficult. Things are even worse in an international context when concepts have labels in different languages. In order to overcome the multilingual interoperability problem between European Libraries, extensive work has been done to manually map concepts from different knowledge organisation systems, which is a tedious and expensive process. Within the TELplus project, we developed and evaluated methods to automatically discover these mappings, using different ontology matching techniques. In experiments on major French, English and German subject heading lists Rameau, LCSH and SWD, we show that we can automatically produce mappings of surprisingly good quality, even when using relatively naive translation and matching methods.
-
Freire, N.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.: Subject information and multilingualism in European bibliographic datasets : experiences with Universal Decimal Classification (2015)
0.00
0.0044477303 = product of:
0.02668638 = sum of:
0.02668638 = product of:
0.05337276 = sum of:
0.05337276 = weight(_text_:29 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05337276 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Matthezing, H.; Zinn, C.: Integrated access to cultural heritage resources through representation and alignment of controlled vocabularies (2008)
0.00
0.0040251864 = product of:
0.024151117 = sum of:
0.024151117 = product of:
0.048302233 = sum of:
0.048302233 = weight(_text_:methods in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048302233 = score(doc=3398,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3077488 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To show how semantic web techniques can help address semantic interoperability issues in the broad cultural heritage domain, allowing users an integrated and seamless access to heterogeneous collections. Design/methodology/approach - This paper presents the heterogeneity problems to be solved. It introduces semantic web techniques that can help in solving them, focusing on the representation of controlled vocabularies and their semantic alignment. It gives pointers to some previous projects and experiments that have tried to address the problems discussed. Findings - Semantic web research provides practical technical and methodological approaches to tackle the different issues. Two contributions of interest are the simple knowledge organisation system model and automatic vocabulary alignment methods and tools. These contributions were demonstrated to be usable for enabling semantic search and navigation across collections. Research limitations/implications - The research aims at designing different representation and alignment methods for solving interoperability problems in the context of controlled subject vocabularies. Given the variety and technical richness of current research in the semantic web field, it is impossible to provide an in-depth account or an exhaustive list of references. Every aspect of the paper is, however, given one or several pointers for further reading. Originality/value - This article provides a general and practical introduction to relevant semantic web techniques. It is of specific value for the practitioners in the cultural heritage and digital library domains who are interested in applying these methods in practice.
-
Manguinhas, H.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.; Miles, T.; Lima, A.; Neroulidis, A.; Ginouves, V.; Atsidis, D.; Hildebrand, M.; Brinkerink, M.; Gordea, S.: Linking subject labels in cultural heritage metadata to MIMO vocabulary using CultuurLink (2016)
0.00
0.0037292899 = product of:
0.022375738 = sum of:
0.022375738 = product of:
0.044751476 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
-
Summers, E.; Isaac, A.; Redding, C.; Krech, D.: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data (2008)
0.00
0.0030854037 = product of:
0.018512422 = sum of:
0.018512422 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Hennicke, S.; Olensky, M.; Boer, V. de; Isaac, A.; Wielemaker, J.: ¬A data model for cross-domain data representation : the "Europeana Data Model" in the case of archival and museum data (2010)
0.00
0.0026686378 = product of:
0.016011827 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 4664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=4664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 11. 8.2011 21:10:29
-
Isaac, A.; Raemy, J.A.; Meijers, E.; Valk, S. De; Freire, N.: Metadata aggregation via linked data : results of the Europeana Common Culture project (2020)
0.00
0.0026686378 = product of:
0.016011827 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 11:29:00
