Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, J."
  1. Zhang, C.; Zeng, D.; Li, J.; Wang, F.-Y.; Zuo, W.: Sentiment analysis of Chinese documents : from sentence to document level (2009) 0.01
    0.012309102 = product of:
      0.036927305 = sum of:
        0.016011827 = product of:
          0.032023653 = sum of:
            0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032023653 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020915478 = product of:
          0.041830957 = sum of:
            0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041830957 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    User-generated content on the Web has become an extremely valuable source for mining and analyzing user opinions on any topic. Recent years have seen an increasing body of work investigating methods to recognize favorable and unfavorable sentiments toward specific subjects from online text. However, most of these efforts focus on English and there have been very few studies on sentiment analysis of Chinese content. This paper aims to address the unique challenges posed by Chinese sentiment analysis. We propose a rule-based approach including two phases: (1) determining each sentence's sentiment based on word dependency, and (2) aggregating sentences to predict the document sentiment. We report the results of an experimental study comparing our approach with three machine learning-based approaches using two sets of Chinese articles. These results illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed method and its advantages against learning-based approaches.
    Date
    2. 2.2010 19:29:56
  2. Wu, S.; Li, J.; Zeng, X.; Bi, Y.: Adaptive data fusion methods in information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.009093864 = product of:
      0.05456318 = sum of:
        0.05456318 = product of:
          0.10912636 = sum of:
            0.10912636 = weight(_text_:methods in 1500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10912636 = score(doc=1500,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.6952785 = fieldWeight in 1500, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Data fusion is currently used extensively in information retrieval for various tasks. It has proved to be a useful technology because it is able to improve retrieval performance frequently. However, in almost all prior research in data fusion, static search environments have been used, and dynamic search environments have generally not been considered. In this article, we investigate adaptive data fusion methods that can change their behavior when the search environment changes. Three adaptive data fusion methods are proposed and investigated. To test these proposed methods properly, we generate a benchmark from a historic Text REtrieval Conference data set. Experiments with the benchmark show that 2 of the proposed methods are good and may potentially be used in practice.
  3. Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, H.: Kernel-based learning for biomedical relation extraction (2008) 0.00
    0.0034859132 = product of:
      0.020915478 = sum of:
        0.020915478 = product of:
          0.041830957 = sum of:
            0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 1611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041830957 = score(doc=1611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 1611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Relation extraction is the process of scanning text for relationships between named entities. Recently, significant studies have focused on automatically extracting relations from biomedical corpora. Most existing biomedical relation extractors require manual creation of biomedical lexicons or parsing templates based on domain knowledge. In this study, we propose to use kernel-based learning methods to automatically extract biomedical relations from literature text. We develop a framework of kernel-based learning for biomedical relation extraction. In particular, we modified the standard tree kernel function by incorporating a trace kernel to capture richer contextual information. In our experiments on a biomedical corpus, we compare different kernel functions for biomedical relation detection and classification. The experimental results show that a tree kernel outperforms word and sequence kernels for relation detection, our trace-tree kernel outperforms the standard tree kernel, and a composite kernel outperforms individual kernels for relation extraction.
  4. Du, Q.; Li, J.; Du, Y.; Wang, G.A.; Fan, W.: Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences (2021) 0.00
    0.0034859132 = product of:
      0.020915478 = sum of:
        0.020915478 = product of:
          0.041830957 = sum of:
            0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041830957 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Project success is critical in the crowdfunding domain. Rather than the existing project-centric prediction methods, we propose a novel backer-centric prediction method. We identify each backer's preferences based on their pledge history and calculate the cosine similarity between backer's preferences and the project as each backer's persuasibility. Finally, we aggregate all the backers' persuasibility to predict project success. To validate our method, we crawled data on 183,886 projects launched during or before December 2014 on Kickstarter, a crowdfunding website. We selected 4,922 backers with a total of 442,793 pledges to identify backers' preferences. The results show that a backer is more likely to be persuaded by a project that is more similar to the backer's preferences. Our findings not only demonstrate the efficacy of backers' pledge history for predicting crowdfunding project success but also verify that a backer-centric method can supplement the existing project-centric approaches. Our model and findings enable crowdfunding platform agencies, fund-seeking entrepreneurs, and investors to predict the success of a crowdfunding project.
  5. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.00
    0.0031167285 = product of:
      0.01870037 = sum of:
        0.01870037 = product of:
          0.03740074 = sum of:
            0.03740074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03740074 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  6. Li, J.; Wu, G.: Characteristics of reference transactions : challenges to librarian's roles (1998) 0.00
    0.003113411 = product of:
      0.018680464 = sum of:
        0.018680464 = product of:
          0.03736093 = sum of:
            0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736093 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    16. 3.1999 9:17:29
  7. Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008) 0.00
    0.0030854037 = product of:
      0.018512422 = sum of:
        0.018512422 = product of:
          0.037024844 = sum of:
            0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037024844 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  8. Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017) 0.00
    0.0026686378 = product of:
      0.016011827 = sum of:
        0.016011827 = product of:
          0.032023653 = sum of:
            0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032023653 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:52
  9. Xie, Z.; Ouyang, Z.; Li, J.; Dong, E.: Modelling transition phenomena of scientific coauthorship networks (2018) 0.00
    0.0026686378 = product of:
      0.016011827 = sum of:
        0.016011827 = product of:
          0.032023653 = sum of:
            0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 4043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032023653 = score(doc=4043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    14. 1.2018 17:03:29
  10. Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016) 0.00
    0.0026446318 = product of:
      0.01586779 = sum of:
        0.01586779 = product of:
          0.03173558 = sum of:
            0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03173558 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:13:32
  11. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.00
    0.0022238651 = product of:
      0.01334319 = sum of:
        0.01334319 = product of:
          0.02668638 = sum of:
            0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02668638 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2018 13:24:10
  12. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.00
    0.0022038599 = product of:
      0.013223159 = sum of:
        0.013223159 = product of:
          0.026446318 = sum of:
            0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026446318 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37