Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  1. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.012261091 = product of:
      0.07356654 = sum of:
        0.07356654 = sum of:
          0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041830957 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03173558 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this research, we aim to identify factors that significantly affect the clickthrough of Web searchers. Our underlying goal is determine more efficient methods to optimize the clickthrough rate. We devise a clickthrough metric for measuring customer satisfaction of search engine results using the number of links visited, number of queries a user submits, and rank of clicked links. We use a neural network to detect the significant influence of searching characteristics on future user clickthrough. Our results show that high occurrences of query reformulation, lengthy searching duration, longer query length, and the higher ranking of prior clicked links correlate positively with future clickthrough. We provide recommendations for leveraging these findings for improving the performance of search engine retrieval and result ranking, along with implications for search engine marketing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  2. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Regions and levels : Measuring and mapping users' relevance judgements (2001) 0.01
    0.010663213 = product of:
      0.063979276 = sum of:
        0.063979276 = sum of:
          0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037292898 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
          0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02668638 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The dichotomous bipolar approach to relevance has produced an abundance of information retrieval (M) research. However, relevance studies that include consideration of users' partial relevance judgments are moving to a greater relevance clarity and congruity to impact the design of more effective [R systems. The study reported in this paper investigates the various regions of across a distribution of users' relevance judgments, including how these regions may be categorized, measured, and evaluated. An instrument was designed using four scales for collecting, measuring, and describing enduser relevance judgments. The instrument was administered to 21 end-users who conducted searches on their own information problems and made relevance judgments on a total of 1059 retrieved items. Findings include: (1) overlapping regions of relevance were found to impact the usefulness of precision ratios as a measure of IR system effectiveness, (2) both positive and negative levels of relevance are important to users as they make relevance judgments, (3) topicality was used more to reject rather than accept items as highly relevant, (4) utility was more used to judge items highly relevant, and (5) the nature of relevance judgment distribution suggested a new IR evaluation measure-median effect. Findings suggest that the middle region of a distribution of relevance judgments, also called "partial relevance," represents a key avenue for ongoing study. The findings provide implications for relevance theory, and the evaluation of IR systems
    Date
    29. 9.2001 13:59:20
  3. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Blakely, C.; Koshman, S.: Defining a session on Web search engines (2007) 0.01
    0.0050314823 = product of:
      0.030188894 = sum of:
        0.030188894 = product of:
          0.060377788 = sum of:
            0.060377788 = weight(_text_:methods in 285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060377788 = score(doc=285,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.384686 = fieldWeight in 285, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=285)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Detecting query reformulations within a session by a Web searcher is an important area of research for designing more helpful searching systems and targeting content to particular users. Methods explored by other researchers include both qualitative (i.e., the use of human judges to manually analyze query patterns on usually small samples) and nondeterministic algorithms, typically using large amounts of training data to predict query modification during sessions. In this article, we explore three alternative methods for detection of session boundaries. All three methods are computationally straightforward and therefore easily implemented for detection of session changes. We examine 2,465,145 interactions from 534,507 users of Dogpile.com on May 6, 2005. We compare session analysis using (a) Internet Protocol address and cookie; (b) Internet Protocol address, cookie, and a temporal limit on intrasession interactions; and (c) Internet Protocol address, cookie, and query reformulation patterns. Overall, our analysis shows that defining sessions by query reformulation along with Internet Protocol address and cookie provides the best measure, resulting in an 82% increase in the count of sessions. Regardless of the method used, the mean session length was fewer than three queries, and the mean session duration was less than 30 min. Searchers most often modified their query by changing query terms (nearly 23% of all query modifications) rather than adding or deleting terms. Implications are that for measuring searching traffic, unique sessions may be a better indicator than the common metric of unique visitors. This research also sheds light on the more complex aspects of Web searching involving query modifications and may lead to advances in searching tools.
  4. Tjondronegoro, D.; Spink, A.: Web search engine multimedia functionality (2008) 0.00
    0.004929826 = product of:
      0.029578956 = sum of:
        0.029578956 = product of:
          0.05915791 = sum of:
            0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05915791 = score(doc=2038,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Web search engines are beginning to offer access to multimedia searching, including audio, video and image searching. In this paper we report findings from a study examining the state of multimedia search functionality on major general and specialized Web search engines. We investigated 102 Web search engines to examine: (1) how many Web search engines offer multimedia searching, (2) the type of multimedia search functionality and methods offered, such as "query by example", and (3) the supports for personalization or customization which are accessible as advanced search. Findings include: (1) few major Web search engines offer multimedia searching and (2) multimedia Web search functionality is generally limited. Our findings show that despite the increasing level of interest in multimedia Web search, those few Web search engines offering multimedia Web search, provide limited multimedia search functionality. Keywords are still the only means of multimedia retrieval, while other methods such as "query by example" are offered by less than 1% of Web search engines examined.
  5. Spink, A.: Interactive information seeking and retrieving : a third feedback framework (1996) 0.00
    0.0046478845 = product of:
      0.027887305 = sum of:
        0.027887305 = product of:
          0.05577461 = sum of:
            0.05577461 = weight(_text_:methods in 7433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05577461 = score(doc=7433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 7433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information science is beginning to explore feedback as a key concept within information seeking and retrieving methods. Feedback has been a fundamental element in mmany cybernetic and social models. Gives an overview of feedback within the cybernetics and social frameworks. Compares these feedback concepts with the interactive feedback concept evolving within the framework of information seeking and retrieving, based on their conceptualization of the feedback loop and notion of information
  6. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Human information behavior : integrating diverse approaches and information use (2006) 0.00
    0.00439501 = product of:
      0.02637006 = sum of:
        0.02637006 = product of:
          0.05274012 = sum of:
            0.05274012 = weight(_text_:theory in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05274012 = score(doc=4915,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    For millennia humans have sought, organized, and used information as they learned and evolved patterns of human information behaviors to resolve their human problems and survive. However, despite the current focus an living in an "information age," we have a limited evolutionary understanding of human information behavior. In this article the authors examine the current three interdisciplinary approaches to conceptualizing how humans have sought information including (a) the everyday life information seeking-sense-making approach, (b) the information foraging approach, and (c) the problem-solution perspective an information seeking approach. In addition, due to the lack of clarity regarding the rote of information use in information behavior, a fourth information approach is provided based an a theory of information use. The use theory proposed starts from an evolutionary psychology notion that humans are able to adapt to their environment and survive because of our modular cognitive architecture. Finally, the authors begin the process of conceptualizing these diverse approaches, and the various aspects or elements of these approaches, within an integrated model with consideration of information use. An initial integrated model of these different approaches with information use is proposed.
  7. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Koshman, S.: Factors affecting assigned information problem ordering during Web search : an exploratory study (2006) 0.00
    0.0037292899 = product of:
      0.022375738 = sum of:
        0.022375738 = product of:
          0.044751476 = sum of:
            0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044751476 = score(doc=991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=991)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Multitasking is the human ability to handle the demands of multiple tasks. Multitasking behavior involves the ordering of multiple tasks and switching between tasks. People often multitask when using information retrieval (IR) technologies as they seek information on more than one information problem over single or multiple search episodes. However, limited studies have examined how people order their information problems, especially during their Web search engine interaction. The aim of our exploratory study was to investigate assigned information problem ordering by forty (40) study participants engaged in Web search. Findings suggest that assigned information problem ordering was influenced by the following factors, including personal interest, problem knowledge, perceived level of information available on the Web, ease of finding information, level of importance and seeking information on information problems in order from general to specific. Personal interest and problem knowledge were the major factors during assigned information problem ordering. Implications of the findings and further research are discussed. The relationship between information problem ordering and gratification theory is an important area for further exploration.
  8. Ozmutlu, S.; Spink, A.; Ozmutlu, H.C.: ¬A day in the life of Web searching : an exploratory study (2004) 0.00
    0.003113411 = product of:
      0.018680464 = sum of:
        0.018680464 = product of:
          0.03736093 = sum of:
            0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 2530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736093 = score(doc=2530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    15. 8.2004 12:00:29
  9. Koshman, S.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching on the Vivisimo search engine (2006) 0.00
    0.0029049278 = product of:
      0.017429566 = sum of:
        0.017429566 = product of:
          0.034859132 = sum of:
            0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034859132 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The application of clustering to Web search engine technology is a novel approach that offers structure to the information deluge often faced by Web searchers. Clustering methods have been well studied in research labs; however, real user searching with clustering systems in operational Web environments is not well understood. This article reports on results from a transaction log analysis of Vivisimo.com, which is a Web meta-search engine that dynamically clusters users' search results. A transaction log analysis was conducted on 2-week's worth of data collected from March 28 to April 4 and April 25 to May 2, 2004, representing 100% of site traffic during these periods and 2,029,734 queries overall. The results show that the highest percentage of queries contained two terms. The highest percentage of search sessions contained one query and was less than 1 minute in duration. Almost half of user interactions with clusters consisted of displaying a cluster's result set, and a small percentage of interactions showed cluster tree expansion. Findings show that 11.1% of search sessions were multitasking searches, and there are a broad variety of search topics in multitasking search sessions. Other searching interactions and statistics on repeat users of the search engine are reported. These results provide insights into search characteristics with a cluster-based Web search engine and extend research into Web searching trends.
  10. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Pedersen, J.: ¬A temporal comparison of AItaVista Web searching (2005) 0.00
    0.0026686378 = product of:
      0.016011827 = sum of:
        0.016011827 = product of:
          0.032023653 = sum of:
            0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 3454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032023653 = score(doc=3454,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3454, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3454)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    3. 6.2005 19:29:59
  11. Spink, A.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Ellis, D.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 3: successive searching (2002) 0.00
    0.0022238651 = product of:
      0.01334319 = sum of:
        0.01334319 = product of:
          0.02668638 = sum of:
            0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02668638 = score(doc=5242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:29:18
  12. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Koshman, S.: Web searcher interaction with the Dogpile.com metasearch engine (2007) 0.00
    0.0022238651 = product of:
      0.01334319 = sum of:
        0.01334319 = product of:
          0.02668638 = sum of:
            0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02668638 = score(doc=270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 4.2007 21:12:02
  13. Spink, A.; Wilson, T.; Ellis, D.; Ford, N.: Modeling users' successive searches in digital environments : a National Science Foundation/British Library funded study (1998) 0.00
    0.0020334495 = product of:
      0.012200696 = sum of:
        0.012200696 = product of:
          0.024401393 = sum of:
            0.024401393 = weight(_text_:methods in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024401393 = score(doc=1255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.15546899 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    As digital libraries become a major source of information for many people, we need to know more about how people seek and retrieve information in digital environments. Quite commonly, users with a problem-at-hand and associated question-in-mind repeatedly search a literature for answers, and seek information in stages over extended periods from a variety of digital information resources. The process of repeatedly searching over time in relation to a specific, but possibly an evolving information problem (including changes or shifts in a variety of variables), is called the successive search phenomenon. The study outlined in this paper is currently investigating this new and little explored line of inquiry for information retrieval, Web searching, and digital libraries. The purpose of the research project is to investigate the nature, manifestations, and behavior of successive searching by users in digital environments, and to derive criteria for use in the design of information retrieval interfaces and systems supporting successive searching behavior. This study includes two related projects. The first project is based in the School of Library and Information Sciences at the University of North Texas and is funded by a National Science Foundation POWRE Grant <http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/show?award=9753277>. The second project is based at the Department of Information Studies at the University of Sheffield (UK) and is funded by a grant from the British Library <http://www.shef. ac.uk/~is/research/imrg/uncerty.html> Research and Innovation Center. The broad objectives of each project are to examine the nature and extent of successive search episodes in digital environments by real users over time. The specific aim of the current project is twofold: * To characterize progressive changes and shifts that occur in: user situational context; user information problem; uncertainty reduction; user cognitive styles; cognitive and affective states of the user, and consequently in their queries; and * To characterize related changes over time in the type and use of information resources and search strategies particularly related to given capabilities of IR systems, and IR search engines, and examine changes in users' relevance judgments and criteria, and characterize their differences. The study is an observational, longitudinal data collection in the U.S. and U.K. Three questionnaires are used to collect data: reference, client post search and searcher post search questionnaires. Each successive search episode with a search intermediary for textual materials on the DIALOG Information Service is audiotaped and search transaction logs are recorded. Quantitative analysis includes statistical analysis using Likert scale data from the questionnaires and log-linear analysis of sequential data. Qualitative methods include: content analysis, structuring taxonomies; and diagrams to describe shifts and transitions within and between each search episode. Outcomes of the study are the development of appropriate model(s) for IR interactions in successive search episodes and the derivation of a set of design criteria for interfaces and systems supporting successive searching.
  14. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: ¬A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval (2005) 0.00
    0.0017630879 = product of:
      0.010578527 = sum of:
        0.010578527 = product of:
          0.021157054 = sum of:
            0.021157054 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021157054 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    19. 1.2007 12:55:22