Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tennis, J.T."
  1. Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016) 0.02
    0.021180402 = product of:
      0.12708241 = sum of:
        0.12708241 = sum of:
          0.084384196 = weight(_text_:theory in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084384196 = score(doc=4889,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04269821 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  2. Tennis, J.T.: Foundational, first-order, and second-order classification theory (2015) 0.01
    0.010548024 = product of:
      0.063288145 = sum of:
        0.063288145 = product of:
          0.12657629 = sum of:
            0.12657629 = weight(_text_:theory in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12657629 = score(doc=2204,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.7796986 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Both basic and applied research on the construction, implementation, maintenance, and evaluation of classification schemes is called classification theory. If we employ Ritzer's metatheoretical method of analysis on the over one-hundred year-old body of literature, we can se categories of theory emerge. This paper looks at one particular part of knowledge organization work, namely classification theory, and asks 1) what are the contours of this intellectual space, and, 2) what have we produced in the theoretical reflection on constructing, implementing, and evaluating classification schemes? The preliminary findings from this work are that classification theory can be separated into three kinds: foundational classification theory, first-order classification theory, and second-order classification theory, each with its own concerns and objects of study.
  3. Tennis, J.T.: Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization : toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework (2008) 0.01
    0.0070320163 = product of:
      0.042192098 = sum of:
        0.042192098 = product of:
          0.084384196 = sum of:
            0.084384196 = weight(_text_:theory in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084384196 = score(doc=2132,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a preliminary classification of knowledge organization research, divided among epistemology, theory, and methodology plus three sphere of research: design, study, and critique. This work is situated in a metatheoretical framework, drawn from sociological thought. Example works are presented along with preliminary classification. The classification is then briefly described as a comparison tool which can be used to demonstrate overlap and divergence in cognate discourses of knowledge organization (such as ontology engineering).
  4. Tennis, J.T.: Four orders of classification theory and their implications (2018) 0.01
    0.0070320163 = product of:
      0.042192098 = sum of:
        0.042192098 = product of:
          0.084384196 = sum of:
            0.084384196 = weight(_text_:theory in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084384196 = score(doc=5264,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an interpretation of the structure of classification theory literature, from the late 19th Century to the present, by dividing it into four orders, and then describes the relationship between that and manuals for classification design.
  5. Tennis, J.T.; Jacob, E.K.: Toward a theory of structure in information organization frameworks (2008) 0.01
    0.0061530145 = product of:
      0.036918085 = sum of:
        0.036918085 = product of:
          0.07383617 = sum of:
            0.07383617 = weight(_text_:theory in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07383617 = score(doc=2251,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    This paper outlines a formal and systematic approach to explication of the role of structure in information organization. It presents a preliminary set of constructs that are useful for understanding the similarities and differences that obtain across information organization systems. This work seeks to provide necessary groundwork for development of a theory of structure that can serve as a lens through which to observe patterns across systems of information organization.
  6. Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002) 0.01
    0.0053372756 = product of:
      0.032023653 = sum of:
        0.032023653 = product of:
          0.06404731 = sum of:
            0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06404731 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.234-235
  7. Tennis, J.T.: Experientialist epistemology and classification theory : embodied and dimensional classification (2005) 0.01
    0.005274012 = product of:
      0.031644072 = sum of:
        0.031644072 = product of:
          0.063288145 = sum of:
            0.063288145 = weight(_text_:theory in 5038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063288145 = score(doc=5038,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 5038, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    What theoretical framework can help in building, maintaining and evaluating networked knowledge organization resources? Specifically, what theoretical framework makes sense of the semantic prowess of ontologies and peer-to-peer systems, and by extension aids in their building, maintenance, and evaluation? I posit that a theoretical work that weds both formal and associative (structurel and interpretive) aspects of knowledge organization systems provides that framework. Here I lay out the terms and the intellectual constructs that serve as the foundation for investigative work into experientialist classification theory, a theoretical framework of embodied, infrastructural, and reified knowledge organization. I build an the interpretive work of scholars in information studies, cognitive semantics, sociology, and science studies. With the terms and the framework in place, I then outline classification theory's critiques of classificatory structures. In order to address these critiques with an experientialist approach an experientialist semantics is offered as a design commitment for an example: metadata in peer-to-peer network knowledge organization structures.
  8. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Tennis, J.T.: Constant pioneers : the citation frontiers of indexing theory in the ISKO international proceedings (2012) 0.00
    0.0049723866 = product of:
      0.029834319 = sum of:
        0.029834319 = product of:
          0.059668638 = sum of:
            0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059668638 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  9. Tennis, J.T.: Is there a new bbliography? (2011) 0.00
    0.0049723866 = product of:
      0.029834319 = sum of:
        0.029834319 = product of:
          0.059668638 = sum of:
            0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059668638 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the position claiming that the contemporary technological, socio-political, and socio-economic environment gives us pause to consider the core theory and practices of bibliography, combining bibliography of the work (in library and information science), bibliography of the text (in textual studies and scholarly editing), and bibliography of the artifact (in book history and now digital forensics), and calls for collaborative multidisciplinary research at the intersection of these fields to ask, is there a new bibliography?
  10. Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017) 0.00
    0.00439501 = product of:
      0.02637006 = sum of:
        0.02637006 = product of:
          0.05274012 = sum of:
            0.05274012 = weight(_text_:theory in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05274012 = score(doc=5800,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
  11. Tennis, J.T.: URIS and intertextuality : incumbent philosophical commitments in the development of the semantic web (2004) 0.00
    0.003558184 = product of:
      0.021349104 = sum of:
        0.021349104 = product of:
          0.04269821 = sum of:
            0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04269821 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 10:19:44
  12. Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006) 0.00
    0.003558184 = product of:
      0.021349104 = sum of:
        0.021349104 = product of:
          0.04269821 = sum of:
            0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04269821 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 10:14:29
  13. Tennis, J.T.: Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization : toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization (2013) 0.00
    0.0035261759 = product of:
      0.021157054 = sum of:
        0.021157054 = product of:
          0.04231411 = sum of:
            0.04231411 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04231411 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:54:49
  14. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.00
    0.0035261759 = product of:
      0.021157054 = sum of:
        0.021157054 = product of:
          0.04231411 = sum of:
            0.04231411 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04231411 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  15. Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks (2006) 0.00
    0.0034859132 = product of:
      0.020915478 = sum of:
        0.020915478 = product of:
          0.041830957 = sum of:
            0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041830957 = score(doc=2520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the purposes, predications, functions, and contexts of information organization frameworks; including: bibliographic control, information retrieval, resource discovery, resource description, open access scholarly indexing, personal information management protocols, and social tagging in order to compare and contrast those purposes, predications, functions, and contexts. Information organization frameworks, for the purpose of this paper, consist of information organization systems (classification schemes, taxonomies, ontologies, bibliographic descriptions, etc.), methods of conceiving of and creating the systems, and the work processes involved in maintaining these systems. The paper first outlines the theoretical literature of these information organization frameworks. In conclusion, this paper establishes the first part of an evaluation rubric for a function, predication, purpose, and context analysis.
  16. Tennis, J.T.: Load Bearing or Levittown? : the edifice metaphor in conceptualizing the ethos of classification work (2014) 0.00
    0.0030854037 = product of:
      0.018512422 = sum of:
        0.018512422 = product of:
          0.037024844 = sum of:
            0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037024844 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Tennis, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability : Dublin core audience element (2003) 0.00
    0.0022238651 = product of:
      0.01334319 = sum of:
        0.01334319 = product of:
          0.02668638 = sum of:
            0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02668638 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.20-23