Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"ST 515"
  1. Weller, K.: Knowledge representation in the Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.01
    0.010219913 = product of:
      0.030659739 = sum of:
        0.018459043 = product of:
          0.036918085 = sum of:
            0.036918085 = weight(_text_:theory in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036918085 = score(doc=4515,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.22741209 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012200696 = product of:
          0.024401393 = sum of:
            0.024401393 = weight(_text_:methods in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024401393 = score(doc=4515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.15546899 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of this book is to sum up the vital and highly topical research issue of knowledge representation on the Web and to discuss novel solutions by combining benefits of folksonomies and Web 2.0 approaches with ontologies and semantic technologies. This book contains an overview of knowledge representation approaches in past, present and future, introduction to ontologies, Web indexing and in first case the novel approaches of developing ontologies. This title combines aspects of knowledge representation for both the Semantic Web (ontologies) and the Web 2.0 (folksonomies). Currently there is no monographic book which provides a combined overview over these topics. focus on the topic of using knowledge representation methods for document indexing purposes. For this purpose, considerations from classical librarian interests in knowledge representation (thesauri, classification schemes etc.) are included, which are not part of most other books which have a stronger background in computer science.
    LCSH
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Subject
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
  2. Cultural frames of knowledge (2012) 0.00
    0.0043508383 = product of:
      0.026105028 = sum of:
        0.026105028 = product of:
          0.052210055 = sum of:
            0.052210055 = weight(_text_:theory in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052210055 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Ch. 1. Introduction: theory, knowledge organization, epistemology, culture -- ch. 3. Praxes of knowledge organization in the first Chinese library catalog, the Seven epitomes -- ch. 4. Feminist epistemologies and knowledge organization -- ch. 5. Problems and characteristics of Foucauldian discourse analysis as a research method -- ch. 6. Epistemology of domain analysis -- ch. 8. Rethinking genre in knowledge organization through a functional unit taxonomy -- Conclusions: Toward multicultural domain plurality in knowledge organization
  3. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.: ¬The science of managing our digital stuff (2016) 0.00
    0.0032865505 = product of:
      0.019719303 = sum of:
        0.019719303 = product of:
          0.039438605 = sum of:
            0.039438605 = weight(_text_:methods in 3971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039438605 = score(doc=3971,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.25127584 = fieldWeight in 3971, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Bergman and Whittaker report that many of us use hierarchical folders for our personal digital organizing. Critics of this method point out that information is hidden from sight in folders that are often within other folders so that we have to remember the exact location of information to access it. Because of this, information scientists suggest other methods: search, more flexible than navigating folders; tags, which allow multiple categorizations; and group information management. Yet Bergman and Whittaker have found in their pioneering PIM research that these other methods that work best for public information management don't work as well for personal information management. Bergman and Whittaker describe personal information collection as curation: we preserve and organize this data to ensure our future access to it. Unlike other information management fields, in PIM the same user organizes and retrieves the information. After explaining the cognitive and psychological reasons that so many prefer folders, Bergman and Whittaker propose the user-subjective approach to PIM, which does not replace folder hierarchies but exploits these unique characteristics of PIM.
  4. Manning, C.D.; Raghavan, P.; Schütze, H.: Introduction to information retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.0024861933 = product of:
      0.014917159 = sum of:
        0.014917159 = product of:
          0.029834319 = sum of:
            0.029834319 = weight(_text_:theory in 4041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029834319 = score(doc=4041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.18377672 = fieldWeight in 4041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4041)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Class-tested and coherent, this textbook teaches information retrieval, including web search, text classification, and text clustering from basic concepts. Ideas are explained using examples and figures, making it perfect for introductory courses in information retrieval for advanced undergraduates and graduate students. Slides and additional exercises are available for lecturers. - This book provides what Salton and Van Rijsbergen both failed to achieve. Even more important, unlike some other books in IR, the authors appear to care about making the theory as accessible as possible to the reader, on occasion including short primers to certain topics or choosing to explain difficult concepts using simplified approaches. Its coverage [is] excellent, the quality of writing high and I was surprised how much I learned from reading it. I think the online resources are impressive.
  5. Marchionini, G.: Information concepts : from books to cyberspace identities (2010) 0.00
    0.0024861933 = product of:
      0.014917159 = sum of:
        0.014917159 = product of:
          0.029834319 = sum of:
            0.029834319 = weight(_text_:theory in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029834319 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.18377672 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information is essential to all human activity, and information in electronic form both amplifies and augments human information interactions. This lecture surveys some of the different classical meanings of information, focuses on the ways that electronic technologies are affecting how we think about these senses of information, and introduces an emerging sense of information that has implications for how we work, play, and interact with others. The evolutions of computers and electronic networks and people's uses and adaptations of these tools manifesting a dynamic space called cyberspace. Our traces of activity in cyberspace give rise to a new sense of information as instantaneous identity states that I term proflection of self. Proflections of self influence how others act toward us. Four classical senses of information are described as context for this new form of information. The four senses selected for inclusion here are the following: thought and memory, communication process, artifact, and energy. Human mental activity and state (thought and memory) have neurological, cognitive, and affective facets.The act of informing (communication process) is considered from the perspective of human intentionality and technical developments that have dramatically amplified human communication capabilities. Information artifacts comprise a common sense of information that gives rise to a variety of information industries. Energy is the most general sense of information and is considered from the point of view of physical, mental, and social state change. This sense includes information theory as a measurable reduction in uncertainty. This lecture emphasizes how electronic representations have blurred media boundaries and added computational behaviors that yield new forms of information interaction, which, in turn, are stored, aggregated, and mined to create profiles that represent our cyber identities.
  6. Weinberger, D.: Too big to know : rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren't the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room (2011) 0.00
    0.0020334495 = product of:
      0.012200696 = sum of:
        0.012200696 = product of:
          0.024401393 = sum of:
            0.024401393 = weight(_text_:methods in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024401393 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.15546899 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this title, a leading philosopher of the internet explains how knowledge and expertise can still work - and even grow stronger - in an age when the internet has made topics simply Too Big to Know. Knowing used to be so straightforward. If we wanted to know something we looked it up, asked an expert, gathered the facts, weighted the possibilities, and honed in on the best answer ourselves. But, ironically, with the advent of the internet and the limitless information it contains, we're less sure about what we know, who knows what, or even what it means to know at all. Knowledge, it would appear, is in crisis. And yet, while its very foundations seem to be collapsing, human knowledge has grown in previously unimaginable ways, and in inconceivable directions, in the Internet age. We fact-check the news media more closely and publicly than ever before. Science is advancing at an unheard of pace thanks to new collaborative techniques and new ways to find patterns in vast amounts of data. Businesses are finding expertise in every corner of their organization, and across the broad swath of their stakeholders. We are in a crisis of knowledge at the same time that we are in an epochal exaltation of knowledge. In "Too Big to Know", Internet philosopher David Weinberger explains that, rather than a systemic collapse, the Internet era represents a fundamental change in the methods we have for understanding the world around us. Weinberger argues that our notions of expertise - what it is, how it works, and how it is cultivated - are out of date, rooted in our pre-networked culture and assumptions. For thousands of years, we've relied upon a reductionist process of filtering, winnowing, and otherwise reducing the complex world to something more manageable in order to understand it. Back then, an expert was someone who had mastered a particular, well-defined domain. Now, we live in an age when topics are blown apart and stitched together by momentary interests, diverse points of view, and connections ranging from the insightful to the perverse. Weinberger shows that, while the limits of our own paper-based tools have historically prevented us from achieving our full capacity of knowledge, we can now be as smart as our new medium allows - but we will be smart differently. For the new medium is a network, and that network changes our oldest, most basic strategy of knowing. Rather than knowing-by-reducing, we are now knowing-by-including. Indeed, knowledge now is best thought of not as the content of books or even of minds, but as the way the network works. Knowledge will never be the same - not for science, not for business, not for education, not for government, not for any of us. As Weinberger makes clear, to make sense of this new system of knowledge, we need - and smart companies are developing - networks that are themselves experts. Full of rich and sometimes surprising examples from history, politics, business, philosophy, and science, "Too Big to Know" describes how the very foundations of knowledge have been overturned, and what this revolution means for our future.

Types