Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.02075103 = product of:
  0.062253084 = sum of:
    0.051674556 = product of:
      0.10334911 = sum of:
        0.10334911 = weight(_text_:theory in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10334911 = score(doc=2258,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.63662124 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010578527 = product of:
      0.021157054 = sum of:
        0.021157054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021157054 = score(doc=2258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This book brings together contemporary facet theory research to propose mapping sentences as a new way of understanding complex behavior, and suggests future directions the approach may take. How do we think about the worlds we live in? The formation of categories of events and objects seems to be a fundamental orientation procedure. Facet theory and its main tool, the mapping sentence, deal with categories of behavior and experience, their interrelationship, and their unification as our worldviews. In this book Hackett reviews philosophical writing along with neuroscientific research and information form other disciplines to provide a context for facet theory and the qualitative developments in this approach. With a variety of examples, the author proposes mapping sentences as a new way of understanding and defining complex behavior.

Content

1 Introduction; 2 Ontological Categorisation and Mereology; Human assessment; Categories and the properties of experiential events; Mathematical, computing, artificial intelligence and library classification approaches; Sociological approaches; Psychological approaches; Personal Construct Theory; Philosophical approaches to categories; Mereology: facet theory and relationships between categories; Neuroscience and categories; Conclusions; 3 Facet Theory and Thinking about Human Behaviour Generating knowledge in facet theory: a brief overviewWhat is facet theory?; Facets and facet elements; The mapping sentence; Designing a mapping sentence; Narrative; Roles that facets play; Single-facet structures: axial role and modular role; Polar role; Circumplex; Two-facet structures; Radex; Three-facet structures; Cylindrex; Analysing facet theory research; Conclusions; 4 Evolving Facet Theory Applications; The evolution of facet theory; Mapping a domain: the mapping sentence as a stand-alone approach and integrative tool; Making and understanding fine art; Defining the grid: a mapping sentence for grid imagesFacet sort-technique; Facet mapping therapy: using the mapping sentence and the facet structures to explore client issues; Research program coordination; Conclusions and Future Directions; Glossary of Terms; Bibliography; Index

Date

17.10.2015 17:22:01

0.006397928 = product of:
  0.038387567 = sum of:
    0.038387567 = sum of:
      0.022375738 = weight(_text_:theory in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.022375738 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.13783254 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.016011827 = weight(_text_:29 in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016011827 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Metadata in the Digital Library is a complete guide to building a digital library metadata strategy from scratch, using established metadata standards bound together by the markup language XML. The book introduces the reader to the theory of metadata and shows how it can be applied in practice. It lays out the basic principles that should underlie any metadata strategy, including its relation to such fundamentals as the digital curation lifecycle, and demonstrates how they should be put into effect. It introduces the XML language and the key standards for each type of metadata, including Dublin Core and MODS for descriptive metadata and PREMIS for its administrative and preservation counterpart. Finally, the book shows how these can all be integrated using the packaging standard METS. Two case studies from the Warburg Institute in London show how the strategy can be implemented in a working environment. The strategy laid out in this book will ensure that a digital library's metadata will support all of its operations, be fully interoperable with others and enable its long-term preservation. It assumes no prior knowledge of metadata, XML or any of the standards that it covers. It provides both an introduction to best practices in digital library metadata and a manual for their practical implementation.

Date

29. 9.2022 17:57:57

0.0031077415 = product of:
  0.018646449 = sum of:
    0.018646449 = product of:
      0.037292898 = sum of:
        0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037292898 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing demand for research evaluation within universities and other research-based organisations. In parallel, there has been an increasing recognition that traditional citation-based indicators are not able to reflect the societal impacts of research and are slow to appear. This has led to the creation of new indicators for different types of research impact as well as timelier indicators, mainly derived from the Web. These indicators have been called altmetrics, webometrics or just web metrics. This book describes and evaluates a range of web indicators for aspects of societal or scholarly impact, discusses the theory and practice of using and evaluating web indicators for research assessment and outlines practical strategies for obtaining many web indicators. In addition to describing impact indicators for traditional scholarly outputs, such as journal articles and monographs, it also covers indicators for videos, datasets, software and other non-standard scholarly outputs. The book describes strategies to analyse web indicators for individual publications as well as to compare the impacts of groups of publications. The practical part of the book includes descriptions of how to use the free software Webometric Analyst to gather and analyse web data. This book is written for information science undergraduate and Master?s students that are learning about alternative indicators or scientometrics as well as Ph.D. students and other researchers and practitioners using indicators to help assess research impact or to study scholarly communication.