-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.03
0.03320545 = product of:
0.09961635 = sum of:
0.019377958 = product of:
0.038755916 = sum of:
0.038755916 = weight(_text_:theory in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038755916 = score(doc=2072,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23873296 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08023839 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023839 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31039283 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- LCSH
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
- Subject
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
-
Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008)
0.01
0.014872484 = product of:
0.04461745 = sum of:
0.026105028 = product of:
0.052210055 = sum of:
0.052210055 = weight(_text_:theory in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052210055 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018512422 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.01
0.014872484 = product of:
0.04461745 = sum of:
0.026105028 = product of:
0.052210055 = sum of:
0.052210055 = weight(_text_:theory in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052210055 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018512422 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010)
0.01
0.013197741 = product of:
0.03959322 = sum of:
0.02637006 = product of:
0.05274012 = sum of:
0.05274012 = weight(_text_:theory in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05274012 = score(doc=3509,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013223159 = product of:
0.026446318 = sum of:
0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026446318 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- In light of ongoing debates about ontological vs. epistemological approaches to knowledge organization (KO), this paper examines E. C. Richardson's treatment of ontology and epistemology in his theory of classification. According to Richardson, there is a natural order of things in the world accessible to human cognition, which may be expressed in two classificatory orders: evolutionary classification, which ranges classes of things from the most simple to the most complex, and logical classification, which ranges classes of things in the inverse order, from the most complex to the most simple. Evolutionary classification reflects ontological order and logical classification reflects epistemological order: both are faces of a single natural order. Such a view requires adherence to a representationalist, or, in Hjorland's (2008) terms, positivist understanding of epistemology, wherein human knowledge faithfully mirrors the structure of the external world. Richardson's harmonization of ontology and epistemology will find little favor among proponents of the currently fashionable pragmatist approach to KO. Nevertheless, it constitutes an early version of what Gnoli (2004) terms a naturalistic epistemology, which, once deepened and clarified, offers the best prospects for an explicit expression of both the ontological and epistemological dimensions of knowledge within a single classification of general scope.
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
LaBarre, K.: Bliss and Ranganathan : synthesis, synchronicity our sour grapes? (2000)
0.01
0.012309102 = product of:
0.036927305 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020915478 = product of:
0.041830957 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The concerns of the past century follow us into the next. Despite continuing technological advancement we find ourselves overwhelmed by a virtual tidal wave of information. Instead of reinventing seemingly novel solutions, it is appropriate to reexamine the successes and failures of the past. In light of the increasing focus on faceted classification as a potential approach to the problems of organizing conceptual space, it is appropriate to direct critical attention to the convoluted nature of the interaction between Henry Evelyn Bliss and S. R. Ranganathan. Drawing upon the methods of historiography, this is a review of original documents and an analysis of primary examples drawn from the correspondence between Ranganathan and Bliss currently in possession of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University and Archives and Special Collections at the Morris Raphael Cohen Library, City College of New York. This analysis will serve as a springboard to further exploration of the synthetic nature of faceted classification
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:43:23
-
Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014)
0.01
0.012261091 = product of:
0.07356654 = sum of:
0.07356654 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03173558 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The relationship between classification research and information retrieval research : 1952 to 1970 (2017)
0.01
0.0120253395 = product of:
0.036076017 = sum of:
0.018646449 = product of:
0.037292898 = sum of:
0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037292898 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017429566 = product of:
0.034859132 = sum of:
0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034859132 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the initial relationship between the Classification Research Group (CRG) and the Center for Documentation and Communication Research (CDCR) and how this relationship changed between 1952 and 1970. The theory of normative behavior and its concepts of worldviews, social norms, social types, and information behavior are used to characterize the relationship between the small worlds of the two groups with the intent of understanding the gap between early classification research and information retrieval (IR) research. Design/methodology/approach This is a mixed method analysis of two groups as evidenced in published artifacts by and about their work. A thorough review of historical literature about the groups as well as their own published works was employed and an author co-citation analysis was used to characterize the conceptual similarities and differences of the two groups of researchers. Findings The CRG focused on fundamental principles to aid classification and retrieval of information. The CDCR were more inclined to develop practical methods of retrieval without benefit of good theoretical foundations. The CRG began it work under the contention that the general classification schemes at the time were inadequate for the developing IR mechanisms. The CDCR rejected the classification schemes of the times and focused on developing punch card mechanisms and processes that were generously funded by both government and corporate funding. Originality/value This paper provides a unique historical analysis of two groups of influential researchers in the field of library and information science.
-
Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985)
0.01
0.011679901 = product of:
0.0350397 = sum of:
0.021096049 = product of:
0.042192098 = sum of:
0.042192098 = weight(_text_:theory in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042192098 = score(doc=571,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.25989953 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013943653 = product of:
0.027887305 = sum of:
0.027887305 = weight(_text_:methods in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027887305 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.17767884 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017)
0.01
0.010663213 = product of:
0.063979276 = sum of:
0.063979276 = sum of:
0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037292898 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02668638 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:58:02
-
Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997)
0.01
0.01062654 = product of:
0.03187962 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01586779 = product of:
0.03173558 = sum of:
0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03173558 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.211-216
-
Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982)
0.01
0.007116368 = product of:
0.04269821 = sum of:
0.04269821 = product of:
0.08539642 = sum of:
0.08539642 = weight(_text_:29 in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539642 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- International classification. 9(1982), S.27-29
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971)
0.01
0.0070523517 = product of:
0.04231411 = sum of:
0.04231411 = product of:
0.08462822 = sum of:
0.08462822 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08462822 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
-
Dahlberg, I.: Classification theory, yesterday and today (1976)
0.01
0.0070320163 = product of:
0.042192098 = sum of:
0.042192098 = product of:
0.084384196 = sum of:
0.084384196 = weight(_text_:theory in 1618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084384196 = score(doc=1618,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 1618, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Until very recently, classification theory was held to be nothing but an expressed or unconscious knowledge framed in intuitively given reasons for the subdivision and arrangement of any universe. Today, after clarification of the elements of classification systems as well as the basis of concept relationshios it is possible to apply a number of principles in the evaluation of existing systems as well as in the construction of new ones and by this achieving relatively predictable and repeatable results
-
Tennis, J.T.: Four orders of classification theory and their implications (2018)
0.01
0.0070320163 = product of:
0.042192098 = sum of:
0.042192098 = product of:
0.084384196 = sum of:
0.084384196 = weight(_text_:theory in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084384196 = score(doc=5264,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This article provides an interpretation of the structure of classification theory literature, from the late 19th Century to the present, by dividing it into four orders, and then describes the relationship between that and manuals for classification design.
-
Wimmer, F.: ¬Die internationale Dezimalklassifikation : Betrachtungen zu ihrer Entstehungsgeschichte und Aktualität (1985)
0.01
0.006226822 = product of:
0.03736093 = sum of:
0.03736093 = product of:
0.07472186 = sum of:
0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07472186 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 29(1985) Nr.5, S.15-18
-
Mitchell, J.S.: Dewey Decimal Classification : 125 and still growing (2001)
0.01
0.0053372756 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = product of:
0.06404731 = sum of:
0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06404731 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 2001, no.2, Nov./Dec., S.27-29
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990)
0.01
0.0052892636 = product of:
0.03173558 = sum of:
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:28:43
-
Miksa, F.L.: ¬The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the post-modern library (1998)
0.00
0.0049723866 = product of:
0.029834319 = sum of:
0.029834319 = product of:
0.059668638 = sum of:
0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 6220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059668638 = score(doc=6220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 6220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6220)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- History of DDC and of classification theory. Implications for post-modern library
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985)
0.00
0.004864385 = product of:
0.029186308 = sum of:
0.029186308 = product of:
0.058372617 = sum of:
0.058372617 = weight(_text_:theory in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058372617 = score(doc=3631,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3595701 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Among the theorists in the field of subject analysis in the twentieth century, none has been more influential than S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) of India, a mathematician by training who turned to librarianship and made some of the most far-reaching contributions to the theory of librarianship in general and subject analysis in particular. Dissatisfied with both the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Universal Decimal Classification, Ranganathan set out to develop his own system. His Colon Classification was first published in 1933 and went through six editions; the seventh edition was in progress when Ranganathan died in 1972. In the course of developing the Colon Classification, Ranganathan formulated a body of classification theory which was published in numerous writings, of which the best known are Elements of Library Classification (1945; 3rd ed., 1962) and Prolegomena to Library Classification (1967). Among the principles Ranganathan established, the most powerful and influential are those relating to facet analysis. Ranganathan demonstrated that facet analysis (breaking down subjects into their component parts) and synthesis (recombining these parts to fit the documents) provide the most viable approach to representing the contents of documents. Although the idea and use of facets, though not always called by that name, have been present for a long time (for instance, in the Dewey Decimal Classification and Charles A. Cutter's Expansive Classification), Ranganathan was the person who systematized the ideas and established principles for them. For his Colon Classification, Ranganathan identified five fundamental categories: Personality (P), Material (M), Energy (E), Space (S) and Time (T) and the citation order PMEST based an the idea of decreasing concreteness.
The Colon Classification has not been widely adopted; however, the theory of facet analysis and synthesis Ranganathan developed has proved to be most influential. Although many theorists of subject analysis do not totally agree with his fundamental categories or citation order, Ranganathan's concept of facet analysis and synthesis has provided a viable method and a framework for approaching subject analysis and has become the foundation of subject analysis in the twentieth century. In this sense, his theory laid the groundwork for later investigations and inquiries into the nature of subject and classificatory categories and citation order. His influence is felt in all modern classification schemes and indexing systems. This is attested to by the citations to his ideas and works in numerous papers included in this collection and by the fact that other modern classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification have become increasingly faceted in recent editions. The following chapter from Elements of Library Classification represents one of Ranganathan's many expositions of facet analysis and fundamental categories. It is chosen because of its clarity of expression and comprehensibility (many readers find the majority of his writings difficult to understand).
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Barber, E.E.; Tripaldi, N.M.; Pisano, S.L.: Facts, approaches, and reflections on classification in the history of Argentine librarianship (2003)
0.00
0.0044477303 = product of:
0.02668638 = sum of:
0.02668638 = product of:
0.05337276 = sum of:
0.05337276 = weight(_text_:29 in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05337276 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 20:06:08
