Search (82 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.07
    0.07471367 = product of:
      0.224141 = sum of:
        0.036918085 = product of:
          0.07383617 = sum of:
            0.07383617 = weight(_text_:theory in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07383617 = score(doc=4536,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.18722291 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18722291 = score(doc=4536,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.72424996 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  2. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.04
    0.035070207 = product of:
      0.10521062 = sum of:
        0.031644072 = product of:
          0.063288145 = sum of:
            0.063288145 = weight(_text_:theory in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063288145 = score(doc=54,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07356654 = sum of:
          0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041830957 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03173558 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  3. Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997) 0.02
    0.024882881 = product of:
      0.07464864 = sum of:
        0.01334319 = product of:
          0.02668638 = sum of:
            0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02668638 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06130545 = sum of:
          0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034859132 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
          0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026446318 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Pays tribute to the recent advances in the ability to access computerized catalogues from the desktop via the Internet but emphasizes that there are problems still to be overcome before the ideal of universal access to catalogue records for UK libraries is achieved. Advances in computerized cataloguing over the past 40 years have been an obstacle to retrospective cataloguing in a coherent and standardized manner which even the adoption of common standards for information retrieval and the Z39.50 protocol have failed to prevent. Many libraries with modern methods for cataloguing new materials still have earlier sequences of records on microfiche or other hard copy format. Other specialized collections are such that they have never been catalogued to professional standards or in a convenient format. Illustrates the point with reference to practical searching of catalogues in Aberystwyth, Wales, and to 2 studies of the logistical and financial issues of a programme of retrospective cataloguing as reported in BLRIC report 53. Discusses the proposed UK coordinating body and coordinated natioanl prgramme, to select which catalogues should be converted, set priorities for work, ensure maintenance of requisite standards, and arrange collaboration between neighbouring or related institutions
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.175-177
  4. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02
    0.02139552 = product of:
      0.06418656 = sum of:
        0.037740238 = product of:
          0.075480476 = sum of:
            0.075480476 = weight(_text_:29 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075480476 = score(doc=2268,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.026446318 = product of:
          0.052892637 = sum of:
            0.052892637 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052892637 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    12.12.1998 12:00:29
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  5. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02
    0.0177109 = product of:
      0.053132698 = sum of:
        0.02668638 = product of:
          0.05337276 = sum of:
            0.05337276 = weight(_text_:29 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05337276 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.026446318 = product of:
          0.052892637 = sum of:
            0.052892637 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052892637 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  6. Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999) 0.02
    0.015173253 = product of:
      0.045519758 = sum of:
        0.032296598 = product of:
          0.064593196 = sum of:
            0.064593196 = weight(_text_:theory in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064593196 = score(doc=107,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.39788827 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013223159 = product of:
          0.026446318 = sum of:
            0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026446318 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Forty-five years have passed since Lubetzky outlined the primary objectives of the catalog, which should facilitate the identification of specific bibliographic entities, and the explicit recoguition of works and relationships amongthem. Still, our catalogs are better designed to identify specific bibliographic entities than they are to guide users among the network of potential related editions and translations of works. In this paper, we seck to examine qualitatively some interesting examples of families of related works, defined as bibliographic families. Although the cases described here were derived from a random sample, this is a qualitative analysis. We selected these bibliographic families for their ability to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of Leazer's model, which incorporates relationship taxonomies by Tillett and Smiraglia Qualitatice analysis is intended to produce on explanation of a phenomenou, particularly an identification of any palterns observed. Patterns observed in qualitative analysis can be used to affirm external observations of the same phenomena; conclusions can contribute to what is knoton as grounded theory-a unique explanation grounded in the phenomenon under study. We arrive at two statements of grounded theory concerning bibliographic families: cataloger-generated implicit maps among works are inadequate, and qualitative analysis suggests the complexity of even the smallest bibliographic families. We conclude that user behavior study is needed to suggest which alternative maps are preferable.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011) 0.01
    0.014976865 = product of:
      0.044930592 = sum of:
        0.026418168 = product of:
          0.052836336 = sum of:
            0.052836336 = weight(_text_:29 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052836336 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018512422 = product of:
          0.037024844 = sum of:
            0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037024844 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:10:37
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  8. Solis, A.Q.; Navarrete, O.A.: Medidas de calidad en la creacion de catalogos de bibliotecas (1998) 0.01
    0.014304606 = product of:
      0.085827634 = sum of:
        0.085827634 = sum of:
          0.048802786 = weight(_text_:methods in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048802786 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
          0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037024844 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion of the importance of clear cataloguing policies and routines as the basis of quality control, in relation to the methods used in the College of Mexico Library. The fundamental principle is to prevent errors occuring rather than to correct them subsequently. Indices of quality and effiency in relation to errors which do and do not affect retrieval, established through monthly review of samples of the work of each cataloguer, are used to monitor activities and ensure high standards. This process, essentially collaborative, promotes an overall culture of quality
    Date
    30. 1.1999 19:22:45
  9. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01
    0.01416872 = product of:
      0.04250616 = sum of:
        0.021349104 = product of:
          0.04269821 = sum of:
            0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04269821 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021157054 = product of:
          0.04231411 = sum of:
            0.04231411 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04231411 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  10. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01
    0.01239763 = product of:
      0.03719289 = sum of:
        0.018680464 = product of:
          0.03736093 = sum of:
            0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736093 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018512422 = product of:
          0.037024844 = sum of:
            0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037024844 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
  11. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01
    0.01239763 = product of:
      0.03719289 = sum of:
        0.018680464 = product of:
          0.03736093 = sum of:
            0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736093 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018512422 = product of:
          0.037024844 = sum of:
            0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037024844 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  12. Clarke, R.I.: Cataloging research by design : a taxonomic approach to understanding research questions in cataloging (2018) 0.01
    0.012261091 = product of:
      0.07356654 = sum of:
        0.07356654 = sum of:
          0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041830957 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
          0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03173558 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03903913 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article asserts that many research questions (RQs) in cataloging reflect design-based RQs, rather than traditional scientific ones. To support this idea, a review of existing discussions of RQs is presented to identify prominent types of RQs, including design-based RQs. RQ types are then classified into a taxonomic framework and compared with RQs from the Everyday Cataloger Concerns project, which aimed to identify important areas of research from the perspective of practicing catalogers. This comparative method demonstrates the ways in which the research areas identified by cataloging practitioners reflect design RQs-and therefore require design approaches and methods to answer them.
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:14:22
  13. Hedman, T.: Utkast till en deskriptiv teori for katalogsokning / informationsatervinning (1997) 0.01
    0.00972877 = product of:
      0.058372617 = sum of:
        0.058372617 = product of:
          0.11674523 = sum of:
            0.11674523 = weight(_text_:theory in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11674523 = score(doc=1428,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.7191402 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Library information searching lacks a descriptive theory which explains how a user decides to borrow one book and not another. Such theory should act as a reference framework against which cataloguing rules and the classification system can be measured, and should be based on 2 complementary perspectives, described in detail: modern classification theory, which explains what cataloguing and classification involve, and philosophy of science, which explains what happens when the user meets the catalogue record. Catalogue information must answer which work is described, and why this work on the subject is chosen. A descriptive theory is especially necessary for knowing what new information to add to the catalogue. Discusses this in a subsequent article
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Draft of a descriptive theory of catalogue searching / information retrieval
  14. Holley, R.P.: Constraints of the 3 x 5 card (1984) 0.01
    0.007116368 = product of:
      0.04269821 = sum of:
        0.04269821 = product of:
          0.08539642 = sum of:
            0.08539642 = weight(_text_:29 in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08539642 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.1, S.29-35
  15. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01
    0.0070523517 = product of:
      0.04231411 = sum of:
        0.04231411 = product of:
          0.08462822 = sum of:
            0.08462822 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08462822 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  16. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.01
    0.0070523517 = product of:
      0.04231411 = sum of:
        0.04231411 = product of:
          0.08462822 = sum of:
            0.08462822 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08462822 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  17. Guerrini, M.: ¬The functions of the catalogue from ICCP to FRBR (2000) 0.01
    0.00629004 = product of:
      0.037740238 = sum of:
        0.037740238 = product of:
          0.075480476 = sum of:
            0.075480476 = weight(_text_:29 in 3947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075480476 = score(doc=3947,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 3947, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3947)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2005 11:30:41
    29. 8.2005 13:23:12
  18. Layne, S.S.: Brian E. Schottlaender : politics and philosophy of bibliographic control, a conversation (1999) 0.01
    0.006226822 = product of:
      0.03736093 = sum of:
        0.03736093 = product of:
          0.07472186 = sum of:
            0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07472186 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 11:29:35
  19. Buschey, D.; Halle, A.; Harms, R.: Zwanzig Jahre Retrokonversion and der SUB Göttingen : Ein Zwischenbericht (2001) 0.01
    0.006226822 = product of:
      0.03736093 = sum of:
        0.03736093 = product of:
          0.07472186 = sum of:
            0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 6510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07472186 = score(doc=6510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 11:33:24
  20. Bolin, M.K.: Catalog design, catalog maintenance, catalog governance (2000) 0.01
    0.006226822 = product of:
      0.03736093 = sum of:
        0.03736093 = product of:
          0.07472186 = sum of:
            0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07472186 = score(doc=493,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 493, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 18:46:29

Years

Languages

  • e 59
  • d 18
  • f 2
  • i 1
  • ru 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…