-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.04
0.036027804 = product of:
0.108083405 = sum of:
0.089570984 = sum of:
0.052210055 = weight(_text_:theory in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052210055 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736093 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.018512422 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.03
0.03320545 = product of:
0.09961635 = sum of:
0.019377958 = product of:
0.038755916 = sum of:
0.038755916 = weight(_text_:theory in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038755916 = score(doc=2072,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23873296 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08023839 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023839 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31039283 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- LCSH
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
- Subject
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.03
0.03198076 = product of:
0.09594228 = sum of:
0.022375738 = product of:
0.044751476 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.07356654 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03173558 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.03
0.025495686 = product of:
0.07648706 = sum of:
0.044751476 = product of:
0.08950295 = sum of:
0.08950295 = weight(_text_:theory in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08950295 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Szostak, R.: Classifying science : phenomena, data, theory, method, practice (2004)
0.02
0.024994198 = product of:
0.07498259 = sum of:
0.038755916 = product of:
0.07751183 = sum of:
0.07751183 = weight(_text_:theory in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07751183 = score(doc=325,freq=24.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.47746593 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.036226675 = product of:
0.07245335 = sum of:
0.07245335 = weight(_text_:methods in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07245335 = score(doc=325,freq=24.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.4616232 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Classification is the essential first step in science. The study of science, as well as the practice of science, will thus benefit from a detailed classification of different types of science. In this book, science - defined broadly to include the social sciences and humanities - is first unpacked into its constituent elements: the phenomena studied, the data used, the theories employed, the methods applied, and the practices of scientists. These five elements are then classified in turn. Notably, the classifications of both theory types and methods allow the key strengths and weaknesses of different theories and methods to be readily discerned and compared. Connections across classifications are explored: should certain theories or phenomena be investigated only with certain methods? What is the proper function and form of scientific paradigms? Are certain common errors and biases in scientific practice associated with particular phenomena, data, theories, or methods? The classifications point to several ways of improving both specialized and interdisciplinary research and teaching, and especially of enhancing communication across communities of scholars. The classifications also support a superior system of document classification that would allow searches by theory and method used as well as causal links investigated.
- Content
- Inhalt: - Chapter 1: Classifying Science: 1.1. A Simple Classificatory Guideline - 1.2. The First "Cut" (and Plan of Work) - 1.3. Some Preliminaries - Chapter 2: Classifying Phenomena and Data: 2.1. Classifying Phenomena - 2.2. Classifying Data - Chapter 3: Classifying Theory: 3.1. Typology of Theory - 3.2. What Is a Theory? - 3.3. Evaluating Theories - 3.4. Types of Theory and the Five Types of Causation - 3.5. Classifying Individual Theories - 3.6. Advantages of a Typology of Theory - Chapter 4: Classifying Method: 4.1. Classifying Methods - 4.2. Typology of Strengths and Weaknesses of Methods - 4.3. Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analysis Revisited - 4.4. Evaluating Methods - 4.5. Classifying Particular Methods Within The Typology - 4.6. Advantages of a Typology of Methods - Chapter 5: Classifying Practice: 5.1. Errors and Biases in ScienceChapter - 5.2. Typology of (Critiques of) Scientific Practice - 5.3. Utilizing This Classification - 5.4. The Five Types of Ethical Analysis - Chapter 6: Drawing Connections Across These Classifications: 6.1. Theory and Method - 6.2. Theory (Method) and Phenomena (Data) - 6.3. Better Paradigms - 6.4. Critiques of Scientific Practice: Are They Correlated with Other Classifications? - Chapter 7: Classifying Scientific Documents: 7.1. Faceted or Enumerative? - 7.2. Classifying By Phenomena Studied - 7.3. Classifying By Theory Used - 7.4. Classifying By Method Used - 7.5 Links Among Subjects - 7.6. Type of Work, Language, and More - 7.7. Critiques of Scientific Practice - 7.8. Classifying Philosophy - 7.9. Evaluating the System - Chapter 8: Concluding Remarks: 8.1. The Classifications - 8.2. Advantages of These Various Classifications - 8.3. Drawing Connections Across Classifications - 8.4. Golden Mean Arguments - 8.5. Why Should Science Be Believed? - 8.6. How Can Science Be Improved? - 8.7. How Should Science Be Taught?
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.2, S.93-95 (H. Albrechtsen): "The book deals with mapping of the structures and contents of sciences, defined broadly to include the social sciences and the humanities. According to the author, the study of science, as well as the practice of science, could benefit from a detailed classification of different types of science. The book defines five universal constituents of the sciences: phenomena, data, theories, methods and practice. For each of these constituents, the author poses five questions, in the well-known 5W format: Who, What, Where, When, Why? - with the addition of the question How? (Szostak 2003). Two objectives of the author's endeavor stand out: 1) decision support for university curriculum development across disciplines and decision support for university students at advanced levels of education in selection of appropriate courses for their projects and to support cross-disciplinary inquiry for researchers and students; 2) decision support for researchers and students in scientific inquiry across disciplines, methods and theories. The main prospective audience of this book is university curriculum developers, university students and researchers, in that order of priority. The heart of the book is the chapters unfolding the author's ideas about how to classify phenomena and data, theory, method and practice, by use of the 5W inquiry model. . . .
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.023205545 = product of:
0.06961663 = sum of:
0.045215234 = product of:
0.09043047 = sum of:
0.09043047 = weight(_text_:theory in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09043047 = score(doc=3617,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.55704355 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024401393 = product of:
0.048802786 = sum of:
0.048802786 = weight(_text_:methods in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048802786 = score(doc=3617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- In view of the impact of systems theory for the construction of classification systems the two major contributions of Dewey are summarized as well as the new methods of facet analysis and organization brought into classification by Ranganathan. With the latter's "canonical" solution for the contents and arrangement of main classes, however, contemporary philosophical thought regarding the organization of knowledge seems to have been neglected. The work of the Classification Research Group and elsewhere considering integrative level theory will improve the science of classification systems construction. Besides this the influence from psychology and linguistics on the recognition of relationships between concepts is outlined as well as some practical implications of the systems approach on classification. (I.C.)
-
Tkalac, S.; Mateljan, V.: Neke karakteristike notacijskih shema (1996)
0.02
0.023090973 = product of:
0.06927292 = sum of:
0.029834319 = product of:
0.059668638 = sum of:
0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059668638 = score(doc=655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.039438605 = product of:
0.07887721 = sum of:
0.07887721 = weight(_text_:methods in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07887721 = score(doc=655,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5025517 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Presents a short review of fundamental knowledge representation methods: logical, graphical, structured and procedural notational schemes. Special attention is given to notational schemes' classifications and the characteristics on which classifications were done. Knowledge representation is one of the central problems in artificial intelligence, but a complete theory of it does not exist, and it remains a set of methods that are used, with more or less success, in attempts to solve a given problem. The characteristics of knowledge schemes play a significant role
-
Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016)
0.02
0.021180402 = product of:
0.12708241 = sum of:
0.12708241 = sum of:
0.084384196 = weight(_text_:theory in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084384196 = score(doc=4889,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04269821 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Dousa, T.M.: Empirical observation, rational structures, and pragmatist aims : epistemology and method in Julius Otto Kaiser's theory of systematic indexing (2008)
0.02
0.01751985 = product of:
0.05255955 = sum of:
0.031644072 = product of:
0.063288145 = sum of:
0.063288145 = weight(_text_:theory in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063288145 = score(doc=2508,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020915478 = product of:
0.041830957 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Hjoerland's typology of the epistemological positions underlying methods for designing KO systems recognizes four basic epistemological positions: empiricism, rationalism, historicism, and pragmatism. Application of this typology to close analysis of Julius Otto Kaiser's theory of systematic indexing shows that his epistemological and methodological positions were hybrid in nature. Kaiser's epistemology was primarily empiricist and pragmatist in nature, whereas his methodology was pragmatist in aim but rationalist in mechanics. Unexpected synergy between the pragmatist and rationalist elements of Kaiser's methodology is evidenced by his stated motivations for the admission of polyhierarchy into syndetic structure. The application of Hjørland's typology to similar analyses of other KO systems may uncover other cases of epistemological-methodological eclecticism and synergy.
-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.02
0.017061142 = product of:
0.10236685 = sum of:
0.10236685 = sum of:
0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059668638 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04269821 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
- Date
- 14. 7.1996 13:29:45
-
Szostak, R.: Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science (2008)
0.02
0.017006397 = product of:
0.051019188 = sum of:
0.02637006 = product of:
0.05274012 = sum of:
0.05274012 = weight(_text_:theory in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05274012 = score(doc=1893,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024649128 = product of:
0.049298257 = sum of:
0.049298257 = weight(_text_:methods in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049298257 = score(doc=1893,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31409478 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to respond to the 2005 paper by Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen by suggesting that an exhaustive and universal classification of the phenomena that scholars study, and the methods and theories they apply, is feasible. It seeks to argue that such a classification is critical for interdisciplinary scholarship. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen as its starting point. Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen had identified several difficulties that would be encountered in developing such a classification; the paper suggests how each of these can be overcome. It also urges a deductive approach as complementary to the inductive approach recommended by Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen. Findings - The paper finds that an exhaustive and universal classification of scholarly documents in terms of (at least) the phenomena that scholars study, and the theories and methods they apply, appears to be both possible and desirable. Practical implications - The paper suggests how such a project can be begun. In particular it stresses the importance of classifying documents in terms of causal links between phenomena. Originality/value - The paper links the information science, interdisciplinary, and study of science literatures, and suggests that the types of classification outlined above would be of great value to scientists/scholars, and that they are possible.
- Content
- Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., K.N. Pedersen: A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval. In: Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.5, S.582-597. - Vgl. auch: Hjoerland, R.: Core classification theory: : a reply to Szostak. In: Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.333 - 342.
-
Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004)
0.01
0.014928497 = product of:
0.089570984 = sum of:
0.089570984 = sum of:
0.052210055 = weight(_text_:theory in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052210055 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736093 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The classification of documents about topics relating to people of mixed race is problematic, partly because of the obscurity of racial categorization in general, and partly because of the limitations and inherent biases of bibliographic classification schemes designed primarily for usage in non-digital environments. Critical race theory is an approach that may prove useful in deterrnining how classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification should most appropriately be stuctured.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:38:42
-
Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998)
0.01
0.0144304065 = product of:
0.04329122 = sum of:
0.022375738 = product of:
0.044751476 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020915478 = product of:
0.041830957 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Ranganathan's canons, principles, and postulates can easily confuse readers, especially because he revised and added to them in various editions of his many books. The Classification Research Group, who drew on Ranganathan's work as their basis for classification theory but developed it in their own way, has never clearly organized all their equivalent canons and principles. In this article Spiteri gathers the fundamental rules from both systems and compares and contrasts them. She makes her own clearer set of principles for constructing facets, stating the subject of a document, and designing notation. Spiteri's "simplified model" is clear and understandable, but certainly not simplistic. The model does not include methods for making a faceted system, but will serve as a very useful guide in how to turn initial work into a rigorous classification. Highly recommended
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.01416872 = product of:
0.04250616 = sum of:
0.021349104 = product of:
0.04269821 = sum of:
0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04269821 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.021157054 = product of:
0.04231411 = sum of:
0.04231411 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04231411 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004)
0.01
0.012795856 = product of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 17:33:13
-
Frické, M.: Faceted classification, analysis and search : some questions on their interrelations (2017)
0.01
0.012795856 = product of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.07677513 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:53:46
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006)
0.01
0.0120253395 = product of:
0.036076017 = sum of:
0.018646449 = product of:
0.037292898 = sum of:
0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037292898 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017429566 = product of:
0.034859132 = sum of:
0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034859132 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
-
Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017)
0.01
0.010663213 = product of:
0.063979276 = sum of:
0.063979276 = sum of:
0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037292898 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02668638 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:58:02
-
Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017)
0.01
0.010663213 = product of:
0.063979276 = sum of:
0.063979276 = sum of:
0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037292898 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02668638 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Inhalt: Richard P. Smiraglia: A Brief Introduction to Facets in Knowledge Organization / Kathryn La Barre: Interrogating Facet Theory: Decolonizing Knowledge Organization / Joseph T. Tennis: Never Facets Alone: The Evolving Thought and Persistent Problems in Ranganathan's Theories of Classification / M. P. Satija and Dong-Guen Oh: The DDC and the Knowledge Categories: Dewey did Faceting without Knowing It / Claudio Gnoli: Classifying Phenomena Part 3: Facets / Rick Szostak: Facet Analysis Without Facet Indicators / Elizabeth Milonas: An Examination of Facets within Search Engine Result Pages / Richard P. Smiraglia: Facets for Clustering and Disambiguation: The Domain Discourse of Facets in Knowledge Organization
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 19:11:29
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.01
0.010623204 = product of:
0.03186961 = sum of:
0.018646449 = product of:
0.037292898 = sum of:
0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037292898 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013223159 = product of:
0.026446318 = sum of:
0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026446318 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.
- Pages
- S.19-22
