-
Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Davidson, C.H.: Improved design of graphic displays in thesauri : through technology and ergonomics (1986)
0.04
0.044128865 = product of:
0.2647732 = sum of:
0.2647732 = weight(_text_:graphic in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2647732 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
1.0242441 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Pollard, R.: Hypertext presentation of thesauri used in on-line searching (1990)
0.03
0.025216494 = product of:
0.15129896 = sum of:
0.15129896 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15129896 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Explores the strengths and limitations of hypertext for the online presentation of thesauri used in information retrieval. Examines the ability of hypertext to support each of 3 common types of thesaurus display: graphic, alphabetical, and hierarchical. Presents a design for a hypertext-based hierarchical display that addresses many inadequacies of printed hierarchical displays. Ullustrates how the design might be implemented using a commercially available hypertext system. Considers issues related to the implementation and evaluation of hypertext-based thesauri
-
Curras, E.: Ontologies, taxonomy and thesauri in information organisation and retrieval (2010)
0.02
0.02211462 = product of:
0.06634386 = sum of:
0.04169473 = product of:
0.08338946 = sum of:
0.08338946 = weight(_text_:theory in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08338946 = score(doc=3276,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024649128 = product of:
0.049298257 = sum of:
0.049298257 = weight(_text_:methods in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049298257 = score(doc=3276,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31409478 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The originality of this book, which deals with such a new subject matter, lies in the application of methods and concepts never used before - such as Ontologies and Taxonomies, as well as Thesauri - to the ordering of knowledge based on primary information. Chapters in the book also examine the study of Ontologies, Taxonomies and Thesauri from the perspective of Systematics and General Systems Theory. "Ontologies, Taxonomy and Thesauri in Information Organisation and Retrieval" will be extremely useful to those operating within the network of related fields, which includes Documentation and Information Science.
- Content
- Inhalt: 1. From classifications to ontologies Knowledge - A new concept of knowledge - Knowledge and information - Knowledge organisation - Knowledge organisation and representation - Cognitive sciences - Talent management - Learning systematisation - Historical evolution - From classification to knowledge organisation - Why ontologies exist - Ontologies - The structure of ontologies 2. Taxonomies and thesauri From ordering to taxonomy - The origins of taxonomy - Hierarchical and horizontal order - Correlation with classifications - Taxonomy in computer science - Computing taxonomy - Definitions - Virtual taxonomy, cybernetic taxonomy - Taxonomy in Information Science - Similarities between taxonomies and thesauri - ifferences between taxonomies and thesauri 3. Thesauri Terminology in classification systems - Terminological languages - Thesauri - Thesauri definitions - Conditions that a thesaurus must fulfil - Historical evolution - Classes of thesauri 4. Thesauri in (cladist) systematics Systematics - Systematics as a noun - Definitions and historic evolution over time - Differences between taxonomy and systematics - Systematics in thesaurus construction theory - Classic, numerical and cladist systematics - Classic systematics in information science - Numerical systematics in information science - Thesauri in cladist systematics - Systematics in information technology - Some examples 5. Thesauri in systems theory Historical evolution - Approach to systems - Systems theory applied to the construction of thesauri - Components - Classes of system - Peculiarities of these systems - Working methods - Systems theory applied to ontologies and taxonomies
-
Huang, M.-H.: Developing an ideal online thesaurus display format (1994)
0.02
0.022064433 = product of:
0.1323866 = sum of:
0.1323866 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1323866 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Describes a design for ideal online subject and author thesauri. The subject thesaurus is a graphic thesaurus with a semantic network, so the spread activation assumption can be applied. The hierarchical relationship is broken into 3 specific relations, so automated inheritance can be performed. The associated relationship is separated with several specific relationships, so spatial recognition can function well. This thesaurus will provide variety and complexity to deal with uncertainty and will be a user constructed, user enhanced hyperthesaurus that serves as an analogue of the human mind. The author thesaurus is designed to show all authors which are alphabetically adjacent to a given author as well as other authors whose subject area is close to that of the given author
-
Miller, U.: Thesaurus construction : problems and their roots (1997)
0.02
0.019240541 = product of:
0.057721622 = sum of:
0.029834319 = product of:
0.059668638 = sum of:
0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059668638 = score(doc=1170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027887305 = product of:
0.05577461 = sum of:
0.05577461 = weight(_text_:methods in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05577461 = score(doc=1170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Analyzes and discusses general problems of thesaurus construction theory and practice, based on research and experience accumulate in librarianship and information science as well as some other sciences and general scientific methods (e.g. linguistics, and systems analysis). Recommends methodological and methodical ways of solving problems existing in thesaurus construction
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.02
0.018655445 = product of:
0.055966333 = sum of:
0.013052514 = product of:
0.026105028 = sum of:
0.026105028 = weight(_text_:theory in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026105028 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.16080463 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.042913817 = sum of:
0.024401393 = weight(_text_:methods in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024401393 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15546899 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.018512422 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018512422 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Eckert, K.; Pfeffer, M.; Stuckenschmidt, H.: Assessing thesaurus-based annotations for semantic search applications (2008)
0.02
0.01772975 = product of:
0.053189248 = sum of:
0.018680464 = product of:
0.03736093 = sum of:
0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736093 = score(doc=1528,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034508783 = product of:
0.06901757 = sum of:
0.06901757 = weight(_text_:methods in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06901757 = score(doc=1528,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.43973273 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Statistical methods for automated document indexing are becoming an alternative to the manual assignment of keywords. We argue that the quality of the thesaurus used as a basis for indexing in regard to its ability to adequately cover the contents to be indexed and as a basis for the specific indexing method used is of crucial importance in automatic indexing. We present an interactive tool for thesaurus evaluation that is based on a combination of statistical measures and appropriate visualisation techniques that supports the detection of potential problems in a thesaurus. We describe the methods used and show that the tool supports the detection and correction of errors, leading to a better indexing result.
- Date
- 25. 2.2012 13:51:29
-
Maculan, B.C.M. dos; Lima, G.A. de; Oliveira, E.D.: Conversion methods from thesaurus to ontologies : a review (2016)
0.02
0.016412137 = product of:
0.04923641 = sum of:
0.021349104 = product of:
0.04269821 = sum of:
0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04269821 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027887305 = product of:
0.05577461 = sum of:
0.05577461 = weight(_text_:methods in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05577461 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Scheven, E.: ¬Die neue Thesaurusnorm ISO 25964 und die GND (2017)
0.01
0.014928497 = product of:
0.089570984 = sum of:
0.089570984 = sum of:
0.052210055 = weight(_text_:theory in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052210055 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736093 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004)
0.01
0.014304606 = product of:
0.085827634 = sum of:
0.085827634 = sum of:
0.048802786 = weight(_text_:methods in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048802786 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this selected bibliography is to introduce issues and problems in relation to thesaurus construction and to present a set of readings that may be used in practical thesaurus design. The concept of thesaurus is discussed, the purpose of the thesaurus and how the concept has evolved over the years according to new IR technologies. Different approaches to thesaurus construction are introduced, and readings dealing with specific problems and developments in the collection, formation and organisation of thesaurus concepts and terms are presented. Primarily manual construction methods are discussed, but the bibliography also refers to research about techniques for automatic thesaurus construction.
- Date
- 18. 5.2006 20:06:22
-
¬3rd Infoterm Symposiums Terminology Work in Subject Fields, Vienna, 12.-14.11.1991 (1992)
0.01
0.012608247 = product of:
0.07564948 = sum of:
0.07564948 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07564948 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.29264116 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Enthält 47 Beiträge den Schwerpunkten der Tagung: Biology and related fields - Engineering and natural sciences - Medicine - Information science and information technology - Law and economics - Social sciences and humanities - Terminology research and interdisciplinary aspects; darunter: OESER, E. u. G. BUDIN: Explication and representation of qualitative biological and medical concepts: the example of the pocket knowledge data base on carnivores; HOHENEGGER, J.: Specles as the basic units in taxonomy and nomenclature; LAVIETER, L. de, J.A. DESCHAMPS u. B. FELLUGA: A multilingual environmental thesaurus: past, present, and future; TODESCHINI, C. u. G. Thoemig: The thesaurus of the International Nuclear Information System: experiences in an international environment; CITKINA, F.: Terminology of mathematics: contrastive analysis as a basis for standardization and harmonization; WALKER, D.G.: Technology and engineering terminolgy: translation problems encountered and suggested solutions; VERVOOM, A.J.: Terminology and engineering sciences; HIRS, W.M.: ICD-10, a missed chance and a new opportunity for medical terminology standardization; THOMAS, P.: Subject indexes in medical literature; RAHMSTORF, G.: Analysis of information technology terms; NEGRINI, G.: Indexing language for research projects and its graphic display; BATEWICZ, M.: Impact of modern information technology on knowledge transfer services and terminology; RATZINGER, M.: Multilingual product description (MPD): a European project; OHLY, H.P.: Terminology of the social sciences and social context approaches; BEAUGRANDE, R. de: Terminology and discourse between the social sciences and the humanities; MUSKENS, G.: Terminological standardisation and socio-linguistic diversity: dilemmas of crosscultural sociology; SNELL, B.: Terminology ten years on; ZHURAVLEV, V.F.: Standard ontological structures of systems of concepts of active knowledge; WRIGHT, S.E.: Terminology standardization in standards societies and professional associations in the United States; DAHLBERG; I.: The terminology of subject fields - reconsidered; AHMAD, K. u. H. Fulford: Terminology of interdisciplinary fields: a new perspective; DATAA, J.: Full-text databases as a terminological support for translation
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.01239763 = product of:
0.03719289 = sum of:
0.018680464 = product of:
0.03736093 = sum of:
0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736093 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018512422 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 2. 3.2013 12:29:05
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012)
0.01
0.012261091 = product of:
0.07356654 = sum of:
0.07356654 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03173558 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Indexing consists of both novel and more traditional techniques. Cutting-edge indexing techniques, such as automatic indexing, ontologies, and topic maps, were developed independently of older techniques such as thesauri, but it is now recognized that these older methods also hold expertise. Indexing describes various traditional and novel indexing techniques, giving information professionals and students of library and information sciences a broad and comprehensible introduction to indexing. This title consists of twelve chapters: an Introduction to subject readings and theasauri; Automatic indexing versus manual indexing; Techniques applied in automatic indexing of text material; Automatic indexing of images; The black art of indexing moving images; Automatic indexing of music; Taxonomies and ontologies; Metadata formats and indexing; Tagging; Topic maps; Indexing the web; and The Semantic Web.
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 14:03:22
-
Assem, M. van: Converting and integrating vocabularies for the Semantic Web (2010)
0.01
0.010131285 = product of:
0.030393854 = sum of:
0.010674552 = product of:
0.021349104 = sum of:
0.021349104 = weight(_text_:29 in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021349104 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019719303 = product of:
0.039438605 = sum of:
0.039438605 = weight(_text_:methods in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039438605 = score(doc=4639,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.25127584 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This thesis focuses on conversion of vocabularies for representation and integration of collections on the Semantic Web. A secondary focus is how to represent metadata schemas (RDF Schemas representing metadata element sets) such that they interoperate with vocabularies. The primary domain in which we operate is that of cultural heritage collections. The background worldview in which a solution is sought is that of the Semantic Web research paradigmwith its associated theories, methods, tools and use cases. In other words, we assume the SemanticWeb is in principle able to provide the context to realize interoperable collections. Interoperability is dependent on the interplay between representations and the applications that use them. We mean applications in the widest sense, such as "search" and "annotation". These applications or tasks are often present in software applications, such as the E-Culture application. It is therefore necessary that applications requirements on the vocabulary representation are met. This leads us to formulate the following problem statement: HOW CAN EXISTING VOCABULARIES BE MADE AVAILABLE TO SEMANTIC WEB APPLICATIONS?
We refine the problem statement into three research questions. The first two focus on the problem of conversion of a vocabulary to a Semantic Web representation from its original format. Conversion of a vocabulary to a representation in a Semantic Web language is necessary to make the vocabulary available to SemanticWeb applications. In the last question we focus on integration of collection metadata schemas in a way that allows for vocabulary representations as produced by our methods. Academisch proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Pollard, A.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993)
0.01
0.006226822 = product of:
0.03736093 = sum of:
0.03736093 = product of:
0.07472186 = sum of:
0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 4713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07472186 = score(doc=4713,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4713, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4713)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.3, S.345-358
-
Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989)
0.01
0.0061708074 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = product of:
0.07404969 = sum of:
0.07404969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404969 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
-
Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri : methodical considerations (2004)
0.01
0.006037779 = product of:
0.036226675 = sum of:
0.036226675 = product of:
0.07245335 = sum of:
0.07245335 = weight(_text_:methods in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07245335 = score(doc=4423,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.4616232 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The paper introduces bibliometrics to the research area of knowledge organization - more precisely in relation to construction and maintenance of thesauri. As such, the paper reviews related work that has been of inspiration for the assembly of a semi-automatic, bibliometric-based, approach for construction and maintenance. Similarly, the paper discusses the methodical considerations behind the approach. Eventually, the semi-automatic approach is used to verify the applicability of bibliometric methods as a supplement to construction and maintenance of thesauri. In the context of knowledge organization, the paper outlines two fundamental approaches to knowledge organization, that is, the manual intellectual approach and the automatic algorithmic approach. Bibliometric methods belong to the automatic algorithmic approach, though bibliometrics do have special characteristics that are substantially different from other methods within this approach.
-
Nielsen, M.L.: ¬A framework for work task based thesaurus design (2001)
0.01
0.006037779 = product of:
0.036226675 = sum of:
0.036226675 = product of:
0.07245335 = sum of:
0.07245335 = weight(_text_:methods in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07245335 = score(doc=4477,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.4616232 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Design and construction of indexing languages require thorough knowledge and understanding of the information environment. This empirical study investigated a mixed set of methods (group interviews, recollection of information needs and word association tests to collect data; content analysis and discourse analysis to analyse data) to evaluate whether these methods collected the data needed for work domain oriented thesaurus design. The findings showed that the study methods together provided the domain knowledge needed to define the role of the thesaurus and design its content and structure. The study was carried out from a person-insituation perspective. The findings reflected the information environment and made it possible to develop a thesaurus according to the characteristics of the work domain. It seemed more difficult to capture the needs of the individual user and adapt the thesaurus to individual characteristics.
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.01
0.0053372756 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = product of:
0.06404731 = sum of:
0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06404731 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 18. 5.2002 17:29:00
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.01
0.0052892636 = product of:
0.03173558 = sum of:
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
