-
Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999)
0.01
0.012261091 = product of:
0.07356654 = sum of:
0.07356654 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03173558 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
- Date
- 10. 8.2001 13:22:14
-
Charles Ammi Cutter's Three-Figure Author Table. Ed. and rev. By Paul K. Swanson and Esther M. Swift (1969)
0.01
0.006226822 = product of:
0.03736093 = sum of:
0.03736093 = product of:
0.07472186 = sum of:
0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07472186 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- 29 S
-
Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000)
0.01
0.0061708074 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = product of:
0.07404969 = sum of:
0.07404969 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404969 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
-
Satija, M.P.; Agrawal, S.P.: Book numbers : some indian methods (1990)
0.00
0.0046478845 = product of:
0.027887305 = sum of:
0.027887305 = product of:
0.05577461 = sum of:
0.05577461 = weight(_text_:methods in 6922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05577461 = score(doc=6922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 6922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6922)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Cheti, A.; Crocetti, A.; Danesi, D.: Espansione o elencazione? : Ovvero l'equivoco ingombro (1995)
0.00
0.004066899 = product of:
0.024401393 = sum of:
0.024401393 = product of:
0.048802786 = sum of:
0.048802786 = weight(_text_:methods in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048802786 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Presents a rebuttal of criticisms of the Italian version of Dewey's 20th ed., which in the section relating to the geography of Italy was alleged to have expanded and updated Auxiliary Table 2 by using classification methods that resulted in errors in the location of some of the country's 8.000 communes (Bibliotecario 38(1993), 147-148). The debate focuses on aspects such as the numbering system of classification, the use of subdivisions, whether or not to list all communes,and the absence in Italy of an intermediate entity between province and commune
-
Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996)
0.00
0.0035261759 = product of:
0.021157054 = sum of:
0.021157054 = product of:
0.04231411 = sum of:
0.04231411 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04231411 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
-
Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005)
0.00
0.0017630879 = product of:
0.010578527 = sum of:
0.010578527 = product of:
0.021157054 = sum of:
0.021157054 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021157054 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
