Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Sprachretrieval"
  1. Voorhees, E.M.: Question answering in TREC (2005) 0.01
    0.0053372756 = product of:
      0.032023653 = sum of:
        0.032023653 = product of:
          0.06404731 = sum of:
            0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 6487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06404731 = score(doc=6487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  2. Hannabuss, S.: Dialogue and the search for information (1989) 0.00
    0.0049723866 = product of:
      0.029834319 = sum of:
        0.029834319 = product of:
          0.059668638 = sum of:
            0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059668638 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge of conversation theory and speech act assists us to understand how people search for information. Dialogue embodies meanings and intentionalities, and represents epistemic inquiry. There are implications for the information-processing model of cognitive psychology. Question formulation (erotetics) and turn-taking play important roles in eliciting information, while discourse analysis furnishes us with information about people's categorising, recall, and semantic skills
  3. Radev, D.; Fan, W.; Qu, H.; Wu, H.; Grewal, A.: Probabilistic question answering on the Web (2005) 0.00
    0.0034859132 = product of:
      0.020915478 = sum of:
        0.020915478 = product of:
          0.041830957 = sum of:
            0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 3455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041830957 = score(doc=3455,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 3455, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3455)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Web-based search engines such as Google and NorthernLight return documents that are relevant to a user query, not answers to user questions. We have developed an architecture that augments existing search engines so that they support natural language question answering. The process entails five steps: query modulation, document retrieval, passage extraction, phrase extraction, and answer ranking. In this article, we describe some probabilistic approaches to the last three of these stages. We show how our techniques apply to a number of existing search engines, and we also present results contrasting three different methods for question answering. Our algorithm, probabilistic phrase reranking (PPR), uses proximity and question type features and achieves a total reciprocal document rank of .20 an the TREC8 corpus. Our techniques have been implemented as a Web-accessible system, called NSIR.
  4. Ferret, O.; Grau, B.; Hurault-Plantet, M.; Illouz, G.; Jacquemin, C.; Monceaux, L.; Robba, I.; Vilnat, A.: How NLP can improve question answering (2002) 0.00
    0.0026686378 = product of:
      0.016011827 = sum of:
        0.016011827 = product of:
          0.032023653 = sum of:
            0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032023653 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.135-155
  5. Srihari, R.K.: Using speech input for image interpretation, annotation, and retrieval (1997) 0.00
    0.0026446318 = product of:
      0.01586779 = sum of:
        0.01586779 = product of:
          0.03173558 = sum of:
            0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03173558 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  6. Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.00
    0.001779092 = product of:
      0.010674552 = sum of:
        0.010674552 = product of:
          0.021349104 = sum of:
            0.021349104 = weight(_text_:29 in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021349104 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03903913 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2009 11:11:45