Search (8545 results, page 1 of 428)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.18 
    0.18344909 = product of:
  0.36689818 = sum of:
    0.062004488 = product of:
      0.18601346 = sum of:
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26306275 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26306275 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.041830957 = product of:
      0.083661914 = sum of:
        0.083661914 = weight(_text_:methods in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083661914 = score(doc=2514,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.53303653 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  2. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.16 
    0.16239655 = product of:
  0.3247931 = sum of:
    0.062004488 = product of:
      0.18601346 = sum of:
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.07677513 = sum of:
      0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044751476 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032023653 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.18601346 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18601346 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  3. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.14 
    0.13879846 = product of:
  0.27759692 = sum of:
    0.062004488 = product of:
      0.18601346 = sum of:
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18601346 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18601346 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.029578956 = product of:
      0.05915791 = sum of:
        0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05915791 = score(doc=400,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.13 
    0.13194287 = product of:
  0.26388574 = sum of:
    0.062004488 = product of:
      0.18601346 = sum of:
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18601346 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18601346 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.01586779 = product of:
      0.03173558 = sum of:
        0.03173558 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03173558 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  5. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12 
    0.124188185 = product of:
  0.24837637 = sum of:
    0.05167041 = product of:
      0.15501122 = sum of:
        0.15501122 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15501122 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.04169473 = product of:
      0.08338946 = sum of:
        0.08338946 = weight(_text_:theory in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08338946 = score(doc=76,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.15501122 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15501122 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  6. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.11 
    0.11023021 = product of:
  0.33069062 = sum of:
    0.082672656 = product of:
      0.24801797 = sum of:
        0.24801797 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24801797 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24801797 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24801797 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  7. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.11 
    0.11023021 = product of:
  0.33069062 = sum of:
    0.082672656 = product of:
      0.24801797 = sum of:
        0.24801797 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24801797 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24801797 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24801797 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  8. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.11 
    0.108355746 = product of:
  0.32506722 = sum of:
    0.062004488 = product of:
      0.18601346 = sum of:
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26306275 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26306275 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  9. Beebe, C.; Jacob, E.K.: Graphic language documents : structures and functions (1998) 0.10 
    0.09729727 = product of:
  0.2918918 = sum of:
    0.029834319 = product of:
      0.059668638 = sum of:
        0.059668638 = weight(_text_:theory in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059668638 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.26205748 = weight(_text_:graphic in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26205748 = score(doc=43,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        1.0137388 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper proposes to explore the nature of graphic language documents from the contrasting perspectives of structure and function -- from the perspectives of the document's structure as a spatially-oriented object. Using design principles derived from Gestalt theory and the Bauhaus concept that form (or structure) follows function, the paper addresses the relationship that exists between structure and function in the broad domain of graphic language documents
  10. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.10 
    0.09645145 = product of:
  0.28935432 = sum of:
    0.07233858 = product of:
      0.21701573 = sum of:
        0.21701573 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21701573 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21701573 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21701573 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  11. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.09 
    0.08647302 = product of:
  0.25941905 = sum of:
    0.2223942 = sum of:
      0.14767234 = weight(_text_:theory in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14767234 = score(doc=3339,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.90964836 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07472186 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
    0.037024844 = product of:
      0.07404969 = sum of:
        0.07404969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07404969 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
    Source
    Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honor of J.H. Shera. Ed. by H. Rawski
  12. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.08 
    0.082672656 = product of:
  0.24801795 = sum of:
    0.062004488 = product of:
      0.18601346 = sum of:
        0.18601346 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18601346 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18601346 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18601346 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  13. Trentin, G.: Graphic tools for knowledge representation and informal problem-based learning in professional online communities (2007) 0.08 
    0.08225169 = product of:
  0.16450338 = sum of:
    0.01334319 = product of:
      0.02668638 = sum of:
        0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02668638 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.13373064 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13373064 = score(doc=1463,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.51732135 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
    0.017429566 = product of:
      0.034859132 = sum of:
        0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034859132 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    The use of graphical representations is very common in information technology and engineering. Although these same tools could be applied effectively in other areas, they are not used because they are hardly known or are completely unheard of. This article aims to discuss the results of the experimentation carried out on graphical approaches to knowledge representation during research, analysis and problem-solving in the health care sector. The experimentation was carried out on conceptual mapping and Petri Nets, developed collaboratively online with the aid of the CMapTool and WoPeD graphic applications. Two distinct professional communities have been involved in the research, both pertaining to the Local Health Units in Tuscany. One community is made up of head physicians and health care managers whilst the other is formed by technical staff from the Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene. It emerged from the experimentation that concept maps arc considered more effective in analyzing knowledge domain related to the problem to be faced (description of what it is). On the other hand, Petri Nets arc more effective in studying and formalizing its possible solutions (description of what to do to). For the same reason, those involved in the experimentation have proposed the complementary rather than alternative use of the two knowledge representation methods as a support for professional problem-solving.
    Date
    28. 2.2008 14:16:29
  14. Hughes, A.V.; Rafferty, P.: Inter-indexer consistency in graphic materials indexing at the National Library of Wales (2011) 0.08 
    0.07669772 = product of:
  0.23009317 = sum of:
    0.018646449 = product of:
      0.037292898 = sum of:
        0.037292898 = weight(_text_:theory in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037292898 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.21144672 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21144672 = score(doc=4488,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.8179569 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to report a project to investigate the degree of inter-indexer consistency in the assignment of controlled vocabulary topical subject index terms to identical graphical images by different indexers at the National Library of Wales (NLW). Design/methodology/approach - An experimental quantitative methodology was devised to investigate inter-indexer consistency. Additionally, the project investigated the relationship, if any, between indexing exhaustivity and consistency, and the relationship, if any, between indexing consistency/exhaustivity and broad category of graphic format. Findings - Inter-indexer consistency in the assignment of topical subject index terms to graphic materials at the NLW was found to be generally low and highly variable. Inter-indexer consistency fell within the range 10.8 per cent to 48.0 per cent. Indexing exhaustivity varied substantially from indexer to indexer, with a mean assignment of 3.8 terms by each indexer to each image, falling within the range 2.5 to 4.7 terms. The broad category of graphic format, whether photographic or non-photographic, was found to have little influence on either inter-indexer consistency or indexing exhaustivity. Indexing exhaustivity and inter-indexer consistency exhibited a tendency toward a direct, positive relationship. The findings are necessarily limited as this is a small-scale study within a single institution. Originality/value - Previous consistency studies have almost exclusively investigated the indexing of print materials, with very little research published for non-print media. With the literature also rich in discussion of the added complexities of subjectively representing the intellectual content of visual media, this study attempts to enrich existing knowledge on indexing consistency for graphic materials and to address a noticeable gap in information theory.
  15. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.07 
    0.07471367 = product of:
  0.224141 = sum of:
    0.036918085 = product of:
      0.07383617 = sum of:
        0.07383617 = weight(_text_:theory in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07383617 = score(doc=4536,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.18722291 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18722291 = score(doc=4536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.72424996 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  16. Greenberg, J.: Intellectual control of visual archives : a comparison between the Art and Architecture Thesaurus and the Library of Congress Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (1993) 0.07 
    0.07297295 = product of:
  0.21891886 = sum of:
    0.022375738 = product of:
      0.044751476 = sum of:
        0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044751476 = score(doc=546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.19654313 = weight(_text_:graphic in 546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19654313 = score(doc=546,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.7603041 = fieldWeight in 546, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=546)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The following investigation is a comparison between the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) and the LC Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (LCTGM), two popular sources for providing subject access to visual archives. The analysis begins with a discussion on the nature of visual archives and the employment of archival control theory to graphic materials. The major difference observed is that the AAT is a faceted structure geared towards a specialized audience of art and architecture researchers, while LCTGM is similar to LCSH in structure and aims to service the wide-spread archival community. The conclusion recognizes the need to understand the differences between subject thesauri and subject heading lists, and the pressing need to investigate and understand intellectual control of visual archives in today's automated environment.
  17. Yukimo Kobashio, N.; Santos, R.N.M.: Information organization and representation by graphic devices : an interdisciplinary approach (2007) 0.07 
    0.0719367 = product of:
  0.21581008 = sum of:
    0.02668638 = product of:
      0.05337276 = sum of:
        0.05337276 = weight(_text_:29 in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05337276 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.18912369 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18912369 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.7316029 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    29.12.2007 18:17:29
  18. Houser, J.: ¬The visual vocabulary of the graphical environment (1996) 0.07 
    0.07185667 = product of:
  0.21557 = sum of:
    0.18912369 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18912369 = score(doc=4755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.7316029 = fieldWeight in 4755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4755)
    0.026446318 = product of:
      0.052892637 = sum of:
        0.052892637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052892637 = score(doc=4755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4755)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Identifies the visual vocabulary of use in the graphic user interface (GUI) environment. Offers tips on using GUIs to the user's advantage, highlighting areas which frequently cause confusion. Presents a thesaurus of GUI terms
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:03:57
  19. Cooper, W.S.: Indexing documents by Gedanken experimentation (1978) 0.07 
    0.06959534 = product of:
  0.20878601 = sum of:
    0.0953118 = sum of:
      0.063288145 = weight(_text_:theory in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063288145 = score(doc=412,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
      0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032023653 = score(doc=412,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03903913 = queryNorm
          0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
    0.11347422 = weight(_text_:graphic in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11347422 = score(doc=412,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.43896174 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Although it is widely accepted that indexing and cataloging are central to the document and reference retrieval process, there is as yet little unamity on the issue of how these operations ought to be carried out. Since indexing is a decision-making process, decision theory and utility theory have been proposed as a possible theoretical framework within which to formulate decision rules for indexing. These decision rules may be interpreted operationally as guides to th thought processes appropriate to the making of sound indexing decisions. Ond such thought process involves "gedanken experimentation", in which the indexer is led to an indexing decision by performing suitable thought experiments. This approach to indexing, in addition to providing a theoretical basis for what the indexer does, lends itself to various training schemes for the education of indexers, to the provision of graphic aids to indexing, and to the evaluation of indexing performance. There are also ramifications for automatic indexing.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 29(1978), S.107-119
  20. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.07 
    0.06889388 = product of:
  0.20668164 = sum of:
    0.05167041 = product of:
      0.15501122 = sum of:
        0.15501122 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15501122 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03903913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15501122 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15501122 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3309742 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03903913 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • el 236
  • b 40
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications