-
Information access to graphic information (1990)
0.04
0.044128865 = product of:
0.2647732 = sum of:
0.2647732 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2647732 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
1.0242441 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Theory of subject analysis : A sourcebook (1985)
0.03
0.034590367 = product of:
0.069180734 = sum of:
0.01318503 = product of:
0.02637006 = sum of:
0.02637006 = weight(_text_:theory in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02637006 = score(doc=3622,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.1624372 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.047280923 = weight(_text_:graphic in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047280923 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.18290073 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.008714783 = product of:
0.017429566 = sum of:
0.017429566 = weight(_text_:methods in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017429566 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.11104927 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Content
- Eine exzellente (und durch die Herausgeber kommentierte) Zusammenstellung und Wiedergabe folgender Originalbeiträge: CUTTER, C.A.: Subjects; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index: introduction; HOPWOOD, H.V.: Dewey expanded; HULME, E.W.: Principles of book classification; KAISER, J.O.: Systematic indexing; MARTEL, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice; BLISS, H.E.: A bibliographic classification: principles and definitions; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories; PETTEE, J.: The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information; HAYKIN, D.J.: Subject headings: fundamental concepts; TAUBE, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization: a critique and a proposal; VICKERY, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing; FEIBLEMAN, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels; GARFIELD, E.: Citation indexes for science; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval; LUHN, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature; COATES, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings; FARRADANE, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification; FOSKETT, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels; CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of index language devices; MOOERS, C.N.: The indexing language of an information retrieval system; NEEDHAM, R.M. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Keywords and clumps; ROLLING, L.: The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies; BORKO, H.: Research in computer based classification systems; WILSON, P.: Subjects and the sense of position; LANCASTER, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system; SALTON, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification; AUSTIN, D. u. J.A. DIGGER: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages
-
¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge (2007)
0.03
0.034464356 = product of:
0.06892871 = sum of:
0.009323224 = product of:
0.018646449 = sum of:
0.018646449 = weight(_text_:theory in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018646449 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.11486045 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.047280923 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047280923 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.18290073 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
0.012324564 = product of:
0.024649128 = sum of:
0.024649128 = weight(_text_:methods in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024649128 = score(doc=1150,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15704739 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Interdisciplinarity draws its strength from the ontological view that reality may be explained from various different angles that permit interpretation of phenomena in a more complete way without becoming mere eclecticism. From an epistemological point of view, interdisciplinarity attempts to unify the field of action of the disciplines that study social facts and phenomena. It has no intention of achieving a priori integration of the paradigms of knowledge. Rather, its efforts are aimed at the enrichment and rational exchanging of the methods of various disciplines, to some extent independently of the categories specific to each science, in order to improve study of reality. Transdisciplinarity, for its part, simultaneously covers what lies between disciplines, cuts across various disciplines or goes beyond any discipline. Its aim is to understand the present world, one essential feature of which is the unity of knowledge. Transdisciplinary research is in no way antagonistic to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research, but rather is complementary to it.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: García Marco, F.J. et al.: Proyectos internacionales de reforma y ampliación de las normas sobre tesauros para su adaptación a los nuevos contextos de integración e interoperabilidad en el entorno digital; De Beer, C.S.: Knowledge is everywhere: a philosophical exploration; Hajdu Barát, Á.: Heisenberg and the structure of conceptcontent and dimension; López-Huertas, M.J.: Gestión del conocimiento multidimensional en los sistemas de organización del conocimiento; Sánchez Gómez, L., Campos Havidich, M.: The idealist paradigm in knowledge representation; González Alcaide, G., et al.: Ámbitos de investigación y colaboració entre disciplinas en la producción científica española sobre abuso de sustancias; Yukimo Kobashio, N., Santos, R.N.M.: Information organization and representation by graphic devices: an interdisciplinary approach; Gnoli, C., Bosch, M., Mazzocchi, F.: A new relationship for multidisciplinary knowledge organization systems: dependence; González de Gómez, M.N., Goyannes Dill Orrico, E., Graciosa, L.: Grupos de investigación interdisciplinaria: flujos transversals de información; Rodríguez López, M. Del C., Santos de Paz, L., Gallego Lorenzo, J., Morán Suárez, M.A.: La red social conocimiento para la inmigración: el caso de Castilla y León; Ferrer Morillo, L.M., Portillo de Hernández, R.: Tesauros transdisciplinarios: del reduccionismo científico a la unidad del conocimiento; Guimarães, J.A.C. et al.: Los valores éticos en organización y representación del conocimiento (ORC); Davies, S.: Mediating knowledge across the activities of information science; Borrego Díaz, J., Chávez González, A.M.: Anomalías en ontologías provisionales; Bräscher, M., Monteiro, F., Silva, A.: Life cycle assessment ontology; Szotak, R.: Interdisciplinarity and the classification of scholarly documents by phenomena, theories and methods; Polsinelli Rubi, M., Spotti Lopes Fujita, M.: La política de indización en la perspectiva del conocimiento organizacional; Gutiérrez García, B., Rodríguez Yunta, L., Román Román, A.: Bases de datos bibliográficas y clasificación de revistas científicas: problemas de la interisciplinariedad para la automatización de procesos; Rodríguez Isaías García, F.,
Benavides, C., Aláiz, H., Alfonso, J., Alonso, Á.: An ontology for control engineering; Ferreira de Oliveira, M.F., Schiessl, M.: Estimate of the distance between areas of an organization using the concept of interlinguistic distance; Lara, M.G.L. de.: Ciencias del lenguaje, terminología y ciencia de la información: relaciones interdisciplinarias y transdisciplinariedad; Moreiro González, J.A.: Evolución paralela de los lenguajes documentales y la terminología; Triska, R.: Artificial intelligence, classification theory and the uncertainty reduction process; Casari Boccato, V.R., Spotti Lopes Fujita, M.: Aproximación cualitativa-cognitiva como método de evaluación de lenguajes documentales: una técnica de protocolo verbal; De Brito Neves, D.A., De Albuquerque, M.E.B.C.: Biblioteca digital un convergencia multidisciplinar; Miranda, A., Simeão, E.: Aspectos interdisciplinarios y tecnológicos de la autoría colectiva e individual; San Segundo, R.: Incidencia de aspectos culturales y siciales en la organización del conocimento transdisciplinar; Barber, E., et al.: Los catálogos en línea de acceso público disponibles en entorno web de las bibliotecas universitarias y especializadas en Argentina y Brasil: diagnóstico de situación; Forsman, M.: Diffusion of a new concept: the case of social capital; Pajor, E.: Una aplicación de topic map que puede ser un modelo posible; Moreiro González, J.A., Franco Álvarez, G., Garcia Martul, D.: Un vocabulario controlado para una hemerotecá: posibilidades y características de los topicsets; Cavalcanti de Miranda, M.L.: Organización y representación del conocimiento: fundamentos teóricos y metológicos para la recuperación de la información en entornos virtuales; Moacir Francelin, M.: Espacios de significación y representación del conocimiento: un análisis sobre teorias y métodos de organización de conceptos en ciencia de la información; Spiteri, L.: The structure and form of folksonomy tags: the road to the public library catalogue;
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.03
0.03320545 = product of:
0.09961635 = sum of:
0.019377958 = product of:
0.038755916 = sum of:
0.038755916 = weight(_text_:theory in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038755916 = score(doc=2072,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23873296 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08023839 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023839 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31039283 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- LCSH
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
- Subject
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
-
Information systems outsourcing in theory and practice (1995)
0.03
0.029744968 = product of:
0.0892349 = sum of:
0.052210055 = product of:
0.10442011 = sum of:
0.10442011 = weight(_text_:theory in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10442011 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.037024844 = product of:
0.07404969 = sum of:
0.07404969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404969 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.1996 10:51:56
-
Emerging frameworks and methods : Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002 (2002)
0.03
0.028882708 = product of:
0.08664812 = sum of:
0.04050887 = sum of:
0.029834319 = weight(_text_:theory in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029834319 = score(doc=55,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.18377672 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.010674552 = weight(_text_:29 in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010674552 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.046139255 = sum of:
0.031178957 = weight(_text_:methods in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031178957 = score(doc=55,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.198651 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.014960297 = weight(_text_:22 in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014960297 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Held for the first time in the United States, the Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4) is the fourth in the series of international conferences that bring together leading researchers from around the world. CoLIS4 provides a forum for critically exploring and analyzing library and information science as a discipline and as a field of research from historical, philosophical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives. The papers in this volume cover a wide variety of topics, presenting the latest research and information on new developments and new approaches to conceptual frameworks and methods in library and information science. Papers range from a re-examination of the core concepts to empirical studies, analyzing such areas as Web searching, information retrieval, informetrics, information behavior, aspects of learning, business intelligence, and information processing mechanisms. As library and information science is closely associated with a variety of other disciplines and its practice employs technologies that are changing rapidly, presenters focus on the old and the new, address theory and practice, and bridge diverse intellectual areas. From challenging existing approaches and proposing new ones to establishing models and reviewing methods-the presenters lead the way to change and further exploration.
- Content
- To encourage a spirit of deeper reflection, the organizing committee invited 20-minute paper presentations, each followed by 10 minutes of discussion. (There were no separate, concurrent tracks.) This approach encouraged direct follow-up questions and discussion which carried forward from session to session, providing a satisfying sense of continuity to the overall conference theme of exploring the interaction between conceptual and empirical approaches to LIS. The expressed goals of CoLIS4 were to: - explore the existing and emerging conceptual frameworks and methods of library and information science as a field, - encourage discourse about the character and definitions of key concepts in LIS, and - examine the position of LIS among parallel contemporary domains and professions likewise concerned with information and information technology, such as computer science, management information systems, and new media and communication studies. The keynote address by Tom Wilson (University of Sheffield) provided an historical perspective on the philosophical and research frameworks of LIS in the post-World War II period. He traced the changing emphases on the objects of LIS study: definitions of information and documents; information retrieval, relevance, systems, and architectures; information users and behaviors. He raised issues of the relevance of LIS research to real-world information services and practice, and the gradual shift in research approaches from quantitative to qualitative. He concluded by stressing the ongoing need of LIS for cumulative, theory-based, and content-rich bodies of research, meaningful to practitioners and useful to contemporary LIS education.
Themes and questions threaded throughout the conference papers and panels addressed the uniqueness of LIS as a contemporary "intersection of information, technology, people, and society" (CoLIS Proceedings Preface). Papers by Birger Hjørland and by Sanna Talja, Kimmo Tuominen, and Reijo Savolainen directly addressed the essential nature and metatheory of LIS as a field of inquiry by reviewing its theoretical models and epistemological perspectives, such as the information transfer model and socio-cognitive theory. The cognitive grounding of much LIS research was present in Pertti Vakkari's and Mikko Pennanen's study linking university students' concept formation with their search processes and task performances while preparing research proposals, as well as in Peter Ingwersen's analysis of the cognitive conception of document polyrepresentation (multiple ways of representing documents) applied to information retrieval. A number of papers presented empirically and theoretically derived taxonomies of the fundamental characteristics of information bearers (documents and systems) and information behaviors (both individual and collaborative). These mark a contemporary effort to enumerate and classify the elements that LIS researchers should be examining and with which they should be building systems and generating theory. Nicholas Belkin and Colleen Cool reported on field research with which they are constructing a taxonomy of interactions in information seeking and communication behavior, to be used to inform information system building. Rong Tang presented her taxonomic study of Web searching query patterns and argued for the need to link these to user cognitive operations and search tasks. Linda Cooper explored school children's categorizations and knowledge of information organization in libraries by having them arrange books and topics visually and spatially on "virtual" bookshelves. Kartriina Byström and Preben Hansen proposed a nested typology of the concepts of work tasks, information seeking tasks, and information retrieval tasks as units of analysis for LIS research. Work task and domain analysis figured importantly in several papers, reflecting a increasing application of information context research approaches. In addition to Byström and Hansen's theoretical study of the concepts of tasks in general, the work reported by researchers at Risø National Laboratory, Denmark (Annelise Mark Pejtersen, Bryan Cleal, Morten Hertzum, Hanne Albrechtsen) demonstrated the application of the Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) framework used to inform the design of a virtual "collaboratory" used by three European film archives. Birger Hjørland asserted that domain analysis, including the study of the interests, goals, values, and consequences of information use and users in specific subject and work domains, is central to the practice of LIS.
LIS research and evaluation methodologies fell under the same scrutiny and systematization, particularly in the presentations employing multiple and mixed methodologies. Jaana Kekäläinen's and Kalervo Järvelin's proposal for a framework of laboratory information retrieval evaluation measures, applied along with analyses of information seeking and work task contexts, employed just such a mix. Marcia Bates pulled together Bradford's Law of Scattering of decreasingly relevant information sources and three information searching techniques (browsing, directed searching, and following links) to pose the question: what are the optimum searching techniques for the different regions of information concentrations? Jesper Schneider and Pia Borlund applied bibliometric methods (document co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-word analysis) to augment manual thesaurus construction and maintenance. Fredrik Åström examined document keyword co-occurrence measurement compared to and then combined with bibliometric co-citation analysis to map LIS concept spaces. Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas, and Keith van Rijsbergen compared system-supplied query expansion terms with interactive user query expansion, incorporating both partial relevance assessment feedback (how relevant is a document) and ostensive relevance feedback (measuring when a document is assessed as relevant over time). Scheduled in the midst of the presentations were two stimulating panel and audience discussions. The first panel, chaired by Glynn Harmon, explored the current re-positioning of many library and information science schools by renaming themselves to eliminate the "library" word and emphasize the "information" word (as in "School of Information," "Information School," and schools of "Information Studies"). Panelists Marcia Bates, Harry Bruce, Toni Carbo, Keith Belton, and Andrew Dillon presented the reasons for name changes in their own information programs, which include curricular change and expansion beyond a "stereotypical" library focus, broader contemporary theoretical approaches to information, new clientele and markets for information services and professionals, new media formats and delivery models, and new interdisciplinary student and faculty recruitment from crossover fields. Sometimes criticized for over-broadness and ambiguity-and feared by library practitioners who were trained in more traditional library schools-renaming schools both results from and occasions a renewed examination of the definitions and boundaries of the field as a whole and the educational and research missions of individual schools.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:12:10
- Footnote
- Vgl. den Bericht in: Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.231-234.
-
Tools for knowledge organization and the human interface : Proc. 1st Int. ISKO-Conference Darmstadt, 14.-17.8.1990. Vol.1-2 (1990-91)
0.03
0.026415272 = product of:
0.07924581 = sum of:
0.013052514 = product of:
0.026105028 = sum of:
0.026105028 = weight(_text_:theory in 270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026105028 = score(doc=270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.16080463 = fieldWeight in 270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0661933 = weight(_text_:graphic in 270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0661933 = score(doc=270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.25606102 = fieldWeight in 270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=270)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HILDRETH, Ch.R.: End users and structured searching of online catalogues: recent resaarch findings; FUJIKAWA, M.: Concept theory and facet analysis of knowledge units - with emphasis on AI research; GILCHRIST, A.: Knowledge organization and the human interface; SECHSER, O.: Classification issues in databases from machine-readable text data; VICKERY, B.C.: Classificatory principles in intelligent interfaces; HJERPPE, R.: A framework for characterizing systems for knowledge organization: a first basis for comparisons and evaluation; MARKEY DRABENSTOTT, K.: Experiences with online catalogs in the USA using a classification system as a subject searching tool; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: Software concepts: knowledge organization and the human interface; BOON, J.A.: The integration of technology in the organization and dissemination of information; FUGMANN, R.: Unused opportunities in indexing and classification; MOLHOLT, P.: Standardizing and codifying related term links for improved information retrieval; BAUER, G.: Promoting creative processes by a thesaurus-like representation of knowledge structures; DEFFNER, R. u. H. GEIGER: Associative word recognition with connectionist architectures; RUGE, G. u. Ch. SCHWARZ: Linguistically based term associations; BOUCHE, R., S. LAINE u. J.-P. METZGER: Knowledge retrieval from a documentary set; CIGANIK, M.: Key faceted structures in the text as background of text understanding; GROLIER, E. de: Some notes on the question of a so-called "Unified classification"; SUKIASJAN, E.: Description and analysis of the Library-Bibliographic Classification (BBK/LBC); RIESTHUIS, G.J.A. u. S. BLIEDUNG: Thesaurification of the UDC; BIES, W.: Die Rezeption von Regelwerken zur Sacherschließung: Das Beispiel RSWK; STERN, A. u. N. RISCHETTE: On the construction of a super thesaurus based on existing thesauri; CRAVEN, T.: Automatic structure modification in the graphic display of thesauri; REES-POTTER, L.K.: Dynamic thesauri: the cohnitive function; EISNER, M.: New thesaurus qualities of ARBOR; GÖDERT, W.: The design of subject access elements in online catalogues: some problems; IYER, H.: Online searching: use of classificatory structures; VASILJEV; A.: Enhancement of the subject access vocabulray in an online catalogue; DYKSTRA, M.: "Handling the stuff itself": toward automatic textual analysis; PEJTERSEN, A.M.: Icons for representation of domain knowledge in interfaces; CZAP, H.: Representation of interrelated economic concepts and facts; HÖLZL, J.: Expertensysteme in Produkt- und Warenwirtschaft; VISCHER, J.: Das harmonisierte System zur Bezeichnung und Codierung der Waren des internationalen Handels; LESCH, A. u. P. SZABO: Hypermedia approaches; BJÖRKLUND, L.: HYPERCLASS: Four hypertext applications of a classification scheme; BJÖRKLUND, L. u. G. KRISTIANSSON: Problems of knowledge organization in an archival environment - KAM; HJERPPE, R.: The role of classification in hypertext: issues in implementing Roget's thesaurus as a hypertext; HUG, H. u. M. WALSER: Retrieval in the ETH database using the UDC; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The Library of Congress Classification: preparation for an online system; GOPINATH, M.A.: Information processing language and development of a knowledge based system; VICKERY, A.: Knowledge organization in an intelligent tutoring system; OECHTERING, V.: On the problem of transparency of individual computer technologies in subject-oriented online retrieval; ROCKMORE, M.: Facet analysis and thesauri for corporate information retreival; SCHOPEN, M.: Cross file searching of biomedical databases at DIMDI; POULSEN, C.: An indexing concept supporting subject access for innovation and creativity; PRASHER, R.G.: Index and indexing; PARAMESWARAN, M.: Chain procedure and Dewey Decimal Classification; IIVONEN, M.: The impact of the indexing environment on interindexer consistency. -
-
Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013)
0.03
0.025928404 = product of:
0.07778521 = sum of:
0.009340232 = product of:
0.018680464 = sum of:
0.018680464 = weight(_text_:29 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018680464 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.068444975 = sum of:
0.042264454 = weight(_text_:methods in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042264454 = score(doc=1155,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2692802 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.02618052 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02618052 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Metadata and semantics are integral to any information system and significant to the sphere of Web data. Research focusing on metadata and semantics is crucial for advancing our understanding and knowledge of metadata; and, more profoundly for being able to effectively discover, use, archive, and repurpose information. In response to this need, researchers are actively examining methods for generating, reusing, and interchanging metadata. Integrated with these developments is research on the application of computational methods, linked data, and data analytics. A growing body of work also targets conceptual and theoretical designs providing foundational frameworks for metadata and semantic applications. There is no doubt that metadata weaves its way into nearly every aspect of our information ecosystem, and there is great motivation for advancing the current state of metadata and semantics. To this end, it is vital that scholars and practitioners convene and share their work.
All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"
- Date
- 17.12.2013 12:51:22
-
Cataloguing: the new and the old (1994)
0.02
0.02479526 = product of:
0.07438578 = sum of:
0.03736093 = product of:
0.07472186 = sum of:
0.07472186 = weight(_text_:29 in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07472186 = score(doc=2331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.037024844 = product of:
0.07404969 = sum of:
0.07404969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404969 = score(doc=2331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 17.10.1995 18:22:54
- Source
- Colorado libraries. 20(1994) no.3, S.5-29
-
Multimedia content and the Semantic Web : methods, standards, and tools (2005)
0.02
0.023733368 = product of:
0.0712001 = sum of:
0.009323224 = product of:
0.018646449 = sum of:
0.018646449 = weight(_text_:theory in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018646449 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.11486045 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.061876882 = sum of:
0.038973697 = weight(_text_:methods in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038973697 = score(doc=150,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.24831375 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.022903185 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022903185 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Classification
- 006.7 22
- Date
- 7. 3.2007 19:30:22
- DDC
- 006.7 22
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.
Semantic web technologies are explained, and ontology representation is emphasized. There is an excellent summary of the fundamental theory behind applying a knowledge-engineering approach to vision problems. This summary represents the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis. A definition of the fuzzy knowledge representation that can be used for realization in multimedia content applications has been provided, with a comprehensive analysis. The second part of the book introduces the multimedia content analysis approaches and applications. In addition, some examples of methods applicable to multimedia content analysis are presented. Multimedia content analysis is a very diverse field and concerns many other research fields at the same time; this creates strong diversity issues, as everything from low-level features (e.g., colors, DCT coefficients, motion vectors, etc.) up to the very high and semantic level (e.g., Object, Events, Tracks, etc.) are involved. The second part includes topics on structure identification (e.g., shot detection for video sequences), and object-based video indexing. These conventional analysis methods are supplemented by results on semantic multimedia analysis, including three detailed chapters on the development and use of knowledge models for automatic multimedia analysis. Starting from object-based indexing and continuing with machine learning, these three chapters are very logically organized. Because of the diversity of this research field, including several chapters of recent research results is not sufficient to cover the state of the art of multimedia. The editors of the book should write an introductory chapter about multimedia content analysis approaches, basic problems, and technical issues and challenges, and try to survey the state of the art of the field and thus introduce the field to the reader.
The final part of the book discusses research in multimedia content management systems and the semantic web, and presents examples and applications for semantic multimedia analysis in search and retrieval systems. These chapters describe example systems in which current projects have been implemented, and include extensive results and real demonstrations. For example, real case scenarios such as ECommerce medical applications and Web services have been introduced. Topics in natural language, speech and image processing techniques and their application for multimedia indexing, and content-based retrieval have been elaborated upon with extensive examples and deployment methods. The editors of the book themselves provide the readers with a chapter about their latest research results on knowledge-based multimedia content indexing and retrieval. Some interesting applications for multimedia content and the semantic web are introduced. Applications that have taken advantage of the metadata provided by MPEG7 in order to realize advance-access services for multimedia content have been provided. The applications discussed in the third part of the book provide useful guidance to researchers and practitioners properly planning to implement semantic multimedia analysis techniques in new research and development projects in both academia and industry. A fourth part should be added to this book: performance measurements for integrated approaches of multimedia analysis and the semantic web. Performance of the semantic approach is a very sophisticated issue and requires extensive elaboration and effort. Measuring the semantic search is an ongoing research area; several chapters concerning performance measurement and analysis would be required to adequately cover this area and introduce it to readers."
-
Structures and relations in knowledge organization : Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998 (1998)
0.02
0.022641659 = product of:
0.06792498 = sum of:
0.011187869 = product of:
0.022375738 = sum of:
0.022375738 = weight(_text_:theory in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022375738 = score(doc=3085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.13783254 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05673711 = weight(_text_:graphic in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05673711 = score(doc=3085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.21948087 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Defining the conceptual space for a world exhibition - first experiences; SOLOMON. P.: On the use of research categorizations as the basis for organizing knowledge: a test in the domain of information behavior in health care; BEAN, C.: The semantics of hierarchy: explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures; HUDON, M.: A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus; JOUIS, C.: System of types + inter-concept relations properties: towards validation of constructed terminologies; HETZLER, B. et al.: Visualizing the full spectrum of document relationships; GREEN, R.: Attribution and relationality; KOLMAYER, E. et al.: Conceptual maps: users navigation trough paradigmatic and syntagmatic links; NAKAMURA, Y.: Subdivisions vs. conjunctions: a discussion on concept theory; DAHLBERG, I.: Classification structure principles: investigations, experiences, conclusions; FROISSART, C. u. G. LALLICH-BOIDIN: Towards structuring of indexing vocabulary for large technical documents; MOUNIER, E. u. C. PAGANELLI: Text structure and information retrieval in large documents; LAROUK, O.: Modelling users need: schemas of interrogation and filtering of answers from the WEB in co-operative mode; VILADENC, I. u. O.DUPONT: Knowledge transfer in the field of telematics, in a didactic communicational context realized with hypermedia support; WILLIAMSON, N.: An interdisciplinary world and discipline based classification; BEGHTOL, C.: General classification systems: structural principles for multidisciplinary specification; McILWAINE, I.: Knowledge classifications, bibliographic classifications and the Internet;
OLSON, H.A. u. D.B. WARD: Charting a journey across knowledge domains: feminism in the Dewey Decimal Classification; RIESTHUIS, G.J.A.: Decomposition of UDC-numbers and the text of the UDC Master Reference File; MEO-EVOLI, L. u.a.: ICC and ICS: comparison and relations between two systems based on different principles; BARTOLO, L.M. et al.: The ALCOM/NIST heterogeneous structures database: knowledge structure for basic and applied research in an interdisciplinary scientific collaboration; BOWKER, L.: Peering through the linguistic keyhole: what can term choice tell us about knowledge organization?; ROUAULT, J.: About abuctive reasoning; GRUSELLE, J.-P.: A cognitive sciences system for symbol grounding; BEEBE, C. u. E.K. JACOB: Graphic language documents: structures and functions; METZGER, J.-P.: Information systems and professional activities; MUSTAFA EL-HADI, W.: Automatic term recognition & extraction tools: examining the new interfaces and their effective communication role in LSP discourse;
-
Pollitt, A.S.; Ellis, G.P.; Smith, M.P.; Li, C.S.: HIBROWSE: adding the power of relational databases to the traditional IR architecture : the future for Graphic User Interfaces (1994)
0.02
0.022064433 = product of:
0.1323866 = sum of:
0.1323866 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1323866 = score(doc=2732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 2732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2732)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Sixth International World Wide Web Conference (1997)
0.02
0.02125308 = product of:
0.06375924 = sum of:
0.032023653 = product of:
0.06404731 = sum of:
0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 2053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06404731 = score(doc=2053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=2053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.865-1542
-
Visualization and graphics on the World Wide Web (1997)
0.02
0.02125308 = product of:
0.06375924 = sum of:
0.032023653 = product of:
0.06404731 = sum of:
0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 6613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06404731 = score(doc=6613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 6613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=6613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.14, S.1555-1744
-
Multimedia information resources (1997)
0.02
0.02125308 = product of:
0.06375924 = sum of:
0.032023653 = product of:
0.06404731 = sum of:
0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06404731 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 31.12.1998 22:05:21
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Australian academic and research libraries 29(1998) no.1, S.68 (B. Collins)
-
Wissen in Aktion : Wege des Knowledge Managements, 22. Online-Tagung der DGI 2000 / Frankfurt am Main, 2. bis 4. Mai 2000: Proceedings (2000)
0.02
0.02125308 = product of:
0.06375924 = sum of:
0.032023653 = product of:
0.06404731 = sum of:
0.06404731 = weight(_text_:29 in 1025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06404731 = score(doc=1025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1025)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03173558 = product of:
0.06347116 = sum of:
0.06347116 = weight(_text_:22 in 1025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06347116 = score(doc=1025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1025)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 2.10.2006 12:29:24
-
Weeding and maintenance of reference collections (1990)
0.02
0.020515172 = product of:
0.061545514 = sum of:
0.02668638 = product of:
0.05337276 = sum of:
0.05337276 = weight(_text_:29 in 6670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05337276 = score(doc=6670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 6670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034859132 = product of:
0.069718264 = sum of:
0.069718264 = weight(_text_:methods in 6670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069718264 = score(doc=6670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.4441971 = fieldWeight in 6670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Present practical advice on weeding and maintaining reference collections, covering different types of libraries and problems. In individual papers, librarians describe methods and criteria used by their libraries in weeding their reference materials
- Series
- Reference librarian; no.29
-
Analyses of bibliographies (1973)
0.02
0.02043515 = product of:
0.1226109 = sum of:
0.1226109 = sum of:
0.069718264 = weight(_text_:methods in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069718264 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.4441971 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
0.052892637 = weight(_text_:22 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052892637 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- SIMON, H.R.: Introduction: why analyze bibliographies?; MARTYN, J.: Secondary services and the rising tide of paper; BROOKES, B.C.: Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis; THOMPSON, L.S.: The humanities: a state of the art report; BOTTLE, R.T.: Information obtainable from analyses of scientific bibliographies; SIMON, H.R.: Outlook: the analyses of bibliographies in the future
- Source
- Library trends. 22(1973), no.1
-
Current theory in library and information science (2002)
0.02
0.019368425 = product of:
0.05810527 = sum of:
0.051133446 = product of:
0.10226689 = sum of:
0.10226689 = weight(_text_:theory in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10226689 = score(doc=822,freq=94.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.6299549 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
9.69536 = tf(freq=94.0), with freq of:
94.0 = termFreq=94.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0069718263 = product of:
0.013943653 = sum of:
0.013943653 = weight(_text_:methods in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013943653 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.08883942 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 54(2003) no.4, S.358-359 (D.O. Case): "Having recently written a chapter an theories applied in information-seeking research (Case, 2002), I was eager to read this issue of Library Trends devoted to "Current Theory." Once in hand I found the individual articles in the issue to be of widely varying quality, and the scope to be disappointingly narrow. A more accurate title might be "Some Articles about Theory, with Even More an Bibliometrics." Eight of the thirteen articles (not counting the Editor's brief introduction) are about quantifying the growth, quality and/or authorship of literature (mostly in the sciences, with one example from the humanities). Social and psychological theories are hardly mentioned-even though one of the articles claims that nearly half of all theory invoked in LIS emanates from the social sciences. The editor, SUNY Professor Emeritus William E. McGrath, claims that the first six articles are about theory, while the rest are original research that applies theory to some problem-a characterization that I find odd. Reading his Introduction provides some clues to the curious composition of this issue. McGrath states that only in "physics and other exact sciences" are definitions of theory "well understood" (p. 309)-a view I think most psychologists and sociologists would content-and restricts his own definition of theory to "an explanation for a quantifiable phenomenon" (p. 310). In his own chapter in the issue, "Explanation and Prediction," McGrath makes it clear that he holds out hope for a "unified theory of librarianship" that would resemble those regarding "fundamental forces in physics and astronomy." However, isn't it wishful thinking to hope for a physics-like theory to emerge from particular practices (e.g., citation) and settings (e.g., libraries) when broad generalizations do not easily accrue from observation of more basic human behaviors? Perhaps this is where the emphasis an documents, rather than people, entered into the choice of material for "Current Theory." Artifacts of human behavior, such as documents, are more amenable to prediction in ways that allow for the development of theorywitness Zipf's Principle of Least Effort, the Bradford Distribution, Lotka's Law, etc. I imagine that McGrath would say that "librarianship," at least, is more about materials than people. McGrath's own contribution to this issue emphasizes measures of libraries, books and journals. By citing exemplar studies, he makes it clear that much has been done to advance measurement of library operations, and he eloquently argues for an overarching view of the various library functions and their measures. But, we have all heard similar arguments before; other disciplines, in earlier times, have made the argument that a solid foundation of empirical observation had been laid down, which would lead inevitably to a grand theory of "X." McGrath admits that "some may say the vision [of a unified theory] is naive" (p. 367), but concludes that "It remains for researchers to tie the various level together more formally . . . in constructing a comprehensive unified theory of librarianship."
However, for well over a century, major libraries in developed nations have been engaging in sophisticated measure of their operations, and thoughtful scholars have been involved along the way; if no "unified theory" has emerged thus far, why would it happen in the near future? What if "libraries" are a historicallydetermined conglomeration of distinct functions, some of which are much less important than others? It is telling that McGrath cites as many studies an brittle paper as he does investigations of reference services among his constellation of measurable services, even while acknowledging that the latter (as an aspect of "circulation") is more "essential." If one were to include in a unified theory similar phenomena outside of libraries-e.g., what happens in bookstores and WWW searches-it can be seen how difficult a coordinated explanation might become. Ultimately the value of McGrath's chapter is not in convincing the reader that a unified theory might emerge, but rather in highlighting the best in recent studies that examine library operations, identifying robust conclusions, and arguing for the necessity of clarifying and coordinating common variables and units of analysis. McGrath's article is one that would be useful for a general course in LIS methodology, and certainly for more specific lectures an the evaluation of libraries. Fra going to focus most of my comments an the remaining articles about theory, rather than the others that offer empirical results about the growth or quality of literature. I'll describe the latter only briefly. The best way to approach this issue is by first reading McKechnie and Pettigrew's thorough survey of the "Use of Theory in LIS research." Earlier results of their extensive content analysis of 1, 160 LIS articles have been published in other journals before, but is especially pertinent here. These authors find that only a third of LIS literature makes overt reference to theory, and that both usage and type of theory are correlated with the specific domain of the research (e.g., historical treatments versus user studies versus information retrieval). Lynne McKechnie and Karen Pettigrew identify four general sources of theory: LIS, the Humanities, Social Sciences and Sciences. This approach makes it obvious that the predominant source of theory is the social sciences (45%), followed by LIS (30%), the sciences (19%) and the humanities (5%) - despite a predominance (almost 60%) of articles with science-related content. The authors discuss interdisciplinarity at some length, noting the great many non-LIS authors and theories which appear in the LIS literature, and the tendency for native LIS theories to go uncited outside of the discipline. Two other articles emphasize the ways in which theory has evolved. The more general of three two is Jack Glazier and Robert Grover's update of their classic 1986 Taxonomy of Theory in LIS. This article describes an elaborated version, called the "Circuits of Theory," offering definitions of a hierarchy of terms ranging from "world view" through "paradigm," "grand theory" and (ultimately) "symbols." Glazier & Grover's one-paragraph example of how theory was applied in their study of city managers is much too brief and is at odds with the emphasis an quantitative indicators of literature found in the rest of the volume. The second article about the evolution of theory, Richard Smiraglia's "The progress of theory in knowledge organization," restricts itself to the history of thinking about cataloging and indexing. Smiraglia traces the development of theory from a pragmatic concern with "what works," to a reliance an empirical tests, to an emerging flirtation with historicist approaches to knowledge.
There is only one article in the issue that claims to offer a theory of the scope that discussed by McGrath, and I am sorry that it appears in this issue. Bor-Sheng Tsai's "Theory of Information Genetics" is an almost incomprehensible combination of four different "models" wich names like "Möbius Twist" and "Clipping-Jointing." Tsai starts by posing the question "What is it that makes the `UNIVERSAL' information generating, representation, and transfer happen?" From this ungrammatical beginning, things get rapidly worse. Tsai makes side trips into the history of defining information, offers three-dimensional plots of citation data, a formula for "bonding relationships," hypothetical data an food consumption, sample pages from a web-based "experts directory" and dozens of citations from works which are peripheral to the discussion. The various sections of the article seem to have little to do with one another. I can't believe that the University of Illinois would publish something so poorly-edited. Now I will turn to the dominant, "bibliometric" articles in this issue, in order of their appearance: Judit Bar-Ilan and Bluma Peritz write about "Informetric Theories and Methods for Exploring the Internet." Theirs is a survey of research an patterns of electronic publication, including different ways of sampling, collecting and analyzing data an the Web. Their contribution to the "theory" theme lies in noting that some existing bibliometric laws apply to the Web. William Hood and Concepción Wilson's article, "Solving Problems ... Using Fuzzy Set Theory," demonstrates the widespread applicability of this mathematical tool for library-related problems, such as making decisions about the binding of documents, or improving document retrieval. Ronald Rosseau's piece an "Journal Evaluation" discusses the strength and weaknesses of various indicators for determining impact factors and rankings for journals. His is an exceptionally well-written article that has everything to do with measurement but almost nothing to do with theory, to my way of thinking. "The Matthew Effect for Countries" is the topic of Manfred Bonitz's paper an citations to scientific publications, analyzed by nation of origin. His research indicates that publications from certain countries-such as Switzerland, Denmark, the USA and the UK-receive more than the expected number of citations; correspondingly, some rather large countries like China receive much fewer than might be expected. Bonitz provides an extensive discussion of how the "MEC" measure came about, and what it ments-relating it to efficiency in scientific research. A bonus is his detour into the origins of the Matthew Effect in the Bible, and the subsequent popularization of the name by the sociologist Robert Merton. Wolfgang Glänzel's "Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998)" is, as the title implies, another citation analysis. He compares the number of authors an papers in three fields-Biomedical research, Chemistry and Mathematics - at sixyear intervals. Among other conclusions, Glänzel notes that the percentage of publications with four or more authors has been growing in all three fields, and that multiauthored papers are more likely to be cited.
Coauthorship is also the topic in Hildrun Kretschmer's article an the origins and uses of "Gestalt Theory." The explanation of the theory is fascinating but the application of it, involving threedimensional graphics depicting coauthorship in physics and medicine, seems somewhat distant from Gestalt Theory and the importance of the results is hard to appreciate. Henk Moed, Marc Luwel, and A.J. Nederhof apply bibliometrics to the evaluation of research performance in the humanities, specifically, Flemish professors of law. Their attempts to classify and measure research output appear rather specific to the population they studied, with little contribution to a more general bibliometric theory. The final contribution is by Peter Vinkler. He offers a comprehensive model of the growth and institutionalization of scientific information. Since it could be viewed as an overview of the concerns of scientometrics, Vinkler's article might best be read before some of the others described above. To conclude, this issue of Library Trends has a schizophrenic quality about it. "Theory" is defined broadly in those initial articles "about" theory (especially in those by McKechnie and Pettigrew, and by Glazier and Grover), but most of the remainder of the pieces consider theory narrowly in the context of bibliometric analysis. This is unfortunate an two counts. First, while bibliometric investigations have uncovered fascinating and useful statistical regularities in the growth, authorship and citation of literature, they are often short an the sort of explanation that we would expect from a well-developed theory. That is, why do the statistical distributions (of publications, citations, etc.) appear as they do? Second, information science studies people at least as much as it does documents. Appropriately, then, most of our theory comes from the social sciences (as the McKechnie and Pettigrew article convincingly demonstrates). However, this source of theory is virtually ignored in the issue of Library Trends an "current theory." What a shame."
-
Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century : integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference, 10-13 July 2002, Granada, Spain (2003)
0.02
0.01869945 = product of:
0.05609835 = sum of:
0.04050887 = sum of:
0.029834319 = weight(_text_:theory in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029834319 = score(doc=2679,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.18377672 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
0.010674552 = weight(_text_:29 in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010674552 = score(doc=2679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
0.015589478 = product of:
0.031178957 = sum of:
0.031178957 = weight(_text_:methods in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031178957 = score(doc=2679,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.198651 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Rebecca GREEN: Conceptual Universals in Knowledge Organization and Representation; 1. Theoretical Models and Universals in Knowledge Organization and Representation Jack ANDERSEN: Ascribing Cognitive Authority to Scholarly Documents an the (Possible) Role of Knowledge Organization in Scholarly Communication; Elin K. JACOB: Augmenting Human Capabilities: Classification as Cognitive Scaffolding; Clare BEGHTOL: Universal Concepts, Cultural Warrant and Cultural Hospitality; Maria Nélida GONZÁLEZ DE GÓMEZ: Knowledge, Communication, Information: Intersubject Links Institutional and Technological Mediations in Information; Joe TENNIS: Subject Ontogeny: Subject Access Through Time and the Dimensionality of Classification; 2. Epistemological Foundations for Knowledge Structures and Analysis Nuno SILVA and Joáo ROCHA: Merging Ontologies Using a Bottom-Up Lexical and Structural Approach; Giliola NEGRINI and Patrizia ZOZI: Ontological Analysis of the Literary Work of Art; Jarmo SAARTI: The Analysis of the Information Process of Fiction: a Holistic Approach to Information Processing; N.Y. KOBASHI, J.W. SMIT and M. de F.G.M. TÁLAMO: Constitution of the Scientific Domain of Information Science; 3. Models and Methods for Knowledge Representation Anita COLEMAN: A Classification of Models; Gian Piero ZARRI: Indexing and Querying of Narrative Documents, a Knowledge Representation Approach: Jeremy J. SHAPIRO: Interdisciplinary Knowledge Integration and Intellectual Creativity; Rahmatollah FATTAHI and Mehri PARIROKH: Restructuring the Bibliographic Record for Better Organization, Management, and Representation of Knowledge in the Global Online Environment: a New Approach; Devika P. MADALLI and A.R.D. PRASSAD: Vyasa: a Knowledge Representation System for Automatic Maintenance of Analytico-Synthetic Scheme; Catalina NAUMIS PENA: Images and Words; 4. Models and Methods for Knowledge Organization. Tools and Systems Maria Ines CORDEIRO and Aida SLAVIC: Data Models for Knowledge Organization Tools: Evolution and Perspectives; Vanda BROUGHTON: Facet Analytical Theory as a Basis for Knowledge Oganization Tool in a Subject Portal; Stella G DEXTRE CLARKE: Planning Controlled Vocabularies for the Uk Public; Sector Widad MUSTAFA el HADI: Terminology & Information Retrieval: New Tools for New Needs. Integration of Knowledge Across Boundaries; Hur-Li LEE and Allyson CARLYLE: Academic Library Gateways to Online Information: a Taxonomy of Organizational Structures; 5. Models and Methods for Knowledge Organization and Retrieval Gerhard J.A. RIESTHUIS and Maja ZUMER: The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Knowledge Organization; Rochelle KEDAR and Snunith SHOHAM: The Subject Cataloging Of Monographs With The Use Of a Thesaurus; Ana PÉREZ LÓPEZ, Mercedes DE LA MONEDA and Ángel MOROS RAMÍREZ: Application of the Cantor set Theory in Making Decision about the Collection Development; Hemalata IYER and Jeanne M. KEEFE: The WordNet as an Auxiliary Resource To Search Visual Image Database In Architecture; Douglas TUDHOPE, Ceri BINDING, Dorothee BLOCKS and Daniel CUNLIFFE: Representation and Retrieval in Faceted Systems;
6. Organization of Integrated Knowledge in the Electronic Environment. The Internet José Antonio SALVADOR OLIVÁN, José Maria ANGÓS ULLATE and Maria Jesús FERNÁNDEZ RUÍZ: Organization of the Information about Health Resources an the Internet; Eduardo PEIS, Antonio RUIZ, Francisco J. MUNOZ-FERNÁNDEZ and Francisco de ALBA QUINONES: Practical Method to Code Archive Findings Aids in Internet Marthinus; S. VAN DER WALT: An Integrated Model For The Organization Of Electronic Information/Knowledge in Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (Smme's) in South Africa; Ricardo EITO BRUN: Software Development and Reuse as Knowledge Management; Practice Roberto POLI: Framing Information; 7. Models and Methods for Knowledge Organization and Conceptual Relationships Terence R. SMITH, Marcia Lei ZENG, and ADEPT Knowledge Organization Team: Structured Models of Scientific Concepts for Organizing, Accessing, and Using Learning Materials; M. OUSSALAH, F. GIRET and T. KHAMMACI: A kr Multi-hierarchies/Multi-Views Model for the Development of Complex Systems; Jonathan FURNER: A Unifying Model of Document Relatedness for Hybrid Search Engines; José Manuel BARRUECO and Vicente Julián INGLADA: Reference Linking in Economics: The Citec Project; Allyson CARLYLE and Lisa M. FUSCO: Equivalence in Tillett's Bibliographic Relationships Taxonomy: a Revision; José Antonio FRÍAS and Ana Belén RÍOS HILARIO: Visibility and Invisibility of the Kindship Relationships in Bibliographic Families of the Library Catalogue; 8. Integration of Knowledge in the Internet. Representing Knowledge in Web Sites Houssem ASSADI and Thomas BEAUVISAGE: A Comparative Study of Six French-Speaking Web Directories; Barbara H. KWASNIK: Commercial Web Sites and The Use of Classification Schemes: The Case of Amazon.Com; Jorge SERRANO COBOS and Ana M' QUINTERO ORTA: Design, Development and Management of an Information Recovery System for an Internet Website: from Documentary Theory to Practice; José Luis HERRERA MORILLAS and M' del Rosario FERNÁNDEZ FALERO: Information and Resources About Bibliographic Heritage an The Web Sites of the Spanish Universities; J.F. ALDANA, A.C. GÓMEZ, N. MORENO, A. J. NEBRO, M.M. ROLDÁN: Metadata Functionality for Semantic Web Integration; Uta PRISS: Alternatives to the "Semantic Web": Multi-Strategy Knowledge Representation; 9. Models and Methods for Knowledge Integration in Information Systems Rebecca GREEN, Carol A. BEAN and Michele HUDON: Universality And Basic Level Concepts; Grant CAMPBELL: Chronotope And Classification: How Space-Time Configurations Affect the Gathering of Industrial Statistical Data; Marianne LYKKE NIELSEN and Anna GJERLUF ESLAU: Corporate Thesauri - How to Ensure Integration of Knowledge and Reflections of Diversity; Nancy WILLIAMSON: Knowledge Integration and Classification Schemes; M.V. HURTADO, L. GARCIA and J.PARETS: Semantic Views over Heterogeneous and Distributed Data Repositories: Integration of Information System Based an Ontologies; Fernando ELICHIRIGOITY and Cheryl KNOTT MALONE: Representing the Global Economy: the North American Industry Classification System;
10. Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Information Retrieval (Part I) Christopher S.G. KHOO, Karen NG and Shiyan OU: An Exploratory Study of Human Clustering Of Web Pages; Stephane CHAUDIRON, Majid IHADJADENE and François ROLE: Authorial Index Browsing in an XML Digital Library; Xavier POLANCO: Clusters, Graphs, and Networks for Analyzing Internet-Web-Supported Communication within a Virtual Community; E. HERRERA-VIEDMA, O. CORDÓN, J.C. HERRERA, M. LUQUE: An IRS Based an Multi-Granular Linguistic Information; Pedro CUESTA, Alma M. GÓMEZ and Francisco J. RODRÍGUEZ: Using Agents for Information Retrieval; 11. Integration of Knowledge in Multicultural Domain-Oriented and General Systems. (Part I) Antonio GARCIA JIMANEZ, Alberto DÍAZ ESTEBAN and Pablo GERVÁS: Knowledge Organization in a Multilingual System for the Personalization of Digital News Services: How to Integrate Knowledge; Marfa J. LÓPEZ-HUERTAS and Mario BARITA: Knowledge Representation and Organization of Gender Studies an the Internet: Towards Integration; Victoria FRANCU: Language-Independent Structures and Multilingual Information Access Annelise Mark PEJTERSEN and Hanne ALBRECHTSEN Models for Collaborative Integration of Knowledge; 12. Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Information Retrieval (Part II) C. LOPEZ-PUJALTE, V.P. GUERRERO, F. de MOYA-ANEGÓN: Evaluation of the Application of Genetic Algorithms to Relevance Feedback; O. CORDÓN, E. HERRERA-VIEDMA, M. LUQUE, F. de MOYA,ANEGÓN and C. ZARCO: An Inductive Query by Example Technique for Extended Boolean Queries Based an Simulated Annealing-Programming; Vfctor HERRERO-SOLANA and F. de MOYA-ANEGÓN: Graphical Table of Contents (GTOC) for Library Collections: the Aplication of UDC Codes for the Subject Maps; Luis M. CAMPOS, Juan M. FERNEZ-LUNA and Juan HUSTE: Managing Documents with Bayesian Belief Networks: A Brief Survey of Applications and Models; 13. Epistemological Approaches to Classification Principles, Design and Construction Birger HJOERLAND: The Methodology Of Constructing Classification Schemes: A discussion of the State-of-the-Art; Hope OLSON, Juliet NIELSEN and Shona R. DIPPIE: Encyclopaedist Rivalry, Classificatory Commonality, Illusory Universality; Jian QIN: Evolving Paradigms of Knowledge Representation and Organization: A Comparative Study of classification, XML/DTD and Ontology; Jens-Erik MAI: Is Classification Theory Possible? Rethinking Classification Research; I.C. McILWAINE: Where Have All The Flowers Gone? An Investigation Into The Fate of Some Special Classification Schemes; 14. Professional Ethics. Users and Information Structures. Evaluation of Systems J. Carlos FERNÁNDEZ-MOLINA and J. Augusto c. GUIMARAES: Ethical Aspects of Knowledge Organization and Representation in the Digital Environment: Their Articulation in Professional Codes of Ethics; Ali Asghar SHIRI, Crawford REVIE and Gobinda CHOWDHURY: Assessing the Impact of User Interaction with Thesaural Knowledge Structures: A Quantitative Analysis Framework; Carmen CARO CASTRO and Críspulo TRAVIESO RODRÍGUEZ: Ariadne's Thread: Knowledge Structures for Browsing in OPAC's; Linda BANWELL: Developing and Evaluation Framework For a Supranational Digital Library; Antonio L. GARCIA GUTIÉRREZ: Knowledge Organization From a "culture of the Border": Towards a Transcultural Ethics of Mediation; Christopher KING, David H. MARWICK and M. Howard WILLIAMS: The Importance of Context in Resolving of Confliets when Sharing User Profiles;
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch den Bericht über die Tagung von N. Williamson in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.94-102
