Search (156 results, page 1 of 8)

0.023818653 = product of:
  0.14291191 = sum of:
    0.14291191 = weight(_text_:automation in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14291191 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18152776 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030570598 = queryNorm
        0.78727305 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Imprint

Berkeley, Calif. : Division of Library Automation and Library Research and Analysis Group, Univ. of California

0.019649388 = product of:
  0.117896326 = sum of:
    0.117896326 = weight(_text_:automation in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.117896326 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18152776 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030570598 = queryNorm
        0.6494672 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

LCSH

Libraries / United States / Automation

Subject

Libraries / United States / Automation

0.016842334 = product of:
  0.101054 = sum of:
    0.101054 = weight(_text_:automation in 1435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101054 = score(doc=1435,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18152776 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030570598 = queryNorm
        0.55668616 = fieldWeight in 1435, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1435)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Describes the creation and results of a questionnaire survey of cataloguers in 6 Singapore academic and national libraries and of their vendor helpdesk staff to evaluate the help systems of library automation systems, with particular emphasis on the cataloguing function. Describes the structure of the questionnaire; the methodology used to analyse the data; the profile of the respondents and the systems used by them; and the implications of the statistical results. Functionalities for the following help features were surveyed: getting in and out of the help systems; selecting a relevant topic; formulating queries; searching of information; completeness and comprehensiveness of the help system; navigation to other topics; applying information to solve problems; and data entry and authority control in cataloguing tasks. Data analysis identified 27 preferred features which could be taken into account in the product development of online help systems

0.015879102 = product of:
  0.09527461 = sum of:
    0.09527461 = weight(_text_:automation in 6977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09527461 = score(doc=6977,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18152776 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030570598 = queryNorm
        0.5248487 = fieldWeight in 6977, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6977)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Describes an investigation of attitudes to the LION (Library Integrated Online Network) online public access catalogue at Liverpool Polytechnic Library (now Liverpool John Moores University) using observation and a questionnaire survey of 55 library users. The reaction to the automation of the library catalogue was positive and it appears to have improved service to users but more user education and guidance would result in a further improvement

0.015879102 = product of:
  0.09527461 = sum of:
    0.09527461 = weight(_text_:automation in 7909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09527461 = score(doc=7909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18152776 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030570598 = queryNorm
        0.5248487 = fieldWeight in 7909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7909)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Reports on a study carried out by the Division of Library Automation, University of California, into the characteristics of use and the success rates of users searching the MELVYL Catalog and Ten-Year databases. Examines a series of user sessions extracted randomly from the MELVYL transaction log and developing a profile of online system use. 1.444 sessions were chosen from 11-17 Apr 92. 3 levels of use were examined: the individual command, the search objective, and the session. Details the findings, and discusses their design implications

0.012346416 = product of:
  0.037039246 = sum of:
    0.008045989 = product of:
      0.024137966 = sum of:
        0.024137966 = weight(_text_:d in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024137966 = score(doc=7585,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058080222 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.415597 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.028993258 = product of:
      0.057986517 = sum of:
        0.057986517 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057986517 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

22. 1.2000 17:52:11

Language

d

Location

D

0.0066062156 = product of:
  0.019818647 = sum of:
    0.0032510702 = product of:
      0.0097532105 = sum of:
        0.0097532105 = weight(_text_:d in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097532105 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058080222 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.016567577 = product of:
      0.033135153 = sum of:
        0.033135153 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033135153 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

22. 2.2009 18:50:43

Language

d

0.005780439 = product of:
  0.017341316 = sum of:
    0.0028446864 = product of:
      0.008534059 = sum of:
        0.008534059 = weight(_text_:d in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008534059 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058080222 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.014496629 = product of:
      0.028993258 = sum of:
        0.028993258 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028993258 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Footnote

Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious

Source

BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23

0.0049546617 = product of:
  0.014863985 = sum of:
    0.0024383026 = product of:
      0.007314908 = sum of:
        0.007314908 = weight(_text_:d in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007314908 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058080222 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012425682 = product of:
      0.024851363 = sum of:
        0.024851363 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024851363 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.

0.00483221 = product of:
  0.028993258 = sum of:
    0.028993258 = product of:
      0.057986517 = sum of:
        0.057986517 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057986517 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382

0.004141894 = product of:
  0.024851363 = sum of:
    0.024851363 = product of:
      0.049702726 = sum of:
        0.049702726 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049702726 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

9. 2.2008 17:52:22

0.0041288845 = product of:
  0.012386654 = sum of:
    0.002031919 = product of:
      0.006095757 = sum of:
        0.006095757 = weight(_text_:d in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006095757 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058080222 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.010354735 = product of:
      0.02070947 = sum of:
        0.02070947 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02070947 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.

Date

22. 7.2006 16:32:43

0.0041288845 = product of:
  0.012386654 = sum of:
    0.002031919 = product of:
      0.006095757 = sum of:
        0.006095757 = weight(_text_:d in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006095757 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058080222 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.010354735 = product of:
      0.02070947 = sum of:
        0.02070947 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02070947 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.

0.0033031078 = product of:
  0.009909323 = sum of:
    0.0016255351 = product of:
      0.0048766052 = sum of:
        0.0048766052 = weight(_text_:d in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048766052 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058080222 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008283788 = product of:
      0.016567577 = sum of:
        0.016567577 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016567577 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Location

D

0.002761263 = product of:
  0.016567577 = sum of:
    0.016567577 = product of:
      0.033135153 = sum of:
        0.033135153 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033135153 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

29. 7.1998 10:57:22

0.002761263 = product of:
  0.016567577 = sum of:
    0.016567577 = product of:
      0.033135153 = sum of:
        0.033135153 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033135153 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

22. 5.1999 19:07:29

0.002761263 = product of:
  0.016567577 = sum of:
    0.016567577 = product of:
      0.033135153 = sum of:
        0.033135153 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033135153 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

22. 7.2006 18:17:44

0.002416105 = product of:
  0.014496629 = sum of:
    0.014496629 = product of:
      0.028993258 = sum of:
        0.028993258 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028993258 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.

0.002416105 = product of:
  0.014496629 = sum of:
    0.014496629 = product of:
      0.028993258 = sum of:
        0.028993258 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028993258 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71

0.002416105 = product of:
  0.014496629 = sum of:
    0.014496629 = product of:
      0.028993258 = sum of:
        0.028993258 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028993258 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10705303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030570598 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22