Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gopinath, M.A."
  1. Gopinath, M.A.: Information retrieval : a confluence of models, techniques and tools into a process (1992) 0.07 
    0.07410837 = product of:
  0.14821674 = sum of:
    0.12867 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 5284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12867 = score(doc=5284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04289195 = queryNorm
        0.57570934 = fieldWeight in 5284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5284)
    0.019546729 = product of:
      0.058640182 = sum of:
        0.058640182 = weight(_text_:29 in 5284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058640182 = score(doc=5284,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5284, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5284)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the basic premises, components, search characteristics, user interfaces, design models and design features of information retrieval. Discusses computer assisted information retrieval, examines current research areas and considers future research areas, trends, and possibilities
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:20:29
  2. Gopinath, M.A.: Information retrieval, ontological model and Ranganathan's contribution (1992) 0.02 
    0.016258039 = product of:
  0.065032154 = sum of:
    0.065032154 = product of:
      0.09754823 = sum of:
        0.05063609 = weight(_text_:systems in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05063609 = score(doc=6491,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
        0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04691214 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the analytico synthetic classification scheme model designed by S.R. Ranganathan and the knowledge representation schemes used in knowledge based systems. Identifies the analogical approaches in both systems and finds global ontological approaches to the organization of knowledge that provide a cognitive basis among users of knowledge
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. ed. by A. Chatterjee et al
  3. Gopinath, M.A.: Research in classification : a pointer towards knowledge representation (1998) 0.01 
    0.013786211 = product of:
  0.055144843 = sum of:
    0.055144843 = product of:
      0.08271726 = sum of:
        0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580512 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
        0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04691214 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the importance of classificatory language and research, and identifies major trends in classification development. Looks at ways of testing the quality of representation in classification systems, highlighting a number of basic research fronts. Notes efforts towards the development of a science of classification, beginning with those of Ranganathan. Examines the problems of keeping classification schemes up to date, and the usefulness of classification theory in knowledge organization. Also discusses categorization at generic levels; developments and objectives in the teaching and learning of classification; and future directions for classification research
    Date
    17.11.1998 18:23:29
  4. Aptagiri, D.V.; Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, A.R.D.: ¬A frame based knowledge representation paradigm for automating POPSI (1995) 0.01 
    0.013715876 = product of:
  0.054863505 = sum of:
    0.054863505 = product of:
      0.082295254 = sum of:
        0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580512 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
        0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046490133 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper is based on the project work carries out by the authors at DRTC. Knowledge representation models are used in building intelligent systems for problem solving. The paper discusses, a frame based knowledge representation model built for automatic indexing. The system assigns POPSI indicators and produces subject strings for titles. The results are given in appendices
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.162-167
  5. Gopinath, M.A.: Summary of the work and acievements of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan (1992) 0.01 
    0.006841354 = product of:
  0.027365416 = sum of:
    0.027365416 = product of:
      0.08209625 = sum of:
        0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 2357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08209625 = score(doc=2357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2357)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 29(1992) no.2, S.46-57
  6. Gopinath, M.A.: Towards a scientific approach to classification and cataloguing : contributions of S.R. Ranganathan (1992) 0.01 
    0.006841354 = product of:
  0.027365416 = sum of:
    0.027365416 = product of:
      0.08209625 = sum of:
        0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08209625 = score(doc=2535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 29(1992) no.2, S.85-89
  7. Gopinath, M.A.: Typology of structural relations for information analysis and consolidation processes (1992) 0.01 
    0.006841354 = product of:
  0.027365416 = sum of:
    0.027365416 = product of:
      0.08209625 = sum of:
        0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 7079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08209625 = score(doc=7079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 7079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7079)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 29(1992) no.3, S.139.142
  8. Gopinath, M.A.: Application of general systems theory to classification theory of Ranganathan (1982) 0.01 
    0.0063295113 = product of:
  0.025318045 = sum of:
    0.025318045 = product of:
      0.07595413 = sum of:
        0.07595413 = weight(_text_:systems in 22) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07595413 = score(doc=22,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.57622015 = fieldWeight in 22, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=22)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  9. Gopinath, M.A.: Design of concept codes in information retrieval : an analysis of trends (1987) 0.00 
    0.0044756406 = product of:
  0.017902562 = sum of:
    0.017902562 = product of:
      0.053707685 = sum of:
        0.053707685 = weight(_text_:systems in 716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053707685 = score(doc=716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=716)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a set of criteria involved in the design and development of information retrieval systems. Analyses the value of facet analysis technique in the knowledge representation process
  10. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.00 
    0.0038741778 = product of:
  0.015496711 = sum of:
    0.015496711 = product of:
      0.046490133 = sum of:
        0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046490133 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  11. Gopinath, M.A.: Descriptors and their role in information retrieval (1993) 0.00 
    0.00298376 = product of:
  0.01193504 = sum of:
    0.01193504 = product of:
      0.03580512 = sum of:
        0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 7802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580512 = score(doc=7802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 7802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7802)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Explains the role and value of descriptors in information retrieval. Discusses methods of generating descriptors from the text, how they correlate to classification schemes, and their use as linking devices in providing cues to individual users of information retrieval systems. Notes a number of controlling devices which can be used to fine-tune the role of descriptors in information retrieval

Authors

Years

Themes