Search (57 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.02115669 = product of:
      0.08462676 = sum of:
        0.08462676 = product of:
          0.12694013 = sum of:
            0.044756405 = weight(_text_:systems in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044756405 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.339541 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
            0.08218372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08218372 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  2. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.02
    0.015819103 = product of:
      0.06327641 = sum of:
        0.06327641 = product of:
          0.094914615 = sum of:
            0.060047016 = weight(_text_:systems in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060047016 = score(doc=201,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.45554203 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
            0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348676 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  3. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.01
    0.010161275 = product of:
      0.0406451 = sum of:
        0.0406451 = product of:
          0.060967647 = sum of:
            0.031647556 = weight(_text_:systems in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031647556 = score(doc=5767,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
            0.029320091 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029320091 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:01
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.0077483556 = product of:
      0.030993422 = sum of:
        0.030993422 = product of:
          0.092980266 = sum of:
            0.092980266 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092980266 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01
    0.0077483556 = product of:
      0.030993422 = sum of:
        0.030993422 = product of:
          0.092980266 = sum of:
            0.092980266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092980266 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  6. Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983) 0.01
    0.006841354 = product of:
      0.027365416 = sum of:
        0.027365416 = product of:
          0.08209625 = sum of:
            0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08209625 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  7. Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000) 0.01
    0.006841354 = product of:
      0.027365416 = sum of:
        0.027365416 = product of:
          0.08209625 = sum of:
            0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08209625 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.10.2000 17:47:29
  8. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.00
    0.004886682 = product of:
      0.019546729 = sum of:
        0.019546729 = product of:
          0.058640182 = sum of:
            0.058640182 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058640182 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:19:32
  9. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00
    0.004842723 = product of:
      0.019370891 = sum of:
        0.019370891 = product of:
          0.05811267 = sum of:
            0.05811267 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05811267 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  10. Rajan, T.N.; Guha, B.; Sayanarayana, R.: Associate relationship of concepts as seen through citations and citation index (1982) 0.00
    0.0044756406 = product of:
      0.017902562 = sum of:
        0.017902562 = product of:
          0.053707685 = sum of:
            0.053707685 = weight(_text_:systems in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053707685 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  11. Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Using citations in facilitate precise indexing and automatic index creation in collections of research papers (2001) 0.00
    0.0044756406 = product of:
      0.017902562 = sum of:
        0.017902562 = product of:
          0.053707685 = sum of:
            0.053707685 = weight(_text_:systems in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053707685 = score(doc=3803,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge-based systems. 14(2001) nos.1/2, S.20-35
  12. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00
    0.0041091866 = product of:
      0.016436746 = sum of:
        0.016436746 = product of:
          0.049310237 = sum of:
            0.049310237 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049310237 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  13. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.00
    0.0039093453 = product of:
      0.015637381 = sum of:
        0.015637381 = product of:
          0.04691214 = sum of:
            0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691214 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
  14. Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006) 0.00
    0.0039093453 = product of:
      0.015637381 = sum of:
        0.015637381 = product of:
          0.04691214 = sum of:
            0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691214 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2006 14:29:40
  15. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00
    0.0039093453 = product of:
      0.015637381 = sum of:
        0.015637381 = product of:
          0.04691214 = sum of:
            0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691214 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:52:23
  16. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.00
    0.0039093453 = product of:
      0.015637381 = sum of:
        0.015637381 = product of:
          0.04691214 = sum of:
            0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691214 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:16:29
  17. Riviera, E.: Scientific communities as autopoietic systems : the reproductive function of citations (2013) 0.00
    0.0038760183 = product of:
      0.015504073 = sum of:
        0.015504073 = product of:
          0.04651222 = sum of:
            0.04651222 = weight(_text_:systems in 970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04651222 = score(doc=970,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.35286134 = fieldWeight in 970, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=970)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The increasing employment of bibliometric measures for assessing, describing, and mapping science inevitably leads to the increasing need for a citation theory constituting a theoretical frame for both citation analysis and the description of citers' behavior. In this article a theoretical model, encompassing both normative and constructivist approaches, is suggested. The conceptualization of scientific communities as autopoietic systems, the components of which are communicative events, allows us to observe the reproductive function of citations conceived as codes and media of scientific communication. Citations, thanks to their constraining and enabling properties, constitute the engine of the structuration process ensuring the reproduction of scientific communities. By referring to Giddens' structuration theory, Luhmann's theory about social systems as communicative networks, Merton's "sociology of science" and his conceptualizations about the functions of citations, as well as Small's proposal about citations as concept-symbols, a sociologically integrated approach to scientometrics is proposed.
  18. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.00
    0.0038741778 = product of:
      0.015496711 = sum of:
        0.015496711 = product of:
          0.046490133 = sum of:
            0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046490133 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  19. Malanga, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data (1982) 0.00
    0.0037297006 = product of:
      0.014918802 = sum of:
        0.014918802 = product of:
          0.044756405 = sum of:
            0.044756405 = weight(_text_:systems in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044756405 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.339541 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  20. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.00
    0.0037297006 = product of:
      0.014918802 = sum of:
        0.014918802 = product of:
          0.044756405 = sum of:
            0.044756405 = weight(_text_:systems in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044756405 = score(doc=4542,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.339541 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The reciprocal relationship between bibliographic references and citations in the context of the scholarly communication system is examined. Semiotic analysis of referencing behaviours and citation counting reveals the complexity of prevailing sign systems and associated symbolic practices.

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 9

Types

  • a 53
  • el 4
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…