Search (125 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.04
    0.038854644 = product of:
      0.15541857 = sum of:
        0.15541857 = sum of:
          0.062016293 = weight(_text_:systems in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.062016293 = score(doc=562,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04289195 = queryNorm
              0.4704818 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04691214 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04289195 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046490133 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04289195 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:21:29
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  2. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.02
    0.019458808 = product of:
      0.07783523 = sum of:
        0.07783523 = product of:
          0.11675285 = sum of:
            0.058640182 = weight(_text_:29 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058640182 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
            0.05811267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05811267 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  3. Miller, K.; Matthews, B.: Having the right connections : the LIMBER project (2001) 0.02
    0.019300502 = product of:
      0.07720201 = sum of:
        0.07720201 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07720201 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.3454256 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As with any journey, you have to make the right connections if you want to reach your desired destination. The goal in the LIMBER project is to facilitate cross-European data analysis independent of domain, resource, language and vocabulary. The paper describes the expertise, associations, standards and architecture underlying the project deliverables designed to achieve the project's ambitious aims. - Limber (Language Independent Metadata Browsing of European Resources) is an EU (European Union) IST (Information Societies Technology) funded project that seeks to address the problems of linguistic and discipline boundaries, which, within a more integrated European environment, are becoming increasingly important. Decision-makers, researchers and journalists need to be provided with a broader, comparative picture of society across the continent; with the social science information often required to be correlated with information from domains such as environmental science, geography and health. This cross-discipline interoperability will be provided via a uniform metadata description. In addition, the provision of multilingual user interfaces and the controlled vocabulary of a multi-lingual thesaurus will make these datasets globally accessible in a range of end-user natural languages
  4. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.02
    0.015567046 = product of:
      0.062268183 = sum of:
        0.062268183 = product of:
          0.093402274 = sum of:
            0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691214 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
            0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046490133 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:29:32
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  5. Campos, F.M.; Lopes, M.I.; Galvao, R.M.: MARC formats and their use : an overview (1995) 0.01
    0.012062935 = product of:
      0.04825174 = sum of:
        0.04825174 = product of:
          0.07237761 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on work carried out as part of a feasibility study for UseMARCON (User Controlled Generic MARC Converter); a European Community funded project to develop a toolbox capable of converting bibliographic records from any MARC format into any other MARC format through a central conversion format. Reviews the use of MARC formats as internal or cataloguing formats or an exchange formats available in tape magnetic tape services. Special attention is paid to the actual us and use trends of UNIMARC, with particular reference to the role of UNIMARC as a new stage in the evolution of MARC formats, devised to improve and facilitate the exchange of bibliographic information between different systems
    Source
    Program. 29(1995) no.4, S.445-459
  6. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.01
    0.0120013915 = product of:
      0.048005566 = sum of:
        0.048005566 = product of:
          0.07200835 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
            0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040678866 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  7. Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.01
    0.0120013915 = product of:
      0.048005566 = sum of:
        0.048005566 = product of:
          0.07200835 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
            0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040678866 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:51:36
  8. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.01
    0.0120013915 = product of:
      0.048005566 = sum of:
        0.048005566 = product of:
          0.07200835 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
            0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040678866 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
  9. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.01
    0.010286908 = product of:
      0.04114763 = sum of:
        0.04114763 = product of:
          0.061721444 = sum of:
            0.026853843 = weight(_text_:systems in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026853843 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
            0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348676 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  10. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.01
    0.008572424 = product of:
      0.034289695 = sum of:
        0.034289695 = product of:
          0.05143454 = sum of:
            0.022378203 = weight(_text_:systems in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022378203 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
            0.029056335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029056335 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  11. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01
    0.008218373 = product of:
      0.032873493 = sum of:
        0.032873493 = product of:
          0.098620474 = sum of:
            0.098620474 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098620474 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  12. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: ¬2. MAB-Expertengespräch (1995) 0.01
    0.0078186905 = product of:
      0.031274762 = sum of:
        0.031274762 = product of:
          0.09382428 = sum of:
            0.09382428 = weight(_text_:29 in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09382428 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S. 322-327
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01
    0.0077483556 = product of:
      0.030993422 = sum of:
        0.030993422 = product of:
          0.092980266 = sum of:
            0.092980266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092980266 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. Devadason, F.J.: Common format for machine-readable bibliographic records for India : a proposal (1978) 0.01
    0.006841354 = product of:
      0.027365416 = sum of:
        0.027365416 = product of:
          0.08209625 = sum of:
            0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 5539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08209625 = score(doc=5539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5539)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Towards a common bibliographic exchange format? International Symposium on Bibliographic Exchange Formats, Taormina, Sicily, 27-29 April 1978
  15. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: Neue MAB-Formatversion MAB2 endgültig verabschiedet (1995) 0.01
    0.006841354 = product of:
      0.027365416 = sum of:
        0.027365416 = product of:
          0.08209625 = sum of:
            0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08209625 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.9, S.1428-1446
  16. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01
    0.0067798113 = product of:
      0.027119245 = sum of:
        0.027119245 = product of:
          0.08135773 = sum of:
            0.08135773 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135773 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  17. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01
    0.0067798113 = product of:
      0.027119245 = sum of:
        0.027119245 = product of:
          0.08135773 = sum of:
            0.08135773 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135773 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  18. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01
    0.0067798113 = product of:
      0.027119245 = sum of:
        0.027119245 = product of:
          0.08135773 = sum of:
            0.08135773 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135773 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  19. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01
    0.0067798113 = product of:
      0.027119245 = sum of:
        0.027119245 = product of:
          0.08135773 = sum of:
            0.08135773 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135773 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  20. ZETA: Format und Konventionen für die Zeitschriften-Titelaufnahme in der Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB) (1993) 0.01
    0.005864018 = product of:
      0.023456072 = sum of:
        0.023456072 = product of:
          0.070368215 = sum of:
            0.070368215 = weight(_text_:29 in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070368215 = score(doc=4335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    28. 6.1996 14:29:37

Authors

Languages

  • e 81
  • d 22
  • f 9
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 107
  • s 11
  • m 8
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…