Search (101 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Black, K.: ELISE: an online image retrieval system (1993) 0.06 
    0.057435524 = product of:
  0.11487105 = sum of:
    0.10293601 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10293601 = score(doc=6631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04289195 = queryNorm
        0.46056747 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
    0.01193504 = product of:
      0.03580512 = sum of:
        0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580512 = score(doc=6631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Research at De Montfort Univ., Division of Learning Development, in Leicester, is focused on promoting the idea of the electronic library. Describes the Electronic Library Image Service for Europe (ELISE) project funded by the Commission for the European Communities, its overall aim and lists the 5 main challenges for the project team which include: identifying image bank technical requirements; exploring storage and retrieval mechanisms; exploring client needs and design user interfaces; the production of a pilot system; and devising a model for the international interconnection of systems
  2. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.06 
    0.057435524 = product of:
  0.11487105 = sum of:
    0.10293601 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10293601 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04289195 = queryNorm
        0.46056747 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
    0.01193504 = product of:
      0.03580512 = sum of:
        0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580512 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
  3. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04 
    0.03992591 = product of:
  0.07985182 = sum of:
    0.06812379 = product of:
      0.20437136 = sum of:
        0.20437136 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20437136 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36363843 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.011728036 = product of:
      0.035184108 = sum of:
        0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035184108 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  4. Dinneen, J.D.; Julien, C.-A.: ¬The ubiquitous digital file : a review of file management research (2020) 0.04 
    0.035897203 = product of:
  0.071794406 = sum of:
    0.064335 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064335 = score(doc=5513,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04289195 = queryNorm
        0.28785467 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
    0.007459401 = product of:
      0.022378203 = sum of:
        0.022378203 = weight(_text_:systems in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022378203 = score(doc=5513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Computer users spend time every day interacting with digital files and folders, including downloading, moving, naming, navigating to, searching for, sharing, and deleting them. Such file management has been the focus of many studies across various fields, but has not been explicitly acknowledged nor made the focus of dedicated review. In this article we present the first dedicated review of this topic and its research, synthesizing more than 230 publications from various research domains to establish what is known and what remains to be investigated, particularly by examining the common motivations, methods, and findings evinced by the previously furcate body of work. We find three typical research motivations in the literature reviewed: understanding how and why users store, organize, retrieve, and share files and folders, understanding factors that determine their behavior, and attempting to improve the user experience through novel interfaces and information services. Relevant conceptual frameworks and approaches to designing and testing systems are described, and open research challenges and the significance for other research areas are discussed. We conclude that file management is a ubiquitous, challenging, and relatively unsupported activity that invites and has received attention from several disciplines and has broad importance for topics across information science.
  5. Electronic systems and records management in the information ages (1997) 0.03 
    0.027572421 = product of:
  0.110289685 = sum of:
    0.110289685 = product of:
      0.16543452 = sum of:
        0.07161024 = weight(_text_:systems in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161024 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.5432656 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
        0.09382428 = weight(_text_:29 in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09382428 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.7-29
  6. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.02 
    0.02023463 = product of:
  0.08093852 = sum of:
    0.08093852 = product of:
      0.12140778 = sum of:
        0.06329511 = weight(_text_:systems in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06329511 = score(doc=7750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
        0.05811267 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05811267 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
  7. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.02 
    0.016187705 = product of:
  0.06475082 = sum of:
    0.06475082 = product of:
      0.09712622 = sum of:
        0.05063609 = weight(_text_:systems in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05063609 = score(doc=2923,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
        0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046490133 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Analysis and design of electronic document management systems in large enterprises
  8. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.01 
    0.014225784 = product of:
  0.056903135 = sum of:
    0.056903135 = product of:
      0.0853547 = sum of:
        0.04430658 = weight(_text_:systems in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04430658 = score(doc=1499,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
        0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041048124 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:26:51
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  9. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.01 
    0.014164242 = product of:
  0.056656968 = sum of:
    0.056656968 = product of:
      0.08498545 = sum of:
        0.04430658 = weight(_text_:systems in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04430658 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040678866 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  10. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.01 
    0.013786211 = product of:
  0.055144843 = sum of:
    0.055144843 = product of:
      0.08271726 = sum of:
        0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580512 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
        0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04691214 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:39:54
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  11. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.01 
    0.013715876 = product of:
  0.054863505 = sum of:
    0.054863505 = product of:
      0.082295254 = sum of:
        0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580512 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
        0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046490133 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Electronic document management systems are a collection of 3 complementary technologies: the repository, the workflow engine and the searching-and-indexing technology. The document repository stores, controls and manages documents. Workflow can eliminate the dead time a document spends in transition between works and integrates with the repository and electronic mail system. Search and indexing technology enables more efficient searching than standard full text technologies by configuring searches to specific attributes. Discusses how the technologies can be combined to manage a WWW site and offers advice on choosing an appropriate solution
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80
  12. Savic, D.: Automatic classification of office documents : review of available methods and techniques (1995) 0.01 
    0.012062935 = product of:
  0.04825174 = sum of:
    0.04825174 = product of:
      0.07237761 = sum of:
        0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031329483 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
        0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041048124 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Classification of office documents is one of the administrative functions carried out by almost every organization and institution which sends and receives correspondence. Processing of this increasing amount of information coming and out going mail, in particular its classification, is time consuming and expensive. More and more organizations are seeking a solution for meeting this challenge by designing computer based systems for automatic classification. Examines the present status of available knowledge and methodology which can be used for automatic classification of office documents. Besides a review of classic methods and techniques, the focus id also placed on the application of artificial intelligence
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.3-18
  13. Szulc, J.: Document management in the the Polish central catalogues (2017) 0.01 
    0.012062935 = product of:
  0.04825174 = sum of:
    0.04825174 = product of:
      0.07237761 = sum of:
        0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031329483 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
        0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041048124 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  14. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.01 
    0.0120013915 = product of:
  0.048005566 = sum of:
    0.048005566 = product of:
      0.07200835 = sum of:
        0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031329483 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040678866 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  15. Myburgh, S.: Records organization and access (2009) 0.01 
    0.010339659 = product of:
  0.041358635 = sum of:
    0.041358635 = product of:
      0.062037952 = sum of:
        0.026853843 = weight(_text_:systems in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026853843 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
        0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035184108 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Records, as documents which provide evidence of business transactions that have taken place, are collected and preserved for as long as they are useful to the organization, or as is demanded by law. In order to be useful, however, they must be organized in such a way that they can easily be identified, located, accessed, and used, for whatever purpose. First, the records must be described by identifying the most useful salient characteristics; then, they are categorized in various ways, according to their age, function, level of confidentiality, privacy and security, and access to them controlled according to these categories. Records may be arranged by one of several ordinal systems, usually involving letters and numbers, but also color: these symbolically represent the characteristics that are considered as important descriptors. Thus, records can be accessed (or protected from access) by their category; they can be located by correspondence between terms (which may be words or numbers) used to describe characteristics and terms used in searching for particular records or records series. These principles apply to both physical and virtual records.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:29:00
  16. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.01 
    0.010117315 = product of:
  0.04046926 = sum of:
    0.04046926 = product of:
      0.06070389 = sum of:
        0.031647556 = weight(_text_:systems in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031647556 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
        0.029056335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029056335 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  17. Hesselbarth, A.: What you see is all you get? : Konzept zur Optimierung des Bildmanagements am Beispiel der jump Fotoagentur (2008) 0.01 
    0.008572424 = product of:
  0.034289695 = sum of:
    0.034289695 = product of:
      0.05143454 = sum of:
        0.022378203 = weight(_text_:systems in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022378203 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
        0.029056335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029056335 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Thema dieser Arbeit ist eine Untersuchung des digitalen Bilderhandels. Es wird die Akzeptanz und die Nutzung von Bilddatenbanken in der Bildbranche analysiert, mit dem Ziel, ein Optimierungskonzept für die Bilddatenbank der jump Fotoagentur zu entwerfen. Zur Einführung werden die Grundlagen der Bildbranche erläutert und auf die Beteiligten und ihre Aufgabenbereiche eingegangen. Es folgt eine Darstellung der Entwicklung der Digitalisierung und den dadurch verursachten Wandel des Bildermarktes. Im Anschluss werden die Möglichkeiten des Bildmanagements und deren Zusammenhang mit der Bildvermarktung aufgezeigt. Weiterhin wird das Bildmanagement-System der jump Fotoagentur näher beschrieben. Mit Hilfe der gewonnen Ergebnisse aus der durchgeführten Befragung wird ein Konzept zur Verbesserung dieses Systems erstellt. Die Erkenntnisse werden zusammengefasst und ein Ausblick auf die Zukunft des digitalen Bilderhandels gegeben.
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:34:12
  18. Chin, A.G.: Text databases and document management : theory and practice (2001) 0.01 
    0.0078186905 = product of:
  0.031274762 = sum of:
    0.031274762 = product of:
      0.09382428 = sum of:
        0.09382428 = weight(_text_:29 in 4687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09382428 = score(doc=4687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4687)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:06:29
  19. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.01 
    0.0077483556 = product of:
  0.030993422 = sum of:
    0.030993422 = product of:
      0.092980266 = sum of:
        0.092980266 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092980266 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  20. Peters, G.; Gaese, V.: ¬Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von G+J (2003) 0.01 
    0.006857938 = product of:
  0.027431753 = sum of:
    0.027431753 = product of:
      0.041147627 = sum of:
        0.01790256 = weight(_text_:systems in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01790256 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
        0.023245066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023245066 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Wir werden einmal die Grundlagen des Text-Mining-Systems bei IBM darstellen, dann werden wir das Projekt etwas umfangreicher und deutlicher darstellen, da kennen wir uns aus. Von daher haben wir zwei Teile, einmal Heidelberg, einmal Hamburg. Noch einmal zur Technologie. Text-Mining ist eine von IBM entwickelte Technologie, die in einer besonderen Ausformung und Programmierung für uns zusammengestellt wurde. Das Projekt hieß bei uns lange Zeit DocText Miner und heißt seit einiger Zeit auf Vorschlag von IBM DocCat, das soll eine Abkürzung für Document-Categoriser sein, sie ist ja auch nett und anschaulich. Wir fangen an mit Text-Mining, das bei IBM in Heidelberg entwickelt wurde. Die verstehen darunter das automatische Indexieren als eine Instanz, also einen Teil von Text-Mining. Probleme werden dabei gezeigt, und das Text-Mining ist eben eine Methode zur Strukturierung von und der Suche in großen Dokumentenmengen, die Extraktion von Informationen und, das ist der hohe Anspruch, von impliziten Zusammenhängen. Das letztere sei dahingestellt. IBM macht das quantitativ, empirisch, approximativ und schnell. das muss man wirklich sagen. Das Ziel, und das ist ganz wichtig für unser Projekt gewesen, ist nicht, den Text zu verstehen, sondern das Ergebnis dieser Verfahren ist, was sie auf Neudeutsch a bundle of words, a bag of words nennen, also eine Menge von bedeutungstragenden Begriffen aus einem Text zu extrahieren, aufgrund von Algorithmen, also im Wesentlichen aufgrund von Rechenoperationen. Es gibt eine ganze Menge von linguistischen Vorstudien, ein wenig Linguistik ist auch dabei, aber nicht die Grundlage der ganzen Geschichte. Was sie für uns gemacht haben, ist also die Annotierung von Pressetexten für unsere Pressedatenbank. Für diejenigen, die es noch nicht kennen: Gruner + Jahr führt eine Textdokumentation, die eine Datenbank führt, seit Anfang der 70er Jahre, da sind z.Z. etwa 6,5 Millionen Dokumente darin, davon etwas über 1 Million Volltexte ab 1993. Das Prinzip war lange Zeit, dass wir die Dokumente, die in der Datenbank gespeichert waren und sind, verschlagworten und dieses Prinzip haben wir auch dann, als der Volltext eingeführt wurde, in abgespeckter Form weitergeführt. Zu diesen 6,5 Millionen Dokumenten gehören dann eben auch ungefähr 10 Millionen Faksimileseiten, weil wir die Faksimiles auch noch standardmäßig aufheben.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:36

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 78
  • d 19
  • f 2
  • sp 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 83
  • m 10
  • s 3
  • x 3
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications