Search (282 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Harter, S.P.: Colinked descriptors (1993) 0.08
    0.081226096 = product of:
      0.16245219 = sum of:
        0.1455735 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 7963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1455735 = score(doc=7963,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.6513408 = fieldWeight in 7963, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7963)
        0.016878698 = product of:
          0.05063609 = sum of:
            0.05063609 = weight(_text_:systems in 7963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05063609 = score(doc=7963,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 7963, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7963)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the preliminary results of an investigation into the effectiveness of colinked descriptors, a new concept and technique suitable for incorporating into the design of interfaces for information retrieval. The idea is borrowed from the analogous idea in bibliometrics-cocited references. Preliminary results suggest that the technique is extremely effective. As a retrieval technique, colinked descriptors can easily be incorporated into information retrieval interfaces, front-end systems, or standalone, pre-search systems
  2. Marchionini, G.: Co-evolution of user and organizational interfaces : a longitudinal case study of WWW dissemination of national statistics (2002) 0.07
    0.06890999 = product of:
      0.13781998 = sum of:
        0.12737681 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12737681 = score(doc=1252,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.56992316 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
        0.010443161 = product of:
          0.031329483 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=1252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The data systems, policies and procedures, corporate culture, and public face of an agency or institution make up its organizational interface. This case study describes how user interfaces for the Bureau of Labor Statistics web site evolved over a 5-year period along with the [arger organizational interface and how this co-evolution has influenced the institution itself. Interviews with BLS staff and transaction log analysis are the foci in this analysis that also included user informationseeking studies and user interface prototyping and testing. The results are organized into a model of organizational interface change and related to the information life cycle.
  3. Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996) 0.04
    0.043076646 = product of:
      0.08615329 = sum of:
        0.07720201 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07720201 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.3454256 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
        0.008951281 = product of:
          0.026853843 = sum of:
            0.026853843 = weight(_text_:systems in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026853843 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article introduces a new concept and technique for information retrieval called 'colinked descriptors'. Borrowed from an analogous idea in bibliometrics - cocited references - colinked descriptors provide a theory and method for identifying search terms that, by hypothesis, will be superior to those entered initially by a searcher. The theory suggests a means of moving automatically from 2 or more initial search terms, to other terms that should be superior in retrieval performance to the 2 original terms. A research project designed to test this colinked descriptor hypothesis is reported. The results suggest that the approach is effective, although methodological problems in testing the idea are reported. Algorithms to generate colinked descriptors can be incorporated easily into system interfaces, front-end or pre-search systems, or help software, in any database that employs a thesaurus. The potential use of colinked descriptors is a strong argument for building richer and more complex thesauri that reflect as many legitimate links among descriptors as possible
  4. White, H.D.: Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis : a remapping of paradigmatic information scientists (2003) 0.04
    0.037054185 = product of:
      0.07410837 = sum of:
        0.064335 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064335 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.28785467 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
        0.009773364 = product of:
          0.029320091 = sum of:
            0.029320091 = weight(_text_:29 in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029320091 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In their 1998 article "Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972-1995," White and McCain used multidimensional scaling, hierarchical clustering, and factor analysis to display the specialty groupings of 120 highly-cited ("paradigmatic") information scientists. These statistical techniques are traditional in author cocitation analysis (ACA). It is shown here that a newer technique, Pathfinder Networks (PFNETs), has considerable advantages for ACA. In PFNETs, nodes represent authors, and explicit links represent weighted paths between nodes, the weights in this case being cocitation counts. The links can be drawn to exclude all but the single highest counts for author pairs, which reduces a network of authors to only the most salient relationships. When these are mapped, dominant authors can be defined as those with relatively many links to other authors (i.e., high degree centrality). Links between authors and dominant authors define specialties, and links between dominant authors connect specialties into a discipline. Maps are made with one rather than several computer routines and in one rather than many computer passes. Also, PFNETs can, and should, be generated from matrices of raw counts rather than Pearson correlations, which removes a computational step associated with traditional ACA. White and McCain's raw data from 1998 are remapped as a PFNET. It is shown that the specialty groupings correspond closely to those seen in the factor analysis of the 1998 article. Because PFNETs are fast to compute, they are used in AuthorLink, a new Web-based system that creates live interfaces for cocited author retrieval an the fly.
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:55:24
  5. Bhavnani, S.K.: Why is it difficult to find comprehensive information? : implications of information scatter for search and design (2005) 0.04
    0.035897203 = product of:
      0.071794406 = sum of:
        0.064335 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064335 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.28785467 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
        0.007459401 = product of:
          0.022378203 = sum of:
            0.022378203 = weight(_text_:systems in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022378203 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The rapid development of Web sites providing extensive coverage of a topic, coupled with the development of powerful search engines (designed to help users find such Web sites), suggests that users can easily find comprehensive information about a topic. In domains such as consumer healthcare, finding comprehensive information about a topic is critical as it can improve a patient's judgment in making healthcare decisions, and can encourage higher compliance with treatment. However, recent studies show that despite using powerful search engines, many healthcare information seekers have difficulty finding comprehensive information even for narrow healthcare topics because the relevant information is scattered across many Web sites. To date, no studies have analyzed how facts related to a search topic are distributed across relevant Web pages and Web sites. In this study, the distribution of facts related to five common healthcare topics across high-quality sites is analyzed, and the reasons underlying those distributions are explored. The analysis revealed the existence of few pages that had many facts, many pages that had few facts, and no single page or site that provided all the facts. While such a distribution conforms to other information-related phenomena, a deeper analysis revealed that the distributions were caused by a trade-off between depth and breadth, leading to the existence of general, specialized, and sparse pages. Furthermore, the results helped to make explicit the knowledge needed by searchers to find comprehensive healthcare information, and suggested the motivation to explore distribution-conscious approaches for the development of future search systems, search interfaces, Web page designs, and training.
  6. Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006) 0.03
    0.030902026 = product of:
      0.061804052 = sum of:
        0.051468004 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051468004 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.23028374 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.010336049 = product of:
          0.031008147 = sum of:
            0.031008147 = weight(_text_:systems in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031008147 = score(doc=76,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2352409 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
  7. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.03
    0.02724233 = product of:
      0.10896932 = sum of:
        0.10896932 = product of:
          0.16345398 = sum of:
            0.08209625 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08209625 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
            0.08135773 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135773 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.02115669 = product of:
      0.08462676 = sum of:
        0.08462676 = product of:
          0.12694013 = sum of:
            0.044756405 = weight(_text_:systems in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044756405 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.339541 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
            0.08218372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08218372 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  9. Thelwall, M.: Quantitative comparisons of search engine results (2008) 0.02
    0.01608375 = product of:
      0.064335 = sum of:
        0.064335 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064335 = score(doc=2350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.28785467 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Search engines are normally used to find information or Web sites, but Webometric investigations use them for quantitative data such as the number of pages matching a query and the international spread of those pages. For this type of application, the accuracy of the hit count estimates and range of URLs in the full results are important. Here, we compare the applications programming interfaces of Google, Yahoo!, and Live Search for 1,587 single word searches. The hit count estimates were broadly consistent but with Yahoo! and Google, reporting 5-6 times more hits than Live Search. Yahoo! tended to return slightly more matching URLs than Google, with Live Search returning significantly fewer. Yahoo!'s result URLs included a significantly wider range of domains and sites than the other two, and there was little consistency between the three engines in the number of different domains. In contrast, the three engines were reasonably consistent in the number of different top-level domains represented in the result URLs, although Yahoo! tended to return the most. In conclusion, quantitative results from the three search engines are mostly consistent but with unexpected types of inconsistency that users should be aware of. Google is recommended for hit count estimates but Yahoo! is recommended for all other Webometric purposes.
  10. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.02
    0.015819103 = product of:
      0.06327641 = sum of:
        0.06327641 = product of:
          0.094914615 = sum of:
            0.060047016 = weight(_text_:systems in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060047016 = score(doc=201,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.45554203 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
            0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348676 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  11. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.02
    0.015567046 = product of:
      0.062268183 = sum of:
        0.062268183 = product of:
          0.093402274 = sum of:
            0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691214 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
            0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046490133 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  12. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.01
    0.013786211 = product of:
      0.055144843 = sum of:
        0.055144843 = product of:
          0.08271726 = sum of:
            0.03580512 = weight(_text_:systems in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03580512 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
            0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691214 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 29(1994) no.2, S.253-269
  13. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.013621165 = product of:
      0.05448466 = sum of:
        0.05448466 = product of:
          0.08172699 = sum of:
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
            0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040678866 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Source
    Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
  14. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01
    0.013621165 = product of:
      0.05448466 = sum of:
        0.05448466 = product of:
          0.08172699 = sum of:
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
            0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040678866 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  15. Craven, T.C.: Determining authorship of Web pages (2006) 0.01
    0.012062935 = product of:
      0.04825174 = sum of:
        0.04825174 = product of:
          0.07237761 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:17:33
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  16. Riechert, M.; Schmitz, J.: Qualitätssicherung von Forschungsinformationen durch visuelle Repräsentation : das Fallbeispiel des "Informationssystems Promotionsnoten" (2017) 0.01
    0.012062935 = product of:
      0.04825174 = sum of:
        0.04825174 = product of:
          0.07237761 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  17. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie : quo vadis? (2017) 0.01
    0.012062935 = product of:
      0.04825174 = sum of:
        0.04825174 = product of:
          0.07237761 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  18. Möller, T.: Woher stammt das Wissen über die Halbwertzeiten des Wissens? (2017) 0.01
    0.012062935 = product of:
      0.04825174 = sum of:
        0.04825174 = product of:
          0.07237761 = sum of:
            0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031329483 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  19. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.01
    0.011675285 = product of:
      0.04670114 = sum of:
        0.04670114 = product of:
          0.07005171 = sum of:
            0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035184108 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
            0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348676 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    17.12.2006 19:44:29
  20. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.01
    0.011675285 = product of:
      0.04670114 = sum of:
        0.04670114 = product of:
          0.07005171 = sum of:
            0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035184108 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
            0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348676 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29

Years

Languages

  • e 258
  • d 22
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 275
  • el 5
  • m 5
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…