Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H.: Theories of cognition and image categorization : what category labels reveal about basic level theory (2008) 0.06
    0.0623421 = product of:
      0.1246842 = sum of:
        0.10918013 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10918013 = score(doc=1958,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.4885056 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
        0.015504073 = product of:
          0.04651222 = sum of:
            0.04651222 = weight(_text_:systems in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04651222 = score(doc=1958,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.35286134 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information search and retrieval interactions usually involve information content in the form of document collections, information retrieval systems and interfaces, and the user. To fully understand information search and retrieval interactions between users' cognitive space and the information space, researchers need to turn to cognitive models and theories. In this article, the authors use one of these theories, the basic level theory. Use of the basic level theory to understand human categorization is both appropriate and essential to user-centered design of taxonomies, ontologies, browsing interfaces, and other indexing tools and systems. Analyses of data from two studies involving free sorting by 105 participants of 100 images were conducted. The types of categories formed and category labels were examined. Results of the analyses indicate that image category labels generally belong to superordinate to the basic level, and are generic and interpretive. Implications for research on theories of cognition and categorization, and design of image indexing, retrieval and browsing systems are discussed.
  2. Rorissa, A.: User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images : a comparison using basic level theory (2008) 0.02
    0.01608375 = product of:
      0.064335 = sum of:
        0.064335 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064335 = score(doc=2122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04289195 = queryNorm
            0.28785467 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although images are visual information sources with little or no text associated with them, users still tend to use text to describe images and formulate queries. This is because digital libraries and search engines provide mostly text query options and rely on text annotations for representation and retrieval of the semantic content of images. While the main focus of image research is on indexing and retrieval of individual images, the general topic of image browsing and indexing, and retrieval of groups of images has not been adequately investigated. Comparisons of descriptions of individual images as well as labels of groups of images supplied by users using cognitive models are scarce. This work fills this gap. Using the basic level theory as a framework, a comparison of the descriptions of individual images and labels assigned to groups of images by 180 participants in three studies found a marked difference in their level of abstraction. Results confirm assertions by previous researchers in LIS and other fields that groups of images are labeled using more superordinate level terms while individual image descriptions are mainly at the basic level. Implications for design of image browsing interfaces, taxonomies, thesauri, and similar tools are discussed.
  3. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.012123236 = product of:
      0.048492946 = sum of:
        0.048492946 = product of:
          0.072739415 = sum of:
            0.031647556 = weight(_text_:systems in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031647556 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
            0.04109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04109186 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  4. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.01
    0.010339659 = product of:
      0.041358635 = sum of:
        0.041358635 = product of:
          0.062037952 = sum of:
            0.026853843 = weight(_text_:systems in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026853843 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
            0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035184108 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of user viewing and query-matching behavior furnishes additional evidence that the relevance of retrieved images for system users may arise from descriptions of objects and content-based elements that are not evident or not even present in the image. This investigation looks at how users assign pre-determined query terms to retrieved images, as well as looking at a post-retrieval process of image engagement to user cognitive assessments of meaningful terms. Additionally, affective/emotion-based query terms appear to be an important descriptive category for image retrieval. A system for capturing (eliciting) human interpretations derived from cognitive engagements with viewed images could further enhance the efficiency of image retrieval systems stemming from traditional indexing methods and technology-based content extraction algorithms. An approach to such a system is posited.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29
  5. Caldera-Serrano, J.: Thematic description of audio-visual information on television (2010) 0.01
    0.010339659 = product of:
      0.041358635 = sum of:
        0.041358635 = product of:
          0.062037952 = sum of:
            0.026853843 = weight(_text_:systems in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026853843 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
            0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035184108 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper endeavours to show the possibilities for thematic description of audio-visual documents for television with the aim of promoting and facilitating information retrieval. Design/methodology/approach - To achieve these goals different database fields are shown, as well as the way in which they are organised for indexing and thematic element description, analysed and used as an example. Some of the database fields are extracted from an analytical study of the documentary system of television in Spain. Others are being tested in university television on which indexing experiments are carried out. Findings - Not all thematic descriptions are used on television information systems; nevertheless, some television channels do use thematic descriptions of both image and sound, applying thesauri. Moreover, it is possible to access sequences using full text retrieval as well. Originality/value - The development of the documentary task, applying the described techniques, promotes thematic indexing and hence thematic retrieval. Given the fact that this is without doubt one of the aspects most demanded by television journalists (along with people's names). This conceptualisation translates into the adaptation of databases to new indexing methods.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:40:35
  6. Laffal, J.: ¬A concept analysis of Jonathan Swift's 'Tale of a tub' and 'Gulliver's travels' (1995) 0.01
    0.008292975 = product of:
      0.0331719 = sum of:
        0.0331719 = product of:
          0.09951569 = sum of:
            0.09951569 = weight(_text_:29 in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09951569 = score(doc=6362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.5, S.339-361
  7. Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995) 0.01
    0.008292975 = product of:
      0.0331719 = sum of:
        0.0331719 = product of:
          0.09951569 = sum of:
            0.09951569 = weight(_text_:29 in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09951569 = score(doc=822,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.4, S.259-270
  8. Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973) 0.01
    0.0078186905 = product of:
      0.031274762 = sum of:
        0.031274762 = product of:
          0.09382428 = sum of:
            0.09382428 = weight(_text_:29 in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09382428 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.2, S.137-168
  9. Krause, J.: Principles of content analysis for information retrieval systems : an overview (1996) 0.01
    0.0052215806 = product of:
      0.020886322 = sum of:
        0.020886322 = product of:
          0.062658966 = sum of:
            0.062658966 = weight(_text_:systems in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062658966 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.004842723 = product of:
      0.019370891 = sum of:
        0.019370891 = product of:
          0.05811267 = sum of:
            0.05811267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05811267 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  11. Jörgensen, C.: ¬The applicability of selected classification systems to image attributes (1996) 0.00
    0.0045220214 = product of:
      0.018088086 = sum of:
        0.018088086 = product of:
          0.054264255 = sum of:
            0.054264255 = weight(_text_:systems in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264255 = score(doc=5175,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Recent research investigated image attributes as reported by participants in describing, sorting, and searching tasks with images and defined 46 specific image attributes which were then organized into 12 major classes. Attributes were also grouped as being 'perceptual' (directly stimulated by visual percepts), 'interpretive' (requiring inference from visual percepts), and 'reactive' (cognitive and affective responses to the images). This research describes the coverage of two image indexing and classification systems and one general classification system in relation to the previous findings and analyzes the extent to which components of these systems are capable of describing the range of image attributes as revealed by the previous research
  12. Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of knowledge based bibliographic retrieval systems (1985) 0.00
    0.0044756406 = product of:
      0.017902562 = sum of:
        0.017902562 = product of:
          0.053707685 = sum of:
            0.053707685 = weight(_text_:systems in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053707685 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0038917614 = product of:
      0.015567046 = sum of:
        0.015567046 = product of:
          0.023350568 = sum of:
            0.011728035 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011728035 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
            0.011622533 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011622533 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  14. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0038741778 = product of:
      0.015496711 = sum of:
        0.015496711 = product of:
          0.046490133 = sum of:
            0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046490133 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  15. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.00
    0.0038741778 = product of:
      0.015496711 = sum of:
        0.015496711 = product of:
          0.046490133 = sum of:
            0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046490133 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  16. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to the classification of fiction (1982) 0.00
    0.0037297006 = product of:
      0.014918802 = sum of:
        0.014918802 = product of:
          0.044756405 = sum of:
            0.044756405 = weight(_text_:systems in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044756405 = score(doc=7240,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.339541 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed. I. Dahlberg
  17. Yoon, J.W.: Utilizing quantitative users' reactions to represent affective meanings of an image (2010) 0.00
    0.0037297006 = product of:
      0.014918802 = sum of:
        0.014918802 = product of:
          0.044756405 = sum of:
            0.044756405 = weight(_text_:systems in 3584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044756405 = score(doc=3584,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.339541 = fieldWeight in 3584, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3584)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Emotional meaning is critical for users to retrieve relevant images. However, because emotional meanings are subject to the individual viewer's interpretation, they are considered difficult to implement when designing image retrieval systems. With the intent of making an image's emotional messages more readily accessible, this study aims to test a new approach designed to enhance the accessibility of emotional meanings during the image search process. This approach utilizes image searchers' emotional reactions, which are quantitatively measured. Broadly used quantitative measurements for emotional reactions, Semantic Differential (SD) and Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), were selected as tools for gathering users' reactions. Emotional representations obtained from these two tools were compared with three image perception tasks: searching, describing, and sorting. A survey questionnaire with a set of 12 images was administered to 58 participants, which were tagged with basic emotions. Results demonstrated that the SAM represents basic emotions on 2-dimensional plots (pleasure and arousal dimensions), and this representation consistently corresponded to the three image perception tasks. This study provided experimental evidence that quantitative users' reactions can be a useful complementary element of current image retrieval/indexing systems. Integrating users' reactions obtained from the SAM into image browsing systems would reduce the efforts of human indexers as well as improve the effectiveness of image retrieval systems.
  18. Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994) 0.00
    0.003692215 = product of:
      0.01476886 = sum of:
        0.01476886 = product of:
          0.04430658 = sum of:
            0.04430658 = weight(_text_:systems in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04430658 = score(doc=3413,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The work is an adaptation of the author's dissertation and has the following chapters: (1) background and introduction; (2) a problem in classification theory; (3) previous fiction analysis theories and systems and 'The left hand of darkness'; (4) fiction warrant and critical warrant; (5) experimental fiction analysis system (EFAS); (6) application and evaluation of EFAS. Appendix 1 gives references to fiction analysis systems and appendix 2 lists EFAS coding sheets
  19. Nahotko, M.: Genre groups in knowledge organization (2016) 0.00
    0.003692215 = product of:
      0.01476886 = sum of:
        0.01476886 = product of:
          0.04430658 = sum of:
            0.04430658 = weight(_text_:systems in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04430658 = score(doc=5139,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The article is an introduction to the development of Andersen's concept of textual tools used in knowledge organization (KO) in light of the theory of genres and activity systems. In particular, the question is based on the concepts of genre connectivity and genre group, in addition to previously established concepts such as genre hierarchy, set, system, and repertoire. Five genre groups used in KO are described. The analysis of groups, systems, and selected genres used in KO is provided, based on the method proposed by Yates and Orlikowski. The aim is to show the genre system as a part of the activity system, and thus as a framework for KO.
  20. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00
    0.003420677 = product of:
      0.013682708 = sum of:
        0.013682708 = product of:
          0.041048124 = sum of:
            0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041048124 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04289195 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14

Languages

  • e 40
  • d 3
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 38
  • m 5
  • el 1
  • More… Less…