-
Gnoli, C.: Metadata about what? : distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions in knowledge organization (2012)
0.04
0.035897203 = product of:
0.071794406 = sum of:
0.064335 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064335 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.28785467 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.007459401 = product of:
0.022378203 = sum of:
0.022378203 = weight(_text_:systems in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022378203 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The spread of many new media and formats is changing the scenario faced by knowledge organizers: as printed monographs are not the only standard form of knowledge carrier anymore, the traditional kind of knowledge organization (KO) systems based on academic disciplines is put into question. A sounder foundation can be provided by an analysis of the different dimensions concurring to form the content of any knowledge item-what Brian Vickery described as the steps "from the world to the classifier." The ultimate referents of documents are the phenomena of the real world, that can be ordered by ontology, the study of what exists. Phenomena coexist in subjects with the perspectives by which they are considered, pertaining to epistemology, and with the formal features of knowledge carriers, adding a further, pragmatic layer. All these dimensions can be accounted for in metadata, but are often done so in mixed ways, making indexes less rigorous and interoperable. For example, while facet analysis was originally developed for subject indexing, many "faceted" interfaces today mix subject facets with form facets, and schemes presented as "ontologies" for the "semantic Web" also code for non-semantic information. In bibliographic classifications, phenomena are often confused with the disciplines dealing with them, the latter being assumed to be the most useful starting point, for users will have either one or another perspective. A general citation order of dimensions- phenomena, perspective, carrier-is recommended, helping to concentrate most relevant information at the beginning of headings.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.03
0.028264118 = product of:
0.11305647 = sum of:
0.11305647 = sum of:
0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031329483 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041048124 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040678866 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.020573815 = product of:
0.08229526 = sum of:
0.08229526 = product of:
0.12344289 = sum of:
0.053707685 = weight(_text_:systems in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053707685 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.0697352 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0697352 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Albrechtsen, H.; Pejtersen, A.M.: Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes (2003)
0.02
0.019300502 = product of:
0.07720201 = sum of:
0.07720201 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07720201 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.3454256 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Work centered design of classification schemes is an emerging area of research which poses particular challenges to domain analysis and scheme construction. A key challenge in work centered design of classification schemes is the evolving semantics of work. This article introduces a work centered approach to the design of classification schemes, based an the framework of cognitive work analysis. We launch collaborative task situations as a new unit of analysis for capturing evolving semantic structures in work domains. An example case from a cognitive work analysis of three national film research archives illustrates the application of the framework for identifying actors' needs for a classification scheme to support collaborative knowledge integration. It is concluded that a main contribution of the new approach is support for empirical analysis and overall design of classification schemes that can serve as material interfaces for actors' negotiations and integration of knowledge perspectives during collaborative work.
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.02
0.016187705 = product of:
0.06475082 = sum of:
0.06475082 = product of:
0.09712622 = sum of:
0.05063609 = weight(_text_:systems in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063609 = score(doc=7242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046490133 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006)
0.02
0.01608375 = product of:
0.064335 = sum of:
0.064335 = weight(_text_:interfaces in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064335 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22349821 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.28785467 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2107263 = idf(docFreq=655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Disciplines are felt by many to be a constraint in classification, though they are a structuring principle of most bibliographic classification schemes. A non-disciplinary approach has been explored by the Classification Research Group, and research in this direction has been resumed recently by the Integrative Level Classification project. This paper focuses on the role and the definition of facets in non-disciplinary schemes. A generalized definition of facets is suggested with reference to predicate logic, allowing for having facets of phenomena as well as facets of disciplines. The general categories under which facets are often subsumed can be related ontologically to the evolutionary sequence of integrative levels. As a facet can be semantically connected with phenomena from any other part of a general scheme, its values can belong to three types, here called extra-defined foci (either special or general), and context-defined foci. Non-disciplinary freely faceted classification is being tested by applying it to little bibliographic samples stored in a MySQL database, and developing Web search interfaces to demonstrate possible uses of the described techniques.
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.02
0.015567046 = product of:
0.062268183 = sum of:
0.062268183 = product of:
0.093402274 = sum of:
0.04691214 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04691214 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.046490133 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046490133 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.01
0.014815299 = product of:
0.059261195 = sum of:
0.059261195 = product of:
0.08889179 = sum of:
0.053707685 = weight(_text_:systems in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053707685 = score(doc=2651,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035184108 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:20:40
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.01
0.013563303 = product of:
0.054253213 = sum of:
0.054253213 = product of:
0.081379816 = sum of:
0.04651222 = weight(_text_:systems in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04651222 = score(doc=2945,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.35286134 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348676 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
-
Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003)
0.01
0.012193529 = product of:
0.048774116 = sum of:
0.048774116 = product of:
0.07316117 = sum of:
0.037977066 = weight(_text_:systems in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037977066 = score(doc=2632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.035184108 = weight(_text_:29 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035184108 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the need for knowledge organization (KO) tools, such as library classifications, thesauri and subject heading systems, to be fully disclosed and available in the open network environment. The authors look at the place and value of traditional library knowledge organization tools in relation to the technical environment and expectations of the Semantic Web. Future requirements in this context are explored, stressing the need for KO systems to support semantic interoperability. In order to be fully shareable KO tools need to be reframed and reshaped in terms of conceptual and data models. The authors suggest that some useful approaches to this already exist in methodological and technical developments within the fields of ontology modelling and lexicographic and terminological data interchange.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:26:23
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.012140779 = product of:
0.048563115 = sum of:
0.048563115 = product of:
0.07284467 = sum of:
0.037977066 = weight(_text_:systems in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037977066 = score(doc=780,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348676 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014)
0.01
0.012140779 = product of:
0.048563115 = sum of:
0.048563115 = product of:
0.07284467 = sum of:
0.037977066 = weight(_text_:systems in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037977066 = score(doc=1425,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.0348676 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348676 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper returns to Beghtol's (1986) insightful typology of warrant to consider an empirical example of a traditional top-down hierarchical classification system as it continues to evolve in the early 21st century. Our examination considers there may be multiple warrants identified among the processes of design and the relationships to users of the National Occupational Classification (NOC), the standard occupational classification system published in Canada. We argue that this shift in semantic warrant signals a transition for traditional knowledge organization systems, and that warrant continues to be a relevant analytical concept and organizing principle, both within and beyond the domain of bibliographic control.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004)
0.01
0.012062935 = product of:
0.04825174 = sum of:
0.04825174 = product of:
0.07237761 = sum of:
0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031329483 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041048124 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The classification of documents about topics relating to people of mixed race is problematic, partly because of the obscurity of racial categorization in general, and partly because of the limitations and inherent biases of bibliographic classification schemes designed primarily for usage in non-digital environments. Critical race theory is an approach that may prove useful in deterrnining how classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification should most appropriately be stuctured.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:38:42
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The facet concept as a universal principle of subdivision (2006)
0.01
0.012062935 = product of:
0.04825174 = sum of:
0.04825174 = product of:
0.07237761 = sum of:
0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031329483 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.041048124 = weight(_text_:29 in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041048124 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:19:30
- Source
- Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.01
0.0120013915 = product of:
0.048005566 = sum of:
0.048005566 = product of:
0.07200835 = sum of:
0.031329483 = weight(_text_:systems in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031329483 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.040678866 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040678866 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the reasons for the decision, taken at Florida International University Library to develop an in house classification system for their local documents collections. Reviews the structures of existing classification systems, noting their strengths and weaknesses in relation to the development of an in house system and describes the 5 components of the new system; geography, subject categories, extensions for population group and/or function, extensions for type of publication, and title/series designator
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.01
0.011302753 = product of:
0.045211013 = sum of:
0.045211013 = product of:
0.06781652 = sum of:
0.038760185 = weight(_text_:systems in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038760185 = score(doc=3483,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.29405114 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.029056335 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029056335 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.
- Pages
- S.19-22
-
Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014)
0.01
0.010117315 = product of:
0.04046926 = sum of:
0.04046926 = product of:
0.06070389 = sum of:
0.031647556 = weight(_text_:systems in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031647556 = score(doc=1417,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.029056335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029056335 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In recent years, Hjørland has developed a typology of basic epistemological approaches to KO that identifies four basic positions - empiricism, rationalism, historicism/hermeneutics, and pragmatism -with which to characterize the epistemological bases and methodological orientation of KOSs. Although scholars of KO have noted that the design of a single KOS may incorporate epistemological-methodological features from more than one of these approaches, studies of concrete examples of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism have been rare. In this paper, we consider the phenomenon of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism in one theoretically significant family of KOSs - namely analytico-synthetic, or faceted, KOSs - by examining two cases - Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI) and Brian Vickery's method of facet analysis (FA) for document classification. We show that both of these systems combined classical features of rationalism with elements of empiricism and pragmatism and argue that such eclecticism is the norm, rather than the exception, for such KOSs in general.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012)
0.01
0.00981578 = product of:
0.03926312 = sum of:
0.03926312 = product of:
0.058894683 = sum of:
0.03837062 = weight(_text_:systems in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03837062 = score(doc=1782,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.29109573 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.020524062 = weight(_text_:29 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020524062 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16. 3.2012 11:26:29
- LCSH
- Information Systems
Information storage and retrieval systems
Multimedia systems
- Subject
- Information Systems
Information storage and retrieval systems
Multimedia systems
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.01
0.009729404 = product of:
0.038917616 = sum of:
0.038917616 = product of:
0.058376424 = sum of:
0.029320091 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029320091 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.029056335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029056335 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15020029 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017)
0.01
0.008616382 = product of:
0.03446553 = sum of:
0.03446553 = product of:
0.051698294 = sum of:
0.022378203 = weight(_text_:systems in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022378203 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13181444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.029320091 = weight(_text_:29 in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029320091 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15088047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04289195 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The identification and contextual definition of concepts is the core of knowledge organization. The full expression of comprehension is accomplished through the use of an extension device called the facet. A facet is a category of dimensional characteristics that cross the hierarchical array of concepts to provide extension, or breadth, to the contexts in which they are discovered or expressed in knowledge organization systems. The use of the facet in knowledge organization has a rich history arising in the mid-nineteenth century. As it has matured through more than a century of application, the notion of the facet in knowledge organization has taken on a variety of meanings, from that of simple categories used in web search engines to the more sophisticated idea of intersecting dimensions of knowledge. This book describes the state of the art of the understanding of facets in knowledge organization today.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 19:11:29
