-
Beall, J.: Abbreviations, full spellings, and searchers' preferences (2011)
0.11
0.10980886 = product of:
0.1647133 = sum of:
0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 4166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10735885 = score(doc=4166,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 4166, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4166)
0.057354435 = product of:
0.11470887 = sum of:
0.11470887 = weight(_text_:engines in 4166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11470887 = score(doc=4166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 4166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study examined ten, selected word pairs, each containing a word's full spelling and its abbreviation, to determine which form search engine users preferred in searching. Using seven search logs gathered from several Internet search engines with approximately 608 MB of data, the study measured the occurrences of the twenty terms. The selected words are important in library cataloging, for some are prescribed abbreviations in metadata content standards. The study found that in eight of the ten word pairs users preferred to search full spellings over the abbreviations, often by a high margin.'
-
Jin, L.: Creating up-to-date corporate name authority records by using official corporate home Web pages (2004)
0.09
0.08769246 = product of:
0.13153869 = sum of:
0.08135357 = weight(_text_:search in 5677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08135357 = score(doc=5677,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.46558946 = fieldWeight in 5677, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5677)
0.05018513 = product of:
0.10037026 = sum of:
0.10037026 = weight(_text_:engines in 5677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10037026 = score(doc=5677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 5677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Internet has changed the way users access information for their research needs. According to recent surveys, we have a generation of Google users who search for information for their research needs in Web search engines before they search the OPAC. Catalogers are faced with the issue of how to help users improve access to the bibliographic world in the Internet environment. This article presents three case studies as examples of corporate name authority records that could be greatly improved by using or adding current information from the Internet. Strategies for searching official corporate body Web pages, adding references, and updating local catalogs are discussed.
-
Scheschy, V.M.: Cataloging procedures on the Web : the greatest thing since MARC (1998)
0.07
0.074022576 = product of:
0.11103386 = sum of:
0.053679425 = weight(_text_:search in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053679425 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
0.057354435 = product of:
0.11470887 = sum of:
0.11470887 = weight(_text_:engines in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11470887 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Cataloguers place a high importance on the ready availability of current and accurate local procedures. By using WWW technology, these procedures may be easily updated, made searchable via powerful search engines and capable of linking directly to related resources. Cataloguers' skills in organization and classification provide a good foundation for learning the basics of Web site creation. Presents some guidelines for dealing with the logical organization of procedures on the WWW, along with the use of appropriate language of consistent design
-
Dodge, C.; Marx, B.; Pfeiffenberger, H.: Web cataloguing through cache exploitation and steps toward consistency maintenance (1995)
0.06
0.06476976 = product of:
0.09715463 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
0.05018513 = product of:
0.10037026 = sum of:
0.10037026 = weight(_text_:engines in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10037026 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a new Web cataloguing strategy based upon the automatic analysis of documents stored in a proxy server cache. This could be an elegant method of Web cataloguing as it creates no extra network load and runs completely automatically. Naturally such a mechanism will only reach a subset of Web documents, but at an institute such as the Alfred Wegner Institute, due to the fact that scientists tend to make quite good search engines, the cache usually contains large numbers of documents related to polar and marine research. Details of a database for polar, marine and global change research, based upon a cache scanning mechanism are given, and it is shown that it is becoming an increasingly uaseful resource
-
Tammaro, A.M.: Catalogando, catalogando ... metacatalogando (1997)
0.06
0.06476976 = product of:
0.09715463 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
0.05018513 = product of:
0.10037026 = sum of:
0.10037026 = weight(_text_:engines in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10037026 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A crucial question for librarians is whether to catalogue Internet information sources, and electronic sources in general, which may contain metainformation of the texts of articles. Librarians can help researchers with data identification and access in 4 ways: making OPAC available on the Internet; providing a complete selection of Gopher, Ftp, WWW, etc. site lists; maintaining a Web site, coordinateted by the library, that functions as an Internet access point; and organising access to existing search engines that do automatic indexing. Briefly reviews several metadata formats, including USMARC field 856, IAFA templates, SOIP (Harvest), TEI Headers, Capcas Head and URC
-
Holley, R.P.: Cataloging : an exciting subject for exciting times (2002)
0.06
0.06476976 = product of:
0.09715463 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.05018513 = product of:
0.10037026 = sum of:
0.10037026 = weight(_text_:engines in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10037026 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Cataloging remains a fundamental component of library and information science and has many lessons to teach the architects of the Internet age. All students can benefit from taking a cataloging course, especially if it stresses cataloging as one specific answer to the problems of managing information and places cataloging within a larger context that also includes indexing and Internet search engines. Students deserve cataloging courses that combine theory and practice, avoid memorization, and require them to show a mastery of core principles rather than picky details. This paper includes specific suggestions on how to make cataloging exciting.
-
Yee, M.M.: Cataloging compared to descriptive bibliography, abstracting and indexing services, and metadata (2007)
0.06
0.06476976 = product of:
0.09715463 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
0.05018513 = product of:
0.10037026 = sum of:
0.10037026 = weight(_text_:engines in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10037026 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Cataloging is compared to descriptive bibliography, to enumerative bibliography and abstracting and indexing services, as well as to metadata created by Web search engines or nonprofessionals at sites such as Amazon.com. These four types of metadata are compared with regard to object of the description, functions, scope, number of copies examined, collective vs. individual creation, standardization, authority control, evidence, amount of descriptive detail, degression, time span the data is intended to last, and degree of evaluation.
-
Salarelli, A.: Nella notte dove tuttel la vacche sono nere qualcuno prova ad accendere un cerino (1996)
0.06
0.05551693 = product of:
0.08327539 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=5763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
0.043015826 = product of:
0.08603165 = sum of:
0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603165 = score(doc=5763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Library science may well have an essential role to play in efficiently organising the huge amount of Internet information available in the various scientific disciplines. The basic problem is to develop a cataloguing theory sufficiently flexible to cope with the impact of an ever changing store of network data. Such a theory would abondon the utopian idea of a 'catalogue of ctalogues', seeking instead to match each specific user query to the most appropriate catalogue. Examines 2 important USA projects for cataloguing network resources: Digital Libraries Research (funded by the National Science Foundation), which uses a combination of search engines to retrieve net data; and the Internet Public Library. Lists the Management and Library Schools now on the WWW
-
Woodward, J.: Cataloging and classifying information resources on the Internet (1996)
0.06
0.05551693 = product of:
0.08327539 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 7397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=7397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 7397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7397)
0.043015826 = product of:
0.08603165 = sum of:
0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 7397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603165 = score(doc=7397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 7397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- State of the art review exploring the problem of bibliographic citations to resources that exist only in electronic form where the cited items may no longer be locatable at the URL indicated. Notes that the Internet is currently in a state of near chaos in terms of access and organization, while searching, usually performed with word based search engines, is generally not adequate for the needs of most users. Reviews strategies used by librarians for cataloguing and classifying information resources on the Internet. Techniques used include: automatic classification projects and classified subject trees, like the BUBL Subject Tree; CyberDewey, and the WWW Virtual Library. Considers OPAC like library catalogues such as the UK's CATRIONA Project and OCLC's InterCat. Explores retrieval tools used with concept analysis and other non traditional proposals, which include some library expertise, usually the use of one of the major library classifications. Pays particular attention to the UDC
-
Dong, E.X.: Organizing Websites : a dilemma for libraries (2004/05)
0.06
0.05551693 = product of:
0.08327539 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
0.043015826 = product of:
0.08603165 = sum of:
0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603165 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Websites are proliferating dramatically, and many should be organized and made available to users since they are of high quality and of great interest to users. There are several ways a library can capture (i.e., obtain and hold) and organize Websites: cataloging is, of course, a traditional way of organizing information in a library, but cataloging Websites poses a dilemma for many libraries, as Websites are essentially different from traditional information resources. Making relevant Website lists and subject gateway links is usually a more popular choice, or just leaving the job to search engines like Google. This article looks at these means of organizing and capturing Websites, as well as their advantages and issues for the library and users. and determines which is the most efficient and cost-effective method.
-
Christensen, A.: Next generation catalogues : what do users think? (2013)
0.06
0.05551693 = product of:
0.08327539 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
0.043015826 = product of:
0.08603165 = sum of:
0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603165 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In the wake of the digital revolution, libraries have started rethinking their catalogues and reshaping them along the lines that have been set by popular search engines and online retailers. Yet it has also become a hallmark of next generation catalogues to reflect the results of studies concerning user behaviour and user needs and to rely on the participation of users in the development and testing of the new tools. A wide array of methods for user driven design and development are being employed, which ideally leverage discovery platforms that reflect the specifics of library metadata and materials as well as the need for attractive design and useful new functionalities. After looking back at the history of user studies on online catalogues, we will briefly investigate methods to involve users actively in the design and development processes for new catalogues before describing and examining the outcomes of studies of users' perceptions.
-
Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993)
0.05
0.053949714 = product of:
0.08092457 = sum of:
0.053679425 = weight(_text_:search in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053679425 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
0.027245143 = product of:
0.054490287 = sum of:
0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054490287 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:47:22
-
Davies-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996)
0.05
0.047206 = product of:
0.070809 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.0238395 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047679 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Additionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001)
0.05
0.047206 = product of:
0.070809 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.0238395 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047679 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:09:22
-
Davis-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996)
0.05
0.047206 = product of:
0.070809 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
0.0238395 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047679 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Addtionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.171-196
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; Smiraglia, R.; Lee, H.-L.; Fox, M.: What is an author now? (2015)
0.04
0.044422872 = product of:
0.066634305 = sum of:
0.037957087 = weight(_text_:search in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037957087 = score(doc=2321,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.21722981 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.028677218 = product of:
0.057354435 = sum of:
0.057354435 = weight(_text_:engines in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057354435 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.22454272 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss and shed light on the following questions: What is an author? Is it a person who writes? Or, is it, in information, an iconic taxonomic designation (some might say a "classification") for a group of writings that are recognized by the public in some particular way? What does it mean when a search engine, or catalog, asks a user to enter the name of an author? And how does that accord with the manner in which the data have been entered in association with the names of the entities identified with the concept of authorship? Design/methodology/approach - The authors use several cases as bases of phenomenological discourse analysis, combining as best the authors can components of eidetic bracketing (a Husserlian technique for isolating noetic reduction) with Foucauldian discourse analysis. The two approaches are not sympathetic or together cogent, so the authors present them instead as alternative explanations alongside empirical evidence. In this way the authors are able to isolate components of iconic "authorship" and then subsequently engage them in discourse. Findings - An "author" is an iconic name associated with a class of works. An "author" is a role in public discourse between a set of works and the culture that consumes them. An "author" is a role in cultural sublimation, or a power broker in deabstemiation. An "author" is last, if ever, a person responsible for the intellectual content of a published work. The library catalog's attribution of "author" is at odds with the Foucauldian discursive comprehension of the role of an "author." Originality/value - One of the main assets of this paper is the combination of Foucauldian discourse analysis with phenomenological analysis for the study of the "author." The authors turned to Foucauldian discourse analysis to discover the loci of power in the interactions of the public with the named authorial entities. The authors also looked to phenomenological analysis to consider the lived experience of users who encounter the same named authorial entities. The study of the "author" in this combined way facilitated the revelation of new aspects of the role of authorship in search engines and library catalogs.
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.04
0.04298305 = product of:
0.064474575 = sum of:
0.04744636 = weight(_text_:search in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04744636 = score(doc=2422,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.27153727 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.017028214 = product of:
0.03405643 = sum of:
0.03405643 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03405643 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Revelli, C.: Integrare o sostituire? : Un dilemma per la norme catalografiche (1997)
0.03
0.027117856 = product of:
0.08135357 = sum of:
0.08135357 = weight(_text_:search in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08135357 = score(doc=1624,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.46558946 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses a range of professional librarians' opinions on the urgent need either to adopt or replace the current cataloguing rules, a theme closely linked to the identity crisis facing libraries and librarians in the online electronic era. Topics examined include: Gorman and Oddy's views on restructuring AACR principles; the 13 metadata elements contained in the Dublin Core document (1995); catalogue search by known item; keyword search versus subject search; and the US Library of Congress's Program for cooperation cataloging
-
Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011)
0.03
0.027117856 = product of:
0.08135357 = sum of:
0.08135357 = weight(_text_:search in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08135357 = score(doc=1887,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.46558946 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
- Object
- Google Book Search
-
Kinstler, T.: Making search work for the library user (2013)
0.03
0.026839714 = product of:
0.08051914 = sum of:
0.08051914 = weight(_text_:search in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08051914 = score(doc=1477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.460814 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
