Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999) 0.08
    0.08235665 = product of:
      0.12353496 = sum of:
        0.08051914 = weight(_text_:search in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08051914 = score(doc=726,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.460814 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
        0.043015826 = product of:
          0.08603165 = sum of:
            0.08603165 = weight(_text_:engines in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08603165 = score(doc=726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper documents the continuing relevance of facet analysis as a technique for searching and organising WWW based materials. The 2 approaches underlying WWW searching and indexing - word and concept based indexing - are outlined. It is argued that facet analysis as an a posteriori approach to classification using words from the subject field as the concept terms in the classification derived represents an excellent approach to searching and organising the results of WWW searches using either search engines or search directories. Finally it is argued that the underlying philosophy of facet analysis is better suited to the disparate nature of WWW resources and searchers than the assumptions of contemporaray IR research.
    This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
  2. Pocock, H.: Classification schemes : development and survival (1997) 0.02
    0.022366427 = product of:
      0.06709928 = sum of:
        0.06709928 = weight(_text_:search in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06709928 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the development of classification schemes and their ability to adapt to and accomodate changes in the information world in order to survive. Examines the revision plans for the major classification schemes and the future use of classification search facilities for OPACs
  3. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.013622571 = product of:
      0.040867712 = sum of:
        0.040867712 = product of:
          0.081735425 = sum of:
            0.081735425 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081735425 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.013622571 = product of:
      0.040867712 = sum of:
        0.040867712 = product of:
          0.081735425 = sum of:
            0.081735425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081735425 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.009081715 = product of:
      0.027245143 = sum of:
        0.027245143 = product of:
          0.054490287 = sum of:
            0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054490287 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  6. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.009081715 = product of:
      0.027245143 = sum of:
        0.027245143 = product of:
          0.054490287 = sum of:
            0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054490287 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  7. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.007946501 = product of:
      0.0238395 = sum of:
        0.0238395 = product of:
          0.047679 = sum of:
            0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047679 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  8. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.0068112854 = product of:
      0.020433856 = sum of:
        0.020433856 = product of:
          0.040867712 = sum of:
            0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040867712 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  9. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.0056760716 = product of:
      0.017028214 = sum of:
        0.017028214 = product of:
          0.03405643 = sum of:
            0.03405643 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03405643 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22