Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Zhang, J.; Dimitroff, A.: Internet search engines' response to Metadata Dublin Core implementation (2005) 0.13
    0.12953952 = product of:
      0.19430926 = sum of:
        0.093939 = weight(_text_:search in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093939 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
        0.10037026 = product of:
          0.20074052 = sum of:
            0.20074052 = weight(_text_:engines in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20074052 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.7858995 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  2. Perkins, M.: Why don't search engines work better? (1997) 0.11
    0.11218452 = product of:
      0.16827677 = sum of:
        0.08135357 = weight(_text_:search in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08135357 = score(doc=753,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.46558946 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.086923204 = product of:
          0.17384641 = sum of:
            0.17384641 = weight(_text_:engines in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17384641 = score(doc=753,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.68060905 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the proliferation of new search engines and improvements to existing ones, their use with the WWW continues to produce innumerable false hits. The reason for this is that HTML is mainly a presentation tool, and does a fairly poor job of describing the contents of a document while search engines are a long way from artificial intelligence. The use of SGML would ease the problem considerably, but is much more complex and time consuming to learn to be of general use. The alternative 'metadata' approach is proving slow to get off the ground. Researchers are investigating these and various other lines of enquiry
  3. Henshaw, R.; Valauskas, E.J.: Metadata as a catalyst: : experiments with metadata and search engines in the Internet journal, First Monday (2001) 0.11
    0.11103386 = product of:
      0.16655079 = sum of:
        0.08051914 = weight(_text_:search in 7098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08051914 = score(doc=7098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.460814 = fieldWeight in 7098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7098)
        0.08603165 = product of:
          0.1720633 = sum of:
            0.1720633 = weight(_text_:engines in 7098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1720633 = score(doc=7098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.67362815 = fieldWeight in 7098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  4. Roux, M.: Metadata for search engines : what can be learned from e-Sciences? (2012) 0.10
    0.10334983 = product of:
      0.15502474 = sum of:
        0.08051914 = weight(_text_:search in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08051914 = score(doc=96,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.460814 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
        0.074505605 = product of:
          0.14901121 = sum of:
            0.14901121 = weight(_text_:engines in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14901121 = score(doc=96,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.58337915 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    E-sciences are data-intensive sciences that make a large use of the Web to share, collect, and process data. In this context, primary scientific data is becoming a new challenging issue as data must be extensively described (1) to account for empiric conditions and results that allow interpretation and/or analyses and (2) to be understandable by computers used for data storage and information retrieval. With this respect, metadata is a focal point whatever it is considered from the point of view of the user to visualize and exploit data as well as this of the search tools to find and retrieve information. Numerous disciplines are concerned with the issues of describing complex observations and addressing pertinent knowledge. In this paper, similarities and differences in data description and exploration strategies among disciplines in e-sciences are examined.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64420.
    Source
    Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
  5. Turner, T.P.; Brackbill, L.: Rising to the top : evaluating the use of HTML META tag to improve retrieval of World Wide Web documents through Internet search engines (1998) 0.10
    0.09615815 = product of:
      0.14423722 = sum of:
        0.06973162 = weight(_text_:search in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973162 = score(doc=5230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.39907667 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
        0.074505605 = product of:
          0.14901121 = sum of:
            0.14901121 = weight(_text_:engines in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14901121 = score(doc=5230,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.58337915 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of using the HTML META tag to improve retrieval of World Wide Web documents through Internet search engines. 20 documents were created in 5 subject areas: agricultural trade; farm business statistics; poultry statistics; vegetable statistics; and cotton statistics. 4 pages were created in each subject area: one with no META tags, one with a META tag using the keywords attribute, one with a META tag using the description attribute, and one with META tags using both the keywords and description attributes. Searches were performed in Alta Vista and Infoseek to find terms common to all pages as well as for each keyword term contained in the META tag. Analysis of the searches suggests that use of the keywords attribute in a META tag substantially improves accessibility while use of the description attribute alone does not. Concludes that HTML document authors should consider using keywords attribute META tags and suggests that more search engines index the META tag to improve resource discovery
  6. Dawson, A.: Creating metadata that work for digital libraries and Google (2004) 0.06
    0.06476976 = product of:
      0.09715463 = sum of:
        0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 4762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0469695 = score(doc=4762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 4762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4762)
        0.05018513 = product of:
          0.10037026 = sum of:
            0.10037026 = weight(_text_:engines in 4762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10037026 = score(doc=4762,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 4762, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    For many years metadata has been recognised as a significant component of the digital information environment. Substantial work has gone into creating complex metadata schemes for describing digital content. Yet increasingly Web search engines, and Google in particular, are the primary means of discovering and selecting digital resources, although they make little use of metadata. This article considers how digital libraries can gain more value from their metadata by adapting it for Google users, while still following well-established principles and standards for cataloguing and digital preservation.
  7. Craven, T.C.: Variations in use of meta tag descriptions by Web pages in different languages (2004) 0.02
    0.015656501 = product of:
      0.0469695 = sum of:
        0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0469695 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Sets of top-ranking pages in 20 languages returned by the Google search engine were downloaded and analyzed for presence of meta tag descriptions and lengths of descriptions. Results showed significant differences in proportion of pages with descriptions and in lengths of descriptions depending on language; specifically, pages in major Western European languages showed higher proportions with descriptions, while pages in Chinese showed the lowest proportions. Descriptions were mostly in the languages of the pages, though English descriptions were provided on some non-English pages. With few exceptions, coding schemes adopted for diacritics and non-Roman characters were standard.
  8. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01
    0.009081715 = product of:
      0.027245143 = sum of:
        0.027245143 = product of:
          0.054490287 = sum of:
            0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054490287 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  9. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.009081715 = product of:
      0.027245143 = sum of:
        0.027245143 = product of:
          0.054490287 = sum of:
            0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054490287 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  10. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.01
    0.007946501 = product of:
      0.0238395 = sum of:
        0.0238395 = product of:
          0.047679 = sum of:
            0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047679 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54