-
Bloomfield, M.: ¬A look at subject headings : a plea for standardization (1993)
0.03
0.027117856 = product of:
0.08135357 = sum of:
0.08135357 = weight(_text_:search in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08135357 = score(doc=2475,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.46558946 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In the preparation of a book on how to do a literature search, many inconsistencies were found in the assignment of subject terms. The Library of Congress Subject Headings is cited for not bringing computer languages into a consistent pattern. BASIC and FORTRAN are treated differently in their see also references and are without references to the words "computers" or "computer." Also index terms for the literature search on the "search for extraterrestrial life" showed inconsistent patterns in indexing. Catalogers and indexers need to review the work they are currently publishing and try to decide how to bring some standardization to the construction of subject terms. There is a need to provide a single thesaurus for all English index terms.
-
Buizza, P.; Guerrini, M: ¬A conceptual model for the new Soggettario : subject indexing in the light of FRBR (2002)
0.02
0.018978544 = product of:
0.056935627 = sum of:
0.056935627 = weight(_text_:search in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056935627 = score(doc=5685,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.3258447 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- The National Central Library in Florence, Italy, has commissioned a feasibility study for the renewal of the Soggettario [Subject headings for Italian libraries]. [It is indispensable for the theoretical development to take place within the international debate and to approach the topic of a new Soggettario with reference to the FRBR.}. The subject is analysed as a relation between the entities in the third group: concept, object, event, place and the entity work. The model identifies the logical entities, attributes and relationships which run between the entities. The article returns to and amplifies the user tasks of FRBR which involve a subject: (1) Find the works on a given subject; (2) Find the works in which a concept is significantly treated; (3) Select a work by its main subject only; (4) Lead to a search for works on related subjects; (5) Lead to a search for works in which related or connected subjects are handled.
-
Liu, Y.-H.; Wacholder, N.: Evaluating the impact of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms on different types of searchers (2017)
0.02
0.018978544 = product of:
0.056935627 = sum of:
0.056935627 = weight(_text_:search in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056935627 = score(doc=5096,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.3258447 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A commonly used technique for improving search engine performance is result caching. In result caching, precomputed results (e.g., URLs and snippets of best matching pages) of certain queries are stored in a fast-access storage. The future occurrences of a query whose results are already stored in the cache can be directly served by the result cache, eliminating the need to process the query using costly computing resources. Although other performance metrics are possible, the main performance metric for evaluating the success of a result cache is hit rate. In this work, we present a machine learning approach to improve the hit rate of a result cache by facilitating a large number of features extracted from search engine query logs. We then apply the proposed machine learning approach to static, dynamic, and static-dynamic caching. Compared to the previous methods in the literature, the proposed approach improves the hit rate of the result cache up to 0.66%, which corresponds to 9.60% of the potential room for improvement.
-
Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007)
0.02
0.018505644 = product of:
0.027758464 = sum of:
0.013419856 = weight(_text_:search in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013419856 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.076802336 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.014338609 = product of:
0.028677218 = sum of:
0.028677218 = weight(_text_:engines in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028677218 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25542772 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.11227136 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."
-
Bone, C.; Lougheed, B.: Library of Congress Subject Headings related to indigenous peoples : changing LCSH for use in a Canadian archival context (2018)
0.02
0.015656501 = product of:
0.0469695 = sum of:
0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 5168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0469695 = score(doc=5168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 5168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5168)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Association for Manitoba Archives has created a database where members can deposit archival descriptions to provide a central search for users. Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) were chosen as the controlled subject vocabulary to use in the descriptions, but changes were made to LCSH to better describe material about or by Indigenous peoples. Examples include: the word "Indian"; geographic place embedded in terms such as "Indians of North America"; changes related to Manitoba peoples specifically; and miscellaneous changes not part of a larger pattern. New terms were also added.
-
Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995)
0.01
0.013622571 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = product of:
0.081735425 = sum of:
0.081735425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081735425 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:37:22
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995)
0.01
0.013419857 = product of:
0.04025957 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to explore the possibilities of extending the use of structured abstracts (which use subheadings such as background, aims, participants method, results, conclusions) of the type often found in biomedical periodicals; to test whether or not such structured abstracts are more easily searched, comprehended and recalled than abstracts set in the traditional manner; and to examine readers' preferences for different typographic settings for structured abstracts. Results indicated: that it is possible to produce structured abstracts for periodical articles in the social sciences; and that such abstracts may be easier to read, search and recall than abstracts presented in the traditional manner. Suggests that abstracts use 6 subheadings (background, aims, method, results, conclusions, and, optionally, comment) and recommends that these subheadings are conveyed in bold capital letters and, ideally, set apart from the main text by printer's rules
-
Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998)
0.01
0.013419857 = product of:
0.04025957 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The introduction of computerized post-coordination has solved many of the problems of pre-coordinated subject access. However, the adoption of computerized post-coordination results in the loss of some pre-coordination benefits. Specifically, the effect of hiding terms within the context of others is lost in post-coodination which give lead status to every document term. This results in spurious matches of terms out of context. Library patrons and Internet searchers are increasingly dissatisfied with subject access performance, in part because of unmanageably large retrieval sets. The need to enhance precision and limit the size of retrieval sets motivates this work which proposes partial coordination, an approach which incorporates the advantages of computer search with the ability of pre-coordination to limit spurious partial matches and thereby enhance precision
-
Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000)
0.01
0.013419857 = product of:
0.04025957 = sum of:
0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04025957 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
-
Biswas, S.C.; Smith, F.: Efficiency and effectiveness of deep structure based indexing languages : PRECIS vs. DSIS (1991)
0.01
0.011183213 = product of:
0.03354964 = sum of:
0.03354964 = weight(_text_:search in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03354964 = score(doc=2187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A subject indexing language (SIL) is an artificial language used for formulating names of subjects and is composed of (a) a vocabulary, (b) a list of elementary categories, and (c) the rules of syntax. A string indexing language is an SIL, whose expressions are multiple overlappimg index entries, constructed accordingly to explicit syntax rules. PRECIS, developed by Austin, and POPSI, developed by Bhattacharyya, are two such string indexing languages. DSIS is a more versatile version of the POPSI system, developed by Devadason. There have been several attempts to compare and evaluate the superiority of one system over another, with the exception that none of these tried to compare their performances from the searcher's point of view. This present study tries to compare the efficiency and effectiveness of printed subject indexes produced by PRECIS and DSIS on a non-empirical basis and based on the following five major characteristics of index entries identified by Craven as desirable from the searcher's viewpoint: (1) predicitibility, (2) collocation, (3) clarity, (4) succinctness, and (5) eliminability. A representative sample of 600 documents (both macro and micro), chosen from three different social science subject fields, has been used as the test data. The main points of discussion are (a) the term structure, (b) the term relationships, and (c) the entry structure, generated by the two systems. On the whole, a PRECIS index performs better than a DSIS index in terms of most of the above characteristics. It has been concluded that the user will search the former more efficiently and effectively than the latter
-
(Sears') List of Subject Headings (1994)
0.01
0.007946501 = product of:
0.0238395 = sum of:
0.0238395 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047679 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
-
Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985)
0.01
0.007946501 = product of:
0.0238395 = sum of:
0.0238395 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047679 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:01
-
Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009)
0.01
0.007946501 = product of:
0.0238395 = sum of:
0.0238395 = product of:
0.047679 = sum of:
0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047679 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.0068112854 = product of:
0.020433856 = sum of:
0.020433856 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040867712 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
(Sears') List of Subject Headings (1997)
0.01
0.0068112854 = product of:
0.020433856 = sum of:
0.020433856 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040867712 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vorgänger: 'List of Subject Headings for small libraries, compiled from lists used in nine representative small libraries', Ed.: M.E. Sears. - 1st ed. 1923. - 2nd ed. 1926. - 3rd ed. 1933. - 4th ed. 1939, Ed.: I.S. Monro. - 5th ed. 1944: 'Sears List of Subject Headings', Ed. I. S. Monro. - 6th ed. 1950, Ed.: B.M. Frick. - 7th ed. 1954 - 8th ed. 1959. - 'List of Subject Headings'. - 9th. ed. 1965, Ed.: B.M. Westby. - 10th ed. 1972. - 11th ed. 1977. - 12th ed. 1982. - 13th ed. 1986, Ed.: C. Rovira u. C. Reyes. - 14th ed. 1991. Ed. M.T. Mooney. - 15th ed. 1994, Ed.: J. Miller // Rez. 15th ed.: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
-
MacEwan, A.: Crossing language barriers in Europe : Linking LCSH to other subject heading languages (2000)
0.01
0.0068112854 = product of:
0.020433856 = sum of:
0.020433856 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040867712 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:10
-
Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000)
0.01
0.0068112854 = product of:
0.020433856 = sum of:
0.020433856 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040867712 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:21
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001)
0.01
0.0068112854 = product of:
0.020433856 = sum of:
0.020433856 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040867712 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009)
0.01
0.0068112854 = product of:
0.020433856 = sum of:
0.020433856 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040867712 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:13
-
Sears' list of subject headings (2018)
0.01
0.0068112854 = product of:
0.020433856 = sum of:
0.020433856 = product of:
0.040867712 = sum of:
0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040867712 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05027291 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21.12.2018 18:22:12
