Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.05
    0.047206 = product of:
      0.070809 = sum of:
        0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0469695 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
        0.0238395 = product of:
          0.047679 = sum of:
            0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047679 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A study of the number of irrelevant documents retrieved in a co-ordinate indexing system that does not employ eitherr roles or links. These tests were based on one hundred actual inquiries received in the library and therefore an evaluation of recall efficiency is not included. Over half the enquiries produced no noise, but the mean average percentage niose figure was approximately 33 per cent based on a total average retireval figure of eighteen documents per search. Details of the size of the indexed collection, methods of indexing, and an analysis of the reasons for the retrieval of irrelevant documents are discussed, thereby providing information officers who are thinking of installing such a system with some evidence on which to base a decision as to whether or not to utilize these devices
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  2. Cooper, W.S.: Expected search length : a single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on the weak ordering action of retrieval systems (1968) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 5904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=5904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 5904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5904)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Climeson, W.D.: File organization and search techniques (1966) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Rübesame, O.: Probleme des geographischen Schlüssels (1963) 0.03
    0.025686968 = product of:
      0.0770609 = sum of:
        0.0770609 = product of:
          0.1541218 = sum of:
            0.1541218 = weight(_text_:22 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1541218 = score(doc=134,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 1.1999 13:22:22
  5. Goffman, W.: ¬A searching procedure for information retrieval (1964) 0.03
    0.025304725 = product of:
      0.075914174 = sum of:
        0.075914174 = weight(_text_:search in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075914174 = score(doc=5281,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.43445963 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A search procedure for an information retrieval system is developed whereby the answer to a question is obtained by maximizing an evaluation function of the system's output in terms of the probility of relevance. Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for a set to be an answer to a query. A partition of the file is made in such way that all documents belonging to the answer are members of the same class. Hence the answer can be generated by one relevant document. In this manner a search of the total file is avoided
  6. Fill, K.: ¬Die Dezimalklassifikation im allgemeinen und in Deutschland (1967) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 12(1967) Nr.5, S.19-22
  7. Meyer-Uhlenried, K.H.: Ordnungsprinzipien der Speicherung in der Dokumentation (1965) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 1977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=1977,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1977, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1977)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 16(1965), S.18-22
  8. Schön, J.: Zum Gedenken an Paul Otlet : 1868-1944 (1968) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 2688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=2688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 13(1968) Nr.6, S.21-22
  9. Hockett, C.F.: ¬The problem of universals in language (1963) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S. 1-22
  10. Jonzeck, M.: ¬Die Aktivierung, Verbesserung und Neuorientierung der Informationstätigkeit der allgemeinen öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1965) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliothekar. 19(1965), S.15-22
  11. Reblin, B.: ¬Die neue "Systematik für Allgemeinbildende Bibliotheken" (1963) 0.02
    0.01816343 = product of:
      0.054490287 = sum of:
        0.054490287 = product of:
          0.10898057 = sum of:
            0.10898057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10898057 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.1999 15:16:22
  12. Soergel, D.: Mathematical analysis of documentation systems : an attempt to a theory of classification and search request formulation (1967) 0.02
    0.015815454 = product of:
      0.04744636 = sum of:
        0.04744636 = weight(_text_:search in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04744636 = score(doc=5449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.27153727 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    As an attempt to make a general structural theory of information retrieval, a documentation system (DS) is defined as a formal system consisting of (a) a set o of objects (documents); (b) a set A++ of elementary attributes (key-words), from which further attributes may be constructed: A++ generates A; (c) a set of axioms of the form X++(x)=m (m¯M, M a set of constant connecting attributes with objects: from the axioms further theorems (=true statements) may be constructed. By use of the theorems, different mappings O -> P(o) (P(o) set of all subsets of o) (search question -> set of documents retrieved) are defined. The type of a DS depends on two basic decisions: (1) choice of the rules for the construction of attributes and theorems, e.g., logical product in coordinate indexing; links. (2) choice of M; M may consist of the two constants 'applicable' and 'not applicable', or some positive integers, ...; Further practical decisions: A++ hierarchical or not; kind of mapping; introduction of roles (=further attributes). The most simple case - ordinary two-valued Coordinate Indexing - is discusssed in detail; o is a free distributive (but not Boolean) lattice, the homographic image a ring of subsets of o; instead of negation which is not useful, a useful retrieval operation 'praeternagation' is introduced. Furthermore these are discussed: a generalized definition of superimposed coding, some functions for the distance of objects or attributes; optimization and automatic derivation of classifications. The model takes into account term-term relations and document-document relations. It may serve as a structural framework in terms of which the functional problems of retrieval theory may be expressed more clearly
  13. Goffman, W.: ¬An indirect method of information retrieval (1968) 0.02
    0.015656501 = product of:
      0.0469695 = sum of:
        0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0469695 = score(doc=72,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The information retrieval process, treated strictly as a matching procedure, has the defects that the whole file must be probed for each query, and that it overlooks the facts that the relevance of the information from one document depends upon what is already known about the subject, and in turn affects the relevance of other documents subsequently examined. A mathematical model of a search technique in which the defects of the direct method are taken into account is demonstrated by an experiment in which a given paper is treated as an enquiry and the references cited in the paper are treated as relevant answers. The results in two tests show much better results than those achieved by the direct method. No spurious material was retrieved by either method
  14. Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969) 0.01
    0.013622571 = product of:
      0.040867712 = sum of:
        0.040867712 = product of:
          0.081735425 = sum of:
            0.081735425 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081735425 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  15. Taylor, R.S.: Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries (1968) 0.01
    0.013419857 = product of:
      0.04025957 = sum of:
        0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04025957 = score(doc=2694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.230407 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Seekers of information in libraries either go through a librarian intermediary or they help themselves. When they go through librarians they must develop their questions through four levels of need, referred to here as the visceral, conscious, formalized, and compromised needs. In his pre-search interview with an information seeker the reference librarian attempts to help him arrive at an understanding of his 'compromised' need by determining: (1) the subject of his interest; (2) his motivation; (3) his personal characteristics; (4) the relationship of the inquiry to file organization; and (5) anticipated answers. The author contends that research is needed into the techniques of conducting this negotiation between the user and the reference librarian
  16. Mooers, C.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1963) 0.01
    0.011352143 = product of:
      0.03405643 = sum of:
        0.03405643 = product of:
          0.06811286 = sum of:
            0.06811286 = weight(_text_:22 in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06811286 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Cetre for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by. Wesley Simonton
  17. Habermas, J.: Technischer Fortschritt und soziale Lebenswelt (1968) 0.01
    0.011238049 = product of:
      0.033714145 = sum of:
        0.033714145 = product of:
          0.06742829 = sum of:
            0.06742829 = weight(_text_:22 in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06742829 = score(doc=1011,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2023 20:22:54
  18. Maron, M.E.; Kuhns, I.L.: On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval (1960) 0.01
    0.011183213 = product of:
      0.03354964 = sum of:
        0.03354964 = weight(_text_:search in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03354964 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a novel technique for literature indexing and searching in a mechanized library system. The notion of relevance is taken as the key concept in the theory of information retrieval and a comparative concept of relevance is explicated in terms of the theory of probability. The resulting technique called 'Probabilistic indexing' allows a computing machine, given a request for information, to make a statistical inference and derive a number (called the 'relevance number') for each document, which is a measure of the probability that the document will satisfy the given request. The result of a search is an ordered list of those documents which satisfy the request ranked according to their probable relevance. The paper goes on to show that whereas in a conventional library system the cross-referencing ('see' and 'see also') is based soley on the 'semantic closeness' between index terms, statistical measures of closeness between index terms can be defined and computed. Thus, given an arbitrary request consisting of one (or many) index term(s), a machine can eleborate on it to increase the probability of selecting relevant documents that would not otherwise have been selected. Finally, the paper suggest an interpretation of the whole library problem as one where the request is considered as a clue on the basis of which the library system makes a concatenated statistical inference in order to provide as an output an ordered list of those documents which most probably satisfy the information needs of the user
  19. Habermas, J.: Technik und Wissenschaft als »Ideologie« (1968) 0.01
    0.0096326135 = product of:
      0.028897839 = sum of:
        0.028897839 = product of:
          0.057795677 = sum of:
            0.057795677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057795677 = score(doc=1032,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2023 20:22:54