Search (247 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.07
    0.06743714 = product of:
      0.10115571 = sum of:
        0.06709928 = weight(_text_:search in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06709928 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
        0.03405643 = product of:
          0.06811286 = sum of:
            0.06811286 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06811286 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  2. Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987) 0.05
    0.053949714 = product of:
      0.08092457 = sum of:
        0.053679425 = weight(_text_:search in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053679425 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
        0.027245143 = product of:
          0.054490287 = sum of:
            0.054490287 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054490287 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
  3. Bellardo, T.: Some attributes of online search intermediaries that relate to search outcome (1984) 0.05
    0.05060945 = product of:
      0.15182835 = sum of:
        0.15182835 = weight(_text_:search in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15182835 = score(doc=5366,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.86891925 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Schwarz, C.: THESYS: Thesaurus Syntax System : a fully automatic thesaurus building aid (1988) 0.05
    0.047206 = product of:
      0.070809 = sum of:
        0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0469695 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
        0.0238395 = product of:
          0.047679 = sum of:
            0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047679 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    THESYS is based on the natural language processing of free-text databases. It yields statistically evaluated correlations between words of the database. These correlations correspond to traditional thesaurus relations. The person who has to build a thesaurus is thus assisted by the proposals made by THESYS. THESYS is being tested on commercial databases under real world conditions. It is part of a text processing project at Siemens, called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent search and indexing (REALIST: REtrieval Aids by Linguistics and STatistics)
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:22:07
  5. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.05
    0.047206 = product of:
      0.070809 = sum of:
        0.0469695 = weight(_text_:search in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0469695 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
        0.0238395 = product of:
          0.047679 = sum of:
            0.047679 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047679 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  6. Janes, J.W.: Towards a search theory of information (1989) 0.04
    0.044732854 = product of:
      0.13419856 = sum of:
        0.13419856 = weight(_text_:search in 4491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13419856 = score(doc=4491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.7680234 = fieldWeight in 4491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4491)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983) 0.04
    0.040462285 = product of:
      0.060693428 = sum of:
        0.04025957 = weight(_text_:search in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04025957 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.230407 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
        0.020433856 = product of:
          0.040867712 = sum of:
            0.040867712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040867712 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17604718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05027291 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
  8. Merrin, G.: Access points and search methods in the Sibil system with special reference to Boolean and tree search (1986) 0.04
    0.037957087 = product of:
      0.113871254 = sum of:
        0.113871254 = weight(_text_:search in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113871254 = score(doc=1344,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6516894 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  9. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Parallel text search methods (1988) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Frederick, S.C.: SIRE: full-text retrieval with augmented search (1985) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Bates, M.J.: ¬The fallacy of the perfect thirty-item online search (1984) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=857,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Problems in determining output size are sometimes associated with the performance of online bibliographic searches for clients in academic and other libraries. These problems are examined through discussion of a fallacy in thinking that arises when searchers try to produce the "perfect thirty-item" online search. Origins of the fallacy are explored by considering sources of misunderstandings between client and searcher and by identifying differences between manual and online searching. Several types of online searches are distinguished, and search techniques that avoid the fallacy are recommended for each search type
  12. Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialties (1983) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 1474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=1474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 1474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1474)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Hartley, J.; Trueman, M.: ¬The effect of headings in texts on recall, search and retrieval (1983) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 2750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=2750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 2750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2750)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Sparck Jones, K.; Tait, J.I.: Automatic search term variant generation (1984) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Bates, M.J.: How to use information search tactics online (1987) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Ingwersen, P.: ¬A cognitive view of three selected online search facilities (1984) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=3896,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Developing a model of the library search process : cognitive and affective aspects (1988) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Helgerson, L.W.: CD-ROM search and retrieval software : the requirements and the realities (1986) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=4007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Schroder, J.J.: Acronyms: the missing element in your search? (1983) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 5132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=5132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 5132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5132)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. Dommer, J.M.; McCaghy, M.D.: Techniques for conducting effective search interviews with thesis and dissertation candidates (1982) 0.04
    0.035786286 = product of:
      0.10735885 = sum of:
        0.10735885 = weight(_text_:search in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10735885 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05027291 = queryNorm
            0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Authors

Languages

  • e 199
  • d 45
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 205
  • m 22
  • s 13
  • d 2
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications