-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.02
0.020157062 = product of:
0.080628246 = sum of:
0.080628246 = sum of:
0.04317559 = weight(_text_:design in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04317559 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745266 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- International co-authorship relations and university-industry-government (Triple Helix) relations have hitherto been studied separately. Using Japanese publication data for the 1981-2004 period, we were able to study both kinds of relations in a single design. In the Japanese file, 1,277,030 articles with at least one Japanese address were attributed to the three sectors, and we know additionally whether these papers were coauthored internationally. Using the mutual information in three and four dimensions, respectively, we show that the Japanese Triple-Helix system has been continuously eroded at the national level. However, since the mid-1990s, international coauthorship relations have contributed to a reduction of the uncertainty at the national level. In other words, the national publication system of Japan has developed a capacity to retain surplus value generated internationally. In a final section, we compare these results with an analysis based on similar data for Canada. A relative uncoupling of national university-industry-government relations because of international collaborations is indicated in both countries.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.02
0.020157062 = product of:
0.080628246 = sum of:
0.080628246 = sum of:
0.04317559 = weight(_text_:design in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04317559 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745266 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Chen, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays : a new method of publication portfolio analysis (2014)
0.01
0.006360365 = product of:
0.02544146 = sum of:
0.02544146 = product of:
0.05088292 = sum of:
0.05088292 = weight(_text_:design in 1200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05088292 = score(doc=1200,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.29373983 = fieldWeight in 1200, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Portfolio analysis of the publication profile of a unit of interest, ranging from individuals and organizations to a scientific field or interdisciplinary programs, aims to inform analysts and decision makers about the position of the unit, where it has been, and where it may go in a complex adaptive environment. A portfolio analysis may aim to identify the gap between the current position of an organization and a goal that it intends to achieve or identify competencies of multiple institutions. We introduce a new visual analytic method for analyzing, comparing, and contrasting characteristics of publication portfolios. The new method introduces a novel design of dual-map thematic overlays on global maps of science. Each publication portfolio can be added as one layer of dual-map overlays over 2 related, but distinct, global maps of science: one for citing journals and the other for cited journals. We demonstrate how the new design facilitates a portfolio analysis in terms of patterns emerging from the distributions of citation threads and the dynamics of trajectories as a function of space and time. We first demonstrate the analysis of portfolios defined on a single source article. Then we contrast publication portfolios of multiple comparable units of interest; namely, colleges in universities and corporate research organizations. We also include examples of overlays of scientific fields. We expect that our method will provide new insights to portfolio analysis.
-
Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003)
0.00
0.0046815826 = product of:
0.01872633 = sum of:
0.01872633 = product of:
0.03745266 = sum of:
0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745266 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.2003 19:48:04
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.00
0.0046815826 = product of:
0.01872633 = sum of:
0.01872633 = product of:
0.03745266 = sum of:
0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745266 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
0.00
0.0044974573 = product of:
0.01798983 = sum of:
0.01798983 = product of:
0.03597966 = sum of:
0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03597966 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.00
0.003901319 = product of:
0.015605276 = sum of:
0.015605276 = product of:
0.031210553 = sum of:
0.031210553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031210553 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016)
0.00
0.003901319 = product of:
0.015605276 = sum of:
0.015605276 = product of:
0.031210553 = sum of:
0.031210553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031210553 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 17:53:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018)
0.00
0.003901319 = product of:
0.015605276 = sum of:
0.015605276 = product of:
0.031210553 = sum of:
0.031210553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031210553 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046071928 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:22:09
