Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, Y."
  1. Ku, Y.; Chiu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Su, H.: Text mining self-disclosing health information for public health service (2014) 0.02
    0.020866206 = product of:
      0.08346482 = sum of:
        0.08346482 = weight(_text_:sites in 1262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08346482 = score(doc=1262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.34654665 = fieldWeight in 1262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1262)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding specific patterns or knowledge of self-disclosing health information could support public health surveillance and healthcare. This study aimed to develop an analytical framework to identify self-disclosing health information with unusual messages on web forums by leveraging advanced text-mining techniques. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed analytical framework, we conducted an experimental study on 2 major human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) forums in Taiwan. The experimental results show that the classification accuracy increased significantly (up to 83.83%) when using features selected by the information gain technique. The results also show the importance of adopting domain-specific features in analyzing unusual messages on web forums. This study has practical implications for the prevention and support of HIV/AIDS healthcare. For example, public health agencies can re-allocate resources and deliver services to people who need help via social media sites. In addition, individuals can also join a social media site to get better suggestions and support from each other.
  2. Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Song, S.: ¬The design and evaluation of a nudge-based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility (2023) 0.02
    0.02052337 = product of:
      0.08209348 = sum of:
        0.08209348 = sum of:
          0.05088292 = weight(_text_:design in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05088292 = score(doc=993,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.29373983 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
          0.031210553 = weight(_text_:22 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031210553 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046071928 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluating the quality of online health information (OHI) is a major challenge facing consumers. We designed PageGraph, an interface that displays quality indicators and associated values for a webpage, based on credibility evaluation models, the nudge theory, and existing empirical research concerning professionals' and consumers' evaluation of OHI quality. A qualitative evaluation of the interface with 16 participants revealed that PageGraph rendered the information and presentation nudges as intended. It provided the participants with easier access to quality indicators, encouraged fresh angles to assess information credibility, provided an evaluation framework, and encouraged validation of initial judgments. We then conducted a quantitative evaluation of the interface involving 60 participants using a between-subject experimental design. The control group used a regular web browser and evaluated the credibility of 12 preselected webpages, whereas the experimental group evaluated the same webpages with the assistance of PageGraph. PageGraph did not significantly influence participants' evaluation results. The results may be attributed to the insufficiency of the saliency and structure of the nudges implemented and the webpage stimuli's lack of sensitivity to the intervention. Future directions for applying nudges to support OHI evaluation were discussed.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:18:34
  3. Zhang, Y.; Broussard, R.; Ke, W.; Gong, X.: Evaluation of a scatter/gather interface for supporting distinct health information search tasks (2014) 0.02
    0.017388504 = product of:
      0.069554016 = sum of:
        0.069554016 = weight(_text_:sites in 1261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069554016 = score(doc=1261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 1261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1261)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Web search engines are important gateways for users to access health information. This study explored whether a search interface based on the Bing API and enabled by Scatter/Gather, a well-known document-clustering technique, can improve health information searches. Forty participants without medical backgrounds were randomly assigned to two interfaces: a baseline interface that resembles typical web search engines and a Scatter/Gather interface. Both groups performed two lookup and two exploratory health-related tasks. It was found that the baseline group was more likely to rephrase queries and less likely to access general-purpose sites than the Scatter/Gather group when completing exploratory tasks. Otherwise, the two groups did not differ in behavior and task performance, with participants in the Scatter/Gather group largely overlooking the features (key words, clusters, and the recluster function) designed to facilitate the exploration of semantic relationships between information objects, a potentially useful means for users in the rather unfamiliar domain of health. The results suggest a strong effect of users' mental models of search on their use of search interfaces and a high cognitive cost associated with using the Scatter/Gather features. It follows that novel features of a search interface should not only be compatible with users' mental models but also provide sufficient affordance to inform users of how they can be used. Compared with the interface, tasks showed more significant impacts on search behavior. In future studies, more effort should be devoted to identify salient features of health-related information needs.
  4. Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.: Effects of interaction design in digital libraries on user interactions (2008) 0.01
    0.0100566195 = product of:
      0.040226478 = sum of:
        0.040226478 = product of:
          0.080452956 = sum of:
            0.080452956 = weight(_text_:design in 1898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080452956 = score(doc=1898,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.46444345 = fieldWeight in 1898, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1898)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This study aims to investigate the effects of different search and browse features in digital libraries (DLs) on task interactions, and what features would lead to poor user experience. Design/methodology/approach - Three operational DLs: ACM, IEEE CS, and IEEE Xplore are used in this study. These three DLs present different features in their search and browsing designs. Two information-seeking tasks are constructed: one search task and one browsing task. An experiment was conducted in a usability laboratory. Data from 35 participants are collected on a set of measures for user interactions. Findings - The results demonstrate significant differences in many aspects of the user interactions between the three DLs. For both search and browse designs, the features that lead to poor user interactions are identified. Research limitations/implications - User interactions are affected by specific design features in DLs. Some of the design features may lead to poor user performance and should be improved. The study was limited mainly in the variety and the number of tasks used. Originality/value - The study provided empirical evidence to the effects of interaction design features in DLs on user interactions and performance. The results contribute to our knowledge about DL designs in general and about the three operational DLs in particular.
  5. Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xie, B.: Quality of health information for consumers on the web : a systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results (2015) 0.01
    0.006360365 = product of:
      0.02544146 = sum of:
        0.02544146 = product of:
          0.05088292 = sum of:
            0.05088292 = weight(_text_:design in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088292 = score(doc=2218,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.29373983 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of online health information for consumers has been a critical issue that concerns all stakeholders in healthcare. To gain an understanding of how quality is evaluated, this systematic review examined 165 articles in which researchers evaluated the quality of consumer-oriented health information on the web against predefined criteria. It was found that studies typically evaluated quality in relation to the substance and formality of content, as well as to the design of technological platforms. Attention to design, particularly interactivity, privacy, and social and cultural appropriateness is on the rise, which suggests the permeation of a user-centered perspective into the evaluation of health information systems, and a growing recognition of the need to study these systems from a social-technical perspective. Researchers used many preexisting instruments to facilitate evaluation of the formality of content; however, only a few were used in multiple studies, and their validity was questioned. The quality of content (i.e., accuracy and completeness) was always evaluated using proprietary instruments constructed based on medical guidelines or textbooks. The evaluation results revealed that the quality of health information varied across medical domains and across websites, and that the overall quality remained problematic. Future research is needed to examine the quality of user-generated content and to explore opportunities offered by emerging new media that can facilitate the consumer evaluation of health information.
  6. Zhang, Y.; Salaba, A.: What do users tell us about FRBR-based catalogs? (2012) 0.01
    0.0062964396 = product of:
      0.025185758 = sum of:
        0.025185758 = product of:
          0.050371516 = sum of:
            0.050371516 = weight(_text_:design in 1924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050371516 = score(doc=1924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.29078758 = fieldWeight in 1924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    FRBR user research has been the least addressed area in FRBR research and development. This article addresses the research gap in evaluating and designing catalogs based on FRBR user research. It draws from three user studies concerning FRBR-based catalogs: (1) user evaluation of three FRBR-based catalogs, (2) user participatory design of a prototype catalog based on the FRBR model, and (3) user evaluation of the resulting FRBR prototype catalog. The major findings from the user studies are highlighted and discussed for future development of FRBR-based catalogs that support various user tasks.
  7. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.0055172984 = product of:
      0.022069193 = sum of:
        0.022069193 = product of:
          0.044138387 = sum of:
            0.044138387 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044138387 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  8. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.00
    0.0046815826 = product of:
      0.01872633 = sum of:
        0.01872633 = product of:
          0.03745266 = sum of:
            0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03745266 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  9. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.00
    0.0046815826 = product of:
      0.01872633 = sum of:
        0.01872633 = product of:
          0.03745266 = sum of:
            0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03745266 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  10. Zhang, Y.: Undergraduate students' mental models of the Web as an information retrieval system (2008) 0.00
    0.0044974573 = product of:
      0.01798983 = sum of:
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 2385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=2385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 2385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study explored undergraduate students' mental models of the Web as an information retrieval system. Mental models play an important role in people's interaction with information systems. Better understanding of people's mental models could inspire better interface design and user instruction. Multiple data-collection methods, including questionnaire, semistructured interview, drawing, and participant observation, were used to elicit students' mental models of the Web from different perspectives, though only data from interviews and drawing descriptions are reported in this article. Content analysis of the transcripts showed that students had utilitarian rather than structural mental models of the Web. The majority of participants saw the Web as a huge information resource where everything can be found rather than an infrastructure consisting of hardware and computer applications. Students had different mental models of how information is organized on the Web, and the models varied in correctness and complexity. Students' mental models of search on the Web were illustrated from three points of view: avenues of getting information, understanding of search engines' working mechanisms, and search tactics. The research results suggest that there are mainly three sources contributing to the construction of mental models: personal observation, communication with others, and class instruction. In addition to structural and functional aspects, mental models have an emotional dimension.
  11. Dang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Hu, P.J.-H.; Brown, S.A.; Larson, C.: Arizona Literature Mapper : an integrated approach to monitor and analyze global bioterrorism research literature (2009) 0.00
    0.0044974573 = product of:
      0.01798983 = sum of:
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Biomedical research is critical to biodefense, which is drawing increasing attention from governments globally as well as from various research communities. The U.S. government has been closely monitoring and regulating biomedical research activities, particularly those studying or involving bioterrorism agents or diseases. Effective surveillance requires comprehensive understanding of extant biomedical research and timely detection of new developments or emerging trends. The rapid knowledge expansion, technical breakthroughs, and spiraling collaboration networks demand greater support for literature search and sharing, which cannot be effectively supported by conventional literature search mechanisms or systems. In this study, we propose an integrated approach that integrates advanced techniques for content analysis, network analysis, and information visualization. We design and implement Arizona Literature Mapper, a Web-based portal that allows users to gain timely, comprehensive understanding of bioterrorism research, including leading scientists, research groups, institutions as well as insights about current mainstream interests or emerging trends. We conduct two user studies to evaluate Arizona Literature Mapper and include a well-known system for benchmarking purposes. According to our results, Arizona Literature Mapper is significantly more effective for supporting users' search of bioterrorism publications than PubMed. Users consider Arizona Literature Mapper more useful and easier to use than PubMed. Users are also more satisfied with Arizona Literature Mapper and show stronger intentions to use it in the future. Assessments of Arizona Literature Mapper's analysis functions are also positive, as our subjects consider them useful, easy to use, and satisfactory. Our results have important implications that are also discussed in the article.
  12. Zhang, Y.: Dimensions and elements of people's mental models of an information-rich Web space (2010) 0.00
    0.0044974573 = product of:
      0.01798983 = sum of:
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 4098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=4098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 4098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although considered proxies for people to interact with a system, mental models have produced limited practical implications for system design. This might be due to the lack of exploration of the elements of mental models resulting from the methodological challenge of measuring mental models. This study employed a new method, concept listing, to elicit people's mental models of an information-rich space, MedlinePlus, after they interacted with the system for 5 minutes. Thirty-eight undergraduate students participated in the study. The results showed that, in this short period of time, participants perceived MedlinePlus from many different aspects in relation to four components: the system as a whole, its content, information organization, and interface. Meanwhile, participants expressed evaluations of or emotions about the four components. In terms of the procedural knowledge, an integral part of people's mental models, only one participant identified a strategy more aligned to the capabilities of MedlinePlus to solve a hypothetical task; the rest planned to use general search and browse strategies. The composition of participants' mental models of MedlinePlus was consistent with that of their models of information-rich Web spaces in general.
  13. Zhang, Y.: Beyond quality and accessibility : source selection in consumer health information searching (2014) 0.00
    0.0044974573 = product of:
      0.01798983 = sum of:
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=1252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A systematic understanding of factors and criteria that affect consumers' selection of sources for health information is necessary for the design of effective health information services and information systems. However, current studies have overly focused on source attributes as indicators for 2 criteria, source quality and accessibility, and overlooked the role of other factors and criteria that help determine source selection. To fill this gap, guided by decision-making theories and the cognitive perspective to information search, we interviewed 30 participants about their reasons for using a wide range of sources for health information. Additionally, we asked each of them to report a critical incident in which sources were selected to fulfill a specific information need. Based on the analysis of the transcripts, 5 categories of factors were identified as influential to source selection: source-related factors, user-related factors, user-source relationships, characteristics of the problematic situation, and social influences. In addition, about a dozen criteria that mediate the influence of the factors on source-selection decisions were identified, including accessibility, quality, usability, interactivity, relevance, usefulness, familiarity, affection, anonymity, and appropriateness. These results significantly expanded the current understanding of the nature of costs and benefits involved in source-selection decisions, and strongly indicated that a personalized approach is needed for information services and information systems to provide effective access to health information sources for consumers.
  14. Zhang, Y.: Understanding the sustained use of online health communities from a self-determination perspective (2016) 0.00
    0.0044974573 = product of:
      0.01798983 = sum of:
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Sustained use of an information source is sometimes important for achieving an individual's long-term goals, such as learning and self-development. It is even more important for users of online health communities because health benefits usually come with sustained use. However, little is known about what retains a user. We interviewed 21 participants who had been using online diabetes communities in a sustained manner. Guided by self-determination theory, which posits that behaviors are sustained when they can satisfy basic human needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, we identified mechanisms that help satisfy these needs, and thus sustain users in online health communities. Autonomy-supportive mechanisms include being respected and supported as a unique individual, feeling free in making choices, and receiving meaningful rationales about others' decisions. Competence-cultivating mechanisms include seeking information, providing information, and exchanging information with others to construct knowledge. Mechanisms that cultivate relatedness include seeing similarities between oneself and peers, receiving responses from others, providing emotional support, and forming small underground groups for closer interactions. The results suggest that, like emotions, information and small group interactions also play a key role in retaining users. System design and community management strategies are discussed based on these mechanisms.
  15. Shah, C.; Anderson, T.; Hagen, L.; Zhang, Y.: ¬An iSchool approach to data science : human-centered, socially responsible, and context-driven (2021) 0.00
    0.0044974573 = product of:
      0.01798983 = sum of:
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Information Schools, also referred to as iSchools, have a unique approach to data science with three distinct components: human-centeredness, socially responsible, and rooted in context. In this position paper, we highlight and expand on these components and show how they are integrated in various research and educational activities related to data science that are being carried out at iSchools. We argue that the iSchool way of doing data science is not only highly relevant to the current times, but also crucial in solving problems of tomorrow. Specifically, we accentuate the issues of developing insights and solutions that are not only data-driven, but also incorporate human values, including transparency, privacy, ethics, fairness, and equity. This approach to data science has meaningful implications on how we educate the students and train the next generation of scholars and policymakers. Here, we provide some of those design decisions, rooted in evidence-based research, along with our perspective on how data science is currently situated and how it should be advanced in iSchools.
  16. Zhang, Y.; Trace, C.B.: ¬The quality of health and wellness self-tracking data : a consumer perspective (2022) 0.00
    0.0044974573 = product of:
      0.01798983 = sum of:
        0.01798983 = product of:
          0.03597966 = sum of:
            0.03597966 = weight(_text_:design in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597966 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information quality (IQ) is key to users' satisfaction with information systems. Understanding what IQ means to users can effectively inform system improvement. Existing inquiries into self-tracking data quality primarily focus on accuracy. Interviewing 20 consumers who had self-tracked health indicators for at least 6 months, we identified eight dimensions that consumers apply to evaluate self-tracking data quality: value-added, accuracy, completeness, accessibility, ease of understanding, trustworthiness, aesthetics, and invasiveness. These dimensions fell into four categories-intrinsic, contextual, representational, and accessibility-suggesting that consumers judge self-tracking data quality not only based on the data's inherent quality but also considering tasks at hand, the clarity of data representation, and data accessibility. We also found that consumers' self-tracking data quality judgments are shaped primarily by their goals or motivations, subjective experience with tracked activities, mental models of how systems work, self-tracking tools' reputation, cost, and design, and domain knowledge and intuition, but less by more objective criteria such as scientific research results, validated devices, or consultation with experts. Future studies should develop and validate a scale for measuring consumers' perceptions of self-tracking data quality and commit efforts to develop technologies and training materials to enhance consumers' ability to evaluate data quality.
  17. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.00
    0.003901319 = product of:
      0.015605276 = sum of:
        0.015605276 = product of:
          0.031210553 = sum of:
            0.031210553 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031210553 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046071928 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12