Search (71 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.02 
    0.024628041 = product of:
  0.098512165 = sum of:
    0.098512165 = sum of:
      0.061059505 = weight(_text_:design in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061059505 = score(doc=4748,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046071928 = queryNorm
          0.3524878 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03745266 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046071928 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  2. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.02 
    0.020157062 = product of:
  0.080628246 = sum of:
    0.080628246 = sum of:
      0.04317559 = weight(_text_:design in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04317559 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046071928 = queryNorm
          0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.03745266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03745266 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046071928 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  3. Manguinhas, H.; Freire, N.; Machado, J.; Borbinha, J.: Supporting multilingual bibliographic resource discovery with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2012) 0.02 
    0.017388504 = product of:
  0.069554016 = sum of:
    0.069554016 = weight(_text_:sites in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069554016 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2408473 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046071928 = queryNorm
        0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: Vgl.: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/supporting-multilingual-bibliographic-resource-discovery-functional-requirements-bibliograph http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj145_2.pdf.
  4. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.013241516 = product of:
  0.052966066 = sum of:
    0.052966066 = product of:
      0.10593213 = sum of:
        0.10593213 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10593213 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.012484221 = product of:
  0.049936883 = sum of:
    0.049936883 = product of:
      0.09987377 = sum of:
        0.09987377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09987377 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.010923693 = product of:
  0.04369477 = sum of:
    0.04369477 = product of:
      0.08738954 = sum of:
        0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08738954 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  7. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.010923693 = product of:
  0.04369477 = sum of:
    0.04369477 = product of:
      0.08738954 = sum of:
        0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08738954 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  8. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01 
    0.010923693 = product of:
  0.04369477 = sum of:
    0.04369477 = product of:
      0.08738954 = sum of:
        0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08738954 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.010923693 = product of:
  0.04369477 = sum of:
    0.04369477 = product of:
      0.08738954 = sum of:
        0.08738954 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08738954 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  10. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01 
    0.009363165 = product of:
  0.03745266 = sum of:
    0.03745266 = product of:
      0.07490532 = sum of:
        0.07490532 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07490532 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  11. McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A comparison of USMARC and UNIMARC for system design (1995) 0.01 
    0.008904511 = product of:
  0.035618044 = sum of:
    0.035618044 = product of:
      0.07123609 = sum of:
        0.07123609 = weight(_text_:design in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07123609 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.41123575 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Provides a background to the development of the MINISIS relational database management system. The new MINISIS will offer a forms-based 4GL application development environment for building an integrated library system at the heart of which will be the catalogue database. Describes the research on the the database structure involving a comparison between USMARC and UNIMARC. Covers the worldwide use of the 2 systems. Discusses differences in field/subfield content designation; differences in field attributes; access points; linking entries, related fields; control information numbers and codes; USMARC format integration and linkage to other languages and holdings information; linkage with other MARC files; and considerations regarding systems design
  12. Willer, M.: UNIMARC format for authority records : its scope and issues for authority control (2004) 0.01 
    0.008904511 = product of:
  0.035618044 = sum of:
    0.035618044 = product of:
      0.07123609 = sum of:
        0.07123609 = weight(_text_:design in 5670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07123609 = score(doc=5670,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.41123575 = fieldWeight in 5670, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The IFLA standard for authority data, UNIMARC authorities format, is described in the light of developments of IFLA standards in the field of authority files, IFLA's activities in promoting the exchange of name authority records within the program of Universal Bibliographic Control and the design of the UNIMARC format for bibliographic records that established principles for its structure and design. The second revised and enlarged edition, UNIMARC Manual: Authorities Format, is described. Particular attention is paid to the methods for expressing relationships between different forms of headings, and relationships between different languages and scripts of headings. The maintenance of the format and sources for its revision are described.
  13. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.008827677 = product of:
  0.035310708 = sum of:
    0.035310708 = product of:
      0.070621416 = sum of:
        0.070621416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070621416 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  14. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01 
    0.008827677 = product of:
  0.035310708 = sum of:
    0.035310708 = product of:
      0.070621416 = sum of:
        0.070621416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070621416 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  15. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01 
    0.007802638 = product of:
  0.031210553 = sum of:
    0.031210553 = product of:
      0.062421106 = sum of:
        0.062421106 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062421106 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  16. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01 
    0.007802638 = product of:
  0.031210553 = sum of:
    0.031210553 = product of:
      0.062421106 = sum of:
        0.062421106 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062421106 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  17. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01 
    0.007724218 = product of:
  0.030896872 = sum of:
    0.030896872 = product of:
      0.061793745 = sum of:
        0.061793745 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061793745 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16133605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  18. Doerr, M.; Gradmann, S.; Hennicke, S.; Isaac, A.; Meghini, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The Europeana Data Model (EDM) (2010) 0.01 
    0.007632438 = product of:
  0.030529752 = sum of:
    0.030529752 = product of:
      0.061059505 = sum of:
        0.061059505 = weight(_text_:design in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061059505 = score(doc=3967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.3524878 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Europeana Data Model (EDM) is a new approach towards structuring and representing data delivered to Europeana by the various contributing cultural heritage institutions. The model aims at greater expressivity and flexibility in comparison to the current Europeana Semantic Elements (ESE), which it is destined to replace. The design principles underlying the EDM are based on the core principles and best practices of the Semantic Web and Linked Data efforts to which Europeana wants to contribute. The model itself builds upon established standards like RDF(S), OAI-ORE, SKOS, and Dublin Core. It acts as a common top-level ontology which retains original data models and information perspectives while at the same time enabling interoperability. The paper elaborates on the aforementioned aspects and the design principles which drove the development of the EDM.
  19. Miller, E.; Ogbuji, U.: Linked data design for the visible library (2015) 0.01 
    0.007632438 = product of:
  0.030529752 = sum of:
    0.030529752 = product of:
      0.061059505 = sum of:
        0.061059505 = weight(_text_:design in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061059505 = score(doc=2773,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.3524878 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In response to libraries' frustration over their rich resources being invisible on the web, Zepheira, at the request of the Library of Congress, created BIBFRAME, a bibliographic metadata framework for cataloging. The model replaces MARC records with linked data, promoting resource visibility through a rich network of links. In place of formal taxonomies, a small but extensible vocabulary streamlines metadata efforts. Rather than using a unique bibliographic record to describe one item, BIBFRAME draws on the Dublin Core and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to generate formalized descriptions of Work, Instance, Authority and Annotation as well as associations between items. Zepheira trains librarians to transform MARC records to BIBFRAME resources and adapt the vocabulary for specialized needs, while subject matter experts and technical experts manage content, site design and usability. With a different approach toward data modeling and metadata, previously invisible resources gain visibility through linking.
  20. Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995) 0.01 
    0.0071959314 = product of:
  0.028783726 = sum of:
    0.028783726 = product of:
      0.05756745 = sum of:
        0.05756745 = weight(_text_:design in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05756745 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17322445 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046071928 = queryNorm
            0.33232868 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a view on the work of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Study Group on behalf of the Anglo-American cataloguing tradition. The study is examining the fundamental aspects of record design using the entity-attribute-relationship model to link data elements to the function that a user can perform while accessing a bibliographic record. The data and functions are being linked by UNIMARC fields

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 12
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 64
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes