-
Shelton, R.D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Publish or patent : bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies (2012)
0.08
0.079322025 = product of:
0.27762708 = sum of:
0.14139913 = weight(_text_:united in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14139913 = score(doc=70,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.61983573 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.13622795 = weight(_text_:states in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13622795 = score(doc=70,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.608396 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Multivariate linear regression models suggest a trade-off in allocations of national research and development (R&D). Government funding and spending in the higher education sector encourage publications as a long-term research benefit. Conversely, other components such as industrial funding and spending in the business sector encourage patenting. Our results help explain why the United States trails the European Union in publications: The focus in the United States is on industrial funding-some 70% of its total R&D investment. Likewise, our results also help explain why the European Union trails the United States in patenting, since its focus on government funding is less effective than industrial funding in predicting triadic patenting. Government funding contributes negatively to patenting in a multiple regression, and this relationship is significant in the case of triadic patenting. We provide new forecasts about the relationships of the United States, the European Union, and China for publishing; these results suggest much later dates for changes than previous forecasts because Chinese growth has been slowing down since 2003. Models for individual countries might be more successful than regression models whose parameters are averaged over a set of countries because nations can be expected to differ historically in terms of the institutional arrangements and funding schemes.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Park, H.W.; Wagner, C.: International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index : is internationalization leading the Network? (2014)
0.07
0.06748921 = product of:
0.23621222 = sum of:
0.09998428 = weight(_text_:united in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09998428 = score(doc=1505,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.43829006 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
0.13622795 = weight(_text_:states in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13622795 = score(doc=1505,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.608396 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- International coauthorship relations have increasingly shaped another dynamic in the natural and life sciences during recent decades. However, much less is known about such internationalization in the social sciences. In this study, we analyze international and domestic coauthorship relations of all citable items in the DVD version of the Social Sciences Citation Index 2011 (SSCI). Network statistics indicate 4 groups of nations: (a) an Asian-Pacific one to which all Anglo-Saxon nations (including the United Kingdom and Ireland) are attributed, (b) a continental European one including also the Latin-American countries, (c) the Scandinavian nations, and (d) a community of African nations. Within the EU-28, 11 of the EU-15 states have dominant positions. In many respects, the network parameters are not so different from the Science Citation Index. In addition to these descriptive statistics, we address the question of the relative weights of the international versus domestic networks. An information-theoretical test is proposed at the level of organizational addresses within each nation; the results are mixed, but the international dimension is more important than the national one in the aggregated sets (as in the Science Citation Index). In some countries (e.g., France), however, the national distribution is leading more than the international one. Decomposition of the United States in terms of states shows a similarly mixed result; more U.S. states are domestically oriented in the SSCI and more internationally in the SCI. The international networks have grown during the last decades in addition to the national ones but not by replacing them.
-
Ye, F.Y.; Yu, S.S.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization (2013)
0.05
0.047593214 = product of:
0.16657624 = sum of:
0.08483948 = weight(_text_:united in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08483948 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
0.081736766 = weight(_text_:states in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081736766 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), we analyze the mutual information among university, industry, and government addresses (U-I-G) at the country level for a number of countries. The dynamic evolution of the Triple Helix can thus be compared among developed and developing nations in terms of cross-sectional coauthorship relations. The results show that the Triple Helix interactions among the three subsystems U-I-G become less intensive over time, but unequally for different countries. We suggest that globalization erodes local Triple Helix relations and thus can be expected to have increased differentiation in national systems since the mid-1990s. This effect of globalization is more pronounced in developed countries than in developing ones. In the dynamic analysis, we focus on a more detailed comparison between China and the United States. Specifically, the Chinese Academy of the (Social) Sciences is changing increasingly from a public research institute to an academic one, and this has a measurable effect on China's position in the globalization.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Wagner, C.S.; Porto-Gomez, I.; Comins, J.A.; Phillips, F.: Synergy in the knowledge base of U.S. innovation systems at national, state, and regional levels : the contributions of high-tech manufacturing and knowledge-intensive services (2019)
0.01
0.0137611 = product of:
0.0963277 = sum of:
0.0963277 = weight(_text_:states in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0963277 = score(doc=5390,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.43020093 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Using information theory, we measure innovation systemness as synergy among size-classes, ZIP Codes, and technological classes (NACE-codes) for 8.5 million American companies. The synergy at the national level is decomposed at the level of states, Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSA), and Combined Statistical Areas (CSA). We zoom in to the state of California and in more detail to Silicon Valley. Our results do not support the assumption of a national system of innovations in the U.S.A. Innovation systems appear to operate at the level of the states; the CBSA are too small, so that systemness spills across their borders. Decomposition of the sample in terms of high-tech manufacturing (HTM), medium-high-tech manufacturing (MHTM), knowledge-intensive services (KIS), and high-tech services (HTKIS) does not change this pattern, but refines it. The East Coast-New Jersey, Boston, and New York-and California are the major players, with Texas a third one in the case of HTKIS. Chicago and industrial centers in the Midwest also contribute synergy. Within California, Los Angeles contributes synergy in the sectors of manufacturing, the San Francisco area in KIS. KIS in Silicon Valley and the Bay Area-a CSA composed of seven CBSA-spill over to other regions and even globally.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.01
0.01016603 = product of:
0.07116221 = sum of:
0.07116221 = sum of:
0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03810662 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033055585 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- International co-authorship relations and university-industry-government (Triple Helix) relations have hitherto been studied separately. Using Japanese publication data for the 1981-2004 period, we were able to study both kinds of relations in a single design. In the Japanese file, 1,277,030 articles with at least one Japanese address were attributed to the three sectors, and we know additionally whether these papers were coauthored internationally. Using the mutual information in three and four dimensions, respectively, we show that the Japanese Triple-Helix system has been continuously eroded at the national level. However, since the mid-1990s, international coauthorship relations have contributed to a reduction of the uncertainty at the national level. In other words, the national publication system of Japan has developed a capacity to retain surplus value generated internationally. In a final section, we compare these results with an analysis based on similar data for Canada. A relative uncoupling of national university-industry-government relations because of international collaborations is indicated in both countries.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.01016603 = product of:
0.07116221 = sum of:
0.07116221 = sum of:
0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03810662 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033055585 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Heimeriks, G.: ¬The self-organization of the European information society : the case of "biotechnology" (2001)
0.01
0.009730568 = product of:
0.068113975 = sum of:
0.068113975 = weight(_text_:states in 6524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068113975 = score(doc=6524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.304198 = fieldWeight in 6524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6524)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Fields of technoscience like biotechnology develop in a network mode: disciplinary insights from different backgrounds are recombined as competing innovation systems are continuously reshaped. The ongoing process of integration at the European level generates an additional network of transnational collaborations. Using the title words of scientific publications in five core journals of biotechnology, multivariate analysis is used to distinguish between the intellectual organization of the publications in terms of title words and the institutional network in terms of addresses of documents. The interaction among the representation of intellectual space in terms of words and co-words, and the potentially European network system is compared with the document sets with American and Japanese addresses. The European system can also be decomposed in terms of the contributions of member states. Whereas a European vocabulary can be made visible at the global level, this communality disappears by this decomposition. The network effect at the European level can be considered as institutional more than cognitive
-
Chen, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays : a new method of publication portfolio analysis (2014)
0.00
0.003207792 = product of:
0.022454543 = sum of:
0.022454543 = product of:
0.044909086 = sum of:
0.044909086 = weight(_text_:design in 1200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044909086 = score(doc=1200,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.29373983 = fieldWeight in 1200, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Portfolio analysis of the publication profile of a unit of interest, ranging from individuals and organizations to a scientific field or interdisciplinary programs, aims to inform analysts and decision makers about the position of the unit, where it has been, and where it may go in a complex adaptive environment. A portfolio analysis may aim to identify the gap between the current position of an organization and a goal that it intends to achieve or identify competencies of multiple institutions. We introduce a new visual analytic method for analyzing, comparing, and contrasting characteristics of publication portfolios. The new method introduces a novel design of dual-map thematic overlays on global maps of science. Each publication portfolio can be added as one layer of dual-map overlays over 2 related, but distinct, global maps of science: one for citing journals and the other for cited journals. We demonstrate how the new design facilitates a portfolio analysis in terms of patterns emerging from the distributions of citation threads and the dynamics of trajectories as a function of space and time. We first demonstrate the analysis of portfolios defined on a single source article. Then we contrast publication portfolios of multiple comparable units of interest; namely, colleges in universities and corporate research organizations. We also include examples of overlays of scientific fields. We expect that our method will provide new insights to portfolio analysis.
-
Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003)
0.00
0.0023611132 = product of:
0.016527792 = sum of:
0.016527792 = product of:
0.033055585 = sum of:
0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033055585 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 5.2003 19:48:04
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.00
0.0023611132 = product of:
0.016527792 = sum of:
0.016527792 = product of:
0.033055585 = sum of:
0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033055585 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
0.00
0.0022682515 = product of:
0.01587776 = sum of:
0.01587776 = product of:
0.03175552 = sum of:
0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175552 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.00
0.0019675945 = product of:
0.013773161 = sum of:
0.013773161 = product of:
0.027546322 = sum of:
0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027546322 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016)
0.00
0.0019675945 = product of:
0.013773161 = sum of:
0.013773161 = product of:
0.027546322 = sum of:
0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027546322 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 17:53:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018)
0.00
0.0019675945 = product of:
0.013773161 = sum of:
0.013773161 = product of:
0.027546322 = sum of:
0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027546322 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04066292 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:22:09
