Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"AN 95100"
  1. Abbas, J.: Structures for organizing knowledge : exploring taxonomies, ontologies, and other schemas (2010) 0.02
    0.02395505 = product of:
      0.08384267 = sum of:
        0.061388128 = weight(_text_:sites in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061388128 = score(doc=480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
        0.022454543 = product of:
          0.044909086 = sum of:
            0.044909086 = weight(_text_:design in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044909086 = score(doc=480,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.29373983 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    LIS professionals use structures for organizing knowledge when they catalog and classify objects in the collection, when they develop databases, when they design customized taxonomies, or when they search online. Structures for Organizing Knowledge: Exploring Taxonomies, Ontologies, and Other Schema explores and explains this basic function by looking at three questions: 1) How do we organize objects so that they make sense and are useful? 2) What role do categories, classifications, taxonomies, and other structures play in the process of organizing? 3) What do information professionals need to know about organizing behaviors in order to design useful structures for organizing knowledge? Taking a broad, yet specialized approach that is a first in the field, this book answers those questions by examining three threads: traditional structures for organizing knowledge; personal structures for organizing knowledge; and socially-constructed structures for organizing knowledge. Through these threads, it offers avenues for expanding thinking on classification and classification schemes, taxonomy and ontology development, and structures. Both a history of the development of taxonomies and an analysis of current research, theories, and applications, this volume explores a wide array of topics, including the new digital, social aspect of taxonomy development. Examples of subjects covered include: Formal and informal structures Applications of knowledge structures Classification schemes Early taxonomists and their contributions Social networking, bookmarking, and cataloging sites Cataloging codes Standards and best practices Tags, tagging, and folksonomies Descriptive cataloging Metadata schema standards Thought exercises, references, and a list of helpful websites augment each section. A final chapter, "Thinking Ahead: Are We at a Crossroads?" uses "envisioning exercises" to help LIS professionals look into the future.
  2. O'Connor, B.C.; Kearns, J.; Anderson, R.L.: Doing things with information : beyond indexing and abstracting (2008) 0.00
    0.0036292023 = product of:
      0.025404414 = sum of:
        0.025404414 = product of:
          0.05080883 = sum of:
            0.05080883 = weight(_text_:design in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05080883 = score(doc=4297,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.33232868 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The relationship between a person with a question and a source of information is complex. Indexing and abstracting often fail because too much emphasis is put on the mechanics of description, and too little has been given as to what ought to be represented. Research literature suggests that inappropriate representation results in failed searches a significant number of times, perhaps even in a majority of cases. "Doing Things with Information" seeks to rectify this unfortunate situation by emphasizing methods of modeling and constructing appropriate representations of such questions and documents. Students in programs of information studies will find focal points for discussion about system design and refinement of existing systems. Librarians, scholars, and those who work within large document collections, whether paper or electronic, will find insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the access systems they use.
    Footnote
    The authors state that this book emerged from a proposal to do a second edition of Explorations in Indexing and Abstracting (O'Connor 1996); much of its content is the result of the authors' reaction to the reviews of this first edition and their realization for "the necessity to address some more fundamental questions". Rez. in: KO 38(2011) no.1, S.62-64 (L.F. Spiteri): "This book provides a good overview of the relationship between the document and the user; in this regard, it reinforces the importance of the clientcentred approach to the design of document representation systems. In the final chapter, the authors state: "We have offered examples of new ways to think about messages in all sorts of media and how they might be discovered, analyzed, synthesized, and generated. We brought together philosophical, scientific, and engineering notions into a fundamental model for just how we might understand doing this with information" (p. 225). The authors have certainly succeeded in highlighting the complex processes, nature, and implications of document representation systems, although, as has been seen, the novelty of some of their discussions and suggestions is sometimes limited. With further explanation, the FOC model may serve as a useful way to understand how to build document representation systems to better meet user needs."; vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_38_2011_1e.pdf.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Design
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Design
  3. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.00
    0.0023611132 = product of:
      0.016527792 = sum of:
        0.016527792 = product of:
          0.033055585 = sum of:
            0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033055585 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
  4. Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization : Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India (2012) 0.00
    0.0011341257 = product of:
      0.00793888 = sum of:
        0.00793888 = product of:
          0.01587776 = sum of:
            0.01587776 = weight(_text_:design in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01587776 = score(doc=986,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.10385271 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION FOR ARCHIVES Renato Rocha Souza, Flávio Codeço Coelho and Suemi Higuchi. The CPDOC Semantic Portal: Applying Semantic and Knowledge Organization Systems to the Brazilian Contemporary History Domain - Natália Bolfarini Tognoli and José Augusto Chaves Guimarães. Challenges of Knowledge Representation in Contemporary Archival Science - Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes. Archival Classification and Knowledge Organization: Theoretical Possibilities for the Archival Field - Pekka Henttonen. Diversity of Knowledge Organization in Records and Archives Management DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION TOOLS Leonard Will. The ISO 25964 Data Model for the Structure of an Information Retrieval Thesaurus - Wieslaw Babik. A Faceted Classification of Cartographic Materials: Problems of Construction and Use - Ming-Shu, Yuan, Fan-Hua, Nan and Gou-Chi, Lee. Constructing Knowledge Classification Scheme in Industrial Technology via Domain Analysis: An Empirical Study - B.L. Vinod Kumar and Khaiser Nikam. Sanskrit-English Bilingual Thesaurus for Yogic Sciences: A Case Study of Problems and Issues with Terms of Non-Latin Origin - Emilena Josemary Lorenzon, Luciana de Souza Gracioso, Marco Donizete Paulino da Silva, Marcele Tinelli, Roniberto Morato Amaral, Leandro Innocentini Lopes de Faria and Wanda Aparecida Machado Hoffmann. Controlled Vocabulary for Intelligence Information System for Shoes