Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.18
    0.1826697 = product of:
      0.6393439 = sum of:
        0.31967196 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31967196 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34474066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.31967196 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31967196 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34474066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  2. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.01
    0.0055092643 = product of:
      0.03856485 = sum of:
        0.03856485 = product of:
          0.0771297 = sum of:
            0.0771297 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0771297 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  3. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.00
    0.0047222264 = product of:
      0.033055585 = sum of:
        0.033055585 = product of:
          0.06611117 = sum of:
            0.06611117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06611117 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  4. Sowa, J.F.: Top-level ontological categories (1995) 0.00
    0.0036292023 = product of:
      0.025404414 = sum of:
        0.025404414 = product of:
          0.05080883 = sum of:
            0.05080883 = weight(_text_:design in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05080883 = score(doc=4743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.33232868 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys ontological questions that arise in artificial intelligence, some of the answers that have been proposed by various philosophers, and an application of the philosophical analysis to the clarification of some current issues in artificial intelligence. Charles Sanders Peirce and Alfred North Whitehead have developed the most complete systems of categories. Their analyses suggest a basic structure of categories that can provide some guidelines for the design of artificial intelligence systems
  5. Guarino, N.; Welty, C.: Identity and subsumption (2002) 0.00
    0.0031755518 = product of:
      0.022228861 = sum of:
        0.022228861 = product of:
          0.044457722 = sum of:
            0.044457722 = weight(_text_:design in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044457722 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.29078758 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The intuitive simplicity of the so-called is-a (or subsumption) relationship has led to widespread ontological misuse. Where previous work has focused largely an the semantics of the relationship itself, we concentrate here an the ontological nature of its arguments, in Order to tell whether a single is-a link is ontologically well-founded. For this purpose, we introduce some techniques based an the philosophical notions of identity, unity, and essence, which have been adapted to the needs of taxonomy design. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques by taking real examples of poorly structured taxonomies and revealing cases of invalid generalization.
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.00
    0.003148151 = product of:
      0.022037057 = sum of:
        0.022037057 = product of:
          0.044074114 = sum of:
            0.044074114 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044074114 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  8. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
  9. Friedman, A.; Thellefsen, M.: Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization (2011) 0.00
    0.0027219015 = product of:
      0.01905331 = sum of:
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the basics of semiotic analysis and concept theory that represent two dominant approaches to knowledge representation, and explore how these approaches are fruitful for knowledge organization. Design/methodology/approach - In particular the semiotic theory formulated by the American philosopher C.S. Peirce and the concept theory formulated by Ingetraut Dahlberg are investigated. The paper compares the differences and similarities between these two theories of knowledge representation. Findings - The semiotic model is a general and unrestricted model of signs and Dahlberg's model is thought from the perspective and demand of better knowledge organization system (KOS) development. It is found that Dahlberg's concept model provides a detailed method for analyzing and representing concepts in a KOS, where semiotics provides the philosophical context for representation. Originality/value - This paper is the first to combine theories of knowledge representation, semiotic and concept theory, within the context of knowledge organization.
  10. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.00
    0.0023611132 = product of:
      0.016527792 = sum of:
        0.016527792 = product of:
          0.033055585 = sum of:
            0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033055585 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  11. Thellefsen, M.M.; Thellefsen, T.; Sørensen, B.: Information as signs : a semiotic analysis of the information concept, determining its ontological and epistemological foundations (2018) 0.00
    0.0022682515 = product of:
      0.01587776 = sum of:
        0.01587776 = product of:
          0.03175552 = sum of:
            0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175552 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to formulate an analytical framework for the information concept based on the semiotic theory. Design/methodology/approach The paper is motivated by the apparent controversy that still surrounds the information concept. Information, being a key concept within LIS, suffers from being anchored in various incompatible theories. The paper suggests that information is signs, and it demonstrates how the concept of information can be understood within C.S. Peirce's phenomenologically rooted semiotic. Hence, from there, certain ontological conditions as well epistemological consequences of the information concept can be deduced. Findings The paper argues that an understanding of information, as either objective or subjective/discursive, leads to either objective reductionism and signal processing, that fails to explain how information becomes meaningful at all, or conversely, information is understood only relative to subjective/discursive intentions, agendas, etc. To overcome the limitations of defining information as either objective or subjective/discursive, a semiotic analysis shows that information understood as signs is consistently sensitive to both objective and subjective/discursive features of information. It is consequently argued that information as concept should be defined in relation to ontological conditions having certain epistemological consequences. Originality/value The paper presents an analytical framework, derived from semiotics, that adds to the developments of the philosophical dimensions of information within LIS.
  12. Machado, L.M.O.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Simões, M.da Graça de Melo: Concept theory in library and information science : an epistemological analysis (2019) 0.00
    0.0022682515 = product of:
      0.01587776 = sum of:
        0.01587776 = product of:
          0.03175552 = sum of:
            0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175552 = score(doc=5457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the literature on concept theory in library and information science (LIS) from an epistemological perspective, ascribing each paper to an epistemological family and discussing their relevance in the context of the knowledge organization (KO) domain. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a hermeneutic approach for the analysis of the texts that compose the corpus of study following contingency and categorical analyses. More specifically, the paper works with Bardin's contingency analysis and follows Hjørland's families of epistemologies for the categorization. Findings The analysis corroborates the observations made for the last ten years about the scarcity of studies on concept theory in LIS and KO. However, the study also reveals an epistemological turn on concept theory since 2009 that could be considered a departure from the rationalist views that dominated the field and a continuation of a broader paradigm shift in LIS and KO. All analyzed papers except two follow pragmatist or historicist approaches. Originality/value This paper follows-up and systematizes the contributions to the LIS and KO fields on concept theory mainly during the last decade. The epistemological analysis reveals the dominant views in this paradigm shift and the main authors and trends that are present in the LIS literature on concept theory.
  13. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  14. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  15. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  16. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22