Search (75 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990) 0.09 
    0.08974262 = product of:
  0.31409916 = sum of:
    0.15997484 = weight(_text_:united in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15997484 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.7012641 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
    0.15412432 = weight(_text_:states in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15412432 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.6883215 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    LCSH
    MARC System / United States
    Subject
    MARC System / United States
  2. USMARC format for bibliographic data : including guidelines for content designation (1994) 0.06 
    0.06345762 = product of:
  0.22210166 = sum of:
    0.113119304 = weight(_text_:united in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.113119304 = score(doc=8041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
    0.108982354 = weight(_text_:states in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108982354 = score(doc=8041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Here is the standard for representing and exchanging bibliographic data in machine-readable form in the United States. This comprehensive publication defines the structure of the MARC bibliographic record in full detail. Also defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in USMARC bibliographic records. Includes specifications for a National Level Bibliographic record (both full and minimal). The remaining future format integration changes are specified
  3. Kaiser, M.; Lieder, H.J.; Majcen, K.; Vallant, H.: New ways of sharing and using authority information : the LEAF project (2003) 0.02 
    0.019830506 = product of:
  0.06940677 = sum of:
    0.035349783 = weight(_text_:united in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035349783 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.15495893 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
    0.034056988 = weight(_text_:states in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034056988 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.152099 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    NACO was established in 1976 and is hosted by the Library of Congress. At the beginning of 2003, nearly 400 institutions were involved in this undertaking, including 43 institutions from outside the United States.6 Despite the enormous success of NACO and the impressive annual growth of the initiative, there are requirements for participation that form an obstacle for many institutions: they have to follow the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) and employ the MARC217 data format. Participating institutions also have to belong to either OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) or RLG (Research Libraries Group) in order to be able to contribute records, and they have to provide a specified minimum number of authority records per year. A recent proof of concept project of the Library of Congress, OCLC and the German National Library-Virtual International Authority File (VIAF)8-will, in its first phase, test automatic linking of the records of the Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF) and the German Personal Name Authority File by using matching algorithms and software developed by OCLC. The results are expected to form the basis of a "Virtual International Authority File". The project will then test the maintenance of the virtual authority file by employing the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH)9 to harvest the metadata for new, updated, and deleted records. When using the "Virtual International Authority File" a cataloguer will be able to check the system to see whether the authority record he wants to establish already exists. The final phase of the project will test possibilities for displaying records in the preferred language and script of the end user. Currently, there are still some clear limitations associated with the ways in which authority records are used by memory institutions. One of the main problems has to do with limited access: generally only large institutions or those that are part of a library network have unlimited online access to permanently updated authority records. Smaller institutions outside these networks usually have to fall back on less efficient ways of obtaining authority data, or have no access at all. Cross-domain sharing of authority data between libraries, archives, museums and other memory institutions simply does not happen at present. Public users are, by and large, not even aware that such things as name authority records exist and are excluded from access to these information resources.
  4. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.01 
    0.012420927 = product of:
  0.08694649 = sum of:
    0.08694649 = sum of:
      0.053890903 = weight(_text_:design in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053890903 = score(doc=4748,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04066292 = queryNorm
          0.3524878 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033055585 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04066292 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  5. Setting the record straight : understanding the MARC format (1993) 0.01 
    0.012119926 = product of:
  0.08483948 = sum of:
    0.08483948 = weight(_text_:united in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08483948 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    MARC is an acronym for Machine Readable Catalogue or Cataloguing. This general description, howcver, is rather misleading as MARC is neither a kind of catalogue nor a method of cataloguing. In fact, MARC is a Standardformat for representing bibliographic information for handling by computer. While the MARC format was primarily designed to serve the needs of libraries, the concept has since been embraced by the wider information community as a convenient way of storing and exchanging bibliographic data. The original MARC format was developed at the Library of Congress in 1965-6 leading to a pilot project, known as MARC I, which had the aim of investigating the feasibility of producing machine-readable catalogue data. Similar work was in progress in the United Kingdom whcre the Council of the British National Bibliography had set up the BNB MARC Project with the rennt of examining the use of machine-readable data in producing the printed British National Bibliography (BNB). These parallel developments led to Anglo-American co-operation an the MARC 11 project which was initiated in 1968. MARC II was to prove instrumental in defining the concept of MARC as a communications format.
  6. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.01 
    0.01016603 = product of:
  0.07116221 = sum of:
    0.07116221 = sum of:
      0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03810662 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04066292 = queryNorm
          0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033055585 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04066292 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  7. Manguinhas, H.; Freire, N.; Machado, J.; Borbinha, J.: Supporting multilingual bibliographic resource discovery with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2012) 0.01 
    0.008769733 = product of:
  0.061388128 = sum of:
    0.061388128 = weight(_text_:sites in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061388128 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04066292 = queryNorm
        0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: Vgl.: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/supporting-multilingual-bibliographic-resource-discovery-functional-requirements-bibliograph http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj145_2.pdf.
  8. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.0066782376 = product of:
  0.046747662 = sum of:
    0.046747662 = product of:
      0.093495324 = sum of:
        0.093495324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093495324 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.006296302 = product of:
  0.044074114 = sum of:
    0.044074114 = product of:
      0.08814823 = sum of:
        0.08814823 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08814823 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  10. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0055092643 = product of:
  0.03856485 = sum of:
    0.03856485 = product of:
      0.0771297 = sum of:
        0.0771297 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0771297 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  11. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.0055092643 = product of:
  0.03856485 = sum of:
    0.03856485 = product of:
      0.0771297 = sum of:
        0.0771297 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0771297 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  12. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01 
    0.0055092643 = product of:
  0.03856485 = sum of:
    0.03856485 = product of:
      0.0771297 = sum of:
        0.0771297 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0771297 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.0055092643 = product of:
  0.03856485 = sum of:
    0.03856485 = product of:
      0.0771297 = sum of:
        0.0771297 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0771297 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  14. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.00 
    0.0047222264 = product of:
  0.033055585 = sum of:
    0.033055585 = product of:
      0.06611117 = sum of:
        0.06611117 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06611117 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  15. McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A comparison of USMARC and UNIMARC for system design (1995) 0.00 
    0.0044909082 = product of:
  0.031436358 = sum of:
    0.031436358 = product of:
      0.062872715 = sum of:
        0.062872715 = weight(_text_:design in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062872715 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.41123575 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Provides a background to the development of the MINISIS relational database management system. The new MINISIS will offer a forms-based 4GL application development environment for building an integrated library system at the heart of which will be the catalogue database. Describes the research on the the database structure involving a comparison between USMARC and UNIMARC. Covers the worldwide use of the 2 systems. Discusses differences in field/subfield content designation; differences in field attributes; access points; linking entries, related fields; control information numbers and codes; USMARC format integration and linkage to other languages and holdings information; linkage with other MARC files; and considerations regarding systems design
  16. Willer, M.: UNIMARC format for authority records : its scope and issues for authority control (2004) 0.00 
    0.0044909082 = product of:
  0.031436358 = sum of:
    0.031436358 = product of:
      0.062872715 = sum of:
        0.062872715 = weight(_text_:design in 5670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062872715 = score(doc=5670,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.41123575 = fieldWeight in 5670, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The IFLA standard for authority data, UNIMARC authorities format, is described in the light of developments of IFLA standards in the field of authority files, IFLA's activities in promoting the exchange of name authority records within the program of Universal Bibliographic Control and the design of the UNIMARC format for bibliographic records that established principles for its structure and design. The second revised and enlarged edition, UNIMARC Manual: Authorities Format, is described. Particular attention is paid to the methods for expressing relationships between different forms of headings, and relationships between different languages and scripts of headings. The maintenance of the format and sources for its revision are described.
  17. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.00 
    0.004452158 = product of:
  0.031165106 = sum of:
    0.031165106 = product of:
      0.062330212 = sum of:
        0.062330212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062330212 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  18. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.00 
    0.004452158 = product of:
  0.031165106 = sum of:
    0.031165106 = product of:
      0.062330212 = sum of:
        0.062330212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062330212 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  19. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.00 
    0.003935189 = product of:
  0.027546322 = sum of:
    0.027546322 = product of:
      0.055092644 = sum of:
        0.055092644 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055092644 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  20. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.00 
    0.003935189 = product of:
  0.027546322 = sum of:
    0.027546322 = product of:
      0.055092644 = sum of:
        0.055092644 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055092644 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 61
  • d 12
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 65
  • s 4
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications