Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Petits petales : a tribute to S.R. Ranganathan (1993) 0.09
    0.094616234 = product of:
      0.22077121 = sum of:
        0.11998113 = weight(_text_:united in 7646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11998113 = score(doc=7646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 7646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7646)
        0.081736766 = weight(_text_:states in 7646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081736766 = score(doc=7646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 7646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7646)
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 7646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=7646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 7646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    KUMAR, P.S.G.: Ranganathan through classification; LANGRIDGE, D.W.: My debt to Ranganathan; SUBBA RAO, C.V.: Controversies on Dr. S.R. Ranganathan; CHAND, K. u. G. SINGH: Impact of information technology on Ranganathan's five laws; SATIJA, M.P.: Research in librarianship before and after Ranganathan; BATTY, C.D.: The influence of Ranganathan on the structural design of index languages; DHYANI, P.: Ranganathan's normatice principles and Dewey Decimal Classification; FRIIS-HANSEN, J.: Facets and clusters; HUNTER, E.J.: Ranganathan UK: The influence of Ranganathan's work on the development of classification and indexing in the United Kingdom; McILWAINE, I.C.: Ranganathan and classification in Britain; BAKEWELL, K.G.B.: Ranganathan and library management; BHARGAVA, G,D.: Dr. S.R. Ranganathan - my teacher and mentor; NAVALINI, K.: The tallest torch bearer; COMARONI, J.P.: Ranganathan's influence on American librarianship; KONNOR, M.B.: Dr. S.R. Ranganathan - American view; SHARMA, R.N.: Ranganathan and the United States
  2. Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985) 0.03
    0.03172881 = product of:
      0.11105083 = sum of:
        0.056559652 = weight(_text_:united in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056559652 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.2479343 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
        0.054491177 = weight(_text_:states in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054491177 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.24335839 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
  3. Hunter, E.J.: ¬The United Kingdom contribution to subject cataloguing and classification since 1945 (1987) 0.03
    0.028279826 = product of:
      0.19795877 = sum of:
        0.19795877 = weight(_text_:united in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19795877 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.86777 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  4. Rolland-Thomas, P.: Eassai sur la contribution de l'anthropologie culturelle aux fondements de la classification documentaire (1996) 0.01
    0.013622794 = product of:
      0.09535956 = sum of:
        0.09535956 = weight(_text_:states in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09535956 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Classification is the natural response to a desire for order among objects and living things and classification systems have existed since time immemorial. Discusses culture and classification, and classification in a scientific and social sciences context, and states that the invention of writing has ensured that classification systems have been passed down through the generations. Discusses the role of cultural anthropology as developed by Dürkheim and Mauss and furthered byCclaude Levi-Strauss in shedding light on the phylogenetic dimension of classification
  5. Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971) 0.01
    0.006296302 = product of:
      0.044074114 = sum of:
        0.044074114 = product of:
          0.08814823 = sum of:
            0.08814823 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08814823 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
  6. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.00
    0.0047222264 = product of:
      0.033055585 = sum of:
        0.033055585 = product of:
          0.06611117 = sum of:
            0.06611117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06611117 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  7. LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007) 0.00
    0.0036292023 = product of:
      0.025404414 = sum of:
        0.025404414 = product of:
          0.05080883 = sum of:
            0.05080883 = weight(_text_:design in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05080883 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.33232868 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Revisits the heritage of faceted classification (FC) beginning with an examination of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in its early manifestations and the groundwork established by international documentalist groups. Early document retrieval experimentation with FC during the intensive period of system design, testing and evaluation in the 1950s and 1960s is discussed, as well as the rise of an international discourse community that sought to augment and extend the reach of FC through system implementations. A list of acronyms employed in the article is given in an appendix.
  8. Tennis, J.T.: Four orders of classification theory and their implications (2018) 0.00
    0.0036292023 = product of:
      0.025404414 = sum of:
        0.025404414 = product of:
          0.05080883 = sum of:
            0.05080883 = weight(_text_:design in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05080883 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.33232868 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an interpretation of the structure of classification theory literature, from the late 19th Century to the present, by dividing it into four orders, and then describes the relationship between that and manuals for classification design.
  9. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.00
    0.003148151 = product of:
      0.022037057 = sum of:
        0.022037057 = product of:
          0.044074114 = sum of:
            0.044074114 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044074114 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  10. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
  11. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  12. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  13. Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification through a century (1965) 0.00
    0.0027219015 = product of:
      0.01905331 = sum of:
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The progress in the first century of the classification era is traced in the three majot perios: pre-facet, transition-to-facet, and facet period. The facet-period is divided into the restricted facet formula, generilised facet formula periods and the two relativity periods - viz. Dorking and Elsinore periods. For each of the six resulting periods, the chief achievements in library classification and the social factors leading to them are mentioned. The achievements of the Dorking period just ending are described in greater detail. The follows the programme of research work for the Elsinore period of 1965 to 1975. A programme for fundamental research in the idea, verbal, and notational planes is chalked out. Then follows the programme for routine research in the building of schedules of common isolates, whcih is a back log from the Dorking period, and in the new area of the design and building of schedules for the depth classification of diverse subjects, needed for documentation work and service. Lastly, the organization suitable to carry out the programme is outlined
  14. Ducheyne, S.: "To treat of the world" : Paul Otlet's ontology and epistemology and the circle of knowledge (2009) 0.00
    0.0027219015 = product of:
      0.01905331 = sum of:
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to document how Paul Otlet, founding-father of what is termed at present as "information science", attempted to provide a complete "image of the world" (and reality in general) by establishing the scientific discipline he dubbed "documentation". The paper also aims to focus on how Otlet represented human knowledge and reality in a systematic and unified way. Design/methodology/approach - A close reading of Otlet's primary works and some of his personal archives was undertaken. Findings - Most importantly, it is shown that Otlet's views on documentation were immersed in a cosmological, objectivist, humanitarian and ontological framework that is alien to contemporary information science. Correspondingly, his alleged affinity with positivism is reassessed. Originality/value - The philosophical foundations of the origins of information science are highlighted. Indirectly, this paper is relevant to the ongoing debate on realism and anti-realism in information science.
  15. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.00
    0.0027219015 = product of:
      0.01905331 = sum of:
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
  16. Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997) 0.00
    0.0023611132 = product of:
      0.016527792 = sum of:
        0.016527792 = product of:
          0.033055585 = sum of:
            0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033055585 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  17. Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014) 0.00
    0.0023611132 = product of:
      0.016527792 = sum of:
        0.016527792 = product of:
          0.033055585 = sum of:
            0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033055585 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The relationship between classification research and information retrieval research : 1952 to 1970 (2017) 0.00
    0.0022682515 = product of:
      0.01587776 = sum of:
        0.01587776 = product of:
          0.03175552 = sum of:
            0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175552 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the initial relationship between the Classification Research Group (CRG) and the Center for Documentation and Communication Research (CDCR) and how this relationship changed between 1952 and 1970. The theory of normative behavior and its concepts of worldviews, social norms, social types, and information behavior are used to characterize the relationship between the small worlds of the two groups with the intent of understanding the gap between early classification research and information retrieval (IR) research. Design/methodology/approach This is a mixed method analysis of two groups as evidenced in published artifacts by and about their work. A thorough review of historical literature about the groups as well as their own published works was employed and an author co-citation analysis was used to characterize the conceptual similarities and differences of the two groups of researchers. Findings The CRG focused on fundamental principles to aid classification and retrieval of information. The CDCR were more inclined to develop practical methods of retrieval without benefit of good theoretical foundations. The CRG began it work under the contention that the general classification schemes at the time were inadequate for the developing IR mechanisms. The CDCR rejected the classification schemes of the times and focused on developing punch card mechanisms and processes that were generously funded by both government and corporate funding. Originality/value This paper provides a unique historical analysis of two groups of influential researchers in the field of library and information science.
  19. Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  20. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22

Languages

Types