Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.03
    0.034359448 = product of:
      0.12025806 = sum of:
        0.098221004 = weight(_text_:sites in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098221004 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.46206218 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.022037057 = product of:
          0.044074114 = sum of:
            0.044074114 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044074114 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  2. Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006) 0.03
    0.029341053 = product of:
      0.102693684 = sum of:
        0.08681592 = weight(_text_:sites in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08681592 = score(doc=2874,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.40840912 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
        0.01587776 = product of:
          0.03175552 = sum of:
            0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175552 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
  3. Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019) 0.01
    0.01052368 = product of:
      0.07366575 = sum of:
        0.07366575 = weight(_text_:sites in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07366575 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.34654665 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
  4. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.01
    0.008471692 = product of:
      0.05930184 = sum of:
        0.05930184 = sum of:
          0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03175552 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04066292 = queryNorm
              0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027546322 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04066292 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, Hjørland has developed a typology of basic epistemological approaches to KO that identifies four basic positions - empiricism, rationalism, historicism/hermeneutics, and pragmatism -with which to characterize the epistemological bases and methodological orientation of KOSs. Although scholars of KO have noted that the design of a single KOS may incorporate epistemological-methodological features from more than one of these approaches, studies of concrete examples of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism have been rare. In this paper, we consider the phenomenon of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism in one theoretically significant family of KOSs - namely analytico-synthetic, or faceted, KOSs - by examining two cases - Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI) and Brian Vickery's method of facet analysis (FA) for document classification. We show that both of these systems combined classical features of rationalism with elements of empiricism and pragmatism and argue that such eclecticism is the norm, rather than the exception, for such KOSs in general.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00
    0.003935189 = product of:
      0.027546322 = sum of:
        0.027546322 = product of:
          0.055092644 = sum of:
            0.055092644 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055092644 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  6. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.00
    0.003148151 = product of:
      0.022037057 = sum of:
        0.022037057 = product of:
          0.044074114 = sum of:
            0.044074114 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044074114 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  7. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  8. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  9. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.00
    0.0027219015 = product of:
      0.01905331 = sum of:
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
  10. Babbar, P.: Web CC : an effort towards its revival (2015) 0.00
    0.0027219015 = product of:
      0.01905331 = sum of:
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=2792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Colon Classification (CC), based on dynamic theory of classification saw seven editions from 1928 to 1987. Libraries practising it continued with extensions and additions carried out to meet their needs since it was not revised for long after the 7th edition. Revision requires adding terms in different disciplines, organising them in relation to each other and assigning notation for shelf classification. Use of ICT would help in reviving CC and is essential for regular revision of a classification scheme. The paper explores the possibility for creation of an expert system through the design of Web based Colon Classification. The author explores the possibility by designing a prototype for online revision of Colon Classification in the paper.
  11. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.00
    0.0027219015 = product of:
      0.01905331 = sum of:
        0.01905331 = product of:
          0.03810662 = sum of:
            0.03810662 = weight(_text_:design in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03810662 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.24924651 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
  12. Barité, M.; Rauch, M.: Systematifier : in rescue of a useful tool in domain analysis (2017) 0.00
    0.0022682515 = product of:
      0.01587776 = sum of:
        0.01587776 = product of:
          0.03175552 = sum of:
            0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175552 = score(doc=4142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Literature on the systematifier is remarkably limited in knowledge organization. Dahlberg created the procedure in the seventies as a guide for the construction of classification systems and showed its applicability in systems she developed. According to her initial conception, all disciplines should be structured in the following sequence: Foundations and theories-Subjects of study-Methods-Influences-Applications-Environment. The nature of the procedure is determined in this study and the concept is situated in relation with the domain analysis methodologies. As a tool for the organization of the map of a certain domain, it is associated with a rationalist perspective and the top-down design of systems construction. It would require a reassessment of its scope in order to ensure its applicability to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary domains. Among other conclusions, it is highlighted that the greatest potential of the systematifier is given by the fact that-as a methodological device-it can act as: i)an analyzer of a subject area; ii)an organizer of its main terms; and, iii)an identifier of links, bridges and intersection points with other knowledge areas.
  13. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  14. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.00
    0.0019675945 = product of:
      0.013773161 = sum of:
        0.013773161 = product of:
          0.027546322 = sum of:
            0.027546322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027546322 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik