Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"m"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Antoniou, G.; Harmelen, F. van: ¬A semantic Web primer (2004) 0.02
    0.019830506 = product of:
      0.06940677 = sum of:
        0.035349783 = weight(_text_:united in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035349783 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.15495893 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
        0.034056988 = weight(_text_:states in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034056988 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22391328 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.152099 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    The next chapter introduces resource description framework (RDF) and RDF schema (RDFS). Unlike XML, RDF provides a foundation for expressing the semantics of dada: it is a standard dada model for machine-processable semantics. Resource description framework schema offers a number of modeling primitives for organizing RDF vocabularies in typed hierarchies. In addition to RDF and RDFS, a query language for RDF, i.e. RQL. is introduced. This chapter and the next chapter are two of the most important chapters in the book. Chapter 4 presents another language called Web Ontology Language (OWL). Because RDFS is quite primitive as a modeling language for the Web, more powerful languages are needed. A richer language. DAML+OIL, is thus proposed as a joint endeavor of the United States and Europe. OWL takes DAML+OIL as the starting point, and aims to be the standardized and broadly accepted ontology language. At the beginning of the chapter, the nontrivial relation with RDF/RDFS is discussed. Then the authors describe the various language elements of OWL in some detail. Moreover, Appendix A contains an abstract OWL syntax. which compresses OWL and makes OWL much easier to read. Chapter 5 covers both monotonic and nonmonotonic rules. Whereas the previous chapter's mainly concentrate on specializations of knowledge representation, this chapter depicts the foundation of knowledge representation and inference. Two examples are also givwn to explain monotonic and non-monotonic rules, respectively. "To get the most out of the chapter. readers had better gain a thorough understanding of predicate logic first. Chapter 6 presents several realistic application scenarios to which the Semantic Web technology can be applied. including horizontal information products at Elsevier, data integration at Audi, skill finding at Swiss Life, a think tank portal at EnerSearch, e-learning. Web services, multimedia collection indexing, online procurement, raid device interoperability. These case studies give us some real feelings about the Semantic Web.
  2. Knitting the semantic Web (2007) 0.02
    0.017315464 = product of:
      0.06060412 = sum of:
        0.04948969 = weight(_text_:united in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948969 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22812355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.2169425 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
        0.011114431 = product of:
          0.022228861 = sum of:
            0.022228861 = weight(_text_:design in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022228861 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.14539379 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Semantic Web, the extension that goes beyond the current Web, better enables computers and people to effectively work together by giving information well-defined meaning. Knitting the Semantic Web explains the interdisciplinary efforts underway to build a more library-like Web through "semantic knitting." The book examines tagging information with standardized semantic metadata to result in a network able to support computational activities and provide people with services efficiently. Leaders in library and information science, computer science, and information intensive domains provide insight and inspiration to give readers a greater understanding in the development, growth, and maintenance of the Semantic Web. Librarians are uniquely qualified to play a major role in the development and maintenance of the Semantic Web. Knitting the Semantic Web closely examines this crucial relationship in detail. This single source reviews the foundations, standards, and tools of the Semantic Web, as well as discussions on projects and perspectives. Many chapters include figures to illustrate concepts and ideas, and the entire text is extensively referenced. Topics in Knitting the Semantic Web include: - RDF, its expressive power, and its ability to underlie the new Library catalog card for the coming century - the value and application for controlled vocabularies - SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the newest Semantic Web language - managing scheme versioning in the Semantic Web - Physnet portal service for physics - Semantic Web technologies in biomedicine - developing the United Nations Food and Agriculture ontology - Friend Of A Friend (FOAF) vocabulary specification-with a real world case study at a university - and more Knitting the Semantic Web is a stimulating resource for professionals, researchers, educators, and students in library and information science, computer science, information architecture, Web design, and Web services.
  3. Daconta, M.C.; Oberst, L.J.; Smith, K.T.: ¬The Semantic Web : A guide to the future of XML, Web services and knowledge management (2003) 0.02
    0.017179724 = product of:
      0.06012903 = sum of:
        0.049110502 = weight(_text_:sites in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049110502 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.23103109 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
        0.011018529 = product of:
          0.022037057 = sum of:
            0.022037057 = weight(_text_:22 in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022037057 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    "The Semantic Web is an extension of the current Web in which information is given well defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation." - Tim Berners Lee, "Scientific American", May 2001. This authoritative guide shows how the "Semantic Web" works technically and how businesses can utilize it to gain a competitive advantage. It explains what taxonomies and ontologies are as well as their importance in constructing the Semantic Web. The companion web site includes further updates as the framework develops and links to related sites.
    Date
    22. 5.2007 10:37:38
  4. Blanco, L.; Bronzi, M.; Crescenzi, V.; Merialdo, P.; Papotti, P.: Flint: from Web pages to probabilistic semantic data (2012) 0.02
    0.0151896225 = product of:
      0.106327355 = sum of:
        0.106327355 = weight(_text_:sites in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106327355 = score(doc=437,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.500197 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Web is a surprisingly extensive source of information: it offers a huge number of sites containing data about a disparate range of topics. Although Web pages are built for human fruition, not for automatic processing of the data, we observe that an increasing number of Web sites deliver pages containing structured information about recognizable concepts, relevant to specific application domains, such as movies, finance, sport, products, etc. The development of scalable techniques to discover, extract, and integrate data from fairly structured large corpora available on the Web is a challenging issue, because to face the Web scale, these activities should be accomplished automatically by domain-independent techniques. To cope with the complexity and the heterogeneity of Web data, state-of-the-art approaches focus on information organized according to specific patterns that frequently occur on the Web. Meaningful examples are WebTables, which focuses on data published in HTML tables, and information extraction systems, such as TextRunner, which exploits lexical-syntactic patterns. As noticed by Cafarella et al., even if a small fraction of the Web is organized according to these patterns, due to the Web scale, the amount of data involved is impressive. In this chapter, we focus on methods and techniques to wring out value from the data delivered by large data-intensive Web sites.
  5. Bizer, C.; Mendes, P.N.; Jentzsch, A.: Topology of the Web of Data (2012) 0.01
    0.014031572 = product of:
      0.098221004 = sum of:
        0.098221004 = weight(_text_:sites in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098221004 = score(doc=425,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.46206218 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of structure of Web content is the determining factor for the types of functionality that search engines can provide. The more well structured the Web content is, the easier it is for search engines to understand Web content and provide advanced functionality, such as faceted filtering or the aggregation of content from multiple Web sites, based on this understanding. Today, most Web sites are generated from structured data that is stored in relational databases. Thus, it does not require too much extra effort for Web sites to publish this structured data directly on the Web in addition to HTML pages, and thus help search engines to understand Web content and provide improved functionality. An early approach to realize this idea and help search engines to understand Web content is Microformats, a technique for markingup structured data about specific types on entities-such as tags, blog posts, people, or reviews-within HTML pages. As Microformats are focused on a few entity types, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) started in 2004 to standardize RDFa as an alternative, more generic language for embedding any type of data into HTML pages. Today, major search engines such as Google, Yahoo, and Bing extract Microformat and RDFa data describing products, reviews, persons, events, and recipes from Web pages and use the extracted data to improve the user's search experience. The search engines have started to aggregate structured data from different Web sites and augment their search results with these aggregated information units in the form of rich snippets which combine, for instance, data This chapter gives an overview of the topology of the Web of Data that has been created by publishing data on the Web using the microformats RDFa, Microdata and Linked Data publishing techniques.
  6. Weiand, K.; Hartl, A.; Hausmann, S.; Furche, T.; Bry, F.: Keyword-based search over semantic data (2012) 0.01
    0.008769733 = product of:
      0.061388128 = sum of:
        0.061388128 = weight(_text_:sites in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061388128 = score(doc=432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21257097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04066292 = queryNorm
            0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    For a long while, the creation of Web content required at least basic knowledge of Web technologies, meaning that for many Web users, the Web was de facto a read-only medium. This changed with the arrival of the "social Web," when Web applications started to allow users to publish Web content without technological expertise. Here, content creation is often an inclusive, iterative, and interactive process. Examples of social Web applications include blogs, social networking sites, as well as many specialized applications, for example, for saving and sharing bookmarks and publishing photos. Social semantic Web applications are social Web applications in which knowledge is expressed not only in the form of text and multimedia but also through informal to formal annotations that describe, reflect, and enhance the content. These annotations often take the shape of RDF graphs backed by ontologies, but less formal annotations such as free-form tags or tags from a controlled vocabulary may also be available. Wikis are one example of social Web applications for collecting and sharing knowledge. They allow users to easily create and edit documents, so-called wiki pages, using a Web browser. The pages in a wiki are often heavily interlinked, which makes it easy to find related information and browse the content.
  7. Handbook on ontologies (2004) 0.00
    0.003207792 = product of:
      0.022454543 = sum of:
        0.022454543 = product of:
          0.044909086 = sum of:
            0.044909086 = weight(_text_:design in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044909086 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.29373983 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    LCSH
    Database design
    Subject
    Database design
  8. Hebeler, J.; Fisher, M.; Blace, R.; Perez-Lopez, A.: Semantic Web programming (2009) 0.00
    0.0031755518 = product of:
      0.022228861 = sum of:
        0.022228861 = product of:
          0.044457722 = sum of:
            0.044457722 = weight(_text_:design in 1541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044457722 = score(doc=1541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.29078758 = fieldWeight in 1541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The next major advance in the Web-Web 3.0-will be built on semantic Web technologies, which will allow data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries. Written by a team of highly experienced Web developers, this book explains examines how this powerful new technology can unify and fully leverage the ever-growing data, information, and services that are available on the Internet. Helpful examples demonstrate how to use the semantic Web to solve practical, real-world problems while you take a look at the set of design principles, collaborative working groups, and technologies that form the semantic Web. The companion Web site features full code, as well as a reference section, a FAQ section, a discussion forum, and a semantic blog.
  9. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.00
    0.0027546322 = product of:
      0.019282425 = sum of:
        0.019282425 = product of:
          0.03856485 = sum of:
            0.03856485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856485 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  10. Aberer, K. et al.: ¬The Semantic Web : 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007 : proceedings (2007) 0.00
    0.0025662337 = product of:
      0.017963635 = sum of:
        0.017963635 = product of:
          0.03592727 = sum of:
            0.03592727 = weight(_text_:design in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03592727 = score(doc=2477,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.23499186 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    LCSH
    Logic design
    Subject
    Logic design
  11. Bizer, C.; Heath, T.: Linked Data : evolving the web into a global data space (2011) 0.00
    0.0025662337 = product of:
      0.017963635 = sum of:
        0.017963635 = product of:
          0.03592727 = sum of:
            0.03592727 = weight(_text_:design in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03592727 = score(doc=4725,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.23499186 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction - Principles ofLinked Data - The Web ofData - Linked Data Design Considerations - Linked Data Design Considerations - Consuming Linked Data - Summary and Outlook Vgl.: http://linkeddatabook.com/book.
  12. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.00
    0.0023611132 = product of:
      0.016527792 = sum of:
        0.016527792 = product of:
          0.033055585 = sum of:
            0.033055585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033055585 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
  13. Call, A.; Gottlob, G.; Pieris, A.: ¬The return of the entity-relationship model : ontological query answering (2012) 0.00
    0.0022682515 = product of:
      0.01587776 = sum of:
        0.01587776 = product of:
          0.03175552 = sum of:
            0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175552 = score(doc=434,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Entity-Relationship (ER) model is a fundamental formalism for conceptual modeling in database design; it was introduced by Chen in his milestone paper, and it is now widely used, being flexible and easily understood by practitioners. With the rise of the Semantic Web, conceptual modeling formalisms have gained importance again as ontology formalisms, in the Semantic Web parlance. Ontologies and conceptual models are aimed at representing, rather than the structure of data, the domain of interest, that is, the fragment of the real world that is being represented by the data and the schema. A prominent formalism for modeling ontologies are Description Logics (DLs), which are decidable fragments of first-order logic, particularly suitable for ontological modeling and querying. In particular, DL ontologies are sets of assertions describing sets of objects and (usually binary) relations among such sets, exactly in the same fashion as the ER model. Recently, research on DLs has been focusing on the problem of answering queries under ontologies, that is, given a query q, an instance B, and an ontology X, answering q under B and amounts to compute the answers that are logically entailed from B by using the assertions of X. In this context, where data size is usually large, a central issue the data complexity of query answering, i.e., the computational complexity with respect to the data set B only, while the ontology X and the query q are fixed.
  14. Linked data and user interaction : the road ahead (2015) 0.00
    0.0022682515 = product of:
      0.01587776 = sum of:
        0.01587776 = product of:
          0.03175552 = sum of:
            0.03175552 = weight(_text_:design in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175552 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.20770542 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This collection of research papers provides extensive information on deploying services, concepts, and approaches for using open linked data from libraries and other cultural heritage institutions. With a special emphasis on how libraries and other cultural heritage institutions can create effective end user interfaces using open, linked data or other datasets. These papers are essential reading for any one interesting in user interface design or the semantic web.
  15. Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013) 0.00
    0.0019478193 = product of:
      0.013634734 = sum of:
        0.013634734 = product of:
          0.027269468 = sum of:
            0.027269468 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027269468 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 12:51:22
  16. Semantic search over the Web (2012) 0.00
    0.0018146011 = product of:
      0.012702207 = sum of:
        0.012702207 = product of:
          0.025404414 = sum of:
            0.025404414 = weight(_text_:design in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025404414 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15288728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.16616434 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7598698 = idf(docFreq=2798, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Web has become the world's largest database, with search being the main tool that allows organizations and individuals to exploit its huge amount of information. Search on the Web has been traditionally based on textual and structural similarities, ignoring to a large degree the semantic dimension, i.e., understanding the meaning of the query and of the document content. Combining search and semantics gives birth to the idea of semantic search. Traditional search engines have already advertised some semantic dimensions. Some of them, for instance, can enhance their generated result sets with documents that are semantically related to the query terms even though they may not include these terms. Nevertheless, the exploitation of the semantic search has not yet reached its full potential. In this book, Roberto De Virgilio, Francesco Guerra and Yannis Velegrakis present an extensive overview of the work done in Semantic Search and other related areas. They explore different technologies and solutions in depth, making their collection a valuable and stimulating reading for both academic and industrial researchers. The book is divided into three parts. The first introduces the readers to the basic notions of the Web of Data. It describes the different kinds of data that exist, their topology, and their storing and indexing techniques. The second part is dedicated to Web Search. It presents different types of search, like the exploratory or the path-oriented, alongside methods for their efficient and effective implementation. Other related topics included in this part are the use of uncertainty in query answering, the exploitation of ontologies, and the use of semantics in mashup design and operation. The focus of the third part is on linked data, and more specifically, on applying ideas originating in recommender systems on linked data management, and on techniques for the efficiently querying answering on linked data.
  17. Multimedia content and the Semantic Web : methods, standards, and tools (2005) 0.00
    0.001703987 = product of:
      0.011927908 = sum of:
        0.011927908 = product of:
          0.023855817 = sum of:
            0.023855817 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023855817 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14239462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04066292 = queryNorm
                0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Classification
    006.7 22
    Date
    7. 3.2007 19:30:22
    DDC
    006.7 22

Subjects