Search (100 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.04
    0.03590802 = product of:
      0.107724056 = sum of:
        0.107724056 = sum of:
          0.023671897 = weight(_text_:science in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023671897 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044112243 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.04221596 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04221596 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044112243 = queryNorm
              0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.0418362 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0418362 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044112243 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  2. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.02
    0.021346582 = product of:
      0.064039744 = sum of:
        0.064039744 = product of:
          0.09605961 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
            0.0478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0478128 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  3. Loehrlein, A.J.; Lemieux, V.L.; Bennett, M.: ¬The classification of financial products (2014) 0.02
    0.015880818 = product of:
      0.04764245 = sum of:
        0.04764245 = product of:
          0.071463674 = sum of:
            0.020290198 = weight(_text_:science in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020290198 = score(doc=1196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
            0.051173475 = weight(_text_:29 in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051173475 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:29:52
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.263-280
  4. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.01
    0.013341613 = product of:
      0.04002484 = sum of:
        0.04002484 = product of:
          0.06003726 = sum of:
            0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030154258 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  5. Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012) 0.01
    0.012130022 = product of:
      0.036390066 = sum of:
        0.036390066 = product of:
          0.0545851 = sum of:
            0.03347712 = weight(_text_:science in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03347712 = score(doc=1782,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
            0.02110798 = weight(_text_:29 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02110798 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.
    Date
    16. 3.2012 11:26:29
    Footnote
    Rez. in: J. Doc. 70(2014) no.4: "Books on the organization of information and knowledge, aimed at a library/information audience, tend to fall into two clear categories. Most are practical and pragmatic, explaining the "how" as much or more than the "why". Some are theoretical, in part or in whole, showing how the practice of classification, indexing, resource description and the like relates to philosophy, logic, and other foundational bases; the books by Langridge (1992) and by Svenonious (2000) are well-known examples this latter kind. To this category certainly belongs a recent book by Martin Frické (2012). The author takes the reader for an extended tour through a variety of aspects of information organization, including classification and taxonomy, alphabetical vocabularies and indexing, cataloguing and FRBR, and aspects of the semantic web. The emphasis throughout is on showing how practice is, or should be, underpinned by formal structures; there is a particular emphasis on first order predicate calculus. The advantages of a greater, and more explicit, use of symbolic logic is a recurring theme of the book. There is a particularly commendable historical dimension, often omitted in texts on this subject. It cannot be said that this book is entirely an easy read, although it is well written with a helpful index, and its arguments are generally well supported by clear and relevant examples. It is thorough and detailed, but thereby seems better geared to the needs of advanced students and researchers than to the practitioners who are suggested as a main market. For graduate students in library/information science and related disciplines, in particular, this will be a valuable resource. I would place it alongside Svenonious' book as the best insight into the theoretical "why" of information organization. It has evoked a good deal of interest, including a set of essay commentaries in Journal of Information Science (Gilchrist et al., 2013). Introducing these, Alan Gilchrist rightly says that Frické deserves a salute for making explicit the fundamental relationship between the ancient discipline of logic and modern information organization. If information science is to continue to develop, and make a contribution to the organization of the information environments of the future, then this book sets the groundwork for the kind of studies which will be needed." (D. Bawden)
    LCSH
    Computer science
    Subject
    Computer science
  6. Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000) 0.01
    0.009381324 = product of:
      0.028143972 = sum of:
        0.028143972 = product of:
          0.08443192 = sum of:
            0.08443192 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08443192 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2002 19:30:29
  7. Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003) 0.01
    0.008318489 = product of:
      0.024955466 = sum of:
        0.024955466 = product of:
          0.0374332 = sum of:
            0.013526798 = weight(_text_:science in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013526798 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
            0.0239064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0239064 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The different points of views an knowledge representation and organization from various research communities reflect underlying philosophies and paradigms in these communities. This paper reviews differences and relations in knowledge representation and organization and generalizes four paradigms-integrative and disintegrative pragmatism and integrative and disintegrative epistemologism. Examples such as classification, XML schemas, and ontologies are compared based an how they specify concepts, build data models, and encode knowledge organization structures. 1. Introduction Knowledge representation (KR) is a term that several research communities use to refer to somewhat different aspects of the same research area. The artificial intelligence (AI) community considers KR as simply "something to do with writing down, in some language or communications medium, descriptions or pictures that correspond in some salient way to the world or a state of the world" (Duce & Ringland, 1988, p. 3). It emphasizes the ways in which knowledge can be encoded in a computer program (Bench-Capon, 1990). For the library and information science (LIS) community, KR is literally the synonym of knowledge organization, i.e., KR is referred to as the process of organizing knowledge into classifications, thesauri, or subject heading lists. KR has another meaning in LIS: it "encompasses every type and method of indexing, abstracting, cataloguing, classification, records management, bibliography and the creation of textual or bibliographic databases for information retrieval" (Anderson, 1996, p. 336). Adding the social dimension to knowledge organization, Hjoerland (1997) states that knowledge is a part of human activities and tied to the division of labor in society, which should be the primary organization of knowledge. Knowledge organization in LIS is secondary or derived, because knowledge is organized in learned institutions and publications. These different points of views an KR suggest that an essential difference in the understanding of KR between both AI and LIS lies in the source of representationwhether KR targets human activities or derivatives (knowledge produced) from human activities. This difference also decides their difference in purpose-in AI KR is mainly computer-application oriented or pragmatic and the result of representation is used to support decisions an human activities, while in LIS KR is conceptually oriented or abstract and the result of representation is used for access to derivatives from human activities.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 17:22:35
  8. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.01
    0.008318489 = product of:
      0.024955466 = sum of:
        0.024955466 = product of:
          0.0374332 = sum of:
            0.013526798 = weight(_text_:science in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013526798 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
            0.0239064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0239064 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
  9. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.0079688 = product of:
      0.0239064 = sum of:
        0.0239064 = product of:
          0.0717192 = sum of:
            0.0717192 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0717192 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.0079688 = product of:
      0.0239064 = sum of:
        0.0239064 = product of:
          0.0717192 = sum of:
            0.0717192 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0717192 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  11. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01
    0.0079688 = product of:
      0.0239064 = sum of:
        0.0239064 = product of:
          0.0717192 = sum of:
            0.0717192 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0717192 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  12. Curras, E.: Ranganathan's classification theories under the systems science postulates (1992) 0.01
    0.0073630577 = product of:
      0.022089172 = sum of:
        0.022089172 = product of:
          0.06626751 = sum of:
            0.06626751 = weight(_text_:science in 6993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06626751 = score(doc=6993,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.57030356 = fieldWeight in 6993, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6993)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the basic ideas concerning system science and discusses S.R. Ranganathan's ideas about concepts of 'universe of ideas', 'universe of science', 'universe of knowledge' and 'universe of classification'. Examines the principles, canons and postulates underlying Colon Classification. Discusses the structure of Colon Classification. Points out that the ideas of Ranganathan conform to the concept 'unity of science' and concludes that the principles of systems science or systems thinking are helpful in understanding the theory of classification formulated by Ranganathan
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 17(1992) no.1, S.45-65
  13. Koshman, S.: Categorization and classification revisited : a review of concept in library science and cognitive psychology (1993) 0.01
    0.006508085 = product of:
      0.019524254 = sum of:
        0.019524254 = product of:
          0.058572758 = sum of:
            0.058572758 = weight(_text_:science in 8349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058572758 = score(doc=8349,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 8349, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8349)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the basic concepts associated with categorization and classification in order to examine the cognitive psychology and library science perspectives toward these processes, to discover if a theoretical affinity exists and to discuss potential applications of cognitive categorization theory to the field of library science
  14. Ranganathan, S.R.; Gopinath, M.A.: Prolegomena to library classification (1967) 0.01
    0.0063765943 = product of:
      0.019129783 = sum of:
        0.019129783 = product of:
          0.05738935 = sum of:
            0.05738935 = weight(_text_:science in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05738935 = score(doc=672,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.49389738 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science
    Series
    Ranganathan series in library science; 20
  15. Neelameghan, A.: Classification, theory of (1971) 0.01
    0.0060119107 = product of:
      0.018035732 = sum of:
        0.018035732 = product of:
          0.054107193 = sum of:
            0.054107193 = weight(_text_:science in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054107193 = score(doc=1988,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.5
  16. Cheti, A.: ¬Le categorie nell'indicizzazione (1990) 0.01
    0.0053607575 = product of:
      0.016082272 = sum of:
        0.016082272 = product of:
          0.048246812 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Biblioteche oggi. 8(1990) no.1, S.29-49
  17. Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996) 0.01
    0.0053607575 = product of:
      0.016082272 = sum of:
        0.016082272 = product of:
          0.048246812 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 7.1996 13:29:45
  18. Poli, R.: Framing information (2003) 0.01
    0.0053607575 = product of:
      0.016082272 = sum of:
        0.016082272 = product of:
          0.048246812 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 15:29:04
  19. Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995) 0.01
    0.0053607575 = product of:
      0.016082272 = sum of:
        0.016082272 = product of:
          0.048246812 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 8.2006 12:29:16
  20. Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016) 0.01
    0.0053607575 = product of:
      0.016082272 = sum of:
        0.016082272 = product of:
          0.048246812 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

Languages

Types

  • a 87
  • m 10
  • el 3
  • s 3
  • More… Less…