Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.04
    0.035774425 = product of:
      0.107323274 = sum of:
        0.107323274 = sum of:
          0.020290198 = weight(_text_:science in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020290198 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044112243 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.051173475 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051173475 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044112243 = queryNorm
              0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0358596 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044112243 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:15:36
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  2. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.02
    0.021346582 = product of:
      0.064039744 = sum of:
        0.064039744 = product of:
          0.09605961 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
            0.0478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0478128 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  3. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01
    0.013341613 = product of:
      0.04002484 = sum of:
        0.04002484 = product of:
          0.06003726 = sum of:
            0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030154258 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:07
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Matthews, B.; Jones, C.; Puzon, B.; Moon, J.; Tudhope, D.; Golub, K.; Nielsen, M.L.: ¬An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system (2010) 0.01
    0.01045839 = product of:
      0.03137517 = sum of:
        0.03137517 = product of:
          0.047062755 = sum of:
            0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016908498 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
            0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030154258 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Traditional subject indexing and classification are considered infeasible in many digital collections. This paper seeks to investigate ways of enhancing social tagging via knowledge organization systems, with a view to improving the quality of tags for increased information discovery and retrieval performance. Design/methodology/approach - Enhanced tagging interfaces were developed for exemplar online repositories, and trials were undertaken with author and reader groups to evaluate the effectiveness of tagging augmented with control vocabulary for subject indexing of papers in online repositories. Findings - The results showed that using a knowledge organisation system to augment tagging does appear to increase the effectiveness of non-specialist users (that is, without information science training) in subject indexing. Research limitations/implications - While limited by the size and scope of the trials undertaken, these results do point to the usefulness of a mixed approach in supporting the subject indexing of online resources. Originality/value - The value of this work is as a guide to future developments in the practical support for resource indexing in online repositories.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 11:39:20
  5. Lee, D.H.; Schleyer, T.: Social tagging is no substitute for controlled indexing : a comparison of Medical Subject Headings and CiteULike tags assigned to 231,388 papers (2012) 0.01
    0.01045839 = product of:
      0.03137517 = sum of:
        0.03137517 = product of:
          0.047062755 = sum of:
            0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016908498 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
            0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030154258 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2012 14:29:37
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.9, S.1747-1757
  6. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01
    0.010398112 = product of:
      0.031194335 = sum of:
        0.031194335 = product of:
          0.0467915 = sum of:
            0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016908498 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.12, S.2488-2502
  7. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01
    0.010398112 = product of:
      0.031194335 = sum of:
        0.031194335 = product of:
          0.0467915 = sum of:
            0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016908498 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
            0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029883001 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.5, S.1089-1104
  8. Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008) 0.01
    0.009563597 = product of:
      0.02869079 = sum of:
        0.02869079 = product of:
          0.043036185 = sum of:
            0.019129783 = weight(_text_:science in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019129783 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.16463245 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
            0.0239064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0239064 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging empowers users to categorize content in a personally meaningful way while harnessing their potential to contribute to a collaborative construction of knowledge (Vander Wal, 2007). In addition, social tagging systems offer innovative filtering mechanisms that facilitate resource discovery and browsing (Mathes, 2004). As a result, social tags may support online communication, informal or intended learning as well as the development of online communities. The purpose of this mixed methods study is to examine how undergraduate students participate in social tagging activities in order to learn about their motivations, behaviours and practices. A better understanding of their knowledge, habits and interactions with such systems will help practitioners and developers identify important factors when designing enhancements. In the first phase of the study, students enrolled at a Canadian university completed 103 questionnaires. Quantitative results focusing on general familiarity with social tagging, frequently used Web 2.0 sites, and the purpose for engaging in social tagging activities were compiled. Eight questionnaire respondents participated in follow-up semi-structured interviews that further explored tagging practices by situating questionnaire responses within concrete experiences using popular websites such as YouTube, Facebook, Del.icio.us, and Flickr. Preliminary results of this study echo findings found in the growing literature concerning social tagging from the fields of computer science (Sen et al., 2006) and information science (Golder & Huberman, 2006; Macgregor & McCulloch, 2006). Generally, two classes of social taggers emerge: those who focus on tagging for individual purposes, and those who view tagging as a way to share or communicate meaning to others. Heavy del.icio.us users, for example, were often focused on simply organizing their own content, and seemed to be conscientiously maintaining their own personally relevant categorizations while, in many cases, placing little importance on the tags of others. Conversely, users tagging items primarily to share content preferred to use specific terms to optimize retrieval and discovery by others. Our findings should inform practitioners of how interaction design can be tailored for different tagging systems applications, and how these findings are positioned within the current debate surrounding social tagging among the resource discovery community. We also hope to direct future research in the field to place a greater importance on exploring the benefits of tagging as a socially-driven endeavour rather than uniquely as a means of managing information.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  9. Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008) 0.01
    0.008318489 = product of:
      0.024955466 = sum of:
        0.024955466 = product of:
          0.0374332 = sum of:
            0.013526798 = weight(_text_:science in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013526798 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
            0.0239064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0239064 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    My keynote at the workshop "Social Tagging in Knowledge Organization" was a great opportunity to make and share new experiences. For the first time ever, I sat in my office at home and gave a live web video presentation to a conference audience elsewhere on the globe. At the same time, it was also an opportunity to premier my conceptual model "Matrix of Perception" to an interdisciplinary audience of researchers and practitioners with a variety of backgrounds - reaching from philosophy, psychology, pedagogy and computation to library science and economics. The interdisciplinary approach of the conference is also mirrored in the structure of this volume, with articles on the theoretical background, the empirical analysis and the potential applications of tagging, for instance in university libraries, e-learning, or e-commerce. As an introduction to the topic of "social tagging" I would like to draw your attention to some foundation concepts of the phenomenon I have racked my brain with for the last few month. One thing I have seen missing in recent research and system development is a focus on the variety of user perspectives in social tagging. Different people perceive tagging in complex variegated ways and use this form of knowledge organization for a variety of purposes. My analytical interest lies in understanding the personas and patterns in tagging systems and in being able to label their different perceptions. To come up with a concise picture of user expectations, needs and activities, I have broken down the perspectives on tagging into two different categories, namely "faces" and "depth". When put together, they form the "Matrix of Perception" - a nuanced view of stakeholders and their respective levels of participation.
    Date
    22. 6.2009 9:15:45
  10. Hunter, J.: Collaborative semantic tagging and annotation systems (2009) 0.01
    0.0060119107 = product of:
      0.018035732 = sum of:
        0.018035732 = product of:
          0.054107193 = sum of:
            0.054107193 = weight(_text_:science in 7382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054107193 = score(doc=7382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 7382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7382)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 43(2009), S.xxx-xxx
  11. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.01
    0.0053607575 = product of:
      0.016082272 = sum of:
        0.016082272 = product of:
          0.048246812 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.29-53
  12. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.01
    0.0053607575 = product of:
      0.016082272 = sum of:
        0.016082272 = product of:
          0.048246812 = sum of:
            0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048246812 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  13. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00
    0.0046956604 = product of:
      0.01408698 = sum of:
        0.01408698 = product of:
          0.04226094 = sum of:
            0.04226094 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04226094 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  14. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.00
    0.004690662 = product of:
      0.014071986 = sum of:
        0.014071986 = product of:
          0.04221596 = sum of:
            0.04221596 = weight(_text_:29 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04221596 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  15. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.00
    0.004690662 = product of:
      0.014071986 = sum of:
        0.014071986 = product of:
          0.04221596 = sum of:
            0.04221596 = weight(_text_:29 in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04221596 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22.11.2023 18:29:56
  16. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00
    0.0046484666 = product of:
      0.0139454 = sum of:
        0.0139454 = product of:
          0.0418362 = sum of:
            0.0418362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0418362 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  17. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.00
    0.004020568 = product of:
      0.012061703 = sum of:
        0.012061703 = product of:
          0.036185108 = sum of:
            0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036185108 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:31
  18. Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008) 0.00
    0.004020568 = product of:
      0.012061703 = sum of:
        0.012061703 = product of:
          0.036185108 = sum of:
            0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036185108 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:20:29
  19. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00
    0.0039844 = product of:
      0.0119532 = sum of:
        0.0119532 = product of:
          0.0358596 = sum of:
            0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0358596 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  20. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.00
    0.0039844 = product of:
      0.0119532 = sum of:
        0.0119532 = product of:
          0.0358596 = sum of:
            0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0358596 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044112243 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

  • e 54
  • d 4
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 54
  • el 4
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…